Advertisement

Electronic Participation with a Special Reference to Social Media - A Literature Review

  • Ayman AlarabiatEmail author
  • Delfina Sá Soares
  • Elsa Estevez
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9821)

Abstract

As a consequence of the interdisciplinary nature of Electronic Participation (e-Participation), current research on the field is fragmented and scattered. The exciting blurry boundaries and the immature identity of the field are making difficult the understanding of the main domain themes being investigated, in particular for “neophytes” researchers. In practice, several e-Participation initiatives often attract a wide audience but face serious limitations regarding involvement of those who attract. Recently, the potential of using social media to address citizens’ involvement deficit has been subject of academic debate. By consulting 44 e-Participation papers, considered highly relevant to the aforementioned challenges, this paper produces a general overview of e-Participation research, particularly through social media. The findings show that the e-Participation field still faces the challenge of identity and strive for gaining wider recognition as an independent research area. Concerning e-Participation through social media which seems to be partly overlooked in the field research, the politicians-citizen’s interaction has dominated scholars’ attention and the adoption of such initiatives sponsored and driven by governments are rarely examine. Based on the findings, several research suggestions, which could play a significant contribution to advance future e-Participation research, are proposed.

Keywords

Electronic Participation Social media Literature review Electronic government Electronic democracy 

References

  1. 1.
    Macintosh, A., Coleman, S., Schneeberger, A.: eParticipation: the research gaps. In: Macintosh, A., Tambouris, E. (eds.) ePart 2009. LNCS, vol. 5694, pp. 1–11. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Medaglia, R.: eParticipation research: Moving characterization forward (2006–2011). Gov. Inf. Q. 29, 346–360 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sæbø, Ø., Rose, J., Flak, L.S.: The shape of eParticipation: characterizing an emerging research area. Gov. Inf. Q. 25, 400–428 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Susha, I., Grönlund, Å.: eParticipation research: systematizing the field. Gov. Inf. Q. 29, 373–382 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sanford, C., Rose, J.: Characterizing eParticipation. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 27, 406–421 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Medaglia, R.: The challenged identity of a field: the state of the art of eParticipation research. Inf. Polity 12, 169–181 (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Charalabidis, Y., Loukis, E.N., Androutsopoulou, A., Karkaletsis, V., Triantafillou, A.: Passive crowdsourcing in government using social media. Transform. Gov.: People Process Policy 8, 283–308 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sæbø, Ø., Flak, L.S., Sein, M.K.: Understanding the dynamics in e-Participation initiatives: looking through the genre and stakeholder lenses. Gov. Inf. Q. 28, 416–425 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sanchez-Nielsen, E., Lee, D.: eParticipation in practice in Europe: the case of “puzzled by policy: helping you be part of EU.” Presented at the 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tambouris, E., Macintosh, A., Dalakiouridou, E., Smith, S., Panopoulou, E., Tarabanis, K., Millard, J.: eParticipation in Europe: current state and practical. E-Gov. Success Around the World: Cases Empir. Stud. Pract. Recomm. 341 (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Karantzeni, D., Gouscos, D.G.: eParticipation in the EU: re-focusing on social media and young citizens for reinforcing European identity. Transform. Gov.: People Process Policy 7, 477–500 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sæbø, Ø., Rose, J., Nyvang, T.: The role of social networking services in eParticipation. In: Macintosh, A., Tambouris, E. (eds.) ePart 2009. LNCS, vol. 5694, pp. 46–55. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Smith, S., Dalakiouridou, E.: Contextualising public (e)Participation in the governance of the European Union. Eur. J. ePract. 7, 4–14 (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rustad, E., Sæbø, Ø.: How, why and with whom do local politicians engage on Facebook? In: Wimmer, M.A., Tambouris, E., Macintosh, A. (eds.) ePart 2013. LNCS, vol. 8075, pp. 69–79. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wakabi, W., Grönlund, Å.: When SNS use doesn’t trigger e-Participation: case study of an African Authoritarian Regime. Int. J. E-Polit. (IJEP) 6, 14–29 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wahid, F., Sæbø, Ø.: Affordances and effects of promoting eParticipation through social media. In: Tambouris, E., Panagiotopoulos, P., Sæbø, Ø., Tarabanis, K., Wimmer, M.A., Milano, M., Pardo, T. (eds.) ePart 2015. LNCS, vol. 9249, pp. 3–14. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Webster, J., Watson, R.T.: Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review. Manag. Inf. Syst. Q. 26, 3 (2002)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Macintosh, A.: Characterizing e-participation in policy-making. Presented at the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2004) (2004)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Avdic, A., Hedström, K., Rose, J., Grönlund, Å.: Understanding eParticipation: contemporary Ph.D. eParticipation research in Europe (2007)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Grönlund, Å.: ICT is not participation is not democracy – eParticipation development models revisited. In: Macintosh, A., Tambouris, E. (eds.) ePart 2009. LNCS, vol. 5694, pp. 12–23. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Edelmann, N., Cruickshank, P.: Introducing psychological factors into e-participation research (2011)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Macintosh, A., Whyte, A.: Towards an evaluation framework for eParticipation. Transform. Gov.: People Process Policy 2, 16–30 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Federici, T., Braccini, A.M., Sæbø, Ø.: “Gentlemen, all aboard!” ICT and party politics: reflections from a mass-eParticipation experience. Gov. Inf. Q. 32, 287–298 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Freschi, A.C., Medaglia, R., Jacob, N.: eParticipation in the institutional domain: a review of research. Analytical report on eParticipation research from an administration and political perspective in six European countries (2009)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Grönlund, Å., Susha, I.: A communication genre perspective on e-Petitioning: the case of the citizens’ initiative. In: Tambouris, E., Macintosh, A., Sæbø, Ø. (eds.) ePart 2012. LNCS, vol. 7444, pp. 37–48. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Koussouris, S., Charalabidis, Y., Askounis, D.: A review of the European Union eParticipation action pilot projects. Transform. Gov.: People Process Policy 5, 8–19 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Panopoulou, E., Tambouris, E., Tarabanis, K.: eParticipation initiatives: how is Europe progressing. Eur. J. ePract. 7, 15–26 (2009)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Panopoulou, E., Tambouris, E., Tarabanis, K.: eParticipation initiatives in Europe: learning from practitioners. In: Tambouris, E., Macintosh, A., Glassey, O. (eds.) ePart 2010. LNCS, vol. 6229, pp. 54–65. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Prieto-Martín, P., de Marcos, L., Martínez, J.: A critical analysis of EU-funded eParticipation. In: Charalabidis, Y., Koussouris, S. (eds.) Empowering Open and Collaborative Governance, pp. 241–262. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Susha, I., Grönlund, T.: Context clues for the stall of the citizens’ initiative: lessons for opening up e-participation development practice. Gov. Inf. Q. 31, 454–465 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tambouris, E., Kalampokis, E., Tarabanis, K.: A survey of e-participation research projects in the European Union. Int. J. Electron. Bus. 6, 554–571 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Charalabidis, Y., Loukis, E.: Transforming government agencies’ approach to e participation through efficient exploitation of social media. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dalakiouridou, E., Tambouris, E., Tarabanis, K.: eParticipation and online social networks: The case of the European Institutions. Eur. J. ePract. (2012)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Effing, R., van Hillegersberg, J., Huibers, T.: Social media and political participation: are Facebook, Twitter and YouTube democratizing our political systems? In: Tambouris, E., Macintosh, A., de Bruijn, H. (eds.) ePart 2011. LNCS, vol. 6847, pp. 25–35. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Effing, R., van Hillegersberg, J., Huibers, T.W.: Social media participation and local politics: a case study of the Enschede Council in The Netherlands. In: Wimmer, M.A., Tambouris, E., Macintosh, A. (eds.) ePart 2013. LNCS, vol. 8075, pp. 57–68. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Effing, R., van Hillegersberg, J., Huibers, T.: Social media indicator and local elections in The Netherlands: towards a framework for evaluating the influence of Twitter, YouTube, and Facebook. In: Sobaci, M.Z. (ed.) Social Media and Local Governments, pp. 281–298. Springer, Heidelberg (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Guttormsen, C., Sæbø, Ø.: Municipalities “Like” Facebook: the use of social media in local municipalities. In: Spagnoletti, P. (ed.) Organizational Change and Information Systems. LNCS, vol. 2, pp. 157–166. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Johannessen, M.: Genres of participation in social networking systems: a study of the 2009 Norwegian parliamentary election. In: Tambouris, E., Macintosh, A., Glassey, O. (eds.) ePart 2010. LNCS, vol. 6229, pp. 104–114. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Johannessen, M.R.: Genres of participation in social networking systems: a study of the 2013 Norwegian parliamentary election. In: Tambouris, E., Macintosh, A., Bannister, F. (eds.) ePart 2014. LNCS, vol. 8654, pp. 26–37. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Johannessen, M.R., Følstad, A.: Political social media sites as public sphere: a case study of the Norwegian labour party. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 34, 1067–1096 (2014)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lacigova, O., Maizite, A., Cave, B.: eParticipation and social media: a symbiotic relationship. Eur. J. ePract. 16, 71–76 (2012)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Panagiotopoulos, P., Sams, S., Elliman, T., Fitzgerald, G.: Do social networking groups support online petitions? Transform. Gov.: People Process Policy 5, 20–31 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Panagiotopoulos, P., Bigdeli, A.Z., Sams, S.: Citizen–government collaboration on social media: the case of Twitter in the 2011 riots in England. Gov. Inf. Q. 31, 349–357 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Sæbø, Ø.: Understanding TwitterTM use among parliament representatives: a genre analysis. In: Macintosh, A., Bruijn, H., Tambouris, E. (eds.) ePart 2011. LNCS, vol. 6847, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Johannessen, M.R.: “New” vs “old” media a case study of political protest groups’ media use in a Norwegian municipality. Int. J. Public Inf. Syst. 11 (2015)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Macintosh, A.: E-democracy and e-participation research in Europe. In: Chen, H., Brandt, L., Gregg, V., Traunmüller, R., Dawes, S., Hovy, E., Macintosh, A., Larson, C. (eds.) Digital Government, pp. 85–102. Springer, US (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Coleman, S., Blumler, J.G.: The Internet and Democratic Citizenship: Theory, Practice and Policy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Reddick, C., Norris, D.F.: E-participation in local governments. Transform. Gov. People Process Policy 7, 453–476 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    United Nation: United Nations E-government Survey 2014: E-government for the Future We Want. UN Publication, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Panopoulou, E., Tambouris, E., Tarabanis, K.: Success factors in designing eParticipation initiatives. Inf. Organ. 24, 195–213 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Gulati, G.J.J., Williams, C.B., Yates, D.J.: Predictors of on-line services and e-participation: a cross-national comparison. Gov. Inf. Q. 31, 526–533 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Bohman, S.: Information technology in eParticipation research: a word frequency analysis. In: Tambouris, E., Macintosh, A., Bannister, F. (eds.) ePart 2014. LNCS, vol. 8654, pp. 78–89. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Dini, A.A., Øystein, S.: The current state of social media research for eParticipation in developing countries: a literature review. Presented at the 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (2016)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Alarabiat, A., Soares, D.S.: Electronic participation through social media. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, pp. 191–194. ACM, New York (2016)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Hoffman, L.H.: Participation or communication? An explication of political activity in the Internet age. J. Inf. Technol. Polit. 9, 217–233 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Grönlund, Å., Horan, T.A.: Introducing e-gov: history, definitions, and issues. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 15, 39 (2005)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Bacon, C.J., Fitzgerald, B.: A systemic framework for the field of information systems. ACM Sigmis Database 32, 46–67 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Alter, S.: 18 reasons why it-reliant work systems should replace “The IT Artifact” as the core subject matter of the IS field. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 12, 23 (2003)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Agarwal, R., Lucas Jr., H.C.: The information systems identity crisis: focusing on high-visibility and high-impact research. MIS Q. 29, 381–398 (2005)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Okoli, C., Pawlowski, S.D.: The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Inf. Manag. 42, 15–29 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Van de Ven, A.H.: Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Axelsson, K., Melin, U., Lindgren, I.: Exploring the importance of citizen participation and involvement in e-government projects. Transform. Gov.: People Process Policy 4, 299–321 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Bohman, S., Hansson, H., Mobini, P.: Online participation in higher education decision-making. JeDEM-eJ. eDemocr. Open Gov. 6, 267–285 (2014)Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Royo, S., Yetano, A., Acerete, B.: E-Participation and environmental protection: are local governments really committed? Public Adm. Rev. 74, 87–98 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Bojovic, D., Bonzanigo, L., Giupponi, C., Maziotis, A.: Online participation in climate change adaptation: a case study of agricultural adaptation measures in Northern Italy. J. Environ. Manag. 157, 8–19 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ayman Alarabiat
    • 1
    Email author
  • Delfina Sá Soares
    • 1
    • 2
  • Elsa Estevez
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Information SystemsUniversity of MinhoGuimarãesPortugal
  2. 2.Operating Unit on Policy-Driven Electronic GovernanceUnited Nations UniversityGuimarãesPortugal
  3. 3.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringUniversidad Nacional del SurBahia BlancaArgentina

Personalised recommendations