Skip to main content

Trade and Foreign Direct Investment Nexus in West Africa: Does Export Category Matter?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Investment and Competitiveness in Africa

Abstract

This paper examines the effect of inward FDI in West Africa on exports to EU countries. It investigates from a host country perspective, the impact of FDI on different export categories: primary, intermediate, and final goods. Contrary to previous studies where multinationals are usually engaged in downstream production in the host country, this study presents a “commodity-proximity” model where multinational presence in upstream activities in resource-abundant host countries can stimulate the export of primary and/or intermediate goods to source countries where downstream activities take place. Results from a theoretically augmented gravity model shows that the effect of FDI in host country’s export differs across export categories. Multinational presence in the ECOWAS region is associated with an increase in exports of primary goods, a decrease in exports of intermediate goods, and has no effect on final goods.

The paper suggests that in order to achieve export diversification and commodity based industrialization, ECOWAS members should align their investment promotion priorities with their industrialization policies. More FDI should be encouraged in sectors that are vital to industrialization aspirations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A few studies based in Asian countries, particularly China have investigated the FDI-trade nexus from a host country perspective (See Chunlai 1997; Zhang and Song 2000; Liu et al. 2001; Zhang and Felmingham 2001; and Min 2010).

  2. 2.

    These are the initial stages within the production value chain, which includes of extractive activities. While downstream activities refer to the processes that involve the conversion to final goods, as well as the distribution and sale.

  3. 3.

    BICS means Brazil, India, China and South Africa. We excluded Russia from the analysis due to lack of adequate data.

  4. 4.

    Sectors in this case refer to primary, intermediate and final goods producing sectors of the economy.

  5. 5.

    The EU-ACP EPA is an agreement which grants African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries duty free access to the European market. It started as a non-reciprocal preferential trade agreement but was later replaced by a reciprocal relationship in order to be in compliance with WTO regulations.

  6. 6.

    Given the paucity of data on intermediate goods trade in Africa, the analysis in this section is limited to only 10 members of the 15-member ECOWAS and limited to some years between 2000 and 2010. The 10 members are Benin, Burkina Faso, Cote D’Ivoire, Gambia, Ghana, Mali, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal and Togo.

  7. 7.

    The seven EU countries are UK, Spain, Netherlands, Italy, Germany, France and Belgium.

  8. 8.

    Krugman (1979, 1980) made profound contributions to the development of the “new” trade theory.

  9. 9.

    Asiedu (2006) and Asiedu and Gyimah-Brempong (2008) show the primary sector attracts most of the FDI in Africa, and availability of natural resources is a strong determinant of the location of multinationals.

  10. 10.

    Baldwin and Taglioni (2006) refer to this bias as the bronze-medal error.

  11. 11.

    The 10 ECOWAS countries are Benin Republic, Burkina Faso, CoteD’Ivoire, Gambia, Ghana, Mali, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal and Togo while the seven EU members are Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Spain and UK.

  12. 12.

    Table 4 in Appendix shows the re-categorization from BEC 5 Stage to 3 Stage product groups.

  13. 13.

    Find CEPII data at: http://www.cepii.fr/anglaisgraph/bdd/distances.htm

  14. 14.

    See standard freight rates on http://worldfreightrates.com/

  15. 15.

    In this analysis, we exclude Burkina Faso, Gambia and Niger Republic and Russia due to a high proportion of zero trade observations.

References

  • Agbodji A (2008) The impact of sub-regional integration on bilateral trade: the case of UEMOA, AERC Research Paper 186

    Google Scholar 

  • Amiti M, Wakelin K (2003) Investment liberalization and international trade. J Int Econ 61:101–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson J, Van Wincoop E (2003) Gravity with gravitas: a solution to the border puzzle. Am Econ Rev 93(1):170–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anwar S, Nguyen LP (2011) Foreign direct investment and trade: the case of Vietnam. Res Int Bus Financ 25:39–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asiedu E (2006) Foreign direct investment in Africa: the role of natural resources, market size, government policy, institutions and political instability. World Econ 9(1):63–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asiedu E, Gyimah-Brempong K (2008) The effect of the liberalization of investment policies on employment and investment of multinational corporations in Africa. Afr Dev Rev 20(1):49–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baier S, Bergstrand J (2007) Do free trade agreements actually increase members’ international trade? J Int Econ 71(1):72–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin R, Taglioni D (2006) Gravity for dummies and dummies for gravity equations. NBER Working Paper 12516. National Bureau of Economic Research

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin R, Taglioni D (2011) Gravity chains: estimating bilateral trade flows when parts and components trade is important. NBER Working Paper 16672. National Bureau of Economic Research

    Google Scholar 

  • Brainard SL (1993) A simple theory of multinational corporations and trade with a trade-off between proximity and concentration. NBER Working Paper No. 4269

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrere C (2006) Revisiting the effects of regional trade agreements on trade flows with proper specification of the gravity model. Eur Econ Rev 50:223–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chunlai C (1997) Foreign direct investment and trade: an empirical investigation of the evidence from China. Chinese Economies Research Centre Working Paper No. 97/11

    Google Scholar 

  • Cieslik A (2009) Foreign direct investment and the volume of trade: the case of Poland. Econ Chang Restruct 42:273–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clausing K (2000) Does multinational activity displace trade? Econ Inq 38(2):190–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning JH (1977) Trade, location of economic activity and the multinational enterprise: a search for an eclectic approach. In: Ohlin B, Hesselbom PO, Wiskman PJ (eds) The international allocation of economic activity. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Elia S (2007) Do Western European FDI substitute for export towards Eastern Europe? Unpublished paper, Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico di Milano

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaulier G, Lemoine F, Unal-Kesenci D (2005) China’s integration in East Asia: production sharing, FDI and high-tech trade. CEPII Working Papers 2005–09

    Google Scholar 

  • Girma S, Kneller R, Pisu M (2005) Multinationals, exporting and overseas production. In: Görg H, Greenaway D, Kneller R (eds) Globalisation and productivity growth: theory and evidence. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp 156–176

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grubert H, Mutti J (1991) Taxes, tariffs and transfer pricing in multinational corporate decision making. Rev Econ Stat 73(2):285–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head K, Reis J (2004) Exporting and FDI as alternative strategies. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 20(3):409–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helpman E (1984) Increasing returns, imperfect markets, and trade theory. In: Jones RW, Kenen PB (eds) Handbook of international economics, vol 1. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindleberger CP (1969) American business abroad: six lectures on foreign direct investment. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneller R, Pisu M, Yu Z (2005) The export effect of investment liberalization: firm level evidence from the UK manufacturing sector. ETSG Working Paper, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman PR (1979) Increasing returns, monopolistic competition, and international trade. J Int Econ 9(4):469–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman PR (1980) Scale economies, product differentiation, and the pattern of trade. Am Econ Rev 70:950–959

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey RE, Weiss ME (1981) Foreign production and exports in manufacturing industries. Rev Econ Stat 66(2):448–494

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey RE, Weiss ME (1984) Foreign production and exports of individual firms. Rev Econ Stat 66(2):304–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Wang C, Wei Y (2001) Causal links between foreign direct investment and trade in China. China Econ Rev 12:190–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markusen JR (1984) Multinationals, multi-plant economies, and the gains from trade. J Int Econ 16(3–4):205–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markusen JR (1997) Trade versus investment liberalization. NBER Working Paper 6231

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen JR (2002) Multinational firms and the theory of international trade. MPRA Paper No. 8380

    Google Scholar 

  • Min B (2010) FDI and trade. J Asia Pac Econ 8(2):229–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullen JK, Williams M (2011) Bilateral FDI and Canadian export activity. Int Trade J 25(3):349–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mundell RA (1957) International trade and factor mobility. Am Econ Rev 47(3):321–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose A (2000) One money, one market: estimating the effect of common currencies on trade. Econ Policy 30:9–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Salisu A, Ademuyiwa I (2013) Analysis of bilateral trade in UEMOA: the implications of trade effects. Afr J Econ Pol 20(2):63–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Soderston B, Reed G (1994) International economics, 3rd edn. Macmillan, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen J (1962) Shaping the world economy: suggestions for an international trade policy. Twentieth Century Fund Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ueki Y (2011) Intermediate goods trade in East Asia. In: Kagami M (ed) Intermediate goods trade in Asia: economic deepening through FTAs/EPAs, BRC Research Report No. 5, Bangkok Research Center

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson J (2004) The Washington consensus as policy prescription for development. A lecture in the series ‘Practitioners of Development’ delivered at the World Bank on January 13. Institute for International Economics. http://www.iie.com/publications/papers/williamson0204.pdf. Retrieved 14 Oct 2014

  • Zhang Q, Felmingham B (2001) The relationship between inward direct foreign investment and China’s provincial export trade. China Econ Rev 12:82–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang KH, Song S (2000) Promoting exports: the role of FDI in China. China Econ Rev 11:385–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chukwuka Onyekwena .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Fig. 6
figure 6

Shares of economic groups in ECOWAS’ imports, 1995–2013. Source: Authors’ computations from UNCTAD Statistics Database, 2014

Fig. 7
figure 7

Correlation matrix

Table 4 Broad economic categories of exports

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Onyekwena, C., Ademuyiwa, I., Uneze, E. (2017). Trade and Foreign Direct Investment Nexus in West Africa: Does Export Category Matter?. In: Seck, D. (eds) Investment and Competitiveness in Africa. Advances in African Economic, Social and Political Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44787-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics