Skip to main content

Slovenia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
International Handbook of Juvenile Justice

Abstract

The Slovenian juvenile justice system has for the most part resisted modern punitive trends in dealing with juvenile offenders. The welfarist tradition remains strong, even though dealing with adult offenders has taken a more punitive route. Slovenia has experienced a steady decline of recorded juvenile crime. Most offences (about 60 %) fall into the category of property crimes, and the proportion of violent crimes have been dropping steadily and now amount to about 6 % of all juvenile crime. The age of criminal responsibility is set at 14 years of age. There are no separate courts for juvenile offenders; they are tried at regular courts by specialized juvenile judges. In practice, generally less than a third of juvenile cases, reported to the police, end up with a court-imposed sanction. The reason for the stark difference is the options that the prosecutors and juvenile judges may dismiss the case because of the expediency principle or to refer it to mediation or other forms of diversion. The court cannot apply the procedure for adult offenders and cannot impose the sanctions for adults, notwithstanding the severity of the committed crime. In about 98 % of all juvenile cases, an educational measure is chosen as the appropriate sanction. When deciding on which of the six educational measures to apply, the only criterion for the court is the juvenile offender’s resocialization and in no way the seriousness of the offence. Imprisonment is extremely rare for juveniles; less than 2 % of offenders are sentenced to juvenile imprisonment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The structure of the Slovenian Criminal Code is comparable to those of other continental legal systems. It is divided into a general part regulating general issues such as jurisdiction, culpability, sentencing, etc., and a special part listing incriminations for specific offenses and sentencing ranges. See (Ambrož and Plesničar 2009).

  2. 2.

    Constitutional Court decision U-I-73/09, 2 July 2009.

  3. 3.

    More on juvenile detention later on.

  4. 4.

    This is true in spite of the peak in pretrial detention for juveniles the Slovenian system in 2006. According to Van Kalmthout et al. (2009) Slovenia shared the third place with Denmark with only 0.7 % of detained juveniles, preceded by Belgium and Portugal with 0.2 %, Finland 0.3 %, and followed by France and Germany with 1 %, United Kingdom 2.7 %, Ireland 3.2 %, Austria 3.4 %.

  5. 5.

    Constitutional Court decision UI 103/95 (24 September 1996).

  6. 6.

    Slovenian prisons face the same overcrowding issues as in most European systems (Plesničar 2012b). In 2013 the average occupancy rate was of 110.6 % with some prisons facing as high a rate as 156.1 %—the latter number is valid for the Ljubljana prison, which incidentally also houses most juvenile pretrial detainees (UIKS 2014).

  7. 7.

    There are two exceptions to applying the adult criminal procedure in cases of juveniles: first, if an offender is tried for offenses committed as juvenile together with offenses committed after coming of age, the procedure for adult offenders is typically used (Criminal Procedure Act, Art. 457). Second, if a juvenile offender commits criminal offenses together with adult offenders, the case is generally tried separately. However, the court may decide for the trials to be held together using the regular procedure, if it deems it absolutely necessary in order to adequately process the case (Criminal Procedure Act, Art. 456).

References

  • Ambrož, M., & Plesničar, M. M. (2009). Slovenia. In A. Weyembergh & V. Santamaria (Eds.), The evaluation of European criminal law: The example of the framework decision on combating trafficking in human beings (pp. 301–313). Brussels: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee for the Prevention of Torture (CPT). (2008). Report to the Slovenian Government on the visit to Slovenia carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT). Strasbourg. Retrieved from http://www.cpt.coe.int/documents/svn/2008-07-inf-eng.pdf

  • Dünkel, F., Grzywa, J., & Pruin, I. (Eds.). (2009). Juvenile justice systems in Europe—Current situation, reform, developments and good practices. Mönchengladbach: Forum Verlag Godesberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enzmann, D., Marshall, I. H., Killias, M., Junger-Tas, J., Steketee, M., & Gruszczynska, B. (2010). Self-reported youth delinquency in Europe and beyond: First results of the Second International Self-Report Delinquency Study in the context of police and victimization data. European Journal of Criminology, 7(2), 159–183. doi:10.1177/1477370809358018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filipčič, K. (2006). Welfare versus neo-liberalism: Juvenile justice in Slovenia. In J. Junger-Tas & S. H. Decker (Eds.), International handbook of juvenile justice (pp. 397–414). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filipčič, K. (2010a). Slovenia. In F. Dünkel, J. Grzywa, P. Horsfield, & I. Pruin (Eds.), Juvenile justice systems in Europe: Current situation and reform developments (pp. 1263–1286). Mönchengladbach: Forum Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filipčič, K. (2010b). Slovenia. In F. Bailleau & Y. Cartuyvels (Eds.), The criminalisation of youth: Juvenile justice in Europe, Turkey and Canada (pp. 211–229). Brussels: VUBPress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filipčič, K. (2015). Slovenia. In F. Dünkel, J. Grzywa-Holten, & P. Horsfield (Eds.), Restorative justice and mediation in penal matters: A stock-tacking of legal issues, implementation strategies and outcomes in 36 European countries (Vol. 2, pp. 847–874). Mönchengladbach: Forum Verlag Godesberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filipčič, K., & Prelić, D. (2011). Deprivation of liberty of juvenile offenders in Slovenia. The Prison Journal, 91(4), 448–466. doi:10.1177/0032885511424393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flander, B., & Meško, G. (2016). Penal and prison policy on the “Sunny Side of the Alps”: The swan song of Slovenian exceptionalism? European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 1–27. doi:10.1007/s10610-015-9299-1

  • Leskošek, V. (2015). Revščina otrok—izziv za zaščito ekonomskih pravic otrok. In K. Filipčič & A. Šelih (Eds.), Otrokove pravice v Sloveniji: Sedanje stanje in izzivi za prihodnost. Ljubljana: Slovenska akademija znanosti in umetnosti.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meško, G., & Bertok, E. (2013). Mladoletniška kriminaliteta in mladoletniško nasilje: Ugotovitve evropske študije o prestopništvu in preventivnih dejavnostih: Priporočila za prakso. Ljubljana: Fakulteta za varnostne vede.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrodet, A. (2002). The public prosecutor. In M. Delmas-Marty & J. R. Spencer (Eds.), European criminal procedures (pp. 415–458). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrovec, D., & Muršič, M. (2011). Science fiction: Opening prison institutions (The Slovenian penological heritage). The Prison Journal, 91(4), 425–447. doi:10.1177/0032885511424394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrovec, D., & Plesničar, M. M. (2009). Perception of female criminality through sentencing. In G. Meško & Kury (Eds.), Crime policy, crime control and crime prevention—Slovenian perspectives. Ljubljana: Tipografija.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrovec, D., & Plesničar, M. M. (2014). The societal impact and role of imprisonment: An example from Slovenia. In E. Carroll & K. Warner (Eds.), Re-imagining imprisonment in Europe: Effects, failures and the future (pp. 71–89). Dublin: Liffey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plesničar, M. M. (2012a). Slovenska ureditev pogojnega odpusta v luči sodobnih razvojnih trendov. Revija Za Kriminalistiko in Kriminologijo, 63(2), 136–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plesničar, M. M. (2012b). How to deal with overcrowding? Presented at the Re-imagining Imprisonment in Europe (Scribani conference), Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plesničar, M. M. (2013). The individualization of punishment: Sentencing in Slovenia. European Journal of Criminology, 10(4), 462–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plesničar, M. M., Tepina, P., & Vrtačnik, U. (2006). The Slovenian judiciary: A guide through Slovenian courts. Slovenian Law Review, 3(1/2), 209–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strban, G. (2015). Socialne pravice v dobrobit otroka: Povečanje ali zmanjšanje njihovega obsega v času recesije? In K. Filipčič & A. Šelih (Eds.), Otrokove pravice v Sloveniji: Sedanje stanje in izzivi za prihodnost. Ljubljana: Slovenska akademija znanosti in umetnosti.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stropnik, N. (2013). Investing in children: Breaking the cycle of disadvantage—A study of national policies: Slovenia. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=1025&langId=en&newsId=2061&moreDocuments=yes&tableName=news

  • Šugman Stubbs, K. (2008). Criminal procedure in Slovenia. In R. Vogler & B. Huber (Eds.), Criminal procedure in Europe (pp. 483–539). Berlin: Duncker & Humbolt.

    Google Scholar 

  • UIKS (Prison Administration). (2014). Letno poročilo 2013. Ljubljana. Retrieved from http://www.mp.gov.si/fileadmin/mp.gov.si/pageuploads/UIKS/Letna_porocila/140505_Letno_porocilo_2013.pdf

  • UN Committee on the Rights of the Child. (2013). Concluding observations on the combined third and fourth periodic reports of Slovenia adopted by the Committee at its sixty-third session (27 May–14 June 2013). New York. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=CRC/C/SVN/CO/3-4&Lang=E

  • Van Kalmthout, A. M., Knapen, M. M., & Morgenstern, C. (Eds.). (2009). Pre-trial detention in the European Union: An analysis of minimum standards in pre-trial detention and the grounds for regular review in the member states of the EU. Nijmegen: Wolf Legal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varuh človekovih pravic RS (Human Rights Ombudsman). (2000). Letno poročilo varuha človekovih pravic. Ljubljana. Retrieved from http://www.varuh-rs.si/fileadmin/user_upload/pdf/lp/vcp_lp_1999_slo.pdf

  • Varuh človekovih pravic RS (Human Rights Ombudsman). (2008). Letno poročilo varuha človekovih pravic. Ljubljana. Retrieved from http://www.varuh-rs.si/fileadmin/user_upload/pdf/lp/VCP-LP07-splet.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katja Filipčič .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Filipčič, K., Plesničar, M.M. (2017). Slovenia. In: Decker, S., Marteache, N. (eds) International Handbook of Juvenile Justice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45090-2_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45090-2_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45088-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45090-2

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics