Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

And the Rest is Just Algebra pp 79–93Cite as

A Deep Understanding of Fractions Supports Student Success in Algebra

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Algebra is frequently referred to as the “gateway” course for high school mathematics in much the same way as calculus can “open” or “close” doors for students interested in pursuing degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) areas. This chapter presents the idea that students’ challenges with algebra begin well before their first course in algebra and that these challenges are embedded in a complex set of issues. Weak or incomplete mathematical understanding of rational number concepts has a profound impact on students’ success in algebra and subsequently, courses that follow where students are expected to confidently, competently, and efficiently address situations in which “and the rest is just algebra” is invoked. Recognizing that developing students’ deep understanding of rational number concepts requires years of nurturing and care by capable, well-prepared teachers, both in terms of content and pedagogical knowledge, and a discussion of issues related to teacher preparation and teacher shortages and how these impact students’ preparedness for algebra and their success in mathematics is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ball, D. L. (1990). Breaking with experience in learning to teach mathematics: The role of a preservice methods course. For the Learning of Mathematics, 10(2), 10–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L. (1993). Halves, pieces, and twoths: Constructing and using representational contexts in teaching fractions. In Rational numbers: an integration of research (pp. 157–195).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, A. (Ed.). (2011). Successful STEM education: A workshop summary. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J. P. & Lin, C.Y. (2005). Effects of a computational skills workshop on prospective elementary teachers. Preliminary report. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the MAA and the American mathematical society, Atlanta, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behr, M., Lesh, R., Post, T., & Silver, E. (1983). Rational number concepts. In R. Lesh & M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes (pp. 91–125). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, J. L., & Newton, K. J. (2012). Fractions: Could they really be the gatekeeper’s doorman? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37(4), 247–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, J. L., & Siegler, R. S. (2006). Developmental and individual differences in numerical estimation. Developmental Psychology, 41, 189–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, J. L., & Siegler, R. S. (2008). Numerical magnitude representations influence arithmetic learning. Child Development, 79(4), 1016–1031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G., & Quinn, R. J. (2007). Fraction proficiency and success in algebra: What does research say? Australian Mathematics Teacher, 63(3), 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charalambous, C. Y., & Pitta-Pantazi, D. (2005). Revisiting a theoretical model on fractions: Implications for teaching and research. International group for the psychology of mathematics education (p. 233).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinnappan, M., & Forrester, T. (2014). Generating procedural and conceptual knowledge of fractions by pre-service teachers. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(4), 871–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D. M., Roche, A., & Mitchell, A. (2008). 10 tips for making fractions come alive and make sense. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 13(7), 372–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences. (2001). The mathematical education of teachers. Washington, DC: American Mathematical Society and Mathematical Association of America.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences. (2012). The mathematical education of teachers II. Washington, DC: American Mathematical Society and Mathematical Association of America.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cortese, A. & Ravitch, D. (2008). Still at risk: What students don’t know, even now. In: A preface in the report from common core by Frederick M. Hess. Washington, DC: Common Core.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, K., Post, T. R., & del Mas, R. C. (2002). Initial fraction learning by fourth and fifth grade students: A comparison of the effects of using commercial curricula with the effects of using the rational number project curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33, 111–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, K., & Whitney, S. (2010). Learning rational number concepts and skills in elementary school classrooms. In D. V. Lambdin & F. K. Lester Jr. (Eds.), Teaching and learning mathematics: Translating research for elementary school teachers (pp. 15–22). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The flat world and education: How America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll, M. (1982). Research within reach: Secondary school mathematics. A research guided response to the concerns of educators. Missouri: (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 225 842).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamoran, A., & Hannigan, E. C. (2000). Algebra for everyone? Benefits of college-preparatory mathematics for students with diverse abilities in early secondary school. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22(3), 241–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gawande, A. (2010). The checklist manifesto: How to get things right. New York: Metropolitan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glouberman, S., & Zimmerman, B. (2002). Complicated and complex systems: What would successful reform of Medicare look like? Toronto: Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J., & Walsh, K. (2008). No common denominator: The preparation of elementary teachers in mathematics by America’s education schools. National Council on Teacher Quality.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, R. (2012). Stretching student teachers’ understanding of fractions. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 24, 493–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieren, T. E. (1976). On the mathematical, cognitive and instructional. In Number and measurement. Papers from a research workshop (Vol. 7418491, p. 101).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieren, T. E. (1980). The rational number construct: Its elements and mechanisms. In T. E. Kieren (Ed.), Recent research on number learning (pp. 125–149). Columbus: Ohio State University (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 212 463).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieren, T. E. (1988). Personal knowledge of rational numbers: Its intuitive and formal development. In J. Hiebert & M. Behr (Eds.), Number concepts and operations in the middle grades (pp. 162–181). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloosterman, P. (2010). Mathematics skills of 17-year-olds in the United States: 1978 to 2004. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(1), 20–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamon, S. J. (1999). Teaching fractions and ratios for understanding: Essential content knowledge and instructional strategies for teachers. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamon, S. J. (2007). Rational numbers and proportional reasoning: Toward a theoretical framework for research. Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 1, 629–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamon, S. J. (2012). Teaching fractions and ratios for understanding: Essential content knowledge and instructional strategies for teachers (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesh, R., Post, T., & Behr, M. (1988). Proportional reasoning. Number Concepts and Operations in the Middle Grades, 2, 93–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobato, J., & Thanheiser, E. (2002). Developing understanding of ratio-as-measures a foundation for slope. In B. Litwiller & G. Bright (Eds.), Making sense of fractions, ratios, and proportions. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack, N. K. (2001). Building on informal knowledge through instruction in a complex content domain: Partitioning, units, and understanding multiplication of fractions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(3), 267–295. doi:10.2307/749828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moses, R. P., & Cobb, C., Jr. (2001). Organizing algebra: The need to voice a demand. Social Policy, 4, 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the national mathematics advisory panel. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newstead, K., & Murray, H. (1998). Young students’ constructions of fractions. In A. Olivier & K. Newstead (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-second international conference for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 3, pp. 295–302). South Africa: Stellenbosch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, K. J. (2008). An extensive analysis of preservice elementary teachers’ knowledge of fractions. American Educational Research Journal, 45(4), 1080–1110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nord, C., Roey, S., Perkins, R., Lyons, M., Lemanski, N., Brown, J., et al. (2011). The nation’s report card: America’s high school graduates (NCES 2011–462). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partelow, L. (2015). You’re hired (to teach, for the right reasons). US News and World Report. Retrieved from http://www.usnews.com/opinion/knowledge-bank/2015/10/14/address-americas-teacher-shortage-the-right-way.

  • Rampey, B. D., Dion, G. S., & Donahue, P. L. (2009). NAEP 2008: Trends in academic progress. NCES 2009-479. National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeder, S. & Utley, J. (Under review). What is a fraction? Developing fraction understanding in prospective elementary teachers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeder, S., Utley, J., & Cassel, D. (2009). Using metaphors as a tool for examining preservice elementary teachers’ beliefs about mathematics teaching and learning. School Science and Mathematics, 109(5), 290–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rich, M. (2015). Teacher shortages spur a nationwide hiring scramble (credentials optional). New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/10/us/teacher-shortages-spur-a-nationwide-hiring-scramble-credentials-optional.html?_r=0.

  • Rittle-Johnson, B., Siegler, R. S., & Alibali, M. W. (2001). Developing conceptual understanding and procedural skill in mathematics: An iterative process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 346–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siebert, D., & Gaskin, N. (2006). Creating, naming, and justifying fractions. Teaching Children Mathematics, 12(8), 394–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, R., Carpenter, T., Fennell, F., Geary, D., Lewis, J., Okamoto, Y, Thompson, L & Wray, J. (2010). Developing effective fractions instruction for Kindergarten through 8th grade. IES practice guide. NCEE 2010-4039. What Works Clearinghouse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, M. A. (1993). Prospective elementary teachers’ knowledge of division. Journal for Research in Mathematics education, 233–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. K., Kaufman, J. H., Sherman, M., & Hillen, A. F. (2011). Algebra a challenge at the crossroads of policy and practice. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 453–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobias, J. M. (2013). Prospective elementary teachers’ development of fraction language for defining the whole. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16, 85–103. doi:10.1007/s10857-012-9212-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Utley, J., & Reeder, S. (2012). Prospective elementary teachers development of fraction number sense. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 5(2), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Walle, J. A. (2007). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, H. (2001). How to prepare students for algebra. American Educator, 25(2), 10–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Z., Peverly, S. T., & Xin, T. (2006). Knowing and teaching fractions: A cross-cultural study of American and Chinese mathematics teachers. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31(4), 438–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Oklahoma, Stacy Reeder, 820 Van Vleet Oval, ECH 114, Norman, OK, 73019, USA

    Stacy Reeder

Authors
  1. Stacy Reeder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stacy Reeder .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mathematics, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA

    Sepideh Stewart

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reeder, S. (2017). A Deep Understanding of Fractions Supports Student Success in Algebra. In: Stewart, S. (eds) And the Rest is Just Algebra. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45053-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45053-7_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45052-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45053-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation