Advertisement

A Metamodel for the E-Participation Reference Framework

  • Sabrina SchererEmail author
  • Maria A. WimmerEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9821)

Abstract

E-participation projects are complex socio-technical constructs integrating different concepts such as participation techniques, stakeholders, objectives, information artefacts, and technical facilities. To conceptualise comprehensive solutions of e-participation projects in a holistic way – i.e. comprehensively integrating the different concepts forming an e-participation project–, enterprise architecture frameworks are increasingly studied. Effective use of enterprise architecture frameworks demands a comprehensive conceptualisation of e-participation projects, which should embark on a common metamodel. In this paper, we study existing conceptual models structuring the e-participation domain and metamodels of enterprise architecture frameworks. From the insights of the comparative analysis, the e-participation metamodel is developed using design science research. The metamodel provides the conceptualisation and taxonomy for an e-participation reference framework to develop comprehensive architectures in e-participation projects. It is presented in a UML 2.0 diagram and involves six viewpoints: Participation Scope, Participant Viewpoint, Participation Viewpoint, Data & Information Viewpoint, E-participation Viewpoint, and Implementation & Governance Viewpoint.

Keywords

Metamodel E-participation Architecture framework Domain model E-participation project 

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson, J.E.: Public Policymaking, 7th edn. Cengage Learning, Wadsworth (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Birkland, T.A.: An Introduction to the Policy Process: Theories, Concept and Models of Public Policy Making. M. E. Sharpe, Armonk/London (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cameron, B.H., McMillan, E.: Analyzing the current trends in enterprise architecture frameworks. J. Enterp. Archit. 9(1), 60–71 (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Estrem, W.A., Gonzalez, S.: TOGAF® framework and ArchiMate® modeling language harmonization. Content metamodel harmonization. Entities and relationships. The Open Group White Paper (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Federal Enterprise Architecture Program Management Office: Federal enterprise architecture framework, version 2 (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Glass, J.J.: Citizen participation in planning: the relationship between objectives and techniques. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 45(2), 180–189 (1979). doi: 10.1080/01944367908976956 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hevner, A., Chatterjee, S.: Design science research in information systems. In: Hevner, A., Chatterjee, S. (eds.) Design Research in Information Systems. Theory and Practice, vol. 22, pp. 9–22. Springer, Boston (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., Perl, A., et al.: Studying Public Policy. Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems, vol. 163, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Don Mills (1995)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kalampokis, E., Tambouris, E., Tarabanis, K.A.: A domain model for eParticipation. In: Mellouk, A., Bi, J., Ortiz, G., et al. (eds) Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Internet and Web Applications and Services, pp. 25–30. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kubicek, H., Aichholzer, G.: Closing the evaluation gap in e-Participation research and practice. In: Aichholzer, G., Kubicek, H., Torres, L. (eds.) Evaluating e-Participation, pp. 11–45. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lankhorst, M.: Enterprise Architecture at Work: Modelling, Communication and Analysis. The Enterprise Engineering Series. Springer, New York (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Macintosh, A.: Characterizing e-participation in policy-making. In: Proceedings of the 37th HICSS. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Macintosh, A., Whyte, A.: Towards an evaluation framework for eParticipation. Transform. Gov. People Process Policy 2(1), 16–30 (2008). doi: 10.1108/17506160810862928 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Matthes, D.: Enterprise Architecture Frameworks Kompendium. Xpert.press. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Medaglia, R.: eParticipation research: moving characterization forward (2006–2011). Gov. Inf. Q. (GIQ) 29(3), 346–360 (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2012.02.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Millard, J.: eGovernment measurement for policy makers. Eur. J. ePractice 4, 1–14 (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M.A., et al.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 24(3), 45–77 (2007). doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Phang, C.W., Kankanhalli, A.: A framework of ICT exploitation for e-participation initiatives. Commun. ACM 51(12), 128–132 (2008). doi: 10.1145/1409360.1409385 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Porwol, L., Ojo, A., Breslin, J.G.: An ontology for next generation e-participation initiatives. Gov. Inf. Q. (2016). doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2016.01.007 Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rozanski, N., Woods, E.: Software Systems Architecture. Working with Stakeholders Using Viewpoints and Perspectives, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, Upper Saddle River (2012)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sæbø, Ø., Flak, L.S., Sein, M.K.: Understanding the dynamics in e-Participation initiatives. Looking through the genre and stakeholder lenses. Gov. Inf. Q. 28(3), 416–425 (2011). doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2010.10.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sæbø, Ø., Rose, J., Flak, L.S.: The shape of eParticipation. Characterizing an emerging research area. Gov. Inf. Q. 25(3), 400–428 (2008). doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2007.04.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Scherer, S., Neuroth, C., Schefbeck, G., Wimmer, M.A.: Enabling eParticipation of the youth in the public debate on legislation in Austria: a critical reflection. In: Macintosh, A., Tambouris, E. (eds.) ePart 2009. LNCS, vol. 5694, pp. 151–162. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Scherer, S., Wimmer, M.A.: A regional model for e-participation in the EU: evaluation and lessons learned from VoicE. In: Tambouris, E., Macintosh, A., Glassey, O. (eds.) ePart 2010. LNCS, vol. 6229, pp. 162–173. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Scherer, S., Wimmer, M.A.: Reference framework for e-participation projects. In: Tambouris, E., Macintosh, A., Bruijn, H. (eds.) ePart 2011. LNCS, vol. 6847, pp. 145–156. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Scherer, S., Wimmer, M.A.: E-participation and enterprise architecture frameworks: an analysis. Inf. Polity 17(2), 147–161 (2012). doi: 10.3233/IP-2012-0270 Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Scherer, S., Wimmer, M.A., Ventzke, S.: Hands-on guideline for e-participation initiatives. In: Rosemann, M., Janssen, M., Lamersdorf, W., Pries-Heje, J. (eds.) EGES 2010 and GISP 2010. IFIP AICT, vol. 334, pp. 49–61. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schönherr, M.: Enterprise architecture frameworks. In: Aier, S. (ed.) Enterprise Application Integration. Serviceorientierung und nachhaltige Architekturen, vol. 2, pp. 3–48. Gito-Verlag (2004)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Smith, S., Macintosh, A., Millard, J.: A three-layered framework for evaluating e-participation. Int. J. Electron. Gov. 4(4), 304–321 (2011). doi: 10.1504/IJEG.2011.046013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Software and Systems Engineering Standards Committee of the IEEE Computer Society: Systems and software engineering - architecture description (ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010:2011) (2011)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tambouris, E., Kalampokis, E., Tarabanis, K.: A survey of e-participation research projects in the European Union. Int. J. Electron. Bus. (IJEB) 6(6), 554–571 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tambouris, E., Liotas, N., Tarabanis, K.: A framework for assessing eParticipation projects and tools. In: Proceedings of the 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE Computer Society Press, US (2007)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    The Open Group: The Open Group Standard TOGAF Version 9.1, Document Number: G116. TOGAF Series. The Open Group (2011)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    The Open Group: ArchiMate® 2.1 Specification. Open Group Standard, C13L. The Open Group, United Kingdom (2013)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    U.S. Department of Defense: The DoDAF Architecture Framework Version 2.02 (2011)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wimmer, M.A.: Ontology for an e-participation virtual resource centre. In: Janowski, T., Pardo, T.A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, pp. 89–98. ACM, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Yusuf, M., Adams, C., Dingley, K.: A novel framework of e-participation. In: Ionas, A. (ed.) Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on eGovernment, p. 363. Academic Conferences Limited (2014)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zachman, J.A.: A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Syst. J. 26(3), 277–293 (1987). doi: 10.1147/sj.263.0276 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for IS ResearchUniversity of Koblenz-LandauKoblenzGermany

Personalised recommendations