Advertisement

Academic Scepticism and the Early Royal Society

  • Benjamin D. HillEmail author
Chapter
Part of the International Archives of the History of Ideas Archives internationales d'histoire des idées book series (ARCH, volume 221)

Abstract

The form of Academic scepticism most amenable to the Baconians and experimentalists of the early Royal Society was Carneades’ doctrine of probablism. Carneades’ doctrine of probablism was understood in seventeenth century Britain as a falabilist account of practical knowledge. Carneades’ hierarchical strictures governing action and motivation fit the early Fellows’ conceptions of experience and hypotheses. It is suggested that they could have provided the early Fellows with resolutions to some conceptual problems that bedevil attempts to develop a workable eliminative induction. It is suggested that Carneades’ probablism could have provided the early Fellows with a proto-version of Confirmation Theory, which helps to ground their understanding of how experience and experiment ground hypotheses, experimental practices, and technological advancements.

Keywords

Confirmation theory Epistemic authority Methodology Royal Society 

Bibliography

  1. Anstey, Peter, and Michael Hunter. 2008. Robert Boyle’s “designe about natural history”. Early Science and Medicine 13: 83–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anstey, Peter, and Alberto Vanzo. 2012. The origins of early modern experimental philosophy. Intellectual History Review 22: 499–518.Google Scholar
  3. Bacon, Francis. 1620. De instauratio magna. London: John Bill.Google Scholar
  4. Bacon, Francis. 1627. Sylva sylvarum: A natural historie. London: J. H. for William Lee.Google Scholar
  5. Bacon, Francis. 1660. New Atlantis. London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  6. Beaumont, John. 1676. Two letters written by Mr. John Beaumont junior of Stony-Easton in Somerset-Shire, concerning rock-plants and their growth. Philosophical Transactions 11: 724–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Connolly, Patrick. 2016. Locke and the methodology of Newton’s Principia. Presentation at The UWO-CUNY Locke Workshop, London, Ontario May 1.Google Scholar
  8. Corneau, Sorana. 2011. Regimens of the mind: Boyle, Locke, and the Early Modern Cultura Animi Tradition. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dear, Peter. 1985. Totius in Verba: Rhetoric and authority in the early royal society. Isis 76: 145–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dear, Peter. 2006. The meanings of experience. In The Cambridge history of science, ed. Katharine Park and Lorraine Daston, 106–131. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gerson, Lloyd. 2009. Academic scepticism. In Ancient epistemology, 116–124. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Giglioni, Guido. 2013. Experimental misunderstandings: The precedent of Francis Bacon’s “Sylva Sylvarum” and the beginnings of the Royal Society. Lecture given to the Royal Society, London 12 April. https://royalsociety.org/events/2013/experimental-misunderstandings/.
  13. Hájek, Alan, and James M. Joyce. 2008. Confirmation. In The Routledge companion to philosophy of science, ed. Stathis Psillos and Martin Curd, 115–128. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Halley, Edmond. 1683. A theory of the variation of the magnetical compass. Philosophical Transactions 13: 208–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hankinson, Robert J. 1998. The sceptics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Harper, William. 2011. Isaac Newton’s scientific method: Turning data into evidence about gravity and cosmology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Howson, Colin. 2008. Baysianism. In The Routledge companion to philosophy of science, ed. Stathis Psillos and Martin Curd, 103–114. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Hunter, Michael. 1989. Establish the New science: The experience of the early Royal Society. Wolfeboro: Boydell and Brewer Press.Google Scholar
  19. Jalobeanu, Dana. 2015. The art of experimental natural history: Francis Bacon in context. Bucharest: Zeta Books.Google Scholar
  20. Lister, Martin. 1673. A description of certain stones figured like plants, and by some observing men esteemed to be plants petrified. Philosophical Transactions 8: 6181–6191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lister, Martin. 1674. Some observation and experiments made, and in a letter communicated to the publisher. Philosophical Transactions 9: 221–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lynch, William. 2001. Solomon’s child: Method in the early Royal Society of London. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Park, Katharine, and Lorraine Daston (eds.). 2006. The Cambridge history of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Popkin, Richard. 1980. The high road to Pyrrhonism. San Diego: Austin Hill Press.Google Scholar
  25. Popkin, Richard. 2003. The history of skepticism: From Savonarola to Bayle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Psillos, Stathis, and Martin Curd (eds.). 2008. The Routledge companion to philosophy of science. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Rawley, William. 1627. Preface to Francis Bacon’s Sylva sylvarum: A natural historie. London.Google Scholar
  28. Sargent, Rose-Mary. 1995. The diffident naturalist: Robert Boyle and the philosophy of experiment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sargent, Rose-Mary. 2012. From Bacon to banks: The vision and realities of pursuing science for the common good. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 43: 82–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shapin, Steven. 1985. Leviathan and the air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the experimental life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Shirley, Thomas. 1667. Description of a well, and earth in Lanchashire, taking fire by a candle approached to it. Philosophical Transactions 2: 482–484.Google Scholar
  32. Stanley, Thomas. 1656. A history of philosophy. London: Moseley & Dring.Google Scholar
  33. Thorsrud, Harald. 2009. Ancient scepticism. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  34. Thorsrud, Harald. 2010. Arcesliaus and Carneades. In The Cambridge companion to ancient scepticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Wallis, John. 1672. An extract of letters from Dr. John Wallis to the publisher concerning the suspension of quick silver well purged of air, much higher than the ordinary standard in the Torricellian experiment. Philosophical Transactions 7: 5160–5170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Western OntarioLondonCanada

Personalised recommendations