Advertisement

Will e-Participation Bring Critical Citizens Back In?

  • Joachim Åström
  • Martin KarlssonEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9821)

Abstract

This paper sets out to critically examine the mobilizing potential of e-participation. The extent to which citizens beyond the usual suspects are engaged is studied by way of survey data from two novel e-participation case studies: one Swedish, one Finnish. Besides from the traditional socio-demographic variables, the analyses highlights cultural attitudes and ask: Do e-participation processes succeed in mobilizing citizens dissatisfied with the way democracy works? Can e-participation bring critical citizens back in? Certainly, the empirical analysis indicates critical citizens are clearly overrepresented in these two cases.

Keywords

e-Participation Mobilization Critical citizens Political culture Democratic satisfaction 

References

  1. 1.
    Oscarsson, H., Holmberg, S.: Nya svenska väljare. Nordstedts Juridik (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    EVS: European Values Study 2008, 4th wave, Integrated Dataset. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne, Germany, ZA4800 Dataset Version 2.0.0, 30 November 2010. doi: 10.4232/1.10188
  3. 3.
    Dalton, R.J.: Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Cq Press, Beverly Hills (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schlozman, K.L., Verba, S., Brady, H.E.: The Unheavenly Chorus: Unequal Political Voice and the Broken Promise of American Democracy. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Norris, P.: Critical Citizens. Global Support for Democratic Governance. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stoker, G.: Why Politics Matters: Making Democracy Work. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Thomassen, J., Poguntke, T., Rossteutscher, S., Schmitt-Beck, R., Zmerli, S.: What’s gone wrong with democracy, or with theories explaining why it has? In: Citizenship and Democracy in an Era of Crisis: Essays in Honour of Jan W. Van Deth, 34 (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    ESS Round 6: European Social Survey Round 6 Data. Data file edition 2.2. Norwegian Social Science Data Services, Norway – Data Archive and distributor of ESS data for ESS ERIC (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Birch, S., Allen, N.: How honest do politicians need to be? Polit. Q. 81(1), 49–56 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mair, P.: Ruling the void: the hollowing of western democracy. New Left Rev. 42, 25–51 (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hooghe, M., Marien, S.: A Comparative analysis of the relation between political trust and forms of participation in Europe. Eur. Soc. 15(1), 131–152 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Christensen, H.: Power sharing and political dissatisfactions: a multilevel analysis of the impact of institutional power sharing on kinds of political dissatisfaction in 24 European democracies. Paper presented at ECPR Joint Sessions, 10–15 April 2014Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Easton, D.: A Framework for Political Analysis, vol. 25. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1965)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hibbing, J.R., Theiss-Morse, E.: Stealth Democracy: Americans’ Beliefs about How Government Should Work. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hay, C.: Why We Hate Politics. Polity Press, Cambridge (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    SOM-institutet. Riks-SOM 2011. Version 1.0. Svensk Nationell Datatjänst (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.5878/002326
  17. 17.
    Anduiza, E., Gallego, A.G., Cantijoch, M.: Online political participation in Spain: the impact of traditional and internet resources. J. Inf. Technol. Polit. 7(4), 356–368 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Carman, J.: Barriers are barriers: asymmetric participation in the Scottish public petitions system. Parliam. Aff. 67(1), 151–171 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Åström, J., Jonsson, M., Karlsson, M.: Democratic innovations: reinforcing or changing perceptions of trust? Int. J. Public Adm. (2016, Forthcoming)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Inglehart, R., Welzel, C.: Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence, p. 262. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceÖrebro UniversityÖrebroSweden

Personalised recommendations