Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Method for Situating Capability Viewpoints

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Perspectives in Business Informatics Research (BIR 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 261))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper presents a method that is used to enrich existing architecture frameworks or methods by enabling development of situated capability viewpoints. The method addresses the issue that in many cases viewpoint definitions suggest a singular way to consider and model a domain. This issue is particularly prevalent in frameworks developed by one profession, such as IT architects, where general concepts, such as capability and service, may have narrow definitions. The method we suggest is to start with a base capability viewpoint and then tailor that into specific situated capability viewpoints by incorporating situational concerns. Each tailored viewpoint supports a stakeholder’s work situation and aims to increase intended and actual use of capability analysis. The method is built upon the ISO 42010 standard, an extendable base capability viewpoint, and concepts from method engineering. The method is demonstrated by applying it to the Strategy Map framework by Kaplan and Norton.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kusunoki, K., Nonaka, I., Nagata, A.: Organizational capabilities in product development of Japanese firms: a conceptual framework and empirical findings. Organ. Sci. 9, 699–718 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bērziša, S., Bravos, G., Gonzalez, T.C., Czubayko, U., España, S., Grabis, J., Henkel, M., Jokste, L., Kampars, J., Koç, H., Kuhr, J.-C., Llorca, C., Loucopoulos, P., Pascual, R.J., Pastor, O., Sandkuhl, K., Simic, H., Stirna, J., Valverde, F.G., Zdravkovic, J.: Capability driven development: an approach to designing digital enterprises. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 57, 15–25 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ulrich, W., Rosen, M.: The Business Capability Map: The “Rosetta Stone” of Business/IT Alignment. https://www.cutter.com

  4. Harmon, P.: Capabilities and Processes. http://www.bptrends.com/publicationfiles/advisor20110712.pdf

  5. The Open Group: TOGAF Version 9.1 - The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Malavolta, I., Lago, P., Muccini, H., Pelliccione, P., Tang, A.: What industry needs from architectural languages: a survey. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 39, 869–891 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. ISO/IEC, IEEE: ISO/IEC 42010:2011 Systems and software engineering — Architecture description (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Teece, D.J.: Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strateg. Manag. J. 28, 1319–1350 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dosi, G., Nelson, R., Winter, S.: The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities. OUP, Oxford (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Schreyögg, G., Kliesch-Eberl, M.: How dynamic can organizational capabilities be? Towards a dual-process model of capability dynamization. Strateg. Manag. J. 28, 913–933 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. McKeen, J.D., Smith, H.: IT Strategy, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Henkel, M., Bider, I., Perjons, E.: Capability-based business model transformation. In: Iliadis, L., Papazoglou, M., Pohl, K. (eds.) CAiSE Workshops 2014. LNBIP, vol. 178, pp. 88–99. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stirna, J., Grabis, J., Henkel, M., Zdravkovic, J.: Capability driven development – an approach to support evolving organizations. In: Sandkuhl, K., Seigerroth, U., Stirna, J. (eds.) PoEM 2012. LNBIP, vol. 134, pp. 117–131. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Beimborn, D., Martin, S.F., Homann, U.: Capability-oriented modeling of the firm. Presented at the IPSI-2005, Amalfi (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Henderson-Sellers, B., Ralyte, J.: Situational method engineering: state-of-the-art review. J. Comput. Sci. 16, 424–478 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ralyte, J., Deneckere, R., Rolland, C.: Towards a generic model for situational method engineering. In: Eder, J., Missikoff, M. (eds.) CAiSE 2003. LNCS, vol. 2681, pp. 95–110. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M., Chatterjee, S.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 24, 45–77 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: The Execution Premium: Linking Strategy to Operations for Competitive Advantage. Harvard Business School Press, Brighton (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. Mis Q. 28, 75–105 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sowa, J.F., Zachman, J.A.: Extending and formalizing the framework for information systems architecture. IBM Syst. J. 31, 1–27 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Object Management Group: Semantics of Business Vocabulary and Business Rules (SBVR), v1.0 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  22. ISO/IEC: ISO 24744:2007 Software Engineering - Metamodel for Development Methodologies (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27, 425–478 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tell, A.W.: What capability is not. In: Johansson, B., Andersson, B., Holmberg, N. (eds.) BIR 2014. LNBIP, vol. 194, pp. 128–142. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Checkland, P.: Soft systems methodology: a thirty year retrospective. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 17, S11–S58 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tools for Institutional, Political, and Social Analysis of Policy Reform. World Bank Publications (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Haeckel, S.: Adaptive Enterprise: Creating and Leading Sense-and-Respond Organizations. Harvard Business School Press, Brighton (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Leinwand, P., Mainardi, C.: The Essential Advantage: How to Win with a Capabilities-Driven Strategy. Harvard Business Press, Brighton (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  29. International Institute of Business Analysis: A Guide to the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge® (BABOK Guide) Version 2.0 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Robeyns, I.: The capability approach: a theoretical survey. J. Hum. Dev. 6, 93–117 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden

    Anders W. Tell, Martin Henkel & Erik Perjons

Authors
  1. Anders W. Tell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martin Henkel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Erik Perjons
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anders W. Tell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information Technology, University of Economics, Prague 3, Czech Republic

    Václav Řepa

  2. Department of Information Technology, University of Economics, Prague 3, Praha, Czech Republic

    Tomáš Bruckner

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tell, A.W., Henkel, M., Perjons, E. (2016). A Method for Situating Capability Viewpoints. In: Řepa, V., Bruckner, T. (eds) Perspectives in Business Informatics Research. BIR 2016. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 261. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45321-7_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation