Skip to main content

Free Rotating Wingsail Arrangement for Åland Sailing Robots

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Robotic Sailing 2016 (WRSC/IRSC 2016)

Abstract

This paper accounts for our ongoing work to evaluate, design and build an optimized wingsail arrangement for one of Åland Sailing Robots’ boats. By examining the current conventional sails of the boat and its propulsion capability, a wingsail arrangement with a similar propulsion capability has been designed and further investigated. The final design has to meet several criteria such as simplicity, reliability, and high degree of autonomous operation. A thorough analysis of the design criteria resulted in the decision to choose a symmetrical, free-rotating wingsail with an additional tail for actuating the wing and controlling its angle of attack. The chosen design is further investigated by using a CFD simulation software. Furthermore, we discuss possible solutions and recommendations regarding the future physical construction of the wingsail.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    To our knowledge, the theoretical prediction of \(C_{L_{max}}\) is still a very hot topic in sophisticated CFD research, and while there are promising results there is not yet a general model which works like the “real world”. Our estimated value \(C_{L_{max}}=0,8\) is based on [8]. Note, however, that this value is only indicative and will guide us to design a first prototype of a wing sail. The wing sails performance in comparison to the soft sail’s has then to be a measure for the reliability of our theoretical assumptions.

References

  1. Anderson, M.R.: Aerodynamic performance of a small-scale Wingsail Vessel. In: 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA SciTech, (AIAA 2016-2039) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Atkins, D.W.: The CFD assisted design and experimental testing of a wing-sail with high lift devices. University of Salford, Ph.D.-thesis (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cokelet, E.D., Meinig, C., Lawrence-Slavas, N., Stabeno, P.J., Mordy C.W., Tabisola H.M., Jenkins R., Cross J.N.: The use of Saildrones to examine spring conditions in the Bering sea. In: OCEANS 2015 - MTS/IEEE Washington, pp. 1–7. IEEE, Washington, DC (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cruz N.A., Alves, J.C.: Integration of wind propulsion in an electric ASV. In: Friebe, A., Haug, F. (eds.) Robotic Sailing 2015. Proceedings of the 8th International Robotic Sailing Conference, pp. 137–149. Springer, Heidelberg (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dahl, K., Bengsén A., Waller, M.: Power management strategies for an autonomous robotic sailboat. In: Fearghal, M., Dermot, T. (eds.) Robotic Sailing 2014. Proceedings of the 7th International Robotic Sailing Conference, pp. 47–55. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Domínguez-Brito, A.C., Valle-Fernández, B., Cabrera-Gámez, J., Ramos-de-Miguel, A., García, J.C.: A-TIRMA G2: an oceanic autonomous sailboat. In: Friebe, A., Haug, F. (eds.) Robotic Sailing 2015. Proceedings of the 8th International Robotic Sailing Conference, pp. 137–149. Springer, Heidelberg (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Elkaim, G.H.: The atlantis project: a GPS-guided wing-sailed autonomous catamaran. Navigation 53, 237–247 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Elkaim, G.H.: Autonomous surface vehicle free-rotating wingsail section design and configuration analysis. J. Aircr. 45(6), 1835–1852 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Eriksson R., Fribe, A.: Challenges for autonomous sailing robots. In: 14th International Conference on Computer and IT Applications in the Maritime Industries, COMPIT15 Ulrichshusen, 11–13 May 2015

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hepperle, M.: About JavaFoil. Retrieved from Aerodynamics of Model Aircraft: http://www.mh-aerotools.de/airfoils/javafoil.htm. Accessed 8 May 2016

  11. Melin, J: Modeling, control and state-estimation for an autonomous sailboat. Master thesis. Uppsala University (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Melin, J., Dahl, K., Waller, M.: Modeling and control for an autonomous sailboat: a case study. In: Friebe, A., Haug, F. (eds.) Robotic Sailing 2015. Proceedings of the 8th International Robotic Sailing Conference, pp. 137–149. Springer, Heidelberg (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Miller, P. H., Hamlet, M., Rossman, J.: Continuous improvements to USNA SailBots for inshore racing and offshore voyaging. In: Sauzé, C., Finnis, J. (eds.) Robotic Sailing 2012. Proceedings of the 5th International Robotic Sailing Conference, pp. 49–60. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Aerodynamic center. Retrieved from National Aeronautics and Space Administration: http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/ac.html. Accessed 05 May 2016

  15. Neal, M., Colin, S., Thomas, B., Alves, J.: Technologies for autonomous sailing: wings and wind sensors. In: Proceedings of the 2nd IRSC, Matsinhos, Portugal, 6–12th July 2009, pp. 23–30 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rynne, P.F., Ellenrieder, K.D.: Development and preliminary experimental validation of a wind- and solar-powered autonomous surface vehicle. EEE J. Ocean. Eng. 35(4), 971–983 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sauzé, C., Neal, M.: MOOP: a miniature sailing robot platform. In: Schlaefer, A., Blaurock, O. (eds.) Robotic Sailing. Proceedings of the 4th International Robotic Sailing Conference, pp. 113–124. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Selig, M.S., Donovan, J.F., Fraser, D.B.: Airfoils at Low Speeds. H.A. Stockley, Virginia Beach (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shukla, P.C., Ghosh, K.: Revival of the modern wing sails for the propulsion of commercial ships. Int. J. Math. Comput. Phys. Electr. Comput. Eng. 3(3) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stelzer, R, Estarriola Dalmau, D.: A study on potential energy savings by the use of a balanced rig on a robotic sailing boat. In: Sauzé, C., Finnis, J. (eds.) Robotic Sailing 2012. Proceedings of the 5th International Robotic Sailing Conference, pp. 87–93. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Svenska 2.4mR Förbundet. BÅTEN. Retrieved from Svenska 2.4mR Förbundet: http://www.swe24metre.com/baten (2014)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teo Enqvist .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Enqvist, T., Friebe, A., Haug, F. (2017). Free Rotating Wingsail Arrangement for Åland Sailing Robots. In: Alves, J., Cruz, N. (eds) Robotic Sailing 2016. WRSC/IRSC 2016. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45453-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45453-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45452-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45453-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics