Skip to main content

Rehabilitation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Lived Sentence

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology ((PSIPP))

  • 806 Accesses

Abstract

As the element of sentencing which focuses most strongly on the obligation of the prisoner to do something, to demonstrate or perform internal change, the idea of rehabilitation is most important when considering the subjective understanding of the prisoner about their sentence. Rehabilitation, an under-interrogated word, used across different habitus with different meanings, is also foundational to ideas about community protection and therefore arguably is the operational aspect of many of the other aims of sentencing. The chapter contextualises the words of prisoners who challenge some of the official discourse with evidence of a multiplicity of barriers to access to services and programmes which allow them to demonstrate rehabilitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    There are many aspects of rehabilitation, which have not been canvassed in this chapter. One of the most important, which is only touched on here, is the way that education and work, two basic needs which appear to be foundational to preventing re-offending and which do not arise from risk/needs assessment, are faring with this new focus on risk assessment and offence-specific programming.

  2. 2.

    The irony of the rise of cognitive skills programmes at the expense of education is that the aetiology of “cog skills” is in education.

  3. 3.

    R v Molina (1984) 13 A Crim R 76 at 77

  4. 4.

    (2008) NSWCCA 33

  5. 5.

    New South Wales v Davis [2008] NSWSC 862

  6. 6.

    Winters v Attorney General of NSW (2008) NSWCCA 33

  7. 7.

    McGarry v Western Australia (2005) 31 WAR 69 at [36]-[39] (Wheeler J);

  8. 8.

    The problems faced by prisoners NSW in accessing legal services were canvassed thoroughly by the Law and Justice Foundation, see Grunseit et al (2008) “Taking Justice into custody: The Legal Needs of Prisoners” Law and Justice Foundation of NSW.

Bibliography

  • McGarry v Western Australia (2005) 31 WAR 69

    Google Scholar 

  • Winters v Attorney General of NSW (2008) NSWCCA 33

    Google Scholar 

  • Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 (NSW)

    Google Scholar 

  • Victim Support and Rehabilitation Act 1996 (NSW) (repealed)

    Google Scholar 

  • Victims Rights and Support Act 2013 (NSW)

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D. A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R. D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F. T. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta- analysis. Criminology, 28, 369–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldry, E. (2009). Prisons and vulnerable persons: Institutions and patriarchy. In M. Segrave (Ed.), Proceedings of the Australian & New Zealand Critical Criminology Conference 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, C. (2005). On the right to be punished: Responsibility and the critique of the rehabilitative ideal. Criminal Justice Matters, 60(1), 20–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blagg, H. (2008). Crime, aboriginality and the decolonisation of justice. Annandale: Hawkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlen, P. (Ed.) (2008). Imaginary penalties. Cullompton, Devon: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crewe, B. (2009). The prisoner society: Power, adaptation and social life in a English prison. Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cunneen, C., Baldry, E., Brown, D., Brown, M., Schwartz, M., and Steel, A. (2013). Penal Culture and Hyper- Incarceration: The Revival of the Prison. Oxon: Routledge Abingdon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Corrective Services NSW (2008). Annual report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donahue, E., & Moore, D. (2009). When is an offender not an offender? Power, the client and shifting penal subjectivities. Punishment and Society, 11(3), 319–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake, D. H. (2012). Prisons, punishment and the pursuit of security. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duff, R. A. (2005). Punishment and rehabilitation: Or punishment as rehabilitation. Criminal Justice Matters, 60(1), 18–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duguid, S. (2000). Can prisons work? Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, S., & Piper, C. (2008). Sentencing and punishment: The quest for justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericson, R. V., & Baranek, P. (1982). The ordering of justice: A study of accused persons as dependants in the criminal process. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findlay, M. (2004a). The demise of corrections 15 years on: any hope for progressive punishment? Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 16, 57–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findlay, M. (2004b). Prisons as progressive punishment: The state of corrective services. Evatt Journal, 4(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, B. (2003). Doing good with a vengeance. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 3(3), 227–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. (2003). Therapeutic jurisprudence: An ethical paradigm for therapists in sex offender treatment programs. Western Criminology Review, 4(2), 143–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. Garden City New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, S. D., & Moriarty, L. J. (2006). Statistical risk assessment: Old problems and new applications. Crime & Delinquency 52, 178–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grunseit, A., Forell, S., & McCarron, E. (2008). Taking justice into custody: The legal needs of prisoners. New South Wales: Law and Justice Foundation of New South Wales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannah-Moffatt, K. (2005). Criminogenic needs and the transformative risk subject. Punishment and Society, 7(1), 29–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heseltine, K., Day, A., & Sarre, R. (2011). Prison-based correctional offender rehabilitation programs: The 2009 national picture in Australia. Research and Public Policy Reports, series 112, Australian Institute of Criminology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howells, K., & Day, A. (1999). The rehabilitation of offenders: International perspectives applied to Australian correctional systems. Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, No 22 Australian Institute of Criminology

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, S. (2006). Countering catastrophic criminality: Reform, punishment and the modern liberal compromise. Punishment and Society, 8(4), 443–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Indemauer, D. (1996). Who owns sentencing? A reply to Bartholomew (1996). Australian Psychologist, 39(1), 63–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebling, A. (2004). Prisons and their moral performance: A study of values, quality and prison life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, R. (2009). Punishment without finality: One year in the life and death of Alan Egan. Criminal Law Journal, 33(1), 45–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maruna, S. (2001). Making good: How Ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, M. (1990). Net-widening: Vagaries in the use of a concept. British Journal of Criminology, 30(2), 121–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D (2007). Criminal artefacts: Governing drugs and users, Vancouver: UBC Press

    Google Scholar 

  • New South Wales Audit Office (2004). Performance audit: Prisoner rehabilitation: Department of corrective services. NSW Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, R. (2004). Program evaluation. In What works in offender rehabilitation conference. Australia: NSW Department of Corrective Services Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Raynor, P. (1997). Some observations on rehabilitation and justice. Howard Journal, 36(3), 248–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sotiri, M. (2003). Punishment and Imprisonment in New South Wales: Towards a conceptual understanding of purpose. Doctoral thesis, UNSW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, V. W. (1967). The forest of symbols. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vess, J., & Eccleston, L. (2009). Extended supervision of sexual offenders across Australia and New Zealand. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 16(2), 271–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L. (2009). Punishing the poor. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, A., & Birgden, A. (2009). Accountability and dignity: Ethical issues in forensic and correctional practice. Aggression and Violent Behaviour, 14, 227–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, A., & Maruna, S. (2007). Rehabilitation. London: Routledge London

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, T., & Whitty, N. (2007). Risk and Human Rights in United Kingdom Prison Governance. British Journal of Criminology, 47(5), 798–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacombe, D. (1997). Reforming Foucault: A critique of the social control thesis. British Journal of Sociology, 47(2), 332–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hall, M. (2016). Rehabilitation. In: The Lived Sentence. Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45038-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45038-4_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45037-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45038-4

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics