Abstract
The juvenile justice system in Ireland has developed slowly against the backdrop of the Children Act 2001 which is the first major legislative reform of juvenile justice since the 1908 Children Act. The ethos of the legislation promotes the diversion of children from the justice system, penalties that have the least restrictive impact on children’s legitimate activities and the use of detention as a measure of last resort. The system follows international juvenile justice trends in combining a dominant philosophy (welfare) with a hybrid mix of other influences including restorative justice, actuarial justice, rehabilitation, reintegration and rights-based approaches. A notable feature of the Irish system, and reflecting its welfare ethos, is the high levels of discretion afforded to criminal justice managers and practitioners in their decision-making in children’s cases. The modest size of the detention population is a positive outcome of juvenile justice reform to date. The National Children Detention Centre which is due to be fully operational in the latter part of 2016 marks a significant milestone in the development of the juvenile justice system in Ireland by ending the practice of detaining children in adult facilities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The DCYA has responsibility for the childcare elements of the Children Act 2001 and for the new National Children Detention Centre. The DJE has responsibility for crime prevention, criminal proceedings and diversionary interventions as well as engagement with key criminal justice agencies such as the police (An Garda SĂochána), the Probation Service and the Prison Service.
- 2.
The 2001 Act refers to persons under 18 years as children and for this reason the terminology of child or children is adopted in this chapter.
- 3.
The only available information refers to general criteria used in decision-making such as the seriousness and persistence of children’s offending and/or previous involvement in the GJDP. Outcomes are divided into categories of: informal caution, formal caution, no further action, case pending and unsuitable for admission but no further information on the nuances underpinning these outcomes are provided.
- 4.
DPP v G Judgment of Ms. Justice Iseult O’Malley delivered the 24th January 2014; D v DPP Judgement of the Supreme Court delivered by Ms Justice Dunne on the 30th July, 2014; D v DPP Judgement of the Supreme Court delivered by Ms Justice Dunne on the 30th July, 2014; Sharon Cullen v DPP Judgement of the Supreme Court delivered by Chief Justice Denham on the 16th October, 2014 (Mullan 2014).
- 5.
The detention school estate based in Lusk Co. Dublin consisted of three institutions (Oberstown Boys School, Oberstown Girls School and Trinity House) until 01 June 2016 when the legislation came into effect to amalgamate them into the National Children Detention Centre.
- 6.
The Criminal Justice (Community Sanctions) Bill 2014 , when enacted, will replace the Probation Act 1907 and create a modern statutory framework for community sanctions in Ireland.
- 7.
Probation orders accounted for a further one-third and the remainder consisted of supervision orders under the 2001 Act (13 %), community service orders (3 %), and full and partially suspended sentences with supervision (2 %) (ibid.).
- 8.
The risk assessment instrument used by the Probation Service in Ireland is the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (YLS/CMI).
References
An Garda SĂochána. (2013). Annual reports of the committee appointed to Monitor the Effectiveness of the Diversion Programme (Reports from 2003 to 2013). Dublin: Garda Youth Diversion Office.
Barry, M. (2006). Youth offending in transition: The search for social recognition. Abingdon: Routledge.
Carroll, J., & Meehan, J. (2007). The children court: A national study. Dublin: Association for Criminal Justice Research and Development (ACJRD).
Central Statistics Office. (2010). Crime and victimisation quarterly national household survey 2010. Retrieved May 30, 2016, from www.cso.ie
Central Statistics Office (CSO). (2015). Survey on income and living conditions (SILC) 2014 results (CSO Statistical Release, 26 November 2015). Retrieved July 10, 2016, from http://www.cso.ie
Committee on the Rights of the Child. (2016). Concluding observations on the combined third and fourth periodic reports of Ireland (CRC/C/IRL/CO/3-4). Retrieved May 30, 2016, from http://www.ohchr.org/
Convery, U., & Seymour, M. (2016). Children, crime and justice. In D. Healy, C. Hamilton, Y. Daly, & M. Butler (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of Irish Criminology. Abingdon: Routledge.
Courts Service. (2009–2013). Annual Reports of the Courts Service 2009–2013. Dublin: The Courts Service. (Original work published 2009)
Dáil Eireann. (2006). Dáil Eireann Debate Vol. 624 No. 3 Responses to Q.141 and Q.194, 3 October 2006. Dublin: Dáil Eireann.
Eadie, T., & Canton, R. (2002). Practising in a context of ambivalence: The challenge for youth justice workers. Youth Justice, 2(1), 14–26.
Freeman, S. (2008). Surviving on remand: A study of how young people cope in remand custody in Ireland. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Dublin Institute of Technology. Retrieved May 30, 2016, from http://arrow.dit.ie/appadoc/15/
Hamilton, C., Fitzgibbon, W., & Carr, N. (2016). Punishment, youth justice and cultural contingency: Towards a balanced approach. Youth Justice. doi:10.1177/1473225415619500.
Hayes, J., & O’Reilly, G. (2007). Emotional intelligence mental health and juvenile delinquency. Cork: Juvenile Health Matters.
Horgan, J. (2013). Drug and alcohol misuse among young offenders on probation supervision in Ireland: Findings from the drugs and alcohol survey 2012 (Probation Service Research Report 3). Dublin: Probation Service.
Hourigan, N. (2012). Juvenile justice, crime and early intervention: Key challenges from the limerick context. Irish Probation Journal, 9, 64–74.
Inspector of Prisons. (2012). Report on an Inspection of St. Patrick’s Institution 2012. Nenagh: Office of the Inspector of Prisons.
Irish Youth Justice Service (IYJS). (2012a). Garda youth diversion project annual plan for 2013. Retrieved May 30, 2016, from http://www.iyjs.ie/en/IYJS/Pages/WP09000002
Irish Youth Justice Service (IYJS). (2012b). Garda youth diversion project annual plan explanatory notes for 2013. Retrieved May 30, 2016, from http://www.iyjs.ie/en/IYJS/Pages/WP09000002
Kilkelly, U. (2005). The children court: A children’s rights audit. Cork: Faculty of Law, University College Cork.
Kilkelly, U. (2008). Youth courts and children’s rights: The Irish experience. Youth Justice, 8(1), 39–56.
Kilkelly, U. (2011). Policing, young people, diversion and accountability. Crime, Law and Social Change, 55(2–3), 133–151.
Kilkelly, U. (2014). Diverging or emerging from law? The practice of youth justice in Ireland. Youth Justice, 14(3), 212–225.
McElvaney, R., Tatlow-Golden, M., Webb, R., Lawlor, E., & Merriman, B. (2013). Someone to care: The mental health needs of children and young people with experience of the care and youth justice systems. Dublin: Children’s Mental Health Coalition.
Mullan, P. (2014). Current juvenile justice policy—Impact on DPP. In Youth Justice Transformation Annual Conference Report of the Association for Criminal Justice Research and Development (ACJRD), 17th October 2014. Retrieved May 30, 2016, from www.acjrd.ie
O’Brien, J. (2014). The Garda youth crime case management programme—A Garda perspective on the role and the relationship dynamics involved when managing cases of high-risk young offenders appearing before the children court. Masters dissertation, Dublin Institute of Technology. Retrieved May 30, 2016, from http://arrow.dit.ie/aaschssldis/94/
O’Leary, P., & Halton, C. (2009). Young persons’ probation in the republic of Ireland: An evaluation of risk assessment. Irish Probation Journal, 6, 97–112.
Probation Service. (2014). Annual Reports of the Probation Service (Reports 2011 to 2014). Dublin: The Probation Service.
Seymour, M. (2006). Transition and reform: Juvenile justice in the republic of Ireland. In J. Junger-Tas & S. Decker (Eds.), International handbook of juvenile justice. Dordrecht: Springer.
Seymour, M. (2012). The youth justice system. In C. Hamilton (Ed.), Social work and social care law. Dublin: Gill and MacMillan.
Seymour, M. (2013). Youth justice in context: Community, compliance and young people. Abingdon: Routledge.
Seymour, M., & Butler, M. (2008). Young people on remand. The National Children’s Strategy Research Series. Dublin: The Stationery Office.
Seymour, M., & Mayock, P. (2009). Ireland. In P. Hadfield (Ed.), Nightlife and crime: Social order and governance in international perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
Swirak, K. (2015). Problematising advanced liberal youth crime prevention: The impacts of management reforms on Irish Garda youth diversion projects. Youth Justice. doi:10.1177/1473225415617859.
Walsh, D. (2008). Balancing due process values with welfare objectives in juvenile justice procedure: Some strengths and weaknesses in the Irish approach. Youth Studies Ireland, 3(2), 3–17.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Seymour, M. (2017). Ireland. In: Decker, S., Marteache, N. (eds) International Handbook of Juvenile Justice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45090-2_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45090-2_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45088-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45090-2
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)