Skip to main content

Towards Quality-Aware Translations of Activity-Centric Processes to Guard Stage Milestone

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9850))

Abstract

Current translation approaches from activity-centric process models to artifact-centric Guard Stage Milestone (GSM) models operate on the syntactic level. While such translations allow equivalent traces (behaviors) of executions, we argue that they generate poor GSM models for the intended audience (including business managers and process modelers). A specific deficiency of these translations is their inability to relate to relevant domain knowledge, especially groupings of activities to achieve well-known business goals cannot be obtained by syntactic translations. Ironically, this is a main principle of GSM models. We developed an initial ontology based translation framework [14] that incorporates the missing knowledge for improved translations. In this paper we further extend this framework with two metrics for the assessment of quality aspects of resulting GSM translations with domain knowledge, propose a novel semantic rewriting algorithm that enhances the quality of GSM translations, and provide an evaluation of the achievable quality for different classes of input processes. Our evaluation shows that maximum quality scores are achievable if semantics and structure of the input processes are well aligned. Given poorly aligned input processes, a translation method can optimize one of the metrics but not both.

J. Köpke—Research conducted while visiting UCSB and supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) under grant J-3609-N15.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.omg.org/spec/CMMN/.

  2. 2.

    CPC Ver.2.1 http://unstats.un.org/unsd/cr/registry/regdnld.asp?Lg=1.

  3. 3.

    2.2 % corresponds to 2 swaps resulting in 4 misaligned activities out of 183 in Fig. 6.

References

  1. Bille, P.: A survey on tree edit distance and related problems. Theor. Comput. Sci. 337(13), 217–239 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bodenreider, O.: Biomedical ontologies in action: role in knowledge management, data integration and decision support. Yearb. Med. Inf. 67–79 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cardoso, J.: Control-flow complexity measurement of processes, Weyuker’s properties. Int. J. Math. Comput. Phys. Electr. Comp Eng. 1(8), 366–371 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cortes-Cornax, M., Matei, A., Dupuy-Chessa, S., et al.: Using intentional fragments to bridge the gap between organizational and intentional levels. Inf. Softw. Tech. 58, 1–19 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Damaggio, E., Hull, R., Vaculín, R.: On the equivalence of incremental and fixpoint semantics for business artifacts with guard-stage-milestone lifecycles. Inform. Syst. 38(4), 561–584 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dhama, H.: Quantitative models of cohesion, coupling in software. J. Syst. Soft. 29(1), 65–74 (1995). Oregon Metric Workshop

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Eshuis, R., Van Gorp, P.: Synthesizing data-centric models from business process models. Computing 98, 345–373 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. City Office for Property Management of Hangzhou: 2014 rental subsidies for low income families: processing guidelines, July 2014 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gemino, A., Wand, Y.: A framework for empirical evaluation of conceptual modeling techniques. Requirements Eng. 9(4), 248–260 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gruhn, V., Laue, R.: Complexity metrics for business process models. In: International Conference on Business Information Systems - BIS, vol. 85, pp. 1–12 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Henry, S., Kafura, D.: Software structure metrics based on information flow. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. SE–7(5), 510–518 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hull, R., Damaggio, E., De Masellis, R., et al.: Business artifacts with guard-stage-milestone lifecycles: managing artifact interactions with conditions and events. In: Proceedings of DEBS, pp. 51–62. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Koliadis, G., Ghose, A.K.: Relating business process models to goal-oriented requirements models in KAOS. In: Hoffmann, A., Kang, B.-H., Richards, D., Tsumoto, S. (eds.) PKAW 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4303, pp. 25–39. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Köpke, J., Su, J.: Towards ontology guided translation of activity-centric processes to GSM. In: Reichert, M., Reijers, H. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2015. LNBIP, vol. 256, pp. 364–375. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-42887-1_30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. McCarthy, W.E.: The REA accounting model: a generalized framework for accounting systems in a shared data environment. Acc. Rev. 57(3), 554–578 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Moody, D.L.: Theoretical and practical issues in evaluating the quality of conceptual models: current state and future directions. Data Knowl. Eng. 55(3), 243–276 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Popova, V., Dumas, M.: From petri nets to guard-stage-milestone models. In: La Rosa, M., Soffer, P. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2012. LNBIP, vol. 132, pp. 340–351. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Popova, V., Fahland, D., Dumas, M.: Artifact lifecycle discovery. Int. J. Coop. Inf. Syst. 24, 44 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S021884301550001X. 1550001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Reijers, H.A., Vanderfeesten, I.T.P.: Cohesion and coupling metrics for workflow process design. In: Desel, J., Pernici, B., Weske, M. (eds.) BPM 2004. LNCS, vol. 3080, pp. 290–305. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Smirnov, S., Dijkman, R., Mendling, J., Weske, M.: Meronymy-based aggregation of activities in business process models. In: Parsons, J., Saeki, M., Shoval, P., Woo, C., Wand, Y. (eds.) ER 2010. LNCS, vol. 6412, pp. 1–14. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Vanderfeesten, I., Cardoso, J., Mendling, J., Reijers, H., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: BPM and workflow handbook, chapter quality metrics for business process models, p. 179 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Weyuker, E.J.: Evaluating software complexity measures. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 14(9), 1357–1365 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Zugal, S., Pinggera, J., Weber, B., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A.: Assessing the impact of hierarchy on model understandability – a cognitive perspective. In: Kienzle, J. (ed.) MODELS 2011. LNCS, vol. 7167, pp. 123–133. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Zugal, S., Soffer, P., Haisjackl, C., et al.: Investigating expressiveness and understandability of hierarchy in declarative business process models. Softw. Sys. Model. 14(3), 1081–1103 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julius Köpke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Köpke, J., Su, J. (2016). Towards Quality-Aware Translations of Activity-Centric Processes to Guard Stage Milestone. In: La Rosa, M., Loos, P., Pastor, O. (eds) Business Process Management. BPM 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9850. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45348-4_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45348-4_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45347-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45348-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics