Abstract
Although there is broad consensus that engineers have social responsibilities, what is owed in the name of social responsibility is not well understood. After briefly reviewing past attempts to understand the social responsibilities of engineers, an account that treats these responsibilities as a form of accountability is sketched. Accountability involves a relationship between an actor and a forum, a shared sense of obligation to explain and justify behavior, and shared norms regarding what needs to be explained, what counts as an adequate explanation, and what consequences might follow. Framing the social responsibilities of engineers as accountability brings to light the multiple actors involved and the activities by which social responsibilities are constituted. Among other things, the account locates the social responsibilities of engineers in the activities of engineering professional organizations, especially when they issue reports on engineering failures. The account also points to the importance of whistleblowing. The idea that social responsibility falls to individual engineers regardless of context or that social responsibility is a decontextualized moral matter is eschewed in favor of understanding engineers’ social responsibilities as constituted through social practices.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This distinction between engineering organizational activity and the behavior of individual engineers is one aspect of Herkert’s (2001) distinction between macro and micro ethical issues in engineering.
References
Alpern, K. (1983). The moral responsibility of engineers in large organizations. Business & professional ethics journal, 22, 39–48.
Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European law journal, 13(4), 447–468.
Davis, M. (1991). Thinking like an engineer. Center for the Study of Ethics in the Professions at IIT. Found at: http://ethics.iit.edu/publication/md_te.html. Accessed on 6 Feb 2015.
Frodeman, R., & Mitcham, C. (2000). Beyond the social contract myth. Issues in Science and Technology, 16(4), 37–41.
Gunn, A., & Aarne Vesiland, P. (2003). Hold paramount: The engineer’s responsibility to society. Pacific Grove: Thompson Learning Inc.
Harris, C. E., Jr. (2008). The good engineer: Giving virtue its due in engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14(2), 153–164.
Hart, H. L. A. (1968). Punishment and responsibility: Essays in the philosophy of law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Herkert, J. R. (2001). Future directions in engineering ethics research: Microethics, macroethics and the role of professional societies. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7(3), 403–414.
Johnson, D. G. (1992). Do engineers have social responsibilities? Journal of Applied Philosophy, 9(1), 21–34.
Lawson, W. D. (2004). Professionalism: The golden years. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 130(1), 26–36.
Manion, M., & Evan, W. M. (2000). The Y2K problem and professional responsibility: A retrospective analysis. Technology in Society, 22(3), 361–387.
Schmidt, J. A. (2014). Changing the paradigm for engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 20(4), 985–1010.
Stieb, J. A. (2011). Understanding engineering professionalism: A reflection on the rights of engineers. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(1), 149–169.
Stovall, P. (2011). Professional virtue and professional self-awareness: A case study in engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(1), 109–132.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. (2009, June). Performance Evaluation of the New Orleans and Southeast Louisiana Hurricane Protection System. Accessed at: http://biotech.law.lsu.edu/katrina/ipet/Volume%20I%20FINAL%2023Jun09%20mh.pdf on 2 Feb 2015.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Johnson, D.G. (2017). Rethinking the Social Responsibilities of Engineers as a Form of Accountability. In: Michelfelder, D., Newberry, B., Zhu, Q. (eds) Philosophy and Engineering. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 26. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45193-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45193-0_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45191-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45193-0
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)