• Michele BurmanEmail author
  • Susan McVie


The aim of every juvenile justice system should surely be to get it right for every child. It is poignant then that, after a very turbulent period of juvenile justice policy development in Scotland, which threatened to get it wrong for many children, the Scottish system is now predicated on a set of principles enshrined in law that are explicitly known as Getting it Right for Every Child (GIRFEC). This chapter provides a brief history of juvenile justice in Scotland before going on to examine the age of criminal responsibility (which currently stands at 8 years) and how this fits with the country’s stance towards the United Nations Convention for the Rights of the Child (UNCRC). It then provides an overview of trends in juvenile crime in Scotland, focusing mainly on the last decade, from a range of sources of information. It examines the role played by various agencies in relation to juveniles, including the police, the courts and the prison system, as well as discussing various alternative sanctions. Finally, it discusses some of the main gender differences in juvenile crime and justice system involvement in the Scottish context.


Scotland Juvenile justice Welfarist approach 


  1. Anderson, S., Kinsey, R., Loader, I., & Smith, C. (1994). Cautionary tales: Young people, crime and policing in Edinburgh. Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
  2. Bannister, J., Pickering, J., Batchelor, S., Burman, M., Kintrea, K., & McVie, S. (2010). Troublesome youth groups, gangs and knife carrying in Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Government Social Research.Google Scholar
  3. Batchelor, S., & Burman, M. (2009). The children’s hearing system. In J. Johnstone & M. Burman (Eds.), Youth justice. Edinburgh: Dunedin Press.Google Scholar
  4. Burman, M., & Batchelor, S. (2009). Between two stools? Responding to young women who offend. Youth Justice, 9(3), 270–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burman, M., Bradshaw, P., Hutton, N., McNeill, F., & Munro, M. (2006). The end of an Era?—Youth justice in Scotland. In J. Junger-Tas & S. Decker (Eds.), International handbook of juvenile justice (pp. 439–471). Verlag: Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Cavanagh, B. (2009). A review of fixed penalty notices for antisocial behaviour. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.Google Scholar
  7. Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service. (2015). Decision making in cases of children jointly reported to the Procurator Fiscal and Children’s Reporter. Edinburgh: Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service.Google Scholar
  8. Fraser, A. (2015). Urban legends: Gang identity in the post-industrial city. Clarendon series in criminology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fraser, A., Burman, M., Batchelor, S., & McVie, S. (2010). Youth violence in Scotland: A literature review. Edinburgh: Scottish Government. Retrieved from
  10. Gelsthorpe, L., & Morris, A. (1994). Juvenile justice 1954–1992. In R. Maguire, R. Morgan, & R. Reiner (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of criminology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Jamieson, J., McIvor, G., & Murray, C. (1999). Understanding offending among young people. Edinburgh: The Scottish Executive Central Research Unit.Google Scholar
  12. Johnstone, J., & Burman, M. (2009). Youth justice in Scotland Edinburgh. Edinburgh: Dunedin Academic Press.Google Scholar
  13. Johnstone, J., & Burman, M. (2015). Scotland. In F. Dunkel, J. Gryzwa-Holten, & P. Horsfeld (Eds.), Restorative justice and mediation in penal matters. Monchengladbach: Forum Verlag Godesberg.Google Scholar
  14. Kilbrandon Committee. (1964). Report on children and young persons, Scotland. Edinburgh: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  15. Lennon, G., & Murray, K. (2016). Under-regulated and unaccountable? Explaining variation in stop and search rates in Scotland. England: Policing and Society. [published online 29 March 2016].
  16. Marshall, R. (2016). The report of the Advisory Group on the minimum age of criminal responsibility. Edinburgh: Scottish Government. Retrieved from
  17. Matthews, B. (2014). Where have all the young offenders gone? Edinburgh: AQMeN. Retrieved from
  18. Matthews, B. (2016). Comparing trends in convictions and non-court disposals in Scotland. Scottish Justice Matters, 4(1), 36–37.Google Scholar
  19. McAra, L. (2006). Welfare in crisis? Youth justice in Scotland. In J. Muncie & B. Goldson (Eds.), Comparative youth justice (pp. 127–145). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McAra, L., & McVie, S. (2005). The usual suspects? Street-life, young people and the police. Criminal Justice, 5(1), 5–35.Google Scholar
  21. McAra, L., & McVie, S. (2007). Youth justice? The impact of system contact on patterns of desistance from offending. European Journal of Criminology, 4(3), 315–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McAra, L., & McVie, S. (2010). Youth crime and justice in Scotland. In H. Croall, G. Mooney, & M. Munro (Eds.), Criminal justice in Scotland. Oxon: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. McAra, L., & McVie, S. (2012). Negotiated order: Towards a theory of pathways into and out of offending. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 12(4), 347–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McAra, L., & McVie, S. (2014). The Scottish juvenile justice system: Policy and practice. In J. A. Winterdyk (Ed.), Juvenile justice: International perspectives, models and trends (pp. 263–294). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  25. McAra, L., & McVie, S. (2015). The reproduction of poverty: Impacts of system contact on the life chances of young people. Scottish Justice Matters 3(3).Google Scholar
  26. McDiarmid, C. (2013). An age of complexity: Children and criminal responsibility in law. Youth Justice, 13, 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McIvor, G., Barnsdale, L., Brown, A., Eley, S., Macrae, R., Malloch, M., et al. (2006). Evaluation of the Airdrie sheriff youth court pilot. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Social Research.Google Scholar
  28. McVie, S. (2010). Gang membership and knife carrying: Findings from the Edinburgh study of youth transitions and crime. Edinburgh: Scottish Government Social Research.Google Scholar
  29. McVie, S. (in press). Social order: crime and justice in Scotland. In: D. McCrone (Ed.), The New Sociology of Scotland. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  30. McVie, S., Norris, P., & Pillinger, R. (2015). Is poverty reflected in changing patterns of victimisation in Scotland? Scottish Justice Matters 3(3).Google Scholar
  31. Morris, A., & McIsaac, M. (1978). Juvenile justice? The practice of social welfare. In: Cambridge studies in criminology. Cambridge: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  32. Mulholland, F. (2014). Lord advocate’s guidelines to the chief constable on the reporting to procurators fiscal of offences alleged to have been committed by children: Revised categories of offence which require to be jointly reported. Scotland: COPFS.Google Scholar
  33. Muncie, J. (1999). Youth and crime: A critical introduction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  34. Murray, K. (2014). Stop and search in Scotland: An evaluation of police practice (SCCJR Research Report/14). Glasgow: Scottish Centre for Crime and Justice.Google Scholar
  35. Murray, K., McGuinness, P., Burman, M., & McVie, S. (2015). Evaluation of the whole system approach to young people who offend in Scotland. Glasgow: SCCJR. Retrieved from
  36. National Records of Scotland. (2015). Mid-2014 population estimates Scotland: Population estimates by sex, age and administrative area. Edinburgh: National Records of Scotland. Retrieved from
  37. NHS. (2014). Scottish Schools Adolescent Lifestyle and Substance Use Survey (SALSUS).Google Scholar
  38. Piacentini, L., & Walters, R. (2006). The politicization of youth justice in Scotland and the rise of the “Burberry Court”. Youth Justice, 6(1), 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rigby, P., Jardine, C., & Whyte, B. (2011). Girls and young women in the youth justice system—vulnerable or risky? (Towards Effective Practice Paper 12). Criminal Justice Social Work Development Centre for Scotland.Google Scholar
  40. Scott, J. (2015). Report of the Independent Advisory Group on Stop and Search. Edinburgh: The Scottish Government.Google Scholar
  41. Scott, G., & Mooney, G. (2015). Scotland’s political and policy landscape: Devolution, social and criminal justice. In H. Croall, G. Mooney, & M. Munro (Eds.), Crime, justice and society in Scotland. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Scottish Executive. (2005a). Getting it right for every child: Proposals for action. Edinburgh: The Scottish Government. Retrieved from
  43. Scottish Executive. (2005b). Scotland’s first youth court opens. Press release. Retrieved from
  44. Scottish Government. (2008). Preventing offending by young people: A framework for action. Edinburgh: The Scottish Government. Retrieved from
  45. Scottish Government. (2009). Review of the Hamilton & Airdrie Youth Courts report. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.Google Scholar
  46. Scottish Government. (2013). Scottish policing performance framework (Annual Rep. 2012–13). Edinburgh: The Scottish Government. Retrieved from
  47. Scottish Government. (2015a). Preventing offending: Getting it right for children and young people. Edinburgh: The Scottish Government. Retrieved from
  48. Scottish Government. (2015b). Recorded crime in Scotland, 2014/15. Edinburgh: The Scottish Government. Retrieved from
  49. Scottish Government. (2015c). Prison statistics and population projections Scotland: 2013–14. Edinburgh: The Scottish Government. Retrieved from
  50. Scottish Government. (2016). Criminal proceedings in Scotland, 2014–15. Edinburgh: The Scottish Government. Retrieved from
  51. Scottish Prison Service. (2013). Unlocking potential: Report of the Scottish Prison Service Organisational Review. Edinburgh: SPS.Google Scholar
  52. Scottish Prison Service. (2014). Vision for young people in custody. Edinburgh: SPS.Google Scholar
  53. UNCRC. (2007). Committee on the rights of the child. Forty-fourth session. General comment No. 10: Children’s right in juvenile justice. Retrieved from
  54. UNCRC. (2008). Committee on the rights of the child. Forty-ninth session. Consideration of reports submitted by states parties under article 44 of the convention. Concluding observations: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Retrieved from

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of GlasgowGlasgowUK
  2. 2.University of EdinburghEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations