Skip to main content

Handling Duplicated Tasks in Process Discovery by Refining Event Labels

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Business Process Management (BPM 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9850))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Processes may require to execute the same activity in different stages of the process. A human modeler can express this by creating two different task nodes labeled with the same activity name (thus duplicating the task). However, as events in an event log often are labeled with the activity name, discovery algorithms that derive tasks based on labels only cannot discover models with duplicate labels rendering the results imprecise. For example, for a log where “payment” events occur at the beginning and the end of a process, a modeler would create two different “payment” tasks, whereas a discovery algorithm introduces a loop around a single “payment” task. In this paper, we present a general approach for refining labels of events based on their context in the event log as a preprocessing step. The refined log can be input for any discovery algorithm. The approach is implemented in ProM and was evaluated in a controlled setting. We were able to improve the quality of up to 42 % of the models compared to using a log with imprecise labeling using default parameters and up to 87 % using adaptive parameters. Moreover, using our refinement approach significantly increased the similarity of the discovered model to the original process with duplicate labels allowing for better rediscoverability. We also report on a case study conducted for a Dutch hospital.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.promtools.org/.

  2. 2.

    doi:10.4121/uuid:ea90c4be-64b6-4f4b-b27c-10ede28da6b6

    or https://svn.win.tue.nl/repos/prom/Documentation/TraceMatching/BPM2016.zip.

References

  1. Herbst, J.: A machine learning approach to workflow management. In: Proceedings 11th European Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 183–194 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Rubin, V., Verbeek, H.M.W., van Dongen, B.F., Kindler, E., Günther, C.W.: Process mining: a two-step approach to balance between underfitting and overfitting. Soft. Syst. Model. 9(1), 87–111 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. De Weerdt, J., De Backer, M., Vanthienen, J., Baesens, B.: A multi-dimensional quality assessment of state-of-the-art process discovery algorithms using real-life event logs. Inf. Syst. 37(7), 654–676 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. vanden Broucke, S.K.L.M.: Advances in process mining: artificial negative events and other techniques. Ph.D. thesis, KU Leuven (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Buijs, J.C.A.M., van Dongen, B.F., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Quality dimensions in process discovery: the importance of fitness, precision, generalization and simplicity. Int. J. Coop. Inf. Syst. 23(1), 1–39 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lu, X., Fahland, D., van den Biggelaar, F.J.H.M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Detecting deviating behaviors without models. In: Reichert, M., Reijers, H. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2015. LNBIP, vol. 256, pp. 126–139. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-42887-1_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Pittke, F., Richetti, P.H.P., Mendling, J., Baião, F.A.: Context-sensitive textual recommendations for incomplete process model elements. In: BPM 2015, Proceedings, pp. 189–197 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Koschmider, A., Ullrich, M., Heine, A., Oberweis, A.: Revising the vocabulary of business process element labels. In: Zdravkovic, J., Kirikova, M., Johannesson, P. (eds.) CAiSE 2015. LNCS, vol. 9097, pp. 69–83. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. de Medeiros, A.K.A., Weijters, A.J.M.M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Genetic process mining: an experimental evaluation. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 14(2), 245–304 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. van Zelst, S.J., van Dongen, B.F., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: ILP-based process discovery using hybrid regions. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Algorithms and Theories for the Analysis of Event Data, ATAED 2015, pp. 47–61 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Leemans, S.J.J., Fahland, D., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Discovering block-structured process models from event logs - a constructive approach. In: Colom, J.-M., Desel, J. (eds.) PETRI NETS 2013. LNCS, vol. 7927, pp. 311–329. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Greco, G., Guzzo, A., Pontieri, L., Saccà, D.: Discovering expressive process models by clustering log traces. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 18(8), 1010–1027 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. De Weerdt, J., vanden Broucke, S.K.L.M., Vanthienen, J., Baesens, B.: Active trace clustering for improved process discovery. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 25(12), 2708–2720 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. García-Bañuelos, L., Dumas, M., La Rosa, M., De Weerdt, J., Ekanayake, C.C.: Controlled automated discovery of collections of business process models. Inf. Syst. 46, 85–101 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. La Rosa, M., Dumas, M., Ekanayake, C.C., García-Bañuelos, L., Recker, J., ter Hofstede, A.H.M.: Detecting approximate clones in business process model repositories. Inf. Syst. 49, 102–125 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Adriansyah, A., van Dongen, B.F.: Replaying history on process models for conformance checking and performance analysis. Wiley Interdisc. Rev.: Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 2(2), 182–192 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Munoz-Gama, J.: Conformance checking and diagnosis in process mining. Ph.D. thesis, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. van der Aalst, W.M.P., de Medeiros, A.K.A., Weijters, A.J.M.M.T.: Process equivalence: comparing two process models based on observed behavior. In: Dustdar, S., Fiadeiro, J.L., Sheth, A.P. (eds.) BPM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4102, pp. 129–144. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. van der Aalst, W.M.P., van Hee, K.M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Sidorova, N., Verbeek, H.M.W., Voorhoeve, M., Wynn, M.T.: Soundness of workflow nets: classification, decidability, and analysis. Formal Aspects Comput. 23(3), 333–363 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xixi Lu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lu, X., Fahland, D., van den Biggelaar, F.J.H.M., van der Aalst, W.M.P. (2016). Handling Duplicated Tasks in Process Discovery by Refining Event Labels. In: La Rosa, M., Loos, P., Pastor, O. (eds) Business Process Management. BPM 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9850. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45348-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45348-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45347-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45348-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics