Skip to main content

Parent-Child Relation Between Process Instances

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Business Process Management Forum (BPM 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 260))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 720 Accesses

Abstract

Business process management systems are well equipped to support the enactment of business processes. However, relations between process instances have not sufficiently been taken into account. To improve the execution of related process instances, batch activities have been introduced, which are based on jointly executing process activities. When analyzing real-world business processes, we encountered situations in which activities of specific process instances do not have to be executed at all. To conceptualize these situations, this paper introduces parent-child relationships between instances of a process. The approach is implemented in a cloud-based BPMS, and the technical contribution is embedded in a design methodology. A simulation shows that the cycle time and process execution costs can be significantly reduced by using parent-child relationships between process instances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The documented steps are available at http://bpt.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/Public/ParentChild.

  2. 2.

    Please see http://bpt.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/Public/ParentChild for more information.

  3. 3.

    http://bimp.cs.ut.ee/. The BPMN XML files used for the simulation can be found at http://bpt.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/Public/ParentChild.

References

  1. van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Kiepuszewski, B., Barros, A.P.: Workflow patterns. Distrib. Parallel Databases 14(1), 5–51 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Barthelmess, P., Ellis, C.A., Wainer, J.: Proclets: a framework for lightweight interacting workflow processes. Int. J. Coop. Inf. Syst. 10(4), 443–481 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Camunda: camunda BPM platform. https://www.camunda.org/

  4. Großbritannien Office of Government Commerce: Service operation (SO): ITIL. TSO (The Stationery Office) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Künzle, V., Reichert, M.: PHILharmonicFlows: towards a framework for object-aware process management. J. Softw. Maint. 23(4), 205–244 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lanz, A., Reichert, M., Dadam, P.: Robust and flexible error handling in the aristaflow BPM suite. In: Proper, E., Soffer, P. (eds.) CAiSE Forum 2010. LNBIP, vol. 72, pp. 174–189. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu, J., Hu, J.: Dynamic batch processing in workflows: model and implementation. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 23(3), 338–347 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Meyer, A., Pufahl, L., Fahland, D., Weske, M.: Modeling and enacting complex data dependencies in business processes. In: Daniel, F., Wang, J., Weber, B. (eds.) BPM 2013. LNCS, vol. 8094, pp. 171–186. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Natschläger, C., Bögl, A., Geist, V.: Optimizing resource utilization by combining running business process instances. In: Toumani, F., et al. (eds.) ICSOC 2014. LNCS, vol. 8954, pp. 120–126. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. OMG: Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN), Version 2.0, January 2011

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pufahl, L., Meyer, A., Weske, M.: Batch regions: process instance synchronization based on data. In: EDOC, pp. 150–159. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pufahl, L., Weske, M.: Batch activities in process modeling and execution. In: Basu, S., Pautasso, C., Zhang, L., Fu, X. (eds.) ICSOC 2013. LNCS, vol. 8274, pp. 283–297. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Russell, N., Hofstede, A.H.M., Edmond, D., Aalst, W.M.P.: Workflow data patterns. Queensland University of Technology, Tech. rep. (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sadiq, S., Orlowska, M., Sadiq, W., Schulz, K.: When workflows will not deliver: the case of contradicting work practice. In: BIS, pp. 69–84 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Weske, M.: Business Process Management: Concepts, Languages, Architectures, p. 404, Second Edition. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luise Pufahl .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pufahl, L., Weske, M. (2016). Parent-Child Relation Between Process Instances. In: La Rosa, M., Loos, P., Pastor, O. (eds) Business Process Management Forum. BPM 2016. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 260. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45468-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics