Skip to main content

Ireland

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
International Handbook of Juvenile Justice
  • 1299 Accesses

Abstract

The juvenile justice system in Ireland has developed slowly against the backdrop of the Children Act 2001 which is the first major legislative reform of juvenile justice since the 1908 Children Act. The ethos of the legislation promotes the diversion of children from the justice system, penalties that have the least restrictive impact on children’s legitimate activities and the use of detention as a measure of last resort. The system follows international juvenile justice trends in combining a dominant philosophy (welfare) with a hybrid mix of other influences including restorative justice, actuarial justice, rehabilitation, reintegration and rights-based approaches. A notable feature of the Irish system, and reflecting its welfare ethos, is the high levels of discretion afforded to criminal justice managers and practitioners in their decision-making in children’s cases. The modest size of the detention population is a positive outcome of juvenile justice reform to date. The National Children Detention Centre which is due to be fully operational in the latter part of 2016 marks a significant milestone in the development of the juvenile justice system in Ireland by ending the practice of detaining children in adult facilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The DCYA has responsibility for the childcare elements of the Children Act 2001 and for the new National Children Detention Centre. The DJE has responsibility for crime prevention, criminal proceedings and diversionary interventions as well as engagement with key criminal justice agencies such as the police (An Garda Síochána), the Probation Service and the Prison Service.

  2. 2.

    The 2001 Act refers to persons under 18 years as children and for this reason the terminology of child or children is adopted in this chapter.

  3. 3.

    The only available information refers to general criteria used in decision-making such as the seriousness and persistence of children’s offending and/or previous involvement in the GJDP. Outcomes are divided into categories of: informal caution, formal caution, no further action, case pending and unsuitable for admission but no further information on the nuances underpinning these outcomes are provided.

  4. 4.

    DPP v G Judgment of Ms. Justice Iseult O’Malley delivered the 24th January 2014; D v DPP Judgement of the Supreme Court delivered by Ms Justice Dunne on the 30th July, 2014; D v DPP Judgement of the Supreme Court delivered by Ms Justice Dunne on the 30th July, 2014; Sharon Cullen v DPP Judgement of the Supreme Court delivered by Chief Justice Denham on the 16th October, 2014 (Mullan 2014).

  5. 5.

    The detention school estate based in Lusk Co. Dublin consisted of three institutions (Oberstown Boys School, Oberstown Girls School and Trinity House) until 01 June 2016 when the legislation came into effect to amalgamate them into the National Children Detention Centre.

  6. 6.

    The Criminal Justice (Community Sanctions) Bill 2014 , when enacted, will replace the Probation Act 1907 and create a modern statutory framework for community sanctions in Ireland.

  7. 7.

    Probation orders accounted for a further one-third and the remainder consisted of supervision orders under the 2001 Act (13 %), community service orders (3 %), and full and partially suspended sentences with supervision (2 %) (ibid.).

  8. 8.

    The risk assessment instrument used by the Probation Service in Ireland is the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (YLS/CMI).

References

  • An Garda SĂ­ochána. (2013). Annual reports of the committee appointed to Monitor the Effectiveness of the Diversion Programme (Reports from 2003 to 2013). Dublin: Garda Youth Diversion Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, M. (2006). Youth offending in transition: The search for social recognition. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J., & Meehan, J. (2007). The children court: A national study. Dublin: Association for Criminal Justice Research and Development (ACJRD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Statistics Office. (2010). Crime and victimisation quarterly national household survey 2010. Retrieved May 30, 2016, from www.cso.ie

  • Central Statistics Office (CSO). (2015). Survey on income and living conditions (SILC) 2014 results (CSO Statistical Release, 26 November 2015). Retrieved July 10, 2016, from http://www.cso.ie

  • Committee on the Rights of the Child. (2016). Concluding observations on the combined third and fourth periodic reports of Ireland (CRC/C/IRL/CO/3-4). Retrieved May 30, 2016, from http://www.ohchr.org/

  • Convery, U., & Seymour, M. (2016). Children, crime and justice. In D. Healy, C. Hamilton, Y. Daly, & M. Butler (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of Irish Criminology. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courts Service. (2009–2013). Annual Reports of the Courts Service 2009–2013. Dublin: The Courts Service. (Original work published 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dáil Eireann. (2006). Dáil Eireann Debate Vol. 624 No. 3 Responses to Q.141 and Q.194, 3 October 2006. Dublin: Dáil Eireann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eadie, T., & Canton, R. (2002). Practising in a context of ambivalence: The challenge for youth justice workers. Youth Justice, 2(1), 14–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, S. (2008). Surviving on remand: A study of how young people cope in remand custody in Ireland. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Dublin Institute of Technology. Retrieved May 30, 2016, from http://arrow.dit.ie/appadoc/15/

  • Hamilton, C., Fitzgibbon, W., & Carr, N. (2016). Punishment, youth justice and cultural contingency: Towards a balanced approach. Youth Justice. doi:10.1177/1473225415619500.

  • Hayes, J., & O’Reilly, G. (2007). Emotional intelligence mental health and juvenile delinquency. Cork: Juvenile Health Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, J. (2013). Drug and alcohol misuse among young offenders on probation supervision in Ireland: Findings from the drugs and alcohol survey 2012 (Probation Service Research Report 3). Dublin: Probation Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hourigan, N. (2012). Juvenile justice, crime and early intervention: Key challenges from the limerick context. Irish Probation Journal, 9, 64–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inspector of Prisons. (2012). Report on an Inspection of St. Patrick’s Institution 2012. Nenagh: Office of the Inspector of Prisons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irish Youth Justice Service (IYJS). (2012a). Garda youth diversion project annual plan for 2013. Retrieved May 30, 2016, from http://www.iyjs.ie/en/IYJS/Pages/WP09000002

  • Irish Youth Justice Service (IYJS). (2012b). Garda youth diversion project annual plan explanatory notes for 2013. Retrieved May 30, 2016, from http://www.iyjs.ie/en/IYJS/Pages/WP09000002

  • Kilkelly, U. (2005). The children court: A children’s rights audit. Cork: Faculty of Law, University College Cork.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilkelly, U. (2008). Youth courts and children’s rights: The Irish experience. Youth Justice, 8(1), 39–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilkelly, U. (2011). Policing, young people, diversion and accountability. Crime, Law and Social Change, 55(2–3), 133–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilkelly, U. (2014). Diverging or emerging from law? The practice of youth justice in Ireland. Youth Justice, 14(3), 212–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McElvaney, R., Tatlow-Golden, M., Webb, R., Lawlor, E., & Merriman, B. (2013). Someone to care: The mental health needs of children and young people with experience of the care and youth justice systems. Dublin: Children’s Mental Health Coalition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullan, P. (2014). Current juvenile justice policy—Impact on DPP. In Youth Justice Transformation Annual Conference Report of the Association for Criminal Justice Research and Development (ACJRD), 17th October 2014. Retrieved May 30, 2016, from www.acjrd.ie

  • O’Brien, J. (2014). The Garda youth crime case management programme—A Garda perspective on the role and the relationship dynamics involved when managing cases of high-risk young offenders appearing before the children court. Masters dissertation, Dublin Institute of Technology. Retrieved May 30, 2016, from http://arrow.dit.ie/aaschssldis/94/

  • O’Leary, P., & Halton, C. (2009). Young persons’ probation in the republic of Ireland: An evaluation of risk assessment. Irish Probation Journal, 6, 97–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Probation Service. (2014). Annual Reports of the Probation Service (Reports 2011 to 2014). Dublin: The Probation Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, M. (2006). Transition and reform: Juvenile justice in the republic of Ireland. In J. Junger-Tas & S. Decker (Eds.), International handbook of juvenile justice. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, M. (2012). The youth justice system. In C. Hamilton (Ed.), Social work and social care law. Dublin: Gill and MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, M. (2013). Youth justice in context: Community, compliance and young people. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, M., & Butler, M. (2008). Young people on remand. The National Children’s Strategy Research Series. Dublin: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, M., & Mayock, P. (2009). Ireland. In P. Hadfield (Ed.), Nightlife and crime: Social order and governance in international perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swirak, K. (2015). Problematising advanced liberal youth crime prevention: The impacts of management reforms on Irish Garda youth diversion projects. Youth Justice. doi:10.1177/1473225415617859.

  • Walsh, D. (2008). Balancing due process values with welfare objectives in juvenile justice procedure: Some strengths and weaknesses in the Irish approach. Youth Studies Ireland, 3(2), 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mairead Seymour .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Seymour, M. (2017). Ireland. In: Decker, S., Marteache, N. (eds) International Handbook of Juvenile Justice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45090-2_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45090-2_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45088-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45090-2

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics