Advertisement

The Authority of the EFTA Court

  • Skúli Magnússon
Chapter

Abstract

The EFTA Court gives binding decisions on direct actions brought by ESA, or another EEA/EFTA State, but also has a role in securing the uniform interpretation of EEA law in the EEA/EFTA States by issuing advisory opinions at the request of their national courts. This, together with its function as an international court of law, argues for powers to create authoritative judge-made law, in a way comparable to the ECJ. However, the situation of the EFTA Court is more complex regarding several factors. This Chapter discusses the authority of EFTA Court rulings and case-law, in particular in relation to the preliminary reference procedure provided for by Article 34 SCA, while also touching up the standing of the Court in its relation with the EEA/EFTA States and the EU.

References

  1. Baudenbacher C (2007) Was ist aus dem Gutachten des EuGH 1/91 Geworden? In: Baur G (ed) Europäer – Botschafter – Mensch. Liber Amicorum für Prinz Nikoluas von Liechtenstein, LiechtensteinGoogle Scholar
  2. Einarsdóttir M (2012) Ráðgefandi álit EFTA-dómstólsins: raunveruleg áhrif í íslenskum rétti. Tímarit lögfræðinga 62(2):135–156Google Scholar
  3. Fredriksen HH (2010) One market two courts: legal pluralism vs. Homogeneity in the European economic area. Nordic J Int Law 79(4):481–499Google Scholar
  4. Fredriksen HH (2011) EØS=EU?. Aftenposten, 8 March 2011, p. 20Google Scholar
  5. Fredriksen HH (2014) The troubled relationship between the Supreme Court of Norway and the EFTA Court – Recent Developments. In: Müller-Graff PC, Mestad O (eds) The rising complexity of European law. Berliner Wissenschafts-VerlagGoogle Scholar
  6. Hannesson ÓÍ, Magnússon S (2013) State liability in EEA law: towards parallelism or homogeneity? Eur Law Rev 2(2013):167–186Google Scholar
  7. Kanninen H (2014) The EFTA court’s early days, the EEA and the EFTA court. In: EFTA Court (ed) Hart, Oxford and PortlandGoogle Scholar
  8. Lennaerts K (2007) The Rule of Law and the Coherence of the Judicial System. CMLR 44:1625–1658Google Scholar
  9. Magnússon S (2010) On the authority of advisory opinions. Europarättslig tidskrift 13:3Google Scholar
  10. Magnússon S (2011) Judicial homogeneity in the European economic area and the authority of the EFTA court […]. Nordic J Int Law 80Google Scholar
  11. Magnússon S (2016) Icelandic courts. In: Baudenbacher C (ed) The handbook of EEA law. Springer International, pp 277–293Google Scholar
  12. Norberg S et al (1993) EEA law. Kluwer, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  13. Nordberg and Johansson (2016) The History of the EEA Agreement and the First Twenty Years of Its Existence. In: Baudenbacher C (ed) The Handbook of EEA. Springer International, pp. 3–45Google Scholar
  14. Poulsen TC (2016) Norwegian courts. In: Baudenbacher C (ed) The handbook of EEA law. Springer International, pp 257–277Google Scholar
  15. Raz J (2009) Between authority and interpretation. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Skouris V (2005) The ECJ and the EFTA court under the EEA agreement. In: Baudenbacher C et al (eds) The EFTA court ten years on. Oxford and PortlandGoogle Scholar
  17. Temple Lang J (2012) The duty of national courts to provide access to justice in the EEA. In: EFTA Court (ed) Judicial protection in the European economic area. German Law Publishers, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  18. Ungerank W (2016) Liechtenstein courts. In: Baudenbacher C (ed) The handbook of EEA law. Springer International, pp 293–349Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.District Court of ReykjavikReykjavikIceland
  2. 2.University of Iceland, Faculty of LawReykjavikIceland

Personalised recommendations