Abstract
Pierre Musso traces the origins of the idea of the technical network to the current of utopian thought in France in the nineteenth century and, in so doing, critiques the rhetoric which celebrates technical networks, and particularly the Internet, as drivers of technical and social changes which will supposedly have unstoppably benevolent consequences for the future of humanity.
Unravelling the ideas and projects promoted by the Saint-Simonian movement allows us to see that technology, at least in the modern world, acquired its full force not just in instrumental terms, but cultural as well. In sum, technology is both function and fiction. Technology fulfils functions such as producing, controlling, informing, shortening distances, etc., but this is not all it does. Technology goes beyond the functional because it emerges, or arises, in a broad context of hopeful expectation. It matters little whether those expectations match the field of human experience or not. Musso believes that enthusiasm for networks has persisted down to the present day as a myth of social transformation. The promise of social change became a mere technological utopia and social change itself became a fiction proclaimed with the advent of each new reticular invention. It is this process which Musso elects to criticize in particular. The network has become reified as a technology and, as a utopia, has been reduced to a technological utopia. Like a perpetual promise, the network heralds a better future, but that today is nothing more than a perversion of the Promethean legacy of the nineteenth century.
In order to understand the current ideology of networks and its discourses, Musso outlines the various factors which contributed to the Saint-Simonian ideal before it expanded to become a technological utopia. In the internal linkages between the concepts devised by different thinkers, he summarises the three aspects which explain the powerful impact of networks on the imagination: the temporal nature of a transition to progress, democracy, and modernity; the acceptance of the technical network as natural by means of metaphor, and rationalization as a design which can be interpreted in reticular forms.
All translations are mine, unless otherwise indicated.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
We have translated the French “imaginaire” as “imaginary”, although the notion is more complex in French. The reader is referred to Gaston Bachelard’s philosophical definition.
- 2.
Émile Barrault, Sermon of 15 January 1832, Le Globe, 16 January 1832.
- 3.
The first four articles, including “Le Système de la Méditerranée”, are titled “La paix est aujourd’hui la condition de l’émancipation des peuples” (Peace is now the condition of the emancipation of peoples), and signed by Michel Chevalier. They were published on 20 and 31 January, and 5 and 12 February 1832. They followed the publication of Émile Barrault’s sermon in Le Globe on 16 January and inaugurated a series of Saint-Simonian propositions on the development of industrial policy.
- 4.
Michel Chevalier, “La paix est aujourd’hui la condition de l’émancipation des peuples”, Le Globe, 30 January 1832.
- 5.
Ibid., Le Globe, 5 February 1832.
- 6.
Ibid., Le Globe, 12 February 1832.
- 7.
Michel Chevalier, Le Globe, 12 February 1832.
- 8.
Le Système de la Méditerranée, Le Globe, 12 February 1832.
- 9.
Gabriel Lamé (1795–1870), an 1814 graduate of the École Polytechnique, became a physics professor at this school. Émile Clapeyron (1799–1864), an 1816 graduate of the École Polytechnique, took part in the construction of the Paris-Versailles-Saint-Germain railway and was elected to the Corps Législatif in 1868.
- 10.
This is what Michel Chevalier reported in his article in Le Globe on 30 March 1832, entitled “Politique d’association, politique de déplacement” (“Association Policy, Movement Policy”) – cited in the pamphlet Politique industrielle et Système de la Méditerranée, June 1832. Rue Monsigny, n°6. Paris (Paris – Fonds Enfantin Bibliothèque de l’Arsenal, FE 957, pp. 29–39).
- 11.
Michel Chevalier, Le Globe, 30 March 1830.
- 12.
Charles Duveyrier, Politique industrielle, Le Globe, 21 February 1832.
- 13.
Alexis Legrand (1791–1848), general manager of the department of civil engineering, outlined the plans of the first French railway network centralised in Paris, hence the name “Legrand’s star”.
- 14.
Based on the title of the book by Jacques Goody (1977).
- 15.
See in particular p. 269 and the following pages on networks.
- 16.
“If the organisation consists of a construction of the whole such that it allows its parts to fulfil actions interconnected through mutual dependence, the less advanced the organisation is, the most interdependent the parts must be; while of the contrary, when the organisation is advanced, the parts’ dependence is overall disastrous. This is something which is as true of the individual organism as of the social organism” (Spencer 1883-1890, vol. 2: 53–54).
- 17.
An automaton is a basic processor defined by three characteristics: an intense state, connections (with other automata or an environment) and a transition function allowing it to calculate its internal state based on the signals it receives about its connections.
- 18.
“Daniel Bell was unchallenged as he launched the concept of ‘post-industrial society’. This notion was already at least implicit in the book he published in 1960, entitled The End of Ideology”, wrote François Bourricaud in the preface from the French edition (Bell 1976).
- 19.
Jacques Attali, Libération, 12 June 1998.
- 20.
Conversation with Jacques Attali in the “Multimédia” supplement of the newspaper Libération, 12 June 1998.
- 21.
- 22.
Title of Henri Saint-Simon’s last book, 1825. See Œuvres complètes by Henri Saint-Simon (Grange et al. 2012, vol. 4).
- 23.
Interview in the newspaper Le Monde 2, 28 May 2005.
References
Atlan, H. 1992. L’organisation biologique et la théorie de l’information. Paris: Hermann.
Balandier, G. 2001. Le grand système. Paris: Fayard.
Bechtel, W., and A. Abrahamsen. 2002. Connectionism and the mind: Parallel processing, dynamics, and evolution in networks. New York: Wiley.
Bell, D. 1976. Vers la société post-industrielle: essai de prospective sociologique. Paris: Editions Robert Laffont.
Bertin, J. 2010. Semiology of graphics: Diagrams, networks, maps. Redlands: ESRI Press.
Boltanski, L., and E. Chiapello. 1999. Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme. Paris: Gallimard.
Bressand, A., and C. Distler. 1986. Le prochain monde: Réseaupolis. Paris: Le Seuil.
———. 1995. La planète relationnelle. Paris: Flammarion.
Breton, P. 1990. Une histoire de l’informatique, Coll. “Points”. Paris: Le Seuil.
———. 1992. L’utopie de la communication. Paris: La Découverte.
Butera, F. 1991. La métamorphose de l’organisation: Du château au réseau. Paris: Les Éditions d'Organisation.
Canguilhem, G. 1993. Le cerveau et la pensée. In Georges Canguilhem, historien des sciences, Bibliothèque du Collège International de Philosophie. Paris: Albin Michel.
Castells, M. 2001. The internet galaxy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2010 [1996]. The rise of the network society, vol. I, 2nd ed. with a new preface. Chichester/West Sussex/Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Chevalier, M. 1836. Lettres sur l’Amérique du Nord, 2 vols. Paris: Gosselin.
———. 1842. Cours d’economie politique fait au Collège de France. Paris: Capelle.
De Kerckhove. D. 2000. L’intelligence des réseaux. Paris: Odile Jacob.
De Rosnay, J. 2000. The symbiotic man: A new understanding of the organization of life and a vision of the future. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Dery, M. 1996. Escape velocity: Cyberculture at the end of the century. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
Ferguson, M. 1987. The aquarian conspiracy: Personal and social transformation in our time, New York: J.P.Tarcher.
Flichy, P. 2002. The internet imaginaire. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Gibson, W. 2011 [1983]. Neuromancer. New York: Harper Collins.
Gille, B. 1978. Histoire des techniques, Coll. “La Pléiade”. Paris: Gallimard.
Goody, J. 1977. The domestication of the savage mind. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Grange, J., P. Musso, P. Régnier, and F. Yonnet. (eds.). 2012. Henri Saint-Simon: Oeuvres Complètes. 4 vols. Paris: PUF.
Gras, A. 1997. Les macro-systèmes techniques, Coll. “Que Sais-Je?”. Paris: PUF.
Guillerme, A. 1988. Genèse de la notion de réseau. Study for the Ministry of Equipment. Paris.
Hiltz, S.R., and M. Turoff. 1978. The network nation: Human communication via computer. New York/Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Houston, J. 2000. Cyber consciousness, Yes, march http://www.yesmagazine.org/issues/new-stories/cyber-consciousness.
Hughes, T.P. 1983. Networks of power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880–1930. London/Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
Huitéma, C. 1996. Et Dieu créa l’internet. Paris: Eyrolles.
Kelly, K. 1995. Out of control: The rise of neo-biological civilization. Menlo Park: Addison-Wesley.
Kerven, G.-Y. 1993. La culture réseau: Ethique et écologie de l’entreprise. Paris: ESKA Editions.
Kropotkin, P. 1910 [1898]. Champs, usines et ateliers ou l’industrie combinée avec l’agriculture et le travail cérébral avec le travail manuel, 2nd ed. Paris: Librairie Schleicher Frères.
Lamé, G., E. Clapeyron, S. Flachat, and E. Flachat. 1832. Vues politiques et pratiques sur les travaux publics de France. Paris: Imprimerie d’Everat (Paris: Bibliothèque de l’Arsenal. Fonds Enfantin FE 901).
Le Breton, D. 1999. L’Adieu au Corps. Paris: Métailié.
Lecourt, D. 1999. Les piètres penseurs. Paris: Flammarion.
Legendre, P. 2001. De la société comme texte: Linéaments d’une anthropologie dogmatique. Paris: Fayard.
Lévy, P. 1999. Collective intelligence: Mankind's emerging world in cyberspace. Trans. R. Bononno. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.
———. 2001. Cyberculture: Report for the Council of Europe. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Licklider, J. C.R. 1960. Man-computer symbiosis. IRE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics HFE-1(March): 4–11.
Lyotard, J.-F. 1979. La condition post-moderne. Paris: Editions de Minuit (The post-modern condition: A report in knowledge, Manchester University Press. 1984).
McCulloch, W.S., and W. Pitts. 1943. A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 5(4): 115–133.
McLuhan, M. 1962. The Gutenberg galaxy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
———. 2001. Understanding media: The extensions of man. Routledge Classics. http://beforebefore.net/80f/s11/media/mcluhan.pdf.
Mumford, L. 1934. Technics and civilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Musso, P. 2000. Le commanagement et les appareils idéologiques d'enterprise. Sciences et Société 50/51(May–October): 149–172.
______. 2003. Critique des réseaux. Paris: PUF.
Naisbitt, J. 1984. Megatrends. Milano: Sperling and Kupfer Editori.
Nora, S., and A. Minc. 1978. L’informatisation de la société française, coll. “Points”. Paris: Le Seuil.
Pinet, G. 1898. Écrivains et penseurs polytechniciens. Paris: Paul Ollendorff Editeur.
Proudhon, P.-J. 1848. Organisation du crédit et de la circulation, et solution du problème social sans impôt, sans emprunt. In Oeuvres complètes de Proudhon. Paris: Edition Rivière.
———. 1851. Idée générale de la Révolution au XIXe siècle. In Oeuvres complètes de Proudhon. Paris: Edition Rivière.
———. 1855. Des réformes à opérer dans l’exploitation des chemins de fer. Paris: Garnier.
———. 1868a. De la concurrence entre les chemins de fer et les voies navigables. Paris: Editeurs Lacroix and Verboeken.
———. 1868b. Oeuvres complètes. Paris: Librairie Internationale.
Rifkin, J. 2000. The age of access: The new culture of hypercapitalism. New York: Jeremy P. Tarcher/Putnam.
Ruyer, R. 1950. L’utopie et les utopies. Paris: PUF.
Saint-Simon, H., and B.-P. Enfantin. 1865–1878. Oeuvres de Saint-Simon & d’Enfantin, 47 vols. Paris: Éditions Ernest Leroux.
Schlanger, J.-E. 1971. Les métaphores de l’organisme. Paris: Librairie Philosophique Jean Vrin.
Sérieyx, H., H. Azoulay, and CFC Group. 1996. Face à la complexité, Mettez du réseau dans vos pyramides: Penser, organiser, vivre la structure en réseau. Paris: Village Mondial.
Servan-Schreiber, J.-J. 1967. Le défi américain. Paris: Denoël.
Spencer, H. 1883–1890. Principles de sociologie, 2 vols. Paris: Germer, Baillière & Co.
Stourdzé, Y. 1998. Les ruines du futur. Paris: Sens & Tonka.
Théry, G. 1994. Les autoroutes de l’information, Report for the Prime Minister. La Documentation Française. Paris.
Toffler, A. 1985. The adaptive corporation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
———. 1986. S’adapter ou périr: L’entreprise face au choc du futur. Trans. M. Deutsch. Paris: Denoël.
Von Neumann, J. 1958. The computer and the brain. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.
Wiener, N. 1988 [1950]. The human use of human beings: Cybernetics and society. Boston: Da Capo.
Winner, L. 1986. Do artifacts have politics? In The whale and the reactor: A search for limits in an age of high technology, 19–39. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Musso, P. (2016). Network Ideology: From Saint-Simonianism to the Internet. In: Garcia, J. (eds) Pierre Musso and the Network Society. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 27. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45538-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45538-9_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45536-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45538-9
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)