Advertisement

Conclusions

  • Eve Kalyva
Chapter

Abstract

Chapter 6 summarises the contribution of conceptual art to artistic practice and art theory, and reiterates art’s critical potential. Conceptual art demonstrated a mode of interrogating the systems of apprehension, classification and evaluation by working around the frame of reference, and opened up the space of art as a social space. Amidst competing interests and historiographical tropes, it demonstrated the dialectical relationship between the work and the world, between art and criticism, and between the object in question and the writing of history. Conceptual art also problematised the object of art in relation to theory and drew to the surface the implications of writing about art and “doing” art history. Chapter 6 moreover reflects on the book’s methodology and reviews the current state of affairs in terms of art and criticism.

References

  1. Adorno, Theodor. 1975 [1967]. Culture industry reconsidered. New German Critique 6: 12–19.Google Scholar
  2. Berland, Jody, Will Straw, and Tomas David. 1996. Introduction: The art of theory/theory and art conference. In Theory rules: Art as theory/theory and art, ed. Jody Berland, Will Straw, and David Tomas, 3–19. Toronto: Yyz Books and University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  3. Burgin, Victor. 1984. The absence of presence: Conceptualism and post-modernisms. In 1965–1972: When attitudes became form, exhibition catalogue, touring, 17–24. Cambridge: Kettle’s Yard Gallery.Google Scholar
  4. Butt, Gavin, ed. 2005. After criticism: New responses to art and performance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  5. Foucault, Michel. 1997. The political function of the intellectual. Radical Philosophy 17: 11–14.Google Scholar
  6. Lenin, V.I. 1973 [1908]. Leo Tolstoy as the mirror of the Russian revolution. In Lenin collected works, vol. 15, 202–209. Trans. R. Cymbala. Moscow: Progress.Google Scholar
  7. Marx, Karl. 1938 [1845– 46]. Theses on Feuerbach. In The German ideology, 197–207. Trans. W. Lough and C.P. Magill. London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar
  8. Newman, Michael. 2008. The specificity of criticism and its need for philosophy. In The state of art criticism, ed. James Elkins and Michael Newman, 29–60. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Readings, Bill. 1996. The university in ruins. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Reiber, Bettina. 2007. What does art theory do? In Reflections on creativity: Exploring the role of theory in creative practices, conference proceedings 21–22 April, Visual Research Centre, Dundee, ed. Hamid van Koten and Sandra McNeil, 1–10. Dundee: Duncan of Jordanstone.Google Scholar
  11. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical investigations. Trans. G. E. M Anscombe. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eve Kalyva
    • 1
  1. 1.LeedsUK

Personalised recommendations