Abstract
In this chapter is discussed the “basic anthropology” of Arnold Gehlen. In this author the idea of the machine is connected to: (a) the concept of Mangel, which expresses not the mere absence of something, but a more complex condition of poverty and inadequacy. The organic deficiency relates to the being of the thing, rather than to any non-presence of certain properties. It is intended to reflect the core idea of non-specialization (Unspezialisierung); (b) the idea of Man as being not designed for any specific natural environment. He must constantly adapt to every living world he happens to encounter in nature. He relies primarily on a self-referential circuit of actions which, in the particular case of technological manipulation, takes the form of compensating for or substituting the missing organ. It is through integration, intensification and facilitation that tools and machines compensate for man’s natural organic shortcomings. In Gehlen’s anthropology machines are simply the exact reflection of our weaknesses, a sort of nature artificielle. The promotion/destruction of life by the great technological man is apparent from the increasingly.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See K. S. REHBERG, Arnold Gehlen’s Elementary Anthropology, Introduction to A. GEHLEN, Man, His Nature and His Place in the World …. There are numerous contributions on action in Gehlen. Among the most recent in the Italian language the: U. FADINI, Il corpo imprevisto. Filosofia, antropologia e tecnica in Arnold Gehlen, Milano 1988; M. T. PANSERA, L’uomo. Progetto della natura. L’antropologia filosofica di Arnold Gehlen, Roma 1990; B. ACCARINO (ed.), Ratio imaginis. Uomo e mondo nell’antropologia filosofica, Firenze 1991; R. TRONCON, Studi di antropologia filosofica. I. La filosofia dell’inquietudine, Milano 1991; there are also some important pages dedicated to Gehlen by U. Galimberti in his recent volume Psyche e Techne, Milano 1999. There is a greater abundance of literature in other languages, though the critics’ interest often focuses more on topics such as Gehlen’s social and political views and the question of technology. As concerns action, see in particular: C. HAGEMANN-WHITE, Legitimation als Anthropologie. Eine Kritk der Philosophie Arnold Gehlens, Stuttgart 1973; P. JANSEN, Arnold Gehlen. Die Anthropologische Kategorienlehre, Bonn 1975; W. OSTBERG, Sprache und Handlung. Zur frühen Philosophie Arnold Gehlen, Diss., Tübingen 1977.
- 2.
Ivi, p. 17 (our translation).
- 3.
For the distinction between environment (Umwelt) and world (Welt), Gehlen refers to the very important work by J. von Uexküll, entitled: Umwelt und Innenwelt der der Tiere, Berlin 1921.
- 4.
Ivi, p. 34 (our translation).
- 5.
In particular, Gehlen quotes the following works by Bolk: le Vergleichende Untersuchungen an einem Fetus eines Gorilla und eines Schimpansen, “Zeitschrift für Anatomie und Entwicklungs-Geschichte”, 81, 1926; and Das Problem der Menschwerdung, Jena 1926.
- 6.
Ivi, p. 34 (our translation).
- 7.
A. Gehlen, Die seele im technischen Zeitalter, Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag, Hamburg 1957, pp. 12–13 (our translation).
- 8.
Ivi, p. 13 (our translation).
- 9.
Ibidem (our translation).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Grigenti, F. (2016). Arnold Gehlen – Inadequacy and Technology. In: Existence and Machine. SpringerBriefs in Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45366-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45366-8_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45365-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45366-8
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)