Advertisement

Rhetorical Operations and the Discursive Creation of Meaning

  • Eve Kalyva
Chapter

Abstract

Chapter 5 scrutinises the discursive creation of meaning and argues that conceptual art not only engaged art’s aesthetic but also its rhetoric. It examines discourse in terms of the institution of art, the writing of history and the normalisation of knowledge; and closely reads Greenbergian formalism vis-à-vis Art & Language’s Lecher System (1970). Borrowing from de Man’s discussion of rhetoric and irony, it specifies the loan rhetoric of conceptual art as a strategy of manipulating different voices in order to challenge the designated context for art. Chapter 5 also reviews different uses of the page, the art press and the exhibition site, and charts how a market for word-related objects emerged by the end of the 1970s. This effectively institutionalised conceptual art and re-materialised its object.

References

  1. Art & Language. 1991. Hostages XXV–LXXVI, exhibition catalogue, March 15–April 12. London: Lisson Gallery.Google Scholar
  2. Art & Language. 1997. Moti memoria. In The impossible document: Photography and conceptual art in Britain 1966–1976, ed. John Roberts, 54–69. London: Camerawork.Google Scholar
  3. Art & Language. 2005. Making meaningless. In Now they are surrounded. London: London Metropolitan University. CD.Google Scholar
  4. Artists’ bookworks. 1975. Exhibition catalogue, touring. London: The British Council.Google Scholar
  5. Atkinson, Terry. 1996. Histories biographies collaborations 1958 to 1996: An eight piece retrospective. Norwich: Norwich Gallery.Google Scholar
  6. Bishop, Claire. 2004. Antagonism and relational aesthetics. October 110: 51–79.Google Scholar
  7. Bourriaud, Nicolas. 2002. Relational aesthetics. Trans. Simon Pleasance and Fronza Woods. Dijon: Les Presse du Reel.Google Scholar
  8. Bruner, Louise. 1972. Review of art in the mind. The Blade, May 7, 1–2.Google Scholar
  9. Buren, Daniel. 1968. Is teaching art necessary? Extracts reproduced in Lucy Lippard, Six years: The dematerialisation of the art object from 1966 to 1972 [. . .], 51. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bürger, Peter. 1984. Theory of the avant garde. Trans. Michael Shaw. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  11. Caro, Anthony. 2005. [Comment.] Anthony Caro. London: Illuminations. DVD.Google Scholar
  12. Compton, Michael. 1974. Art as thought process: Works bought for the Arts Council by Michael Compton, exhibition catalogue, touring, 3–5. London: Arts Council.Google Scholar
  13. de Man, Paul. 1973. Semiology and rhetoric. Diacritics 3(3): 27–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. de Man, Paul. 1979. Allegories of reading: Figurative language in Rousseau, Nietzsche, Rilke, and Proust. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  15. de Man, Paul. 1996a. The concept of irony. In Aesthetic ideology, 163–184. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  16. de Man, Paul. 1996b. Phenomenology and materiality in Kant. In Aesthetic ideology, 70–90. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  17. Documentation in conceptual art. 1970. Arts Magazine 44(6): 42–45.Google Scholar
  18. Drucker, Johanna. 1995. The century of artists’ books. New York: Granary.Google Scholar
  19. Eco, Umberto. 1974 [1968]. La estructura ausente. Trans. Francisco Serra Cantarell. Barcelona: Lumen.Google Scholar
  20. Foucault, Michel. 1972 [1969]. The archaeology of knowledge. Trans. A.M. Sheridan Smith. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  21. Foucault, Michel. 1977 [1969]. What is an author? In Language, counter-memory, practice, ed. Donald F. Bouchard. Trans. D. F. Bouchard and Sherry Simon, 113–138. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Fuller, Peter. 1976. Clearing a space for criticism. Studio International 192(983): 119–125.Google Scholar
  23. Gombrich, Ernst. 1985. Image and word in twentieth-century art. Word & Image 1(2): 213–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Graham, Dan. 1985. My works for magazine pages: “A history of conceptual art”. In Dan Graham, exhibition catalogue, September 14–November 4, 8–13. Perth: The Art Gallery of Western Australia.Google Scholar
  25. Graham, Dan. 2001 [1969]. Other observations. Reprinted in Dan Graham: Works 1965–2000, exhibition catalogue, touring, 97. Düsseldorf: RichterVerlag.Google Scholar
  26. Greenberg, Clement. 1961. Modernist painting. Arts Yearbook 4: 101–108.Google Scholar
  27. Greenberg, Clement. 1970 [1968]. Avant garde attitudes: New art in the sixties. Studio International 179(921): 142–145.Google Scholar
  28. Greenberg, Clement. 1971. Counter avant garde. Art International 15(5): 16–19.Google Scholar
  29. Greenberg, Clement. 1975. Seminar five. Studio International 189(975): 191–192.Google Scholar
  30. Harrison, Charles. 1987. Art & Language: A commentary on the work of the second decade. In Art & Language: The paintings, exhibition catalogue, May 16–June 21, 23–38. Brussels: Société des Expositions du Palais des Beux-Arts.Google Scholar
  31. Harrison, Charles. 1988. The suppression of the beholder: Sculpture and the late sixties. In Starlit waters: British sculpture, an international art 1968–1988, exhibition catalogue, May 28, 1988–September 4, 1989, 40–44. Liverpool: Tate Gallery.Google Scholar
  32. Harrison, Charles. 1990. Art object and artwork. In L’art conceptuel, une perspective, exhibition catalogue, November 21, 1989–February 18, 1990, 61–64. Paris: Musée d’art Moderne de la ville de Paris.Google Scholar
  33. Harrison, Charles. 1999. The moment of deception. In Art & Language in practice, critical symposium, vol. 2, ed. Charles Harrison, 197–215. Barcelona: Fundació Tàpies.Google Scholar
  34. Harrison, Charles. 2002. A crisis of modernism. In Blast to freeze: British art in the 20th century, exhibition catalogue, touring, 221–224. Ostfildern: Cantz.Google Scholar
  35. Harrison, Charles. 2003. Conceptual art and painting: Further essays on Art & Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  36. Harrison, Charles. 2008. In conversation with the author, December. Unedited material.Google Scholar
  37. Harrison, Charles. 2009. Keith Arnatt, an informal reminiscence. In Keith Arnatt works 1968–1990, ed. Karsten Schubert and Richard Saltoun, 6–7. Sales catalogue. Oxted: Hurtwood.Google Scholar
  38. Harrison, Charles, and Fred Orton. 1982. A provisional history of Art & Language. Paris: Editions E. Fabre.Google Scholar
  39. Herbert, Annick, and Anton Herbert. 2009. Conversation with Sophie Richards. In Sophie Richards, Unconcealed: The international network of conceptual artists 1967–1977, dealers, exhibitions and public collections, ed. Lynda Morris, 433–440. London: Ridinghouse.Google Scholar
  40. Information. 1970. Exhibition checklist, July 2–September 20, MoMA, New York. Available from the MoMA Library, MoMA 934c.Google Scholar
  41. Introduction. 1969. [Atkinson, Bainbridge, Baldwin, and Hurrell.] Art-Language 1(1): 1–10.Google Scholar
  42. Kant, Immanuel. 1952 [1790]. The critique of judgement. Trans. James Creed Meredith. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  43. Krauss, Rosalind. 1973. Sense and sensibility: Reflection on post ’60s sculpture. Artforum 12(3): 43–52.Google Scholar
  44. Kuhn, Thomas. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  45. Lessing, G.E. 1984 [1766]. Laocoön. An essay on the limits of painting and poetry. Trans. Edward Allen McCormick. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Lippard, Lucy. 1973. Six years: The dematerialisation of the art object from 1966 to 1972 […]. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  47. Lippard, Lucy. 1985. Conspicuous consumption: New artists’ books. In Artists books: A critical anthology and sourcebook, ed. Joan Lyons, 49–57. Rochester: Visual Studies Workshop Press.Google Scholar
  48. Logsdail, Nicholas. 2011. In conversation with the author, January. Unedited material.Google Scholar
  49. Marx, Karl. 1918 [1859]. A contribution to the critique of political economy. Trans. N.I. Stone. Chicago: C.H. Kerr.Google Scholar
  50. McLuhan, Marshall. 1964. Understanding media: The extensions of man. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
  51. Messer, Thomas. 1971. Letter to Hans Haacke, March 19. Published in Gurgles around the Guggenheim. Studio International 181(934): 246–249.Google Scholar
  52. Morris, Robert. 1989. Words and images in modernism and post-modernism. Critical Inquiry 15(2): 337–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. NACAE. 1960. First report of the national advisory council on art education. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  54. Newman, Michael. 1996. Conceptual art from the 60s to the 90s: An unfinished project? Kunst & Museumjournaal 7, English edition, 1/2/3: 95–104.Google Scholar
  55. Osborne, Peter. 2004. Art beyond aesthetics: Philosophical criticism, art history and contemporary art. Art History 27(4): 651–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Phillpot, Clive. 1980. Art magazines and magazine art. Artforum 18(6): 52–54.Google Scholar
  57. Pilkington, Philip, Kevin Lole, David Rushton, and Charles Harrison. 1971. Some concerns in fine-art education. Studio International 182(937): 120–122.Google Scholar
  58. Plagens, Peter. 1969. 557,087: Seattle. Artforum 8(3): 64–67.Google Scholar
  59. Reise, Barbara. 1971. A tail of two exhibitions: The aborted Haacke and Robert Morris shows. Studio International 182(935): 30–34.Google Scholar
  60. Roberts, John. 1999. In character. In Art & Language in practice, critical symposium, vol. 2, ed. Charles Harrison, 161–177. Barcelona: Fundació Tàpies.Google Scholar
  61. Seth Siegelaub: Beyond conceptual art. 2016. Exhibition catalogue, December 12, 2015–April 12, 2016. Amsterdam: Stedelijk Museum.Google Scholar
  62. Siegelaub, Seth. 1999. A conversation between Seth Siegelaub and Hans Ulrich Obrist. TRANS 6: 51–63.Google Scholar
  63. Siegelaub, Seth. 2001. Interviewed by Catherine Moseley. In Conception. Conceptual documents, exhibition catalogue, touring, 145–150. Norwich: Norwich Art Gallery.Google Scholar
  64. Spear, Athena. 1970. Introduction. In Art in the mind, exhibition catalogue, April 17–May 12, n.p. Oberlin: Allen Memorial Museum.Google Scholar
  65. Sperlinger, Mike. 2005. Orders! Conceptual art’s imperatives. In Afterthought: New writing on conceptual art, ed. Mike Sperlinger, 1–28. London: Rachmaninoff’s.Google Scholar
  66. Survey. 1976. A survey of contemporary art magazines. Studio International 192(983): 145–186.Google Scholar
  67. Tagg, John. 1976. Movements and periodicals: The magazines of art. Studio International 192(983): 136–144.Google Scholar
  68. Townsend, Peter. 1975. Ave Atque . . . or, a pot-pourri of random reflections on putting a magazine onto the presses for month after bloody month. Studio International 189(975): 168–171.Google Scholar
  69. van Eelen, Herman, and Henriëtte van Eelen. 2009. Conversation with Sophie Richards. In Sophie Richards, Unconcealed: The international network of conceptual artists 1967–77, dealers, exhibitions and public collections, ed. Lynda Morris, 483–488. London: Ridinghouse.Google Scholar
  70. Wartofsky, Marx. 1975. Art, action, and ambiguity. The Monist 58(2): 327–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Archives

  1. AMAM Archives. Allen Memorial Art Museum Archives. Exhibition records. Title: Art in the Mind. Date: 1970.Google Scholar
  2. FDU Archives. Fairleigh Dickinson University Library Archives, Florham Campus. Name: The New York Cultural Center Archives. Box 15.Google Scholar
  3. TDG Archives. The Dwan Gallery Archives. The Center for Curatorial Studies, Bard College, New York.Google Scholar
  4. The Tate Archives. Collection Name: Harrison, Charles. Title: Records relating to an exhibition for the V&A Circulation Department. Date: 1970. Reference number: TGA 839/1/4.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eve Kalyva
    • 1
  1. 1.LeedsUK

Personalised recommendations