Skip to main content

Abstract

An enterocele is a herniation of the pelvic peritoneum and/or small bowel beyond the normal boundaries of the cul-de-sac. Endopelvic fascia supporting the anterior, apical or posterior vagina is deficient, allowing the vagina to prolapse and small bowel to fill the hernia sac. An enterocele classically causes apical and/or posterior vaginal wall prolapse as the small bowel dissects into the rectovaginal space. Anterior and/or posterior vaginal wall prolapse without concomitant apical prolapse is uncommon. Therefore, apical prolapse repair should be included in the majority of enterocele repairs. Outcome studies also show that restoration of the apex corrects nearly half of anterior vaginal wall defects and one-third of posterior defects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kenton K, Shott S, Brubaker L. Vaginal topography does not correlate well with visceral position in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1997;8:336–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:10–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hall AF, Theofrastous JP, Cundiff GW, et al. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, and American Urogynecologic Society pelvic organ prolapse classification system. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:1467–70; discussion 70–1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kelvin FM, Hale DS, Maglinte DD, Patten BJ, Benson JT. Female pelvic organ prolapse: diagnostic contribution of dynamic cystoproctography and comparison with physical examination. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173:31–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. DeLancey JO, Morgan DM, Fenner DE, et al. Comparison of levator ani muscle defects and function in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:295–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Altringer WE, Saclarides TJ, Dominguez JM, Brubaker LT, Smith CS. Four-contrast defecography: pelvic “floor-oscopy”. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;38:695–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rooney K, Kenton K, Mueller ER, FitzGerald MP, Brubaker L. Advanced anterior vaginal wall prolapse is highly correlated with apical prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195:1837–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Guiahi M, Kenton K, Brubaker L. Sacrocolpopexy without concomitant posterior repair improves posterior compartment defects. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19:1267–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Brubaker L, Cundiff G, Fine P, et al. A randomized trial of colpopexy and urinary reduction efforts (CARE): design and methods. Control Clin Trials. 2003;24:629–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lowder JL, Park AJ, Ellison R, et al. The role of apical vaginal support in the appearance of anterior and posterior vaginal prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:152–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bradley CS, Zimmerman MB, Qi Y, Nygaard IE. Natural history of pelvic organ prolapse in postmenopausal women. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:848–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Swift S, Woodman P, O’Boyle A, et al. Pelvic Organ Support Study (POSST): the distribution, clinical definition, and epidemiologic condition of pelvic organ support defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:795–806.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mahajan ST, Elkadry EA, Kenton KS, Shott S, Brubaker L. Patient-centered surgical outcomes: the impact of goal achievement and urge incontinence on patient satisfaction one year after surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194:722–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Elkadry EA, Kenton KS, FitzGerald MP, Shott S, Brubaker L. Patient-selected goals: a new perspective on surgical outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:1551–7; discussion 7–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bradley MS, Visco AG. Role of salpingectomy at the time of urogynecologic surgery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;27:385–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Committee on Gynecologic P. Committee opinion no. 620: Salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125:279–81.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wei JT, Nygaard I, Richter HE, et al. A midurethral sling to reduce incontinence after vaginal prolapse repair. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2358–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Brubaker L, Cundiff GW, Fine P, et al. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy with Burch colposuspension to reduce urinary stress incontinence. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:1557–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nichols D, Randall C. Vaginal surgery. 4th ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Adams EJ, Hagen S, Glazener CM. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;4:CD004014.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Moschowitz A. The pathogenesis, anatomy, and cure of prolapse of the rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1912;15:7–21.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Halban J. Gynakoligische Operationslehre. Berlin-Vienna: Urban & Schwarzenberg; 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bradley CS, Nygaard IE, Brown MB, et al. Bowel symptoms in women 1 year after sacrocolpopexy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:642.e1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Buckwalter JA. Should bone, soft-tissue, and joint injuries be treated with rest or activity? J Orthop Res. 1995;13:155–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Buckwalter JA. Activity vs. rest in the treatment of bone, soft tissue and joint injuries. Iowa Orthop J. 1995;15:29–42.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Weir LF, Nygaard IE, Wilken J, Brandt D, Janz KF. Postoperative activity restrictions: any evidence? Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107:305–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katarzyna Bochenska MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(MP4 238274 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bochenska, K., Kenton, K. (2017). Enterocele Repair. In: Zimmern, P., De, E. (eds) Native Tissue Repair for Incontinence and Prolapse. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45268-5_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45268-5_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45266-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45268-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics