Modelling a Mutual Support Network for Coping with Stress

  • Lenin MedeirosEmail author
  • Ruben Sikkes
  • Jan Treur
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9875)


The emotional state of an individual is continuously affected by daily events. Stressful periods can be coped with by support from a person’s social environment. Support can for example reduce stress and social disengagement. Before improvements on the process of support are however made, it is essential to understand the actual real world process. In this paper a computational model of a network for mutual support is presented. The dynamic model quantifies the change in the network over time of stressors and support. The model predicts that more support is provided when more stress is experienced and when more people are capable of support. Moreover, the model is able to distinguish personal characteristics. The model behaves according to predictions and is evaluated by simulation experiments and mathematical analysis. The proposed model can be important in development of a software agent which aims to improve coping with stress through social connections.


Stress Coping Mutual support Network Computational model 



The authors would like to state that Lenin Medeiros' stay at Vrije Universtiteit Amsterdam was funded by the Brazilian Science without Borders program. This work was performed with the support from CNPq, National Council for Scientific and Technological Development - Brazil, through a scholarship which reference number is 235134/2014-7.


  1. 1.
    Anderson, N.B.: Encyclopedia of Health and Behavior, vol. 1. Sage (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aziz, A.A., Ahmad, F.: A Multi-agent model for supporting exchange dynamics in social support networks during stress. In: Imamura, K., Usui, S., Shirao, T., Kasamatsu, T., Schwabe, L., Zhong, N. (eds.) BHI 2013. LNCS, vol. 8211, pp. 103–114. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aziz, A., Klein, M.C.A., Treur, J.: Intelligent configuration of social support networks around depressed persons. In: Peleg, M., Lavrač, N., Combi, C. (eds.) AIME 2011. LNCS, vol. 6747, pp. 24–34. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aziz, A.A., Treur, J.: Modelling dynamics of social support networks for mutual support in coping with stress. In: Nguyen, N.T., Katarzyniak, R.P., Janiak, A. (eds.) New Challenges in Computational Collective Intelligence. SCI, vol. 244, pp. 167–179. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bosse, T., Hoogendoorn, M., Klein, M.C.A., Treur, J.: A generic agent architecture for human-aware ambient computing. In: Mangina, E., Carbo, J., Molina, J.M. (eds.) Agent-Based Ubiquitous Computing, pp. 35–62. Atlantis Press, World Scientific Publishers (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bosse, T., Memom, Z.A., Treur, J., Umair, M.: An adaptive human-aware software agent supporting attention-demanding tasks. In: Yang, J.-J., Yokoo, M., Ito, T., Jin, Z., Scerri, P. (eds.) PRIMA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5925, pp. 292–307. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bosse, T., Memon, Z.A., Oorburg, R., Treur, J., Umair, M., de Vos, M.: A software environment for an adaptive human-aware software agent supporting attention-demanding tasks. J. AI Tools 20, 819–846 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ditzen, B., Heinrichs, M.: Psychobiology of social support: the social dimension of stress buffering. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci. 32, 149–162 (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pantic, M., Pentland, A., Nijholt, A., Huang, T.S.: Human computing and machine understanding of human behavior: a survey. In: Huang, T.S., Nijholt, A., Pantic, M., Pentland, A. (eds.) ICMI/IJCAI Workshops 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4451, pp. 47–71. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pentland, A.: Socially aware computation and communication. IEEE Comput. 38, 33–40 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schalkwijk, F.J., Blessinga, A., Willemen, A., Van Der Werf, Y.D., Schuengel, C.: Social support moderates the effects of stress on sleep in adolescents. J. Sleep Res. 24, 407–413 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schwarzer, R., Bowler, R., Cone, J.: Social integration buffers stress in New York police after the 9/11 terrorist attack. Anxiety, Stress & Coping 27(1), 18–26 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Smith, A., Wang, Z.: Hypothalamic oxytocin mediates social buffering of the stress response. Biol. Psychiatry 76(4), 281–288 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stein, E., Smith, B.: Social support attenuates the harmful effects of stress in healthy adult women. Soc. Sci. Med. 146, 129–136 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Treur, J.: On human aspects in ambient intelligence. In: Muehlhauser, M., Ferscha, A., Aitenbichler, E. (eds.) AmI 2007 Workshops. CCIS, vol. 11, pp. 262–267. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Treur, J.: Dynamic modeling based on a temporal–causal network modeling approach. Biologically Inspired Cogn. Architect. 16, 131–168 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Behavioural Informatics GroupVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamNetherlands

Personalised recommendations