Advertisement

Targeting Muslims Through Women’s Dress: The Niqab and the Psychological War against Muslims

  • Susan S. M. EdwardsEmail author
Chapter
  • 307 Downloads

Abstract

Susan S. M. Edwards expounds upon the need to recognise that the habituated vilification of ‘the Muslim’ in the media, the public monolithic discourse that essentialises and demonises them, the refusal to recognise verbal attacks on Muslims as race hatred and the condonation of insult as satire in the context of rising xenophobia, all demonstrate the necessity for a ‘real time’ analysis. Marked out by their clothing women, especially, have become identifiable targets for right-wing extremism and violent assault whose hurt and disposal is rendered no more than ‘collateral damage’ and in whose victimisation public discourse and media representation in promoting orientalised and racialised tropes of Muslims must bear some responsibility. Edwards notes with irony that the Western world, in a self-professed secular crusade against the niqab, has positioned itself thereby as the saviour of womankind. She notes how, in very recent times, the once recognised polysemicity of the niqab (Young 2003) with its several and contradictory meanings, are understandings that have become displaced and subjugated in the Foucauldian sense (Foucault 1980), whilst a highly orientalised trope of the niqab and its wearer (and to a lesser extent the hijab) becomes fetishised at national and governmental level. There is now little inclination to understand why women wear the niqab, even less to give them a voice from their subject position. What emerges, Edwards posits, is that the niqab has become central to the project of Western nation states’ condemnation of the Muslim ‘other’.

Keywords

Domestic Violence Hate Crime Muslim Woman Muslim Community Muslim Culture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Abu-Lughod, L. (2015). Do muslim women really need saving? Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ahmed, L. (1992). Women and gender in Islam. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Amis, M. (2013). The second plane: September 11, 2001–2007. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  4. Asad, T. (2006). Powers of the secular modern. Stanford, USA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Aziz, S. (2012). The Muslim veil post 9/11 rethinking women’s rights and leadership. London, UK: Institute for social policy and understanding and the British Council.Google Scholar
  6. Barbibay, Y. (2010). Citizenship privilege or the right to religious freedom: the blackmailing of France’s Islamic Women. Cardoza Journal of International and Comparative Law, 18(1), 159–206.Google Scholar
  7. BBC Radio 4. (2016, January 18). Muslim women’s segregation in UK communities must end—Cameron. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-35338413. Accessed 2 April 2016.
  8. Bourke, J. (2004, May 7). Torture as pornography. The Guardian.Google Scholar
  9. Bouteldja, N. (2014). France v. England. In E. Brems (Ed.), The experiences of face veil wearers in Europe and the law (pp. 115–160). Cambridge, UK: CUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bremner, C. (2016, April 14). Extend headscarf ban to universities urges French PM. Times, p. 27.Google Scholar
  11. Brems, E. (Ed.) (2014). The experiences of face veil wearers in Europe and the law. Cambridge, UK: CUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Calgary Reuters. (2015). Canada to press for ban on Islamic veil at citizenship ceremonies. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/sep/16/canada-government-islamic-veil-niqab-ban-citizenship. Accessed 2 June 2016.
  13. Child, B. (2015, June 12). ‘Women-only’ film screening pulled after cinema decides to admit men. Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/film/2015/jun/12/women-only-screening-pulled-london-israeli-film-festival-rechy-elias. Accessed 2 April 2016.
  14. Ciancio, A. (2010, May 4). Italian police fine Muslim woman for wearing veil. Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/may/04/italian-police-fine-muslim-woman. Accessed 3 April 2016.
  15. Conseil d’Etat, 27 juin 2008, Mme Maacdhbour, no. 286798.Google Scholar
  16. Coppock, V. (2014). Can you spot a terrorist in your classroom? Problematizing the recruitment of schools to the ‘war on terror’ in the United Kingdom. Global Studies of Childhood, 4(2), 115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cooke, Rachel. (2015). Interview: ‘Do you feel liberated? I feel I am not.’ Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/books/2015/oct/11/nawal-el-saadawi-interview-do-you-feel-you-are-liberated-not?cmp=share-btn-fb. Accessed 11 October 2015.
  18. De Saussure, F. (1995). Course in general linguistics. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  19. Dubuis, A. (2014, September 23). Camden school bans Muslim teenager.… London Evening Standard. http://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/camden-school-bans-muslim-teenager-from-taking-alevels-because-she-wears-the-niqab-9750269.html. Accessed 2 April 2016.
  20. Edwards, P. (2016). Closure through resilience: the case of prevent. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 39(4), 292–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Edwards, S. (2010). Defacing Muslim women—dialectical meanings of dress in the body politic. In R. Banakar (Ed.), Rights in context. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  22. Edwards, S. (2012). For her own good! Criming the niqab. International Family Law, 2, 203–209.Google Scholar
  23. Edwards, S.S.M. (2014). Proscribing Unveiling - Law a chimera and an instrument in the political agenda. In Brems, E. (Ed.). The experience of face veil wearers in Europe and the law. Cambridge, UK: CUP.Google Scholar
  24. Eisenman, S. F. (2007a). Waterboarding: political and sacred torture. In J. A. Carlson and E. Weber (Eds.), Speaking about torture (pp. 129–139). New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Eisenman, S. F. (2007b). Abu Ghraib effect. London, UK: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
  26. El-Guindi, F. (1999). Veil: modesty, privacy and resistance. London: Bloomsbury Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Espinoza, J. (2016, March 28). ‘Teaching children fundamental British values is act of ‘cultural supremacism’. Telegraph. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/03/28/teaching-children-fundamental-british-values-is-act-of-cultural/ Accessed 2 April 2016.
  28. Fanon, F. (1965). Studies in a dying colonialism. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  29. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977, C. Gordon (Ed.). New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  30. Fussey, P. (2013). Contested topologies of UK counterterrorist surveillance: the rise and fall of project champion. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 6(3), 351–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gerin Report. (2010). Parliamentary Commission to study the wearing of the Full Veil in France. http://www.assemble-nationale.fr/13/pdf/rap-info/i2262.pdf. Accessed 11 October 2016.
  32. Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015. Accessed 16 April 2016.
  33. Hernton, C. (1992). Sex and racism in America 1968. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
  34. Iglesias, D. (2014, December 9). Shock and anal probe: Reading between the redactions in the CIA torture report. Guardian.Google Scholar
  35. Ishaq v. Minister of Citizenship and Immigration. (2015, February 6). http://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fc-cf/decisions/en/108049/1/document.do. Accessed 2 April 2016.
  36. Khalid, M. (2011). Gender, orientalism and representations of the ‘other’ in the war on terror. Global Change, Peace & Security, 23(1), 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kundnani, A. (2007). The age of intolerance. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
  38. Kundnani, A. (2014). The Muslims are coming. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  39. Lewis, B. (1990). The roots of Muslim rage. Atlantic, 266, 3.Google Scholar
  40. Luban, D. (2007). The torture lawyers of Washington. In D. Luban (Ed.), Legal ethics and human dignity (pp. 162–206). Cambridge, UK: CUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lynch, O. (2013). British Muslim youth: radicalisation, terrorism and the construction of the ‘other’. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 6(2), 241–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mancini, S. (2012). Patriarchy as the exclusive domain of the other: the veil controversy, false projection and cultural racism. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 10(2), 411–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Martin, T. (2014). Governing an unknowable future: the politics of Britain’s prevent policy. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 7(1), 62–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McClintock, A. (1995). Imperial leather: race, gender, and sexuality in the colonial contest. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Moors, A. (2014). Face veiling in the Netherlands: public debates and women’s narratives. In E. Brems (Ed.), The experiences of face veil wearers in Europe and the law (pp. 19–42). Cambridge, UK: CUP.Google Scholar
  46. Nussbaum, M. (2012). The new religious intolerance: overcoming the politics of fear in an anxious age. Harvard: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Okin, S. M. (1999). Is multiculturalism bad for women? In J. Cohen, M. Howard, M. Nussbaum (Eds.), Is multi culturalism bad for women (Part 1). Princeton, USA: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Oral Evidence. (2016, January 19). Home Affairs Committee: Countering extremism, HC 428, Home Affairs Select Committee on Countering Extremism. http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/home-affairs-committee/news-parliament-2015/160115-countering-extremism-evidence/ Accessed 2 April 2016.
  49. Parekh, B. (2005). Rethinking multiculturalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  50. Patel, P. (1997). Third wave feminism and black women’s activism. In H. S. Mirza (Ed.), Black British feminism (pp. 269–277). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Recurso Casasion Num.: 4118/2011 Tribunal Supremo Votacion: 06/02/2013 Ponente Exc. mo. Sr. D Vicente Conde Martin de Hijas Secretaria Sr./Sra.:11mo. Sr. D. Jose Golderos Cebrian 06/02/2013.Google Scholar
  52. Sahgal, G. & Yuval-Davis, N. (Eds.) (1992). Refusing holy orders. London: Virago.Google Scholar
  53. Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  54. Said, E. W. (1997). Covering Islam: how the media and the experts determine how we see the rest of the world. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  55. SAS v. France (2014). Application no. 43835/11, 1 July 2014, Grand Chamber.Google Scholar
  56. Samia Belkacemi et al. v. Belgium (2012) (Application no. 145/2012 (6 December 2012) http://www.const.be/public/f/2012/2012-145f/p. Accessed 2 June 2016.
  57. Southall Black Sisters. (1989). Two struggles challenging male violence and the police. In C. Dunhill (Ed.), The boys in blue (pp. 38–44). London: Virago.Google Scholar
  58. Wilcox, L. B. (2011). Dying is not permitted: sovereignty, biopower, and force-feeding at Guantanamo Bay. In S. Biswas and Z. Zalloua (Eds.), Global re-visions: torture: power, democracy, and the human body (pp. 101–128). Washington, USA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  59. Yeğenoğlu, M. (1998). Colonial fantasies. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
  60. Yoder WesselHoeft, K. M. (2010). Gendered secularity: the feminine individual in the 2010 Gerin Report. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 31(3), 399–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Young, R. J. C. (2003). Postcolonialism: a very short introduction. Oxford: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of BuckinghamBuckinghamUK

Personalised recommendations