Advertisement

The Performative Gesture of Image and Text Juxtapositions

  • Eve Kalyva
Chapter

Abstract

Chapter 3 discusses speech act theory and the concept of the “performative” in relation to Keith Arnatt’s Art as an Act of Retraction (1971, London), Roelof Louw’s Tape-Recorder Project (6) (1971, London and New York) and the exhibitions Arte de Sistemas I (1971, Buenos Aires) and Arte e Ideología/CAYC al aire libre (1972, Buenos Aires) organised by the Centre of Art and Communication (CAYC). It specifies how images and texts operate in different physical and discursive contexts. It considers the use of photography and installation in staging an event and in inverting the mediation of reality, the effects of documentation, the role of the archive and institutional discourse, and the relation between art, violence and political mobilisation. This chapter also reflects on the binary distinction between conceptual art and conceptualism.

References

  1. AdSII. 1972a. Arte e ideología en CAYC al aire libre. Exhibition brochure. Buenos Aires: Centro de Arte y Comunicación. International Center for the Arts of the Americas at the Museum of Fine Arts, Houston (ICAA) Documents no. 761671.Google Scholar
  2. AdSII. 1972b. Glusberg, Jorge. Arte e ideología en CAYC al aire libre. Exhibition brochure. Buenos Aires: Centro de Arte y Comunicación. International Center for the Arts of the Americas at the Museum of Fine Arts, Houston (ICAA) Documents no. 747360.Google Scholar
  3. AdSII. 1972c. Ficha de obra de los artistas de la exhibición arte de sistemas II del Centro de Arte y Comunicación (CAYC). Exhibition catalogue. Buenos Aires: CAyC, September. International Center for the Arts of the Americas at the Museum of Fine Arts, Houston (ICAA) Documents no. 761701.Google Scholar
  4. Althusser, Louis. 1971 [1970]. Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. In Lenin and philosophy and other essays, 121–176. Trans. Ben Brewster. London: NLB.Google Scholar
  5. Arnatt, Keith. 1989. “Keith Arnatt transport to another world”. Interview with Michael Craig-Smith. Creative Camera 6: 18–28.Google Scholar
  6. Arnatt, Keith. 1997. Interview with John Roberts. In The impossible document: Photography and conceptual art in Britain 1966–1976, ed. John Roberts, 47–53. London: Camerawork.Google Scholar
  7. Austin, J.L. 1961. Pretending. In Philosophical papers, 201–219. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Austin, J.L. 1962a [1955]. How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Austin, J.L. 1962b. Performatif-Constatif. In La philosophie analytique, ed. Jean Whal, 271–304. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
  10. Baker, Kenneth. 1972. London: Roeluf [sic] Louw challenging limits. Artforum 10(9): 49–51.Google Scholar
  11. Breakwell, Ian. 1969. UNWORD. Green Island, magazine special edition.Google Scholar
  12. Breakwell, Ian. 2004. Interviewed by Victoria Worsley. National Live Stories, British Library series.Google Scholar
  13. Breakwell, Ian, and John Hilliard. 1970. John Hilliard and Ian Breakwell. Studio International 180(925): 94–95.Google Scholar
  14. Brett, Guy. 1972. Live action pieces at the Tate. The Times, February 29, 9.Google Scholar
  15. Buren, Daniel. 1975. Notes on work in connection with the place where it is installed, taken between 1967 and 1975 […]. Studio International 190(977): 124–129.Google Scholar
  16. Burn, Ian, and Mel Ramsden. 1980. Soft Tate 1966–67. In Art & Language, 17–18. Eindhoven: Van Abbemuseum.Google Scholar
  17. Butler, Judith. 1997. Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Camnitzer, Luis. 2007. Conceptualism in Latin American art: Didactics of liberation. Austin: Texas University Press.Google Scholar
  19. CAYC. 1971. From figuration art to systems art in Argentina. Exhibition catalogue, February. London: Camden Arts Centre.Google Scholar
  20. Chapin, Louis. 1971. Art: British conceptualism and “artists and writers”. The Christian Science Monitor, July 19, 7.Google Scholar
  21. Clarín. 1972a. Concurso. September 18, n.p.Google Scholar
  22. Clarín. 1972b. Reclamo británico de obras de arte. November 22, n.p.Google Scholar
  23. Clarín. 1972c. El levantamiento de una muestra plástica no tuvo fundamento legal. December 8, n.p.Google Scholar
  24. Cohen, Jonathan L. 1964. Do illocutionary forces exist? The Philosophical Quarterly 14(55): 118–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Comunicado n° 4. 1972. Duplicados de telegramas y cartas recibidas a raíz de la clausura de CAYC al aire libre, dirigidas al Excelentísimo Señor Presidente General Alejandro Agustín Lanusse, Balcarce 50, Buenos Aires. Buenos Aires: CAYC. Biblioteca del Museo Nacional de Bellas Artes Buenos Aires. International Center for the Arts of the Americas at the Museum of Fine Arts, Houston (ICAA) Documents no. 747542.Google Scholar
  26. Comunicado n° 5. 1972. Cartas recibidas a raíz de la clausura de CAYC al aire libre, dirigidas al Excelentísimo Señor Presidente Teniente General Alejandro Agustín Lanusse, Balcarce 50, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Buenos Aires: CAYC. Biblioteca del Museo Nacional de Bellas Artes Buenos Aires. International Center for the Arts of the Americas at the Museum of Fine Arts, Houston (ICAA) Documents no. 761185.Google Scholar
  27. Coulthard, Malcolm. 1985. An introduction to discourse analysis. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  28. Davis, Fernando. 2008. El conceptualismo como categoría táctica. Ramona 82: 30–40.Google Scholar
  29. Debord, Guy. 1970 [1967]. Society of the spectacle. Detroit: Black and Red.Google Scholar
  30. Derrida, Jacques. 1974 [1967]. Of grammatology. Trans. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Derrida, Jacques. 1988. Limited inc. Trans. Samuel Weber and Jeffrey Mehlman. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Fanon, Frantz. 1963 [1961]. The wretched of the earth. Trans. Constance Farrington. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
  33. Felman, Shoshana. 1983. The literary speech act: Don Juan with J.L. Austin or seduction in two languages. Trans. C. Porter. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Flynt, Henry. 1963 [1961]. Concept art. In An anthology of chance operations […], ed. La Monte Young and Jackson Mac Low, n.p. New York: Heiner Friedrich.Google Scholar
  35. Foster, Hal. 1996. The archive without museums. October 77: 97–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Fotion, N. 1971. Master speech acts. The Philosophical Quarterly 21(84): 232–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Foucault, Michel. 1972 [1969]. The archaeology of knowledge. Trans. A.M. Sheridan Smith. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  38. García Canclini, Néstor. 2005. Hybrid cultures: Strategies for entering and leaving modernity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  39. Genette, Gérard. 1980 [1972]. Narrative discourse. Trans. Jane E. Lewin. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  40. Glusberg, Jorge. 1972. CAYC: Hacia un perfil del arte latinoamericano (GT-129; GT-129 II). Exhibition brochure. Buenos Aires: CAYC. International Center for the Arts of the Americas at the Museum of Fine Arts, Houston (ICAA) Documents no. 761168.Google Scholar
  41. Glusberg, Jorge. 1985. Del pop-art a la nueva imagen. Buenos Aires: Ediciones de Arte Gaglianone.Google Scholar
  42. Goodman, Nelson. 1980. Twisted tales. Critical Inquiry 7(1): 103–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gosling, Nigel. 1972. Twilight gropings. The Observer, February 27, 31.Google Scholar
  44. Gruen, John. 1971. Dated data. The New York Times, June 14, 60.Google Scholar
  45. Hancher, Michael. 1975. Understanding poetic speech acts. College English 36(6): 632–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Harrison, Charles. 1969a. Some recent sculpture in Britain. Studio International 177(907): 26–33.Google Scholar
  47. Harrison, Charles. 1969b. Roelof Louw’s sculpture. Studio International 178(915): 126–129.Google Scholar
  48. Harrison, Charles. 1971. Virgin soil and old land. In The British avant-garde, exhibition catalogue, May 19–August 29, 1–5. New York: The New York Cultural Center and Studio International.Google Scholar
  49. Harrison, Charles. 1984. The late sixties in London and elsewhere. In 1965–1972: When attitudes became form, exhibition catalogue, touring, 9–16. Cambridge: Kettle’s Yard Gallery.Google Scholar
  50. Harrison, Charles. 1988. The suppression of the beholder: Sculpture and the late sixties. In Starlit waters: British sculpture, an international art 1968–1988, exhibition catalogue, May 28, 1988–September 4, 1989, 40–44. Liverpool: Tate Gallery.Google Scholar
  51. Harrison, Charles. 2009. Keith Arnatt, an informal reminiscence. In Keith Arnatt works 1968–1990, ed. Karsten Schubert and Richard Saltoun, 6–7. Sales catalogue. Oxted: Hurtwood.Google Scholar
  52. Harrison, Charles, and Paul Wood. 1993. Modernity and modernism reconsidered. In Modernism in dispute, ed. Paul Wood, Charles Harrison, et al., 170–260. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Herrera, María José. 1997. En medio de los medios. In Arte argentino del siglo XX, ed. María de los Angeles de Rueda, 123–132. Buenos Aires: Fundación para la Investigación del Arte Argentino.Google Scholar
  54. Hilliard, John. 1971. Letter to Barbara Reise, January 25. The Tate Archives TGA 786/5/2/80.Google Scholar
  55. Huebler, Douglas. 1969. [Untitled.] In Prospect 69, exhibition catalogue/newsletter, September 30–October 12, 26. Düsseldorf: Städtische Kunsthalle.Google Scholar
  56. Hurst, B.C. 1981. The myth of historical evidence. History and Theory 20(3): 279–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Huyssen, Andreas. 1993. Monument and memory in a postmodern age. Yale Journal of Criticism 6(2): 249–261.Google Scholar
  58. Kalyva, Eve. 2016. The rhetoric of disobedience: Art and power in Latin America. Latin American Research Review 51(2): 46–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Karshan, Donald. 1971. Acquisition versus exhibition. In The British avant-garde, exhibition catalogue, May 19–August 29, iv. New York: The New York Cultural Center and Studio International.Google Scholar
  60. La Nación. 1972. Concursos. August 29, n.p.Google Scholar
  61. La Opinión. 1972. También el público se expresó en la exposición que desmanteló la censura. September 30, n.p.Google Scholar
  62. Lakoff, Robin. 1977. What you can do with words: Politeness, pragmatics, and performatives. In Berkley studies of syntax and semantics, vol. 1, ed. C.J. Fillmore, G. Lakoff, and R. Lakoff, 1–55. Berkley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  63. Latham, John. 1968. Where does the collision happen? In conversation with Charles Harrison. Studio International 175(900): 258–261.Google Scholar
  64. LeWitt, Sol. 1967. Paragraphs on conceptual art. Artforum 5(10): 79–83.Google Scholar
  65. LeWitt, Sol. 1969. Sentences on conceptual art. 0–9 5: 3–5.Google Scholar
  66. Longoni, Ana. 2007. Other beginnings of conceptualism (Argentinean and Latin-American). Papers d’Art 93: 155–158.Google Scholar
  67. Longoni, Ana, and Mariano Mestman. 2008. Del di Tella a Tucumán arde: Vanguardia artística y política en el ’68 argentino. Buenos Aires: Eudeba.Google Scholar
  68. López, Miguel. 2010. How do we know what Latin American conceptualism looks like? Afterall 23. http://afterall.org/journal/issue.23/how.do.we.know.what.latin.american.conceptualism.looks.likemiguela.lopez
  69. Louw, Roelof. 1968. [Untitled.] In Survey ’68: Abstract sculpture, exhibition catalogue, June 20–July 21, 18–19. London: Camden Arts Centre.Google Scholar
  70. Louw, Roelof. 1969. [Untitled.] In Live in your head–When attitudes become form, exhibition catalogue, March 22–April 27, artists’ section, n.p. Bern: Kunsthalle.Google Scholar
  71. Louw, Roelof. 1974. Roelof Louw: An interview with Chryssa Zacharea. Art and Artists 8(11): 10–15.Google Scholar
  72. Marchán Fiz, Simón. 1972. Del arte objetual al arte de concepto. Madrid: Corazón.Google Scholar
  73. Miller, J. Hillis. 2001. Speech acts in literature. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Ohmann, Richard. 1972. Speech, literature, and the space between. New Literary History 4(1): 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Pratt, Mary Louise. 1986. Ideology and speech-act theory. Poetics Today 7(1): 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Richardson, Gordon. 1968. Eight young sculptors and the Stockwell depot, until June 17. Studio International 176(902): 36.Google Scholar
  77. Roberts, John. 2007. Avant-gardes after avant-gardism. Chto Delat?/What is to be Done? 17. http://chtodelat.org/b8-newspapers/12-57/avant-gardes-after-avant-gardism/
  78. Romero, Juan Carlos, Fernando Davis, and Ana Longoni. 2010. Romero. Colección conceptual. Buenos Aires: Fundación Espigas.Google Scholar
  79. Russell, John. 1972. Wider horizons. The Sunday Times, March 12, 36.Google Scholar
  80. Sadock, Jerrold. 1974. Towards a linguistic theory of speech acts. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  81. Searle, John. 1969. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Searle, John. 1979. Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Searle, John. 1999. Mind, language and society: Philosophy in the real world. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  84. Serota, Nicholas. 2009. Conversation with Sophie Richards. In Sophie Richards, Unconcealed: The international network of conceptual artists 1967–77, dealers, exhibitions and public collections, ed. Lynda Morris, 462–465. London: Ridinghouse.Google Scholar
  85. Seymour, Anne. 1969. Stockwell depot 2. Exhibition pamphlet, September 26–October 18. London.Google Scholar
  86. TA. 1968. Gramuglio, María Teresa, and Nicolás Rosa. “Tucumán Arde. Declaración de la muestra de Rosario”. In Escritos de vanguardia: Arte argentino de los años 60s, ed. Inés Katzenstein, 327–334. New York/Buenos Aires: MoMA/Fundación Espigas, Fundación Proa.Google Scholar
  87. UNSCULPT. 2008 [1970]. DVD, digital restoration and commentary by John Hilliard and Mike Leggett.Google Scholar
  88. UNWORD. 2003 [1969]. DVD, digital restoration and commentary.Google Scholar
  89. Wall, Jeff. 1995. “Marks of indifference”: Aspects of photography in, or as, conceptual art. In Reconsidering the object of art: 1965–1975, exhibition catalogue, October 15, 1995–February 4, 1996, Museum of Contemporary Art Los Angeles, 247–267. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  90. Warnock, G.L. 1973. Some types of performative utterances. In Essays on Austin, ed. Isaiah Berlin et al., 69–89. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  91. Worsley, Victoria. 2006. Ian Breakwell’s UNWORD 1969–1970: Early performance art in Britain. Leeds: Henry Moore Institute.Google Scholar

Archives

  1. BAG Archives. Fairleigh Dickinson University Library Archives, Florham Campus. Name: The British Avant-Garde. Box 14.Google Scholar
  2. The Tate Archives. Collection Name: Arnatt, Keith. Title: Photographic pieces by Keith Arnatt. Date: 1968–1972. Reference number: TGA 7226.Google Scholar
  3. The Tate Archives. Collection Name: Harrison, Charles. Title: Correspondence between Harrison and the New York Cultural Center. Date: 1970–1971. Reference number: TGA 839/1/5/1.Google Scholar
  4. The Tate Archives. Collection Name: Reise, Barbara. Title: John Hilliard. Date: 1969–1974. Reference number: TGA 786/5/2/80.Google Scholar
  5. The Tate Archives. Collection Name: Reise, Barbara. Title: Keith Arnatt. Date: 1969–1977. Reference number: TGA 786/5/2/6.Google Scholar
  6. The Tate Archives. Collection Name: Tate Public Records: Tate Collections: Acquisitions: Louw, Roelof. Title: Acquisition file. Date: 1970. Reference number: TG 4/2/643/1.Google Scholar
  7. The Tate Archives. Collection Name: Tate Public Records: Tate Exhibitions. Title: Seven Exhibitions [. . .]. Date: 1971–1973. Reference number: TG 92/242.Google Scholar
  8. The Whitechapel Art Gallery Archives. Name: Roelof Louw, 12.1970–2.1971. Reference number: WAG/EXH/2/135.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eve Kalyva
    • 1
  1. 1.LeedsUK

Personalised recommendations