Abstract
How humans perceive and judge nature and relate it to their life is shaped by emotional, cognitive, cultural, and social factors. Whether a species is considered native, non-native, or invasive can affect such aesthetics of nature by interacting with our emotions, affronting or confirming our cognitive categories, or engaging in our social, economic, and cultural worlds. Consequently, how humans perceive and judge the presence of such species, or how they judge an ecosystem or landscape change triggered by them, is not fixed or easy to define. Here, some of the psychological, cognitive, and social dimensions that influence how humans judge non-native and invasive species and their effects on ecosystems are reviewed. It is concluded, at least in the case of non-native species, that the reduction of aesthetics to a ‘service’ is problematic, for it occludes the complex psychological and social processes that shape divergent perceptions of changing species distributions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Callicot JB (1983) The land aesthetic. Environ Rev 7(4):345–358
Carlson A, Lintott S (eds) (2008) Nature, aesthetics, and environmentalism: from beauty to duty. Columbia University Press, New York
Carter J, Leonard BP (2002) A review of the literature on the worldwide distribution, spread of, and efforts to eradicate the coypu (Myocastor coypus). Wildl Soc Bull 30:162–175
Copp GH, Bianco P, Bogutskaya N et al (2005) To be, or not to be, a non-native freshwater fish? J Appl Ichthyol 21(4):242–262
Cronon W (1996) Uncommon ground: rethinking the human place in nature. In: Norton W, Cronon W (eds) Uncommon ground: rethinking the human place in nature. New York, pp 69–90
Cullen JM, Delfosse ES (1985) Echium plantagineum: catalyst for conflict and change in Australia. In: Delfosse ES (ed) Proceedings of the VI international symposium on biological control of weeds, 19–25 August 1984. Agricultural Canada, Vancouver, Canada, pp 249–292
Daehler CC (2008) Invasive plant problems in the Hawaiian Islands and beyond: insights from history and psychology. In: Tokarska-Guzik B, Brock JH, Brundu G et al (eds) Plant invasions: human perception, ecological impacts and management. Backhuys, Leiden, pp 3–20
Daniel TC, Muhar A, Arnberger A et al (2012) Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(23):8812–8819
Fischer A, van der Wal R (2007) Invasive plant suppresses charismatic seabird: the construction of attitudes towards biodiversity management options. Biol Conserv 135(2):256–267
Gobster PH, Nassauer JI, Daniel TC et al (2007) The shared landscape: what does aesthetics have to do with ecology? Landsc Ecol 22(7):959–972
Gross M (2010) Ignorance and surprise: science, society, and ecological design. MIT Press, Cambridge
Hall M (2003) The native, naturalized and exotic – plants and animals in human history. Landsc Res 28(1):5–137
Humair F, Kueffer C, Siegrist M (2014a) Are non-native plants perceived to be more risky? Factors influencing horticulturists’ risk perceptions of ornamental plant species. PLoS One 9(7):e102121
Humair F, Siegrist M, Edwards PJ et al (2014b) Understanding misunderstandings in invasion science: why experts don’t agree on common concepts and risk assessments. Neobiota 20:1–30
Kueffer C (2013) Integrating natural and social sciences for understanding and managing plant invasions. In: Larrue S (ed) Biodiversity and society in the Pacific Islands. Presses Universitaires de Provence. Collection “Confluent des Sciences” & ANU ePress, Marseille, France & Canberra, Australia, pp 71–96
Kueffer C, Hirsch Hadorn G (2008) How to achieve effectiveness in problem-oriented landscape research: the example of research on biotic invasions. Living Rev Landsc Res 2:2. http://lrlr.landscapeonline.de/Articles/lrlr-2008-2/
Kueffer C, Larson BM (2014) Responsible use of language in scientific writing and science communication. Bioscience 64:719–724
Kueffer C, Beaver K, Mougal J (2013) Management of novel ecosystems in the Seychelles. In: Hobbs RJ, Higgs ES, Hall CM (eds) Novel ecosystems. Intervening in the new ecological world order. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, pp 228–238
Kull CA, Rangan H (2015) The political ecology of weeds: a scalar approach to landscape transformation. In: Bryant R (ed) The international handbook of political ecology. Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 487–500
Kull CA, Shackleton CM, Cunningham PJ et al (2011) Adoption, use and perception of Australian acacias around the world. Divers Distrib 17:822–836
Kull CA, Tassin J, Carrière SM (2014) Approaching invasive species in Madagascar. Madagascar Conserv Dev 9:60–70
Larson B (2005) The war of the roses: demilitarizing invasion biology. Front Ecol Environ 3(9):495–500
Marris E (2011) Rambunctious garden. Saving nature in a post-wild world. Bloomsbury, New York
McNeely JA (2001) The great reshuffling. Human dimensions of invasive alien species. IUCN, Gland
Ode Å, Hagerhall CM, Sang N (2010) Analysing visual landscape complexity: theory and application. Landsc Res 35(1):111–131
Shine R, Doody JS (2011) Invasive species control: understanding conflicts between researchers and the general community. Front Ecol Environ 9(7):400–406
Simberloff D (2012) Integrity, stability, and beauty: Aldo Leopold’s evolving view of nonnative species. Environ Hist 17(3):487–511
Starfinger U, Kowarik I, Rode M, Schepker H (2003) From desirable ornamental plant to pest to accepted addition to the flora? - The perception of an alien tree species through the centuries. Biol Invasions 5:323–335.
Stromberg JC, Chew MK, Nagler PL et al (2009) Changing perceptions of change: the role of scientists in Tamarix and river management. Restor Ecol 17(2):177–186
van Zanten BT, Verburg PH, Koetse MJ et al (2014) Preferences for European agrarian landscapes: a meta-analysis of case studies. Landsc Urban Plann 132:89–101
Acknowledgments
This work was partly supported by the National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC; NSF DBI-1052875), the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, and sDiv, the Synthesis Centre of iDiv (DFG FZT 118).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kueffer, C., Kull, C.A. (2017). Non-native Species and the Aesthetics of Nature. In: Vilà, M., Hulme, P. (eds) Impact of Biological Invasions on Ecosystem Services. Invading Nature - Springer Series in Invasion Ecology, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45121-3_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45121-3_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45119-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45121-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)