Skip to main content

Introduction: Towards a Critical Philosophy of Networks – Reflections on the Perspective of Pierre Musso

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Philosophy of Engineering and Technology ((POET,volume 27))

Abstract

One of the most original philosophers to have addressed the world of information and computing technology in his writings, the Frenchman Pierre Musso, took a degree in Philosophy at the École Nationale Supérieure des Postes et Télécommunications, before obtaining a doctorate in Political Science at the University of Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne. Musso is professor of Information and Communication Sciences at the University of Rennes 2 and at Télécom Paris Tech. The technical network is the key topic and concept in his critical approach to information and communication technologies. Musso has carried out in-depth research on the dissemination and prevalence of networked power, not only in its instrumental aspects, but also and above all in its cultural and political aspects, adopting an approach involving a multidisciplinary dialogue. Musso’s research looks to history, the philosophy of technology and the social sciences in his search for the origins of the idea of the network. He argues that the concept did not arise with the Internet, but has its roots in the ideas – or perhaps it would be more accurate to say in the plans – of Henri Saint-Simon and his disciples who became high priests of industrial development, Saint-Amand Bazard, Barthélemy Prosper Enfantin, and Michel Chevalier, among others. In addition to this introduction, this book brings together various researchers' contributions on Musso's theories, and the final chapter contains his brief comments on those contributions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In their modern interpretation, Chevalier’s ideas were adopted by other Saint-Simonians who made plans and projects based on technical networks. Combined with each other, these different typologies formed a social system which was to be regulated by means of mixed policy solutions linking the role of the State with private and public enterprise, uniting industrialism and liberalism.

  2. 2.

    Saint-Amand Bazard argued that networks were the engines of a policy of social change; Prosper Enfantin advocated a religion of universal communication guided by the power of networks; Chevalier argued for a liberal and technocratic political economy for communication networks.

  3. 3.

    The biotechnological, Galenic-Cartesian association between networks and the body, which “naturalizes” networks and technical solutions; the Leibnizian formulation of the network as logical or rational design, having no a priori meaning, but merely establishing connections and parallels; the technical network as the social and technical revolution which disrupts the existing social organization, adapted from Chevalier’s theories and revived by the ideologues of modern networked innovations; the Saint-Simonian-inspired network as a technical solution which would provide peace and prosperity; the network as an economic tool for dealing with crisis, defining techno-economic policies and promising a new society; and the network as a structure which embodies in itself a choice of society or policy.

  4. 4.

    This theory was supported by mathematicians and psychologists Warren McCulloch and Walter Pitts. We should recall here that it was on the basis of this assumption that the mathematician and scientist Norbert Wiener asserted that organisms and machines share similar regulatory mechanisms as producers of communication.

  5. 5.

    See, in this connection, Garcia (2015).

  6. 6.

    On this subject, see also Subtil (2014).

References

  • Anders, G. 1984. Die Antiquiertheit des Menschen: Über die zerstörung des lebens in zeitalter der dritten industriellen revolution. Munich: Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Yam, Y. 1997. Dynamics of complex systems. Reading: Perseus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, I. 2002. Saint-Simon. In Isaiah Berlin. Freedom and its betrayal: Six enemies of human liberty, ed. H. Hardy, 105–130. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breton, P. 1992. L’utopie de la communication. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, J.W. 1992 [1989]. Communication as culture: Essays on media and society. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. 2000 [1996] The information age: Economy, society and culture, vol. I. The rise of the network society. Cambridge, MA and Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chanial, Ph. 2001. Les socialismes français. In Histoire Raisonnée de la Philosophie Morale et Politique, ed. A. Caillé, Ch. Lazzeri, and M. Senellart, 524–534. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. 1995. Technization and civilization. Theory, Culture & Society 12(3): 7–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flichy, P. 2001. L’imaginaire d’internet. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, J.L. 2014. Une critique de l’économie des communications à l'aune des medias numériques. In La contribution en ligne: Pratiques participatives à l’ère du capitalisme informationnel, ed. S. Proulx, J.L. Garcia, and L. Heaton, 49–61. Québec: Presses de l’Université du Québec.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Theodicy. In Ethics, Science, Technology, and Engineering: A global resource, 2nd ed. J.B. Holbrook (Editor in Chief), and C. Mitcham (Associate Editor), vol 4: 357–360. Farmington Hills: Gale, Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grange, J., P. Musso, P. Régnier, and F. Yonnet (ed). 2012. Henri Saint-Simon: Oeuvres Complètes, vol 4. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innis, H.A. 1998 [1951]. The bias of communication. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koselleck, R. 1972. Einleitung. In Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland. Bd. 1, ed. R. Koselleck, W. Conze, and O. Brunner, XIII–XXVII. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manuel, F.E. 1962. The prophets of Paris. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins, H. 2005. The metaphysics of information: The power and the glory of machinehood. Res-Publica: Revista Lusófona de Ciência Política e Relações Internacionais 1: 165–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins, H., and J.L. Garcia. 2013. Web. In Portugal social de A a Z: Temas em aberto, ed. J.L. Cardoso, P. Magalhães, and J.M. Pais, 285–293. Paço de Arcos: Impresa Publishing/Expresso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattelart, A. 1994. L’ invention de la communication. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattelart, A., and A. Vitalis. 2014. Le profilage des populations. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, B. 2013. Metcalfe’s Law after 40 years of ethernet. Computer 46(12, Dec): 26–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musso, P. 1997. Télécommunications et philosophie des réseaux: La postérité paradoxale de Saint-Simon. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. Saint-Simon et le Saint-Simonisme. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Critique des réseaux. Paris: PUF.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Proulx, S., F. Massit-Folléa, and B. Conein. 2005. Internet, une utopie limitée: nouvelles régulations, nouvelles solidarités. Québec: Presse de l’Université Laval.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainie, L., and B. Wellman. 2014. Networked: The new social operating system. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sfez, L. 1995. La santé parfait: Critique d’une nouvelle utopie. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002. Technique et idéologie: un enjeu de pouvoir. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiegler, B. 2006. La télécratie contre la démocratie: Lettre ouverte aux représentants politiques. Paris: Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subtil, F. 2014. Du télégraphe à Internet: enjeux politique liés aux technologies de l’information. In La contribution en ligne: Pratiques participatives à l’ère du capitalisme informationnel, ed. S. Proulx, J.L. Garcia, and L. Heaton, 115–125. Québec: Presses de l’Université du Québec.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This chapter was supported by the Portuguese national funding agency for science, research and technology (FCT), as part of the UID/SIC/50013/2013 Project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José Luís Garcia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Garcia, J.L. (2016). Introduction: Towards a Critical Philosophy of Networks – Reflections on the Perspective of Pierre Musso. In: Garcia, J. (eds) Pierre Musso and the Network Society. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 27. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45538-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics