Advertisement

No Place for a Woman: Harmful Practices, Religion and State Responses

  • Pragna PatelEmail author
Chapter
  • 276 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter examines how notions of culture and religion are inextricably linked to the control of black and minority women in the UK and used to legitimate harmful practices, such as domestic violence, forced marriage and honour-based violence. It is a process in which the British state has often been complicit through official policies on multiculturalism that previously contributed to the violations of women’s human rights and freedoms. Years of struggles by black feminists against racism and aspects of multiculturalism finally began to yield positive changes, but recent developments in law and social policy, such as the push towards the privatisation of justice and the promotion of faith-based approach to minorities (multi-faithism), now threaten to undo the gains that have been made. These new developments need to be urgently tackled, since they contribute to a climate that is conducive to the promotion of gender inequality and patriarchal power in minority communities.

Keywords

Domestic Violence Minority Woman Minority Community South Asian Woman Family Matter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Abbas, T. (2007). British Muslims minorities today: challenges and opportunities to Europeanism, multiculturalism and Islamism. Sociology Compass, 1, 724–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ali, Y. (1992). Muslim women and the politics of ethnicity and culture in Northern England. In N. Y. Davis and G. Sahgal (Eds.), Refusing holy orders: women and fundamentalism in Britain (pp. 101–123). London: Virago.Google Scholar
  3. Al-Jibaly, M. (2004, January 16). The perils of committing Zina (Adultery or fornication). Fiqh of Inheritance, https://www.islamweb.net/emerath/index.php?page=articles&id=14830. Accessed 1 July 2016.
  4. Anthias, F., & Yuval-Davis, N. (1992). Racialized boundaries: race, nation, gender, colour and class and the anti-racist struggle. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. AP. (2016). Swedish academy condemns Salman Rushdie death warrant 27 years later. Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/mar/24/salman-rushdie-death-threat-fatwa-swedish-academy-satanic-verses. Accessed 2 July 2016.
  6. Archbishop of Canterbury. (2008, February 7). Civil and religious law in England: a religious perspective. London: Royal Courts of Justice.Google Scholar
  7. Bennoune, K. (2007). Secularism and human rights: a contextual analysis of headscarves, religious expression, and women’s equality under International Law. Columbian Journal of Transnational Law, 45(2), 367–397.Google Scholar
  8. Bhatt, R. (2014, January 20). University challenge: secular neutrality or religious privilege? 50.50 inclusive democracy. https://www.opendemocracy.net/5050/radha-bhatt/university-challenge-secular-neutrality-or-religious-privilege. Accessed 1 July 2016.
  9. Dodd, V. (2003, September 30). Kurd who slit daughter’s throat in ‘honour killing’ is jailed for life. Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2003/sep/30/religion.world. Accessed 6 July 2016.
  10. EHRC. (2014a, July 18). Commission tackles gender segregation in universities’. http://www.equalityhumanrights.com/commission-tackles-gender-segregation-universities. Accessed 1 July 2016.
  11. Edwards, S. (1994). From victim to defendant—a life sentence. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 26(2–3), 261–293.Google Scholar
  12. Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of the Constabulary (HMIC). (2014, March). Everyone’s business: improving the police response to domestic abuse. https://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmic/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/improving-the-police-response-to-domestic-abuse.pdf. Accessed 19 July 2016.
  13. Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of the Constabulary (HMIC). (2015, December). The depths of dishonour: hidden voices and shameful crimes. https://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmic/wp-content/uploads/the-depths-of-dishonour.pdf. Accessed19 July 2016.
  14. Home Office Minister Mike O’Brien. (1999, February 8–16). Adjournment debate on human rights (women), 325. London.: House of Commons.Google Scholar
  15. Istanbul Convention. (2002). Council of Europe. http://www.coe.int/en/web/istanbul-convention/text-of-the-convention. Accessed 2 July 2016.
  16. MAT. (2015). Muslim arbitration tribunal. http://www.matribunal.com/. Accessed 1 July 2016.
  17. Patel, P. (2003). Shifting terrains: old struggles for new? In R. Gupta and S. B. Sisters (Eds.), From homebreakers to jailbreakers. London: Southall Black Sisters.Google Scholar
  18. Patel, P. (2013). Multifaithism and the gender question: implications of government policy on the struggle for equality and rights for minority women in the UK. In Y. Rehman, L. Kelly, H. Siddiqui (Eds.), Moving in the shadows. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  19. Patel, P., & Sahgal, G. (2016, July 4). Whitewashing Sharia councils in the UK? 50.50 inclusive democracy. https://www.opendemocracy.net/pragna-patel-gita-sahgal/whitewashing-sharia-councils-in-uk. Accessed 6 July 2016.
  20. Patel, P., & Siddiqui, H. (2010). Shrinking secular spaces. In R. K. Thiara and A.K. Gill (Eds.), Violence against women in South Asian communities: issues for policy and practice. London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
  21. Patel, P., & Sen, U. (2010). Cohesion, faith and gender. London: Southall Black Sisters Trust.Google Scholar
  22. R. (Quila & Anor) v. SSHD; R. (Bibi & Anor) v. SSHD. (2011). UKSC 45. https://www.supremecourt.uk/decided-cases/docs/UKSC_2011_0022_Judgment.pdf. Accessed 6 July 2016.
  23. R. (on application of Begum (by Rahman) v. Headteacher and Governors of Denbigh High School. (2006). UKHL 15. https://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldjudgmt/jd060322/begum.pdf. Accessed 2 July 2016.
  24. R. v. Ahluwalia (Kiranjit) [1992] 4 All ER 889; (1993) 96 Cr. App. R. 133 CA (Crim Div).Google Scholar
  25. SBS. (1989). Two struggles: challenging male violence and the police. In C. Dunhill (Ed.), The boys in blue: women’s challenge to the police (pp. 38–44). London: Virago.Google Scholar
  26. SBS. (2014). Law society withdraws practice note. http://www.southallblacksisters.org.uk/law-society-withdraws-sharia-wills-practice-note/. Accessed 2 July 2016.
  27. Scutt, J.A. (2014). Human rights, ‘arranged marriages’ and nullity law: should culture override or inform fraud and duress? Denning Law Journal, 26, 62–97. http://www.ubplj.org/index.php/dlj/article/view/935. Accessed 4 June 2016.Google Scholar
  28. Siddiqui, H., & Patel, M. (2010). Safe and sane: a model of intervention on domestic violence and mental health, suicide and self-harm amongst black and minority ethnic women. London: Southall Black Sisters Trust.Google Scholar
  29. Tax, M. (2013, February 5) Double bind: tied up in knots on the left. Open Democracy. https://www.opendemocracy.net/5050/meredith-tax/double-bind-tied-up-in-knots-on-left. Accessed 16 July 2016.
  30. Transcript. (1989). Copy held by author.Google Scholar
  31. Women Living Under Muslim Laws. (2004, December). ‘Women Living Under Muslim Laws’. In A. Imam, J. Morgan, N. Yuval-Davies (Eds.), Warning signs of Fundamentalism. London: WLUML.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Southall Black SistersSouthallUK

Personalised recommendations