Skip to main content

Network Ideology: From Saint-Simonianism to the Internet

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pierre Musso and the Network Society

Part of the book series: Philosophy of Engineering and Technology ((POET,volume 27))

Abstract

Pierre Musso traces the origins of the idea of the technical network to the current of utopian thought in France in the nineteenth century and, in so doing, critiques the rhetoric which celebrates technical networks, and particularly the Internet, as drivers of technical and social changes which will supposedly have unstoppably benevolent consequences for the future of humanity.

Unravelling the ideas and projects promoted by the Saint-Simonian movement allows us to see that technology, at least in the modern world, acquired its full force not just in instrumental terms, but cultural as well. In sum, technology is both function and fiction. Technology fulfils functions such as producing, controlling, informing, shortening distances, etc., but this is not all it does. Technology goes beyond the functional because it emerges, or arises, in a broad context of hopeful expectation. It matters little whether those expectations match the field of human experience or not. Musso believes that enthusiasm for networks has persisted down to the present day as a myth of social transformation. The promise of social change became a mere technological utopia and social change itself became a fiction proclaimed with the advent of each new reticular invention. It is this process which Musso elects to criticize in particular. The network has become reified as a technology and, as a utopia, has been reduced to a technological utopia. Like a perpetual promise, the network heralds a better future, but that today is nothing more than a perversion of the Promethean legacy of the nineteenth century.

In order to understand the current ideology of networks and its discourses, Musso outlines the various factors which contributed to the Saint-Simonian ideal before it expanded to become a technological utopia. In the internal linkages between the concepts devised by different thinkers, he summarises the three aspects which explain the powerful impact of networks on the imagination: the temporal nature of a transition to progress, democracy, and modernity; the acceptance of the technical network as natural by means of metaphor, and rationalization as a design which can be interpreted in reticular forms.

All translations are mine, unless otherwise indicated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We have translated the French “imaginaire” as “imaginary”, although the notion is more complex in French. The reader is referred to Gaston Bachelard’s philosophical definition.

  2. 2.

    Émile Barrault, Sermon of 15 January 1832, Le Globe, 16 January 1832.

  3. 3.

    The first four articles, including “Le Système de la Méditerranée”, are titled “La paix est aujourd’hui la condition de l’émancipation des peuples” (Peace is now the condition of the emancipation of peoples), and signed by Michel Chevalier. They were published on 20 and 31 January, and 5 and 12 February 1832. They followed the publication of Émile Barrault’s sermon in Le Globe on 16 January and inaugurated a series of Saint-Simonian propositions on the development of industrial policy.

  4. 4.

    Michel Chevalier, “La paix est aujourd’hui la condition de l’émancipation des peuples”, Le Globe, 30 January 1832.

  5. 5.

    Ibid., Le Globe, 5 February 1832.

  6. 6.

    Ibid., Le Globe, 12 February 1832.

  7. 7.

    Michel Chevalier, Le Globe, 12 February 1832.

  8. 8.

    Le Système de la Méditerranée, Le Globe, 12 February 1832.

  9. 9.

    Gabriel Lamé (1795–1870), an 1814 graduate of the École Polytechnique, became a physics professor at this school. Émile Clapeyron (1799–1864), an 1816 graduate of the École Polytechnique, took part in the construction of the Paris-Versailles-Saint-Germain railway and was elected to the Corps Législatif in 1868.

  10. 10.

    This is what Michel Chevalier reported in his article in Le Globe on 30 March 1832, entitled “Politique d’association, politique de déplacement” (“Association Policy, Movement Policy”) – cited in the pamphlet Politique industrielle et Système de la Méditerranée, June 1832. Rue Monsigny, n°6. Paris (Paris – Fonds Enfantin Bibliothèque de l’Arsenal, FE 957, pp. 29–39).

  11. 11.

    Michel Chevalier, Le Globe, 30 March 1830.

  12. 12.

    Charles Duveyrier, Politique industrielle, Le Globe, 21 February 1832.

  13. 13.

    Alexis Legrand (1791–1848), general manager of the department of civil engineering, outlined the plans of the first French railway network centralised in Paris, hence the name “Legrand’s star”.

  14. 14.

    Based on the title of the book by Jacques Goody (1977).

  15. 15.

    See in particular p. 269 and the following pages on networks.

  16. 16.

    “If the organisation consists of a construction of the whole such that it allows its parts to fulfil actions interconnected through mutual dependence, the less advanced the organisation is, the most interdependent the parts must be; while of the contrary, when the organisation is advanced, the parts’ dependence is overall disastrous. This is something which is as true of the individual organism as of the social organism” (Spencer 1883-1890, vol. 2: 53–54).

  17. 17.

    An automaton is a basic processor defined by three characteristics: an intense state, connections (with other automata or an environment) and a transition function allowing it to calculate its internal state based on the signals it receives about its connections.

  18. 18.

    “Daniel Bell was unchallenged as he launched the concept of ‘post-industrial society’. This notion was already at least implicit in the book he published in 1960, entitled The End of Ideology”, wrote François Bourricaud in the preface from the French edition (Bell 1976).

  19. 19.

    Jacques Attali, Libération, 12 June 1998.

  20. 20.

    Conversation with Jacques Attali in the “Multimédia” supplement of the newspaper Libération, 12 June 1998.

  21. 21.

    Manuel Castells’ citation is in a note (2010 [1996]: 70, note 87). See Kelly (1995).

  22. 22.

    Title of Henri Saint-Simon’s last book, 1825. See Œuvres complètes by Henri Saint-Simon (Grange et al. 2012, vol. 4).

  23. 23.

    Interview in the newspaper Le Monde 2, 28 May 2005.

References

  • Atlan, H. 1992. L’organisation biologique et la théorie de l’information. Paris: Hermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balandier, G. 2001. Le grand système. Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechtel, W., and A. Abrahamsen. 2002. Connectionism and the mind: Parallel processing, dynamics, and evolution in networks. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. 1976. Vers la société post-industrielle: essai de prospective sociologique. Paris: Editions Robert Laffont.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertin, J. 2010. Semiology of graphics: Diagrams, networks, maps. Redlands: ESRI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, L., and E. Chiapello. 1999. Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bressand, A., and C. Distler. 1986. Le prochain monde: Réseaupolis. Paris: Le Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1995. La planète relationnelle. Paris: Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breton, P. 1990. Une histoire de l’informatique, Coll. “Points”. Paris: Le Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1992. L’utopie de la communication. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butera, F. 1991. La métamorphose de l’organisation: Du château au réseau. Paris: Les Éditions d'Organisation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canguilhem, G. 1993. Le cerveau et la pensée. In Georges Canguilhem, historien des sciences, Bibliothèque du Collège International de Philosophie. Paris: Albin Michel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. 2001. The internet galaxy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010 [1996]. The rise of the network society, vol. I, 2nd ed. with a new preface. Chichester/West Sussex/Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevalier, M. 1836. Lettres sur l’Amérique du Nord, 2 vols. Paris: Gosselin.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1842. Cours d’economie politique fait au Collège de France. Paris: Capelle.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Kerckhove. D. 2000. L’intelligence des réseaux. Paris: Odile Jacob.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Rosnay, J. 2000. The symbiotic man: A new understanding of the organization of life and a vision of the future. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dery, M. 1996. Escape velocity: Cyberculture at the end of the century. London: Hodder & Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, M. 1987. The aquarian conspiracy: Personal and social transformation in our time, New York: J.P.Tarcher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flichy, P. 2002. The internet imaginaire. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, W. 2011 [1983]. Neuromancer. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gille, B. 1978. Histoire des techniques, Coll. “La Pléiade”. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goody, J. 1977. The domestication of the savage mind. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grange, J., P. Musso, P. Régnier, and F. Yonnet. (eds.). 2012. Henri Saint-Simon: Oeuvres Complètes. 4 vols. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gras, A. 1997. Les macro-systèmes techniques, Coll. “Que Sais-Je?”. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillerme, A. 1988. Genèse de la notion de réseau. Study for the Ministry of Equipment. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiltz, S.R., and M. Turoff. 1978. The network nation: Human communication via computer. New York/Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston, J. 2000. Cyber consciousness, Yes, march http://www.yesmagazine.org/issues/new-stories/cyber-consciousness.

  • Hughes, T.P. 1983. Networks of power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880–1930. London/Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huitéma, C. 1996. Et Dieu créa l’internet. Paris: Eyrolles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, K. 1995. Out of control: The rise of neo-biological civilization. Menlo Park: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerven, G.-Y. 1993. La culture réseau: Ethique et écologie de l’entreprise. Paris: ESKA Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kropotkin, P. 1910 [1898]. Champs, usines et ateliers ou l’industrie combinée avec l’agriculture et le travail cérébral avec le travail manuel, 2nd ed. Paris: Librairie Schleicher Frères.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamé, G., E. Clapeyron, S. Flachat, and E. Flachat. 1832. Vues politiques et pratiques sur les travaux publics de France. Paris: Imprimerie d’Everat (Paris: Bibliothèque de l’Arsenal. Fonds Enfantin FE 901).

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Breton, D. 1999. L’Adieu au Corps. Paris: Métailié.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lecourt, D. 1999. Les piètres penseurs. Paris: Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre, P. 2001. De la société comme texte: Linéaments d’une anthropologie dogmatique. Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévy, P. 1999. Collective intelligence: Mankind's emerging world in cyberspace. Trans. R. Bononno. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Cyberculture: Report for the Council of Europe. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Licklider, J. C.R. 1960. Man-computer symbiosis. IRE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics HFE-1(March): 4–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J.-F. 1979. La condition post-moderne. Paris: Editions de Minuit (The post-modern condition: A report in knowledge, Manchester University Press. 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch, W.S., and W. Pitts. 1943. A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 5(4): 115–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, M. 1962. The Gutenberg galaxy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Understanding media: The extensions of man. Routledge Classics. http://beforebefore.net/80f/s11/media/mcluhan.pdf.

  • Mumford, L. 1934. Technics and civilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musso, P. 2000. Le commanagement et les appareils idéologiques d'enterprise. Sciences et Société 50/51(May–October): 149–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • ______. 2003. Critique des réseaux. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naisbitt, J. 1984. Megatrends. Milano: Sperling and Kupfer Editori.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nora, S., and A. Minc. 1978. L’informatisation de la société française, coll. “Points”. Paris: Le Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinet, G. 1898. Écrivains et penseurs polytechniciens. Paris: Paul Ollendorff Editeur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proudhon, P.-J. 1848. Organisation du crédit et de la circulation, et solution du problème social sans impôt, sans emprunt. In Oeuvres complètes de Proudhon. Paris: Edition Rivière.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1851. Idée générale de la Révolution au XIXe siècle. In Oeuvres complètes de Proudhon. Paris: Edition Rivière.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1855. Des réformes à opérer dans l’exploitation des chemins de fer. Paris: Garnier.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1868a. De la concurrence entre les chemins de fer et les voies navigables. Paris: Editeurs Lacroix and Verboeken.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1868b. Oeuvres complètes. Paris: Librairie Internationale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rifkin, J. 2000. The age of access: The new culture of hypercapitalism. New York: Jeremy P. Tarcher/Putnam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruyer, R. 1950. L’utopie et les utopies. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saint-Simon, H., and B.-P. Enfantin. 1865–1878. Oeuvres de Saint-Simon & d’Enfantin, 47 vols. Paris: Éditions Ernest Leroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlanger, J.-E. 1971. Les métaphores de l’organisme. Paris: Librairie Philosophique Jean Vrin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sérieyx, H., H. Azoulay, and CFC Group. 1996. Face à la complexité, Mettez du réseau dans vos pyramides: Penser, organiser, vivre la structure en réseau. Paris: Village Mondial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Servan-Schreiber, J.-J. 1967. Le défi américain. Paris: Denoël.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, H. 1883–1890. Principles de sociologie, 2 vols. Paris: Germer, Baillière & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stourdzé, Y. 1998. Les ruines du futur. Paris: Sens & Tonka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Théry, G. 1994. Les autoroutes de l’information, Report for the Prime Minister. La Documentation Française. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toffler, A. 1985. The adaptive corporation. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1986. S’adapter ou périr: L’entreprise face au choc du futur. Trans. M. Deutsch. Paris: Denoël.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Neumann, J. 1958. The computer and the brain. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, N. 1988 [1950]. The human use of human beings: Cybernetics and society. Boston: Da Capo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winner, L. 1986. Do artifacts have politics? In The whale and the reactor: A search for limits in an age of high technology, 19–39. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierre Musso .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Musso, P. (2016). Network Ideology: From Saint-Simonianism to the Internet. In: Garcia, J. (eds) Pierre Musso and the Network Society. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 27. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45538-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics