Abstract
The paper discusses new opportunities to carry out research on physics education, specifically from a neurodidactical point of view . It shows the possible ways of applying new tools and technologies in didactics of physics. Emphasis was placed on analysing eyetracking as a research method. Examples chosen from an analysis of empirical research results are provided to illustrate the diagnostic possibilities of the tool as well as to point out their strengths and weaknesses. Eyetracking technology was used to examine the strategies and difficulties faced by high school students, university students, and scientists in the process of problem solving.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, K. J., Revelle W., & Lynch, M. J. (1989). Caffeine, impulsivity, and memory scanning: A comparison of two explanations for the Yerkes-Dodson Effect. Motivation and Emotion, 13, 1–20.
Andrzejewska, M., Stolińska, A., Błasiak, W., Pęczkowski, P., Rosiek, R., & Rożek, B., et al. (2015). Zastosowanie badań eye-trackingowych w neurodydaktyce, Edukacja a nowe technologie w kulturze, informacji i komunikacji (pp. 273–288). Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika.
Kekule, M. (2014). Students’ approaches when dealing with kinematics graphs explored by eye-tracking research method In: A. Bilsel & M. U. Garip (Eds.), Proceedings of the Frontiers in Mathematics and Science Education Research Conference, FISER’ 2014 (pp. 108–117). Famagusta: Science Education research Group as Eastern Mediterranean University.
Lai, M.-L., Tsai, M.-J., Yang, F.-Y., Hsu, C.-Y., Liu, T.-C., & Lee, S. W.-Y., et al. (2013). A review of using eye-tracking technology in exploring learning from 2000 to 2012. Educational Research Review, 10, 90–115.
Lupien, S. J., Maheu, F., Tu, M., Fiocco, A., & Schramek, T. E. (2007). The effects of stress and stress hormones on human cognition: Implications for the field of brain and cognition. Brain and Cognition, 65, 209–237.
Madsen, A., Larson, A., Loschky, L., & Rebello, S. (2012). Differences in visual attention between those who correctly and incorrectly answer physics problems. Physical Review Special Topics, Physics Education Research, 8, 1–13.
Madsen, A., Rouinfar, A., Larson, A., Loschky, L. C., & Rebello, N. S. (2013). Can short duration visual cues influence students’ reasoning and eye movements in physics problems? Physical Review Special Topics, Physics Education Research, 9, 020104.
Ohno, E., Shimojo, A., & Iwata, M. (2015). Analysis of problem solving processes in physics based on eye-movement data. In: The Conference of International Research Group on Physics Teaching (GIREP) European Physical Society—Physics Education Division (EPS PED), University of Wrocław (Book of abstracts, p. 67).
Smith, A. D., Mestre, J. P., & Ross, B. H. (2010). Eye-gaze patterns as students study worked-out examples in mechanics. Physical Review Special Topics, Physics Education Research, 6, 020118.
Soluch, P., & Tarnowski, A. (2013). O metodologii badań eyetrackingowych. Lingwistyka Stosowana, 7, 115–135.
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Rosiek, R., Sajka, M. (2017). Eyetracking in Research on Physics Education. In: Greczyło, T., Dębowska, E. (eds) Key Competences in Physics Teaching and Learning. Springer Proceedings in Physics, vol 190. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44887-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44887-9_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44886-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44887-9
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)