Advertisement

Passive Expert-Sourcing for Policy Making in the European Union

  • Aggeliki AndroutsopoulouEmail author
  • Francesco Mureddu
  • Euripidis Loukis
  • Yannis Charalabidis
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9821)

Abstract

The public sector gradually starts exploiting the crowdsourcing ideas initially developed in the private sector. However, there is much less knowledge on efficient and effective methods and practices for public sector citizen-sourcing in comparison with private sector crowd-sourcing, so extensive research is required in this area. This paper contributes to filling this research gap, by presenting an ICT-based method for ‘passive expert-sourcing’, with the latter term denoting the collection of policy relevant information, knowledge and ideas from experts, which aims at supporting policy making by the European Union (EU) by leveraging its large policy community. Its theoretical foundation is previous theoretical work on the relationships between democracy and technocracy, and also on policy networks. The main technological pillars of the proposed method are: EU policy experts’ profiling and reputation management, relevant documents’ opinion mining and relevance rating, and finally advanced visualized presentation of them. Finally, a first evaluation of the proposed method is presented, leading to encouraging results.

Keywords

Crowd-sourcing Citizen-sourcing Public policy Technocracy Policy network Reputation management Opinion mining 

References

  1. 1.
    Androutsopoulou, A., Charalabidis, Y., Loukis, E.: Using social media monitoring for public policy making – an evaluation. In: Proceedings of 9th Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems (MCIS 2015), October 2015, Samos, Greece (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Atkinson, M., Coleman, W.: Strong states and weak states: sectoral policy networks in advanced capitalist economies. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 19, 47–67 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bekkers, V., Edwards, A., de Kool, D.: Social media monitoring: responsive governance in the shadow of surveillance? Gov. Inf. Q. 30(4), 335–342 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brabham, D.C.: Crowdsourcing as a model for problem solving: an introduction and cases. Converg.: Int. J. Res. New Media Technol. 14(1), 75–90 (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brabham, D.C.: Crowdsourcing: a model for leveraging online communities. In: Delwiche, A., Henderson, J. (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Participative Cultures. Routledge, Abingdon (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brabham, D.C.: Crowdsourcing. MIT Press, Cambridge (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brown, M.B.: Science in Democracy: Expertise, Institutions, and Representation. MIT Press, Cambridge (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Charalabidis, Y., Loukis, E.: Participative public policy making through multiple social media platforms utilization. Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res. 8(3), 78–97 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Charalabidis, Y., Loukis, E., Androutsopoulou, A., Karkaletsis, V., Triantafillou, A.: Passive crowdsourcing in government using social media. Transform. Gov.: People Process Policy 2(8), 283–308 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Charalabidis, Y., Maragoudakis, M., Loukis, E.: Opinion mining and sentiment analysis in policy formulation initiatives: the EU-community approach. In: Tambouris, E., Panagiotopoulos, P., Sæbø, Ø., Tarabanis, K., Wimmer, M.A., Milano, M., Pardo, T. (eds.) ePart 2015. LNCS, vol. 9249, pp. 147–160. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–339 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ferro, E., Loukis, E., Charalabidis, Y., Osella, M.: Policy making 2.0: from theory to practice. Gov. Inf. Q. 30(4), 359–368 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fischer, F.: Technocracy and the Politics of Expertise. Sage, London (1990)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Harcourt, A., Radaelli, C.: Limits to EU technocratic regulation? Eur. J. Polit. Res. 35, 107–122 (1999)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hetmank, L.: Components and functions of crowdsourcing systems – a systematic literature review. In: Proceedings of 2013 International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hilgers, D., Ihl, C.: Citizensourcing: applying the concept of open innovation to the public sector. Int. J. Public Particip. 4(1), 67–88 (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Howe, J.: The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired 14(6) (2006). http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.06/crowds.html
  18. 18.
    Howe, J.: Crowdsourcing, Why the Power of the Crowd is Driving the Future of Business. Crown Business, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Howlett, M.: Do networks matter? Linking policy network structure to policy outcome: evidence from four canadian policy sectors 1990–2000. Can. J. Polit Sci. 35(2), 235–267 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hsiao, C.H., Yang, C.: The intellectual development of the technology acceptance model: a co-citation analysis. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 31(2), 128–136 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kurki, M.: Democracy through technocracy? Reflections on technocratic assumptions in EU democracy promotion discourse. J. Interv. Statebuilding 5(2), 211–234 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Linders, D.: From e-government to we-government: defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Gov. Inf. Q. 29, 446–454 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Loukis, E., Charalabidis, Y., Androutsopoulou, A.: An analysis of multiple social media consultations in the european parliament from a public policy perspective. In: European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS) 2014, Tel Aviv, Israel (2014)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lukensmeyer, C.J., Torres, L.H.: Citizensourcing: citizen participation in a networked nation. In: Yang, K., Bergrud, E. (eds.) Civic Engagement in a Network Society, pp. 207–233. Information Age Publishing, Charlotte (2008)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Marsh, D., Smith, M.: Understanding policy networks: towards a dialectical approach. Polit. Stud. 48, 4–21 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Maylor, H., Blackmon, K.: Researching Business and Management. Palgrave-Macmillan, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mergel, I., Desouza, K.C.: Implementing open innovation in the public sector: the case of challenge.gov. Public Adm. Rev. 73(6), 882–890 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nam, T.: Suggesting frameworks of citizen-sourcing via government 2.0. Gov. Inf. Q. 29, 12–20 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pedersen, J., Kocsis, D., Tripathi, A., Tarrell, A., Weerakoon, A., Tahmasbi, N., Xiong, J., Deng, W., Oh, O., Vreede, G.J.: Conceptual foundations of crowdsourcing: a review of IS research. In: Proceedings of the 46th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, HI, USA (2013)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Radaelli, C.M.: The role of knowledge in the policy process. J. Eur. Public Policy 2(2), 159–183 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Radaelli, C.M.: The public policy of the european union: whither politics of expertise? J. Eur. Public Policy 6(5), 757–774 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ragin, C., Amoroso, L.: Constructing Social Research: The Unity and Diversity of Method, 2nd edn. Pine Forge Press – Sage Publications, California (2011)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rhodes, R.A.W.: Policy network analysis. In: Moran, M., Rein, M., Goodin, R.E. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, pp. 423–445. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rhodes, R.A.W.: Understanding governance: ten years on. Organ. Stud. 28(8), 1243–1264 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rechenberger, T., Jung, V., Schmidt, N., Rosenkranz, C.: Utilizing the crowd – a literature review on factors influencing crowdsourcing initiative success. In: Pacific Conference on Information Systems (PACIS) 2015 Proceedings, Paper 250 (2015)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rouse, A.C.: A preliminary taxonomy of crowdsourcing. In: Proceedings of the Austalasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS) 2010, Paper 76 (2010)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Prpić, J., Taeihagh, A., Melton, J.: The fundamentals of policy crowdsourcing. Policy Internet 7(3), 340–361 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Schepers, J., Wetzels, M.: A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: investigating subjective norm and moderation effects. Inf. Manag. 44, 90–103 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Seltzer, E., Mahmoudi, D.: Citizen participation, open innovation, and crowdsourcing: challenges and opportunities for planning. J. Plan. Lit. 28(1), 3–18 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Skogstad, G.: Policy networks and policy communities: conceptual evolution and governing realities. In: Workshop on “Canada’s Contribution to Comparative Theorizing” Annual Meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario (2005)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tarrell, A., Tahmasbi, N., Kocsis, D., Tripathi, A., Pedersen, J., Xiong, J., Oh, O., Vreede, G.J.D.: Crowdsourcing: a snapshot of published research. In: Proceedings of the Nineteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS) 2013, Chicago, Illinois, USA (2013)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    United Nations Research Institute for Social Development. Technocratic Policy Making and Democratic Accountability, UNRISD Research and Policy Brief no. 3, United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD), Switzerland (2004)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Van Waarden, F.: Dimensions and types of policy networks. Eur. J. Polit. Res. 21, 29–52 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wandhöfer, T., Taylor, S., Alani, H., Joshi, S., Sizov, S., Walland, P., Thamm, M., Bleier, A., Mutschke, P.: Engaging politicians with citizens on social networking sites: the WeGov Toolbox. Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res. 8(3), 22–43 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aggeliki Androutsopoulou
    • 1
    Email author
  • Francesco Mureddu
    • 2
  • Euripidis Loukis
    • 1
  • Yannis Charalabidis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information and Communication Systems EngineeringUniversity of the AegeanSamosGreece
  2. 2.Information and Communication Science DepartmentUniversitat Oberta de CatalunyaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations