Theoretical Approach: The Situation-Structural Model as an Analytical Tool to Explain Regionalism

  • Johannes MuntschickEmail author


This chapter provides the analytical framework and guiding theory for this work. Muntschick develops an innovative situation-structural model to the analysis of regionalism that goes beyond Euro-centric and classic integration theories because it takes the impact of external actors explicitly into account. This—often neglected—aspect is of crucial importance in regions with mainly developing countries that show strong and asymmetric relations to extra-regional actors. Besides offering clear-cut definitions of regions and regionalism, Muntschick draws on insights from cooperation and regime theory in order to specify assumptions and deduce hypotheses about the emergence, institutional design and effectiveness of regionalism. In terms of an internal and external line of the argument, the theory offers sound explanations for the phenomenon of regional integration and regionalism in the Global South and beyond.


  1. Asche, H. 2009. Die SADC? Welche SADC? Afrikanische Regionalgemeinschaften im Übergang. In Entwicklung als Beruf, ed. T. Hanf, H.N. Weiler, and H. Dickow, 69–84. Baden-Baden: Nomos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Axelrod, R. 1987. Die Evolution der Kooperation. München: R. Oldenbourg Verlag.Google Scholar
  3. Axelrod, R., and R.O. Keohane. 1993. Achieving Cooperation Under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions. In Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, ed. D.A. Baldwin, 85–115. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Axline, W.A. 1977. Underdevelopment, Dependence and Integration: The Politics of Regionalism in the Third World. International Organization 31 (1): 83–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Axline, W.A. 1994. Comparative Case Studies of Regional Cooperation Among Developing Countries. In The Political Economy of Regional Cooperation. Comparative Case Studies, ed. W.A. Axeline, 7–33. London: Pinter Publishers and Associated University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bach, D. 2003. New Regionalism as an Alias: Regionalisation Through Trans-State Networks. In New Regionalism in Africa, ed. J.A. Grant, F. Söderbaum, 21–30. Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  7. Bates, R.H., A. Greif, M. Levi, and J.-L. Rosenthal. 1998. Introduction. In Analytic Narratives, ed. R.H. Bates, A. Greif, M. Levi, and J.-L. Rosenthal, 3–22. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Behrmann, G. 2008. The Most Noble Adventure: The Marshall Plan and How America Helped Rebuild Europe. London: Aurum Press.Google Scholar
  9. Berg, S.V., and J. Horall. 2008. Networks of Regulatory Agencies as Regional Public Goods: Improving Infrastructure Performance. Review of International Organizations 3 (2): 179–200.Google Scholar
  10. Bhalla, A.S., and P. Bhalla. 1997. Regional Blocs: Building Blocks or Stumbling Blocks?. Houndmills, NY: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blatter, J. 2001. Integrative Symbolik und regulative Normen bei der Institutionenbildung. Erkenntnisse vom Gewässerschutz am Bodensee. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 8 (1): 5–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bogner, A., and W. Menz. 2005. Das theoriegenerierende Experteninterview. Erkenntnisinteresse, Wissensformen, Interaktion. In Das Experteninterview: Theorie, Methode, Anwendung, ed. A. Bogner, B. Littig, and W. Menz, 33–70. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.Google Scholar
  13. Boli, J., and G.M. Thomas. 1997. World Culture in the World Polity: A Century of International Non-Governmental Organization. American Sociological Review 62 (2): 171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Börzel, T.A. 2010. The Transformative Power of Europe Reloaded. The Limits of External Europeanization. KFG Working Paper 11. Berlin: Otto-Suhr-Institut für Politikwissenschaft.Google Scholar
  15. Börzel, T.A. 2011. Comparative Regionalism. A New Research Agenda. KFG Working Paper 28. Berlin: Otto-Suhr-Institut für Politikwissenschaft.Google Scholar
  16. Börzel, T.A., and T. Risse. 2009a. Diffusing (Inter-)Regionalism. The EU as a Model of Regional Integration. KFG Working Paper 7. Berlin: Otto-Suhr-Institut für Politikwissenschaft.Google Scholar
  17. Börzel, T.A., and T. Risse. 2009b. The Transformative Power of Europe. The European Union and the Diffusion of Ideas. KFG Working Paper 1. Berlin: Otto-Suhr-Institut für Politikwissenschaft.Google Scholar
  18. Braun, D., and F. Gilardi. 2006. Taking ‘Galton’s Problem’ Seriously: Towards a Theory of Policy Diffusion. Journal of Theoretical Politics 18 (3): 298–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Breslin, S., and R. Higgot. 2000. Studying Regions: Learning from the Old, Constructing the New. New Political Economy 5 (3): 333–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Burns, T., and W. Buckley. 1974. The Prisoners’ Dilemma Game as a System of Social Dimension. Journal of Peace Research 11 (3): 221–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Buzan, B. 1992. Third World Regional Security in Structural and Historical Perspective. In The Insecurity Dilemma. National Security of Third World States, ed. B.L. Job, 167–189. Boulder: Lienne Rienner.Google Scholar
  22. Buzan, B., and O. Wæver. 2003. Regions and Powers. The Structure of International Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Cahnman, W.J. 1944. The Concept of Raum and the Theory of Regionalism. American Sociological Review 9 (5): 455–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chayes, A., and A. Handler Chayes. 1993. On Compliance. International Organization 47 (2): 175–205.Google Scholar
  25. Cox, K.R. 1969. On the Utility and Definition of Regions in Comparative Political Sociology. Comparative Political Studies 2 (69): 68–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Crocker, C.A. 1974. Military Dependence: The Colonial Legacy in Africa. Journal of Modern African Studies 12 (2): 265–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. de Lombaerde, P., and L. van Langenhove. 2006. Indicators of Regional Integration: Conceptual and Methodological Aspects. In Assessment and Measurement of Regional Integration. Routledge/Warwick Studies in Globalisation, vol. 13, ed. P. de Lombaerde, 9–41. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. de Lombaerde, P., and M. Schulz (eds.). 2009. The EU and World Regionalism: The Makability of Regions in the 21st Century. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  29. de Lombaerde, P., F. Söderbaum, L. van Langenhove, and F. Baert. 2010. Problems and Divides in Comparative Regionalism. In Comparative Regional Integration. Europe and Beyond. The International Political Economy of New Regionalisms Series, ed. F. Laursen, 21–39. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  30. DiMaggio, P.J., and W.W. Powell. 1983. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review 48 (2): 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Downs, G.W. 2000. Constructing Effective Environmental Regimes. Annual Review of Political Science 3 (1): 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Downs, G.W., D.M. Rocke, and P.N. Barsoom. 1996. Is the Good News about Compliance Good News about Cooperation? International Organization 50 (3): 379–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Eckstein, H. 1975. Case Study and Theory in Political Science (Handbook of Political Science). In Strategies of Inquiry, vol. 7, ed. F.I. Greenstein and N.W. Polsby, 79–138. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  34. Ende, M. 2004. Jim Knopf und Lukas der Lokomotivführer. Stuttgart: Thienemann Verlag.Google Scholar
  35. Farell, M. 2007. From EU Model to External Policy? Promoting Regional Integration in the Rest of the World. In Making History: European Integration and Institutional Change at Fifty. The State of the European Union, vol. 8, ed. S. Meunier and K.R. McNamara, 299–315. Oxford, Bloomington: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Flick, U. 2007. Qualitative Sozialforschung. Eine Einführung. Reinbeck: Rowohlt.Google Scholar
  37. Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry 12 (2): 219–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gehring, T. 1994. Der Beitrag von Institutionen zur Förderung der internationalen Zusammenarbeit. Lehren aus der institutionellen Struktur der Europäischen Gemeinschaft. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 1 (2): 211–242.Google Scholar
  39. Gehring, T. 1995. Regieren im internationalen System. Verhandlungen, Normen und Internationale Regime. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 36 (2): 197–219.Google Scholar
  40. Gehring, T. 1996. Integrating Integration Theory: Neo-Functionalism and International Regimes. Global Society 10 (3): 225–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gehring, T. 2002. Die Europäische Union als komplexe internationale Organisation. Wie durch Kommunikation und Entscheidung soziale Ordnung entsteht. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  42. Gehring, T., and S. Oberthür. 1997. Internationale Regime als Steuerungsinstrumente der Umweltpolitik. In Internationale Umweltregime. Umweltschutz durch Verhandlungen und Verträge, ed. T. Gehring and S. Oberthür, 9–26. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.Google Scholar
  43. George, A.L., and A. Bennett. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  44. Gilardi, F. 2008. Delegation in the Regulatory State. Independent Regulatory Agencies in Western Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  45. Gilardi, F. 2013. Transnational Diffusion: Norms, Ideas, and Policies. In Handbook of International Relations, ed. W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse, and B.A. Simmons, 453–477. London: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Gilpin, R. 1987. The Political Economy of International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Göhler, G. 1997. Der Zusammenhang von Institution, Macht und Repräsentation. In Institution—Macht—Repräsentation: Wofür politische Institutionen stehen und wie sie wirken, ed. G. Göhler, 11–62. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  48. Gray, J. 2012. Life, Death, or Zombies? The Endurance of Inefficient Regional Economic Organizations. Unpublished Manuscript. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  49. Gregory, S. 2000. The French Military in Africa: Past and Present. African Affairs 99: 435–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Grieco, J.M. 1988. Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism. International Organization 42 (3): 485–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Grieco, J.M. 1997. Realist International Theory and the Study of World Politics. In New Thinking in International Relations Theory, ed. M. Doyle and J. Ikenberry: 163–201. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  52. Gruber, L. 2000. Ruling the World: Power Politics and the Rise of Supranational Institutions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Haas, E.B. 1958. The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social, and Economic Forces 1950–1957. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Hansen, R.D. 1969. Regional Integration: Reflections on a Decade of Theoretical Efforts. World Politics 21 (2): 242–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Harbeson, J.W. 1994. Civil Society and the Study of African Politics: A Preliminary Assesment. In Civil Society and the State in Africa, ed. J.W. Harbeson, D. Rothchild, and N. Chazan, 285–300. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  56. Hasenclever, A., P. Mayer, and V. Rittberger. 1997. Theories of International Regimes. Cambridge Studies in International Relations, vol. 55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Herbst, J. 2007. Crafting Regional Cooperation in Africa. In Crafting Cooperation. Regional International Institutions in Comparative Perspective, ed. A. Acharya and A.I. Johnston, 129–144. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Herz, J.H. 1950. Idealist Internationalism and Security Dilemma. World Politics 2 (2): 157–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Hettne, B. 1999. Globalisation and the New Regionalism: The Second Great Transformation. In Globalism and the New Regionalism, ed. B. Hettne, A. Inotai, and O. Sunkel, 1–24. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Hettne, B. 2005. Beyond the ‘New’ Regionalism. New Political Economy 10 (4): 543–571.Google Scholar
  61. Hettne, B., and F. Söderbaum. 1998. The New Regionalism Approach. Politeia: Journal for Political Science and Public Administration 17 (3): 5–19.Google Scholar
  62. Hettne, B., and F. Söderbaum. 2008. The Future of Regionalism. Old Divides, New Frontiers. In Regionalisation and Global Governance. The Taming of Globalisation?, ed. A.F. Cooper, C.W. Hughes, and P. de Lombaerde, 61–79. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  63. Hirschmann, A.O. 1945. National Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade. Berkeley, Los Angeles and New York: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  64. Hitchcock, W.I. 2010. The Marshall Plan and the Creation of the West. In The Cambridge History of the Cold War Volume 1: Origins, ed. M.P. Leffler and O.A. Westad, 154–174. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Hoffmann, S. 1982. Reflections on the Nation-State in Western Europe Today. Journal of Common Market Studies 21 (2): 21–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Howorth, J. 2007. Security and Defence Policy in the European Union. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Hurrell, A. 1995. Explaining the Resurgence of Regionalism in World Politics. Review of International Studies 21 (4): 331–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Jervis, R. 1978. Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma. World Politics 30 (2): 167–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Jervis, R. 1982. Security Regimes. International Organization 36 (2): 357–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Jetschke, A., and T. Lenz. 2011. Vergleichende Regionalismusforschung und Diffusion: Eine neue Forschungsagenda. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 52 (3): 448–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Jetschke, A., and A. Liese. 1999. Die kulturelle Prägung staatlicher Interessen und Handlungen. Anmerkungen zur sozialkonstruktivistischen Analyse von “Kultur” in den Internationalen Beziehungen. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 28 (3): 285–300.Google Scholar
  72. Keman, H. 2008. Comparative Research Methods. In Comparative Politics, ed. D. Caramani, 63–82. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Kennes, W. 1999. African Regional Economic Integration & the European Union. In Regionalism in Africa. Integration & Disintegration, ed. D.C. Bach, 27–40. Oxford and Bloomington: James Currey.Google Scholar
  74. Keohane, R.O. 1982. The Demand for International Regimes. International Organization 36 (2): 325–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Keohane, R.O. 1984. After Hegemony. Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Keohane, R.O. 1988. International Institutions: Two Approaches. International Studies Quarterly 32 (4): 379–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Keohane, R.O. 1990. The Concept of Interdependence: Current American Thinking. In Soviet-American Dialogue in the Social Sciences. Research Workshops on Interdependence Among Nations, ed. Education CoBaSSa, 37–41. Washington: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  78. Keohane, R.O. 1998. International Institutions: Can Interdependence Work? Foreign Policy 10 (1): 82–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Keohane, R.O., and J.S. Nye. 1977. Power and Interdependence. World Politics in Transition. Boston and Toronto: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  80. Keohane, R.O., and J.S. Nye. 1987. Power and Interdependence revisited. International Organization 41 (4):725–753.Google Scholar
  81. Keohane, R.O., and J.S. Nye. 2001. Power and Interdependence. New York, London, Boston: Longman.Google Scholar
  82. Kindleberger, C. 1981. Dominance and Leadership in the International Economy. Exploitation, Public Goods, and Free Rides. International Studies Quarterly 25 (2): 242–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. King, G., R.O. Keohane, and S. Verba. 1994. Designing Social Inquirey: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Kohler-Koch, B. 1989. Regime in den Internationalen Beziehungen. In Regime in den Internationalen Beziehungen, ed. B. Kohler-Koch, 17–85. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  85. Krapohl, S., and J. Muntschick. 2009. Two Logics of Regionalism: The Importance of Interdependence and External Support for Regional Integration in Southern Africa. In Proceedings of the 2008 FOPRISA Annual Conference, vol. 7, ed. J.M. Kaunda and F. Zizhou, 3–17. Gaborone: Lightbooks.Google Scholar
  86. Krapohl, S., and S. Fink. 2013. Different Paths of Regional Integration: Trade Networks and Regional Institution-Building in Europe, Southeast Asia and Southern Africa. Journal of Common Market Studies 51 (3): 472–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Krasner, S.D. 1976. World Politics and the Structure of International Trade. World Politics 28 (3): 317–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Krasner, S.D. 1982. Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables. International Organization 36 (2): 185–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Krasner, S.D. 1991. Global Communications and National Power: Life on the Pareto Frontier. World Politics 43 (3): 336–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Levy, J.S. 2008. Case Studies: Types, Designs, and Logics of Inference. Conflict Management and Peace Science 25 (1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Mansfield, E.D., and H.V. Milner. 1999. The New Wave of Regionalism. International Organization 53 (3): 589–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Martin, L.L. 1992. Interests, Power, and Multilateralism. International Organization 46 (4): 765–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Martin, L.L., and B.A. Simmons. 1998. Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions. International Organization 52 (4): 729–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Mattli, W. 1999. The Logic of Regional Integration: Europe and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Mayer, P., V. Rittberger, and M. Zürn. 1993. Regime Theory: State of the Art and Perspectives. In Regime Theory and International Relations, ed. V. Rittberger and P. Mayer, 391–430. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  96. Meyer, J.W., and B. Rowan. 1977. Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. The American Journal of Sociology 83 (2): 340–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Meyer, J.W., J. Boli, G.M. Thomas, and F.O. Ramirez. 1997. World Society and Nation State. The American Journal of Sociology 103 (1): 144–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Moravcsik, A. 1993. Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach. Journal of Common Market Studies 31 (4): 473–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Moravcsik, A. 1997. Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics. International Organization 51 (4): 513–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Moravcsik, A. 1998. The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  101. Moravcsik, A., and K. Nicolaïdis. 1999. Explaining the Treaty of Amsterdam: Interests, Influence, Institutions. Journal of Common Market Studies 37 (1): 59–85.Google Scholar
  102. Morgan, P.M. 1997. Regional Security Complexes and Regional Orders. In Regional Orders. Building Security in a New World, ed. D.A. Lake and P.M. Morgan, 20–42. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
  103. Morgenthau, H. 1948. Politics Among Nations. The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  104. Müller, H. 1993. Die Chance der Kooperation. Regime in den internationalen Beziehungen. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
  105. Münch, R. 2008. Die Konstruktion der europäischen Gesellschaft. Zur Dialektik von transnationaler Integration und nationaler Desintegration. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
  106. Muntschick, J. 2012. Theorising Regionalism and External Influence: A Situation-Structural Approach. Mainz Papers on International and European Politics 2012/2. Mainz: Chair of International Relations, Johannes Gutenberg University. Google Scholar
  107. Muntschick, J. 2013c. Regionalismus und Externer Einfluss: Stört die Europäische Union die Regionale Marktintegration im südlichen Afrika? Politische Vierteljahresschrift 54 (4): 686–713.Google Scholar
  108. Nye, J.S. 1965. Patterns and Catalysts in Regional Integration. International Organization 19 (4): 870–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Nye, J.S. 1968a. Central American Regional Integration. In International Regionalism: Readings, ed. J.S. Nye, 377–420. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  110. Nye, J.S. 1968b. Introduction. In International Regionalism: Readings, ed. J.S. Nye, V–XVI. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  111. Nye, J.S. 2008. Understanding International Conflicts: An Introduction to Theory and History, 7th ed. London: Pearson.Google Scholar
  112. Odell, J.S. 2001. Case Study Methods in International Political Economy. International Studies Perspective 2: 161–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Oye, K.A. 1985. Explaining Cooperation Under Anarchy: Hypotheses and Strategies. World Politics 38 (1): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Proff, H.W. 2000. SADC—Another Institutional Papertiger in Sub-Saharan Africa or a Chance for Joint Industrial Development? Darmstadt Discussion Papers in Economics 101. Darmstadt: TU Darmstadt.Google Scholar
  115. Przeworski, A., and H. Teune. 1982. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. Malabar: Krieger.Google Scholar
  116. Raustiala, K. 2000. Compliance & Effectiveness in International Regulatory Cooperation. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 32 (2): 387–440.Google Scholar
  117. Ravenhill, J. 2008. Regionalism. In Global Political Economy, 2nd ed, ed. J. Ravenhill, 172–210. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  118. Rittberger, V. 1990. International Regimes in the CSCE Region—From Anarchy to Governance and Stable Peace. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 19 (4): 349–364.Google Scholar
  119. Rittberger, V. 1993. Research on International Regimes in Germany: The Adaptive Internalization of an American Social Science Concept. In Regime Theory and International Relations, ed. V. Rittberger and P. Mayer, 3–22. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  120. Rittberger, V., and M. Zürn. 1990. Towards Regulated Anarchy in East-West Relations: Causes and Consequences of East-West Regimes. In International Regimes in East-West Relations, ed. V. Rittberger, 9–63. London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
  121. Rittberger, V., and M. Zürn. 1991. Regime Theory: Findings from the Study of “East-West Regimes”. Cooperation and Conflict 26 (4): 165–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Robson, P. 1993. The New Regionalism and Developing Countries. Journal of Common Market Studies 31 (3): 329–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Scharpf, F.W. 2000. Interaktionsformen. Akteurzentrierter Institutionalismus in der Politikforschung. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.Google Scholar
  124. Schimmelfennig, F. 2001. The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union. International Organization 55 (1): 47–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Schirm, S.A. 2002. Globalization and the New Regionalism: Global Markets, Domestic Politics and Regional Cooperation. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  126. Scott, R.W. 1995. Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  127. Sebenius, J.K. 1983. Negotiation Arithmetic: Adding and Subtracting Issues and Parties. International Organization 37 (2): 281–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Simmons, B.A., F. Dobbin, and G. Garrett. 2006. Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism. International Organization 60 (4): 781–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Snidal, D. 1985. Coordination Versus Prisoners’ Dilemma: Implications for International Cooperation and Regimes. The American Political Science Review 79 (4): 923–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Söderbaum, F. 2007. African Regionalism and EU-African Interregionalism. In European Union and New Regionalism. Regional Actors and Global Governance in a Post-Hegemonic Era, ed. M. Telò, 185–202, 2nd ed. Aldershot and Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  131. Söderbaum, F., and T.M. Shaw (eds.). 2003. Theories of New Regionalism. A Palgrave Reader, International Political Economy Series. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  132. Stein, A.A. 1982. Coordination and Collaboration: Regimes in an Anarchic World. International Organization 36 (2): 300–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Stein, A. 1993. Coordination and Collaboration: Regimes in an Anarchic World. In Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, ed. D.A. Baldwin, 29–59. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  134. Tavares, R., and M. Schulz. 2006. Measuring the Impact of Regional Organisations on Peace Building. In Assessment and Measurement of Regional Integration, ed. P. de Lombaerde, 232–251. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  135. Taylor, M. 1987. The Possibility of Cooperation. Studies in Rationality and Social Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  136. Terlinden, U. 2004. IGAD—Papiertiger vor Mammutaufgaben. Bonn: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.Google Scholar
  137. Underdal, A. 1992. The Concept of Regime ‘Effectiveness’. Cooperation and Conflict 27 (3): 227–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Underdal, A. 1998. Explaining Compliance and Defection: Three Models. European Journal of International Relations 4 (5): 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Wagner, R.H. 1983. The Theory of Games and the Problem of International Cooperation. The American Political Science Review 77 (2): 330–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Wallander, C.A., and R.O. Keohane. 1999. Risk, Threat, and Security Institutions. In Imperfect Unions. Security Institutions Over Time and Space, ed. H. Haftendorn, R.O. Keohane, and C.A. Wallander, 21–47. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  141. Wallander, C.A., H. Haftendorn, and R.O. Keohane. 1999. Introduction. In Imperfect Unions. Security Institutions Over Time and Space, ed. H. Haftendorn, R.O. Keohane, and C.A. Wallander, 2–18. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  142. Waltz, K. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  143. Warleigh-Lack, A. 2008. Studying Regionalisation Comparatively. A Conceptual Framework. In Regionalisation and Global Governance. The taming of Globalisation? ed. A.F. Cooper, C.W. Hughes, and P. de Lombaerde, 43–60. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  144. Winters, L.A. 1999. Regionalism vs. Multilateralism. In Market Integration, Regionalism and the Global Economy, ed. R. Baldwin, D. Cohen, A. Sapir, and A. Venables, 7–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Yang, Y., and S. Gupta. 2005. Regional Trade Arrangements in Africa: Past Performance and the Way Forward. IMF Working Papers, vol WP/05/36. Washington: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  146. Yin, R.K. 2003. Case Study Research. Design and Methods, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  147. Young, O.R. 1969. Interdependencies in World Politics. International Journal 24 (4): 726–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Young, O.R. 1982. Regime Dynamics: The Rise and Fall of International Regimes. International Organization 36 (2): 277–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Young, O.R. 1992. The Effectiveness of International Institutions: Hard Cases and Critical Variables. In Governance Without Government: Order and Change in World Politics, ed. J.N. Rosenau and E-O. Czempiel, 160–194. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  150. Young, C. 1994. In Search of Civil Society. In Civil Society and the State in Africa, ed. J.W. Harbeson, D. Rothchild, and N. Chazan, 33–50. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  151. Zangl, B. 1994. Politik auf zwei Ebenen. Hypothesen zur Bildung internationaler Regime. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 1 (2): 279–312.Google Scholar
  152. Zimmerling, R. 1991. Externe Einflüsse auf die Integration von Staaten. Zur politikwissenschaftlichen Theorie regionaler Zusammenschlüsse. Freiburg: Verlag Karl Alber.Google Scholar
  153. Zürn, M. 1987. Gerechte internationale Regime. Bedingungen und Restriktionen der Entstehung nicht-hegemonialer internationaler Regime untersucht am Beispiel der Weltkommunikationsordnung. Frankurt am Main: Haag Herchen.Google Scholar
  154. Zürn, M. 1992. Interessen und Institutionen in der Internationalen Politik: Grundlegung und Anwendung des situationsstrukturellen Ansatz. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Zürn, M. 1993. Problematic Social Situations and International Institutions: On the Use of Game Theory in International Politics. In International Relations and Pan-Europe: Theoretical Approaches and Empirical Findings, ed. F. Pfetsch, 63–84. Münster: Lit-Verlag.Google Scholar
  156. Zürn, M. 1997. ‘Positives Regieren’ jenseits des Nationalstaates. Zur Implementation internationaler Umweltregime. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 4 (1): 41–68.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political SciencesJohannes Gutenberg University of MainzMainzGermany

Personalised recommendations