Skip to main content

Reporting Guidelines

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 643 Accesses

Abstract

Have you ever tried to repeat somebody’s experiment, but did not find the necessary information in the publication on how the experiment was conducted? Once you know about the critical protocol steps of an Elispot assay, don’t you wonder how they were addressed by others? For example: How long it took to isolate PBMC after blood draw? How was resting performed, and for how long? What was the background reactivity for the tested samples? Was the serum used pretested? Were reported results background corrected? Or would you like to see an example image of crucial wells (which will likely be the best example available)? Did you wonder how the authors established reading parameters, and if reading parameters were adapted when necessary? Many more questions come to mind.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Janetzki S, Britten CM, Kalos M, Levitsky HI, Maecker HT, Melief CJM, et al. “MIATA”-minimal information about T cell assays. Immunity. 2009;31(19833080):527–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Taylor CF, Field D, Sansone S-A, Aerts J, Apweiler R, Ashburner M, et al. Promoting coherent minimum reporting guidelines for biological and biomedical investigations: the MIBBI project. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26(18688244):889–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Brazma A, Hingamp P, Quackenbush J, Sherlock G, Spellman P, Stoeckert C, et al. Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)-toward standards for microarray data. Nat Genet. 2001;29(4):365–71. doi:10.1038/ng1201-365.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brazma A, Robinson A, Cameron G, Ashburner M. One-stop shop for microarray data. Nature. 2000;403(6771):699–700. doi:10.1038/35001676.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee JA, Spidlen J, Boyce K, Cai J, Crosbie N, Dalphin M, et al. MIFlowCyt: the minimum information about a Flow Cytometry Experiment. Cytometry A. 2008;73(10):926–30. doi:10.1002/cyto.a.20623.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Britten CM, Janetzki S, van der Burg SH, Huber C, Kalos M, Levitsky HI, et al. Minimal information about T cell assays: the process of reaching the community of T cell immunologists in cancer and beyond. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2011;60(1):15–22. doi:10.1007/s00262-010-0940-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Britten CM, Janetzki S, Butterfield LH, Ferrari G, Gouttefangeas C, Huber C, et al. T cell assays and MIATA: the essential minimum for maximum impact. Immunity. 2012;37(1):1–2. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2012.07.010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Janetzki, S. (2016). Reporting Guidelines. In: Elispot for Rookies (and Experts Too). Techniques in Life Science and Biomedicine for the Non-Expert. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45295-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics