Skip to main content

Do Market Size and Remittances Explain Foreign Direct Investment Flows to Sub-Sahara Africa?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Investment and Competitiveness in Africa

Abstract

The paper analyzes the effect of remittances in attracting foreign direct investment (FDI) to Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). We apply an unbalanced panel data set for 40 African countries for the period 1981–2013. The results indicate positive and significant impacts of remittances on net FDI inflows to SSA conditioned on the level of per capita GDP in the host country. Therefore, a threshold of per capita GDP is needed for a SSA country to benefit from the positive impact of remittances on net FDI inflows. In addition, host country demand positively affects net FDI inflows to Africa, which supports the market size hypothesis.

Paper submitted to the Sixth Annual Conference on Regional Integration in Africa (ACRIA 6), July 1–2, 2015, Lagos, Nigeria

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The International Monetary Fund defines FDI as an investment that represents at least 10 % of voting stocks in an enterprise operating in a country other than that of the investor. In this study, FDI is net inflows of foreign direct investment as a share of host country GDP and represents at least 10 % of voting stock, and it is the sum of equity capital, reinvestment of earnings, and other long term and short term capital.

  2. 2.

    Remittances are the sum of workers’ remittances, compensation of employees and migrants’ transfers received by individuals in the migrant home country.

  3. 3.

    The 40 countries are listed beneath the descriptive statistics in Appendix 3.

  4. 4.

    This will bode well for Africa since ODA is expected to eventually dwindle following the recent global economic recession.

  5. 5.

    Please see Sect. 3 of the paper for a more comprehensive review of the literature.

  6. 6.

    The top recipient of remittances is India. Countries in Latin America and the Caribbean receive about 25 % of all remittances, as do countries in the East Asia and Pacific region.

  7. 7.

    Lucas and Stark (1985), identified pure altruism, pure self-interest, and tempered altruism (or enlightened self-interest) as the microeconomic determinants of remittances using evidence from Botswana.

  8. 8.

    Moosa’s (2002) Chap. 2 provides a description of the theories of FDI.

  9. 9.

    This implies that appreciation of the host country’s currency against the U.S. dollar is expected to negatively affect FDI inflows.

  10. 10.

    The appropriate per capita GDP threshold is the log value of per capita GDP that makes the sum of remittances and the interaction term positive, or \( log\; human\; capital\ge \left(-\frac{\beta_{remittances}}{\beta_{interaction\; term}}\right) \). If both estimates are positive (negative), then remittances has an unambiguously positive (negative) effect on net FDI inflows.

References

  • Agosin MR, Machado R (2006) Openness and the international allocation of foreign direct investment. Economic and Sector Studies Series, RE2-06-004

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlburg DA (1991) Remittances and their impact: a study of Tonga and Western Samoa. National Center for Development Studies, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Asiedu E (2002) On the development of foreign direct investment to developing countries: is Africa different? World Dev 30:107–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bajo-Rubio O, Sosvilla-Rivero S (1994) An econometric analysis of foreign direct investment in Spain, 1964–1989. South Econ J 61(1):104–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balasubramanyam VN, Salisu M, Sapsford D (1996) Foreign direct investment and growth in EP and IS countries. Econ J 106:92–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrel R, Pain N (1996) An econometric analysis of U.S. foreign direct investment. Rev Econ Stat 78(2):200–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrel R, Pain N (1997) The growth of foreign direct investment in Europe. Natl Inst Econ Rev 2/97:63–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro R, Sala-i-Martin X (2004) Economic growth, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengoa M, Sanchez-Robles B (2003) Foreign direct investment, economic freedom and growth: new evidence from Latin America. Eur J Polit Econ 19:529–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billington N (1999) The location of foreign direct investment: an empirical analysis. Appl Econ 31:65–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blonigen BA, Feenstra RC (1996) Protectionist threats and foreign direct investment. National Bureau of Economic Research, 5475

    Google Scholar 

  • Borovnik M (2003) Seafarers in Kiribati—consequences of international labour circulation. Unpublished PhD Thesis. University of Canterbury, Christchurch

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenton P, Di Mauro F, Lücke M (1999) Economic integration and FDI: an empirical analysis of foreign investment in the EU and in Central and Eastern Europe. Empirica 26:95–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruno M, Easterly W (1998) Inflation crises and long run growth. J Monet Econ 41:3–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (2009) Microeconometrics using stata. Stata Press, College Station, TX

    Google Scholar 

  • Campos NF, Kinoshita Y (2002) Foreign direct investment as technology transferred: some panel evidence from the transition economies. Manch Sch 70(3):398–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark P (2004) The economic impact of contracted labour upon the livelihoods of small pacific island states: an examination of the expenditure patterns of I-Kiribati and Tuvaluan seafarers and their dependents. Unpublished Masters of Social Planning and Development Thesis, University of Queensland

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell J (1980) Remittances and rural development: migration, dependency and inequality in the south pacific. National Centre for Development Studies Occasional Paper No. 22. The Australia National University, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Cukierman A, Kalaitzidakis P, Summers L, Webb SB (1993) Central bank independence, growth, investment, and real estates. Carn-Roch Conf Ser Public Policy 39:95–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culem CG (1988) The location determinants of direct investments among industrialized countries. Eur Econ Rev 32:885–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cushman DO (1985) Real exchange rate risk, expectations, and the level of direct investment. Rev Econ Stat 67(2):297–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cushman DO (1987) The effects of real wages and labor productivity on foreign direct investment. South Econ J 54(1):174–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cushman DO (1988) Exchange-rate uncertainty and foreign direct investment in the United States. Weltwirtschaftliches Arch 124(2):322–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diatta MA, Mbow N (1999) Releasing the development potential of return migration: the case of Senegal. Int Migr 37(1):243–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dornbush R, Fischer S (1994) Macroeconomics, 6th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupasquier C, Osakwe PN (2005) Foreign direct investment in Africa: performance, challenges and responsibilities. ATPC Work in Progress No. 21, United Nations Economic Commission for Africa

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedderke JW, Romm AT (2006) Growth impact and the determinants of foreign direct investment into South Africa, 1956–2003. Econ Model 23:738–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filippaios F, Papanastassiou M, Pearce R (2003) The evolution of U.S. outward foreign direct investment in the pacific rim: a cross-time and country analysis. Appl Econ 35:1779–1787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Findley SE, Sow S (1998) From season to season: agriculture, poverty, and migration in the Senegal River Valley, Mali. In: Appleyard R (ed) Emigration dynamics in developing countries: Sub-Saharan Africa. Ashgate, London, pp 69–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer S (1993) The role of macroeconomics factors in growth. J Monet Econ 32:485–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Froot KA, Stein JC (1991) Exchange rates and foreign direct investment: an imperfect capital markets approach. Q J Econ 106(4):1191–1217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Fuentes PA, Kennedy PL (2011) Foreign direct investment inflows to Latin America and the Caribbean: remittances and market size. J Int Agric Trade Dev 7(1):1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Giuliano P, Ruiz-Arranz M (2009) Remittances, financial development, and growth. J Dev Econ 90:144–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Globerman S, Shapiro D (1999) The impact of government policies on foreign direct investment: the Canadian experience. J Int Bus Stud 30(3):513–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glytsos NP (2005) The contribution of remittances to growth: a dynamic approach and empirical analysis. J Econ Stud 32(6):468–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gopinath M, Pick D, Vasavada U (1999) The economics of foreign direct investment and trade with an application to the U.S. food processing industry. Am J Agric Econ 81:442–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta P (2005) Macroeconomic determinants of remittances: evidence from India. IMF Working Paper 05/224, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta S, Pattillo C, Wagh S (2007) Making remittances work for Africa. Financ Dev 44(2):40–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggard S (1989) The political economy of foreign direct investment in Latin America. Latin Am Res Rev 24(1):184–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen H, Rand J (2006) On the causal link between FDI and growth in developing countries. World Econ 29(1):21–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokko A (1994) Technology, market characteristics and spillovers. J Dev Econ 43:279–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman P (1991) Increasing returns and economic geography. J Polit Econ 99:483–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lall P, Norman DW, Featherstone AM (2003) Determinants of U.S. direct investment in the Caribbean. Appl Econ 35:1485–1496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemi A, Asefa S (2003) Foreign direct investment and uncertainty: empirical evidence from Africa. Afr Financ J 5:36–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Liu X (2005) Foreign direct investment and economic growth: an increasing endogenous relationship. World Dev 33(3):393–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love JH, Lage-Hidalgo F (2000) Analyzing the determinants of U.S. direct investment in Mexico. Appl Econ 32:259–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas REB, Stark O (1985) Motivations to remit: evidence from Botswana. J Polit Econ 93(5):901–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchant MA, Cornell DN, Koo W (2002) International trade and foreign direct investment: substitutes or complements? J Agric Appl Econ 34(2):289–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markusen JR (1983) Factor movements and commodity trade as complements. J Int Econ 14:341–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohapatra S, Ratha D, Silwal A (2010) Outlook for remittances flows 2011–12: recovery after the crisis, but risk lie ahead. Migration and development brief 13. World Bank, Nov 8, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Moosa IA (2002) Foreign direct investment: theory, evidence and practice. Palgrave, NewYork, NY

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morrisset P (2000) Foreign direct investment to Africa: policies also matter. Transl Corp 9:107–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundell RA (1957) International trade and factor mobility. Am Econ Rev 47(3):321–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Mwilima N (2003) Foreign direct investment in Africa. Labour Resource and Research Institute, Africa Labour Research Network, Final Draft Report

    Google Scholar 

  • Nigh D (1985) The effect of political events on United States direct foreign investment: a pooled time-series cross-sectional analysis. J Int Bus Stud 16(1):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onyeiwu S, Shrestha H (2004) Determinants of foreign direct investment in Africa. J Dev Soc 20:89–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Pain N (1993) An econometric analysis of foreign direct investment in the United Kingdom. Scottish J Polit Econ 40(1):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport H, Docquier F (2006) The economics of migrants’ remittances. In: Kolm GV, Mercier-Ythier J (eds) Handbook on the economics of reciprocity, giving and altruism, vol 2. North Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart CM, Rogoff KS (2002). FDI to Africa: the role of price stability and currency instability. Paper prepared for the Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics, Washington, DC, Apr 29–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer D (2006) Advanced macroeconomics, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens GVG (1998) Exchange rates and foreign direct investment: a note. J Policy Model 20(3):393–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temple J (1999) The new growth evidence. J Econ Lit 37:112–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuman JP, Emert CF (2004) The political economy of U.S. foreign direct investment in Latin America: a reappraisal. Lat Am Res Rev 39(3):9–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD (2010) World investment report 2010: investing in a low-carbon economy. United Nations Organization, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD (2011) UNCTAD handbook of statistics 2011. United Nations Organization, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD (2014) Economic development in Africa report: catalysing investment for transformative growth in Africa. United Nations Organization, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (2009) World investment report 2009. United Nations Organization, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldkirch A (2003) The new regionalism and foreign investment: the case of Mexico. J Int Trade Econ Dev 12(2):151–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2014, April) Africa’s pulse: an analysis of issues shaping Africa’s economic future. Office of the chief economist for the Africa region, vol. 9

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2007) Global development finance 2007. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2012) World development indicators (online version). World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William A. Amponsah .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix 1

1.1 Derivation of the Econometric Model

The model assumes that the TNC decides first on whether or not to undertake FDI which requires a decision on the output level in the foreign country. Then, for the TNC undertaking FDI, total costs are defined as a function of costs of production in both the TNC’s home and foreign plants. So, total costs are given by:

$$ TC={c}_h\left({q}_h\right){q}_h+{c}_f\left({q}_f\right){q}_f $$
(6)

where TC is total costs, \( {c}_h \) and \( {q}_h \) are unit costs and output level in the home plant, \( {c}_f \) and \( {q}_f \) are unit costs and output level in the foreign plant, subscripts h and f are for home and foreign.

The constraint for total cost minimization is given by total output demand (TD) as:

$$ TD={q}_h+{q}_f $$
(7)

The associated Lagrangian function is defined as:

$$ L={c}_h\left({q}_h\right){q}_h+{c}_f\left({q}_f\right){q}_f+\lambda\;\left(TD-{q}_h - {q}_f\right) $$
(8)

and the first order conditions for the cost minimization problem are given by:

$$ \partial L/\partial {q}_h={c}_h^{\prime}\;\left({q}_h\right){q}_h+{c}_h\left({q}_h\right)-\lambda =0, $$
(9)
$$ \frac{\partial L}{\partial {q}_f}={c}_f^{\prime}\left({q}_f\right){q}_f+{c}_f\left({q}_f\right)-\lambda =0,\mathrm{and} $$
(10)
$$ \partial L/\partial \lambda =TD-{q}_h - {q}_f=0 $$
(11)

where \( {c}_h^{\prime }=\partial {c}_h/\partial {q}_h \) and \( {c}_f^{\prime }=\partial {c}_f/\partial {q}_f \). Equations (9) and (10) are marginal costs in the home and foreign plants respectively.

By equating (9) and (10) and solving for home output (\( {q}_h\Big) \) and then substituting this result into Eq. (11), we obtain the equilibrium output at the foreign plant. Therefore, foreign production is given as:

$$ {q}_f={\varnothing}_1\;TD+{\varnothing}_2\;RUC $$
(12)

where \( {\varnothing}_1={c}_h^{\prime }/\left({c}_h^{\prime }+{c}_f^{\prime}\right) \) and \( {\varnothing}_2=1/\left({c}_h^{\prime }+{c}_f^{\prime}\right) \) which are assumed to be positive, and \( RUC={c}_h-{c}_f \) which represents relative unit costs between home country and host country. Equation (12) shows that the foreign plant’s output is positively related to both total demand and relative unit costs.

Next, the TNC has to determine the level of inputs for producing in the foreign plant. A Cobb-Douglas production function is assumed to represent foreign production as follows:

$$ {q}_f={L}_f^{\propto}\;{K}_f^{\beta } $$
(13)

Then, the costs associated with foreign production are given by:

$$ {C}_f={w}_f\;{L}_f+{r}_f\;{K}_f $$
(14)

where w and r are real wage and real user cost of capital respectively.

Assuming the foreign plant’s costs are minimized, the Lagrangian function is defined as:

$$ L={w}_f\;{L}_f+{r}_f\;{K}_f+\lambda\;\left({q}_f - {L}_f^{\propto}\;{K}_f^{\beta}\right) $$
(15)

The first order conditions for the cost minimization problem are given by:

$$ \partial L/\partial {L}_f={w}_f-\lambda \propto \left({q}_f/{L}_f\right)=0, $$
(16)
$$ \frac{\partial L}{{\partial K}_f}={r}_f-\lambda\;\beta\;\left(\frac{q_f}{K_f}\right)=0,\mathrm{and} $$
(17)
$$ \partial L/\partial \lambda ={q}_f - {L}_f^{\propto}\;{K}_f^{\beta }=0 $$
(18)

Dividing Eq. (16) by Eq. (17) and then rearranging yields:

$$ {w}_f\;{L}_f/\propto {q}_f={r}_f\;{K}_f/\beta {q}_f $$
(19)

Taking \( {L}_f \) from Eq. (18) and substituting it into (19) yields \( {K}_f \) as:

$$ {K}_f={\left[\left(\beta /\propto \right)\left({w}_f/{q}_f\right)\right]}^{\propto /\left(\propto +\beta \right)}\;{q_f}^{1/\left(\propto +\beta \right)} $$
(20)

Plugging Eq. (12) into Eq. (20) yields the final expression for the TNC’s desired capital stock (a capital stock level that solves the cost minimization problem) at the foreign plant as:

$$ {K}_f^{*}={\left[\left(\beta /\propto \right)\left({w}_f/{q}_f\right)\right]}^{\propto /\left(\propto +\beta \right)}\;{\left[{\varnothing}_1\;TD+{\varnothing}_2\;RUC\right]}^{1/\left(\propto +\beta \right)} $$
(21)

Appendix 2

1.1 Variable Definitions and Data Sources

Variable name

Variable definition

Source

FDI/GDP

Ratio of real net FDI inflows to real GDP

Own calculations

Net FDI inflows

Net FDI inflows balance of payment values in current U.S. dollars

World Development Indicators online version, World Bank (2014)

Real GDP

Host country real GDP at 2005 constant prices

Penn World Table Version 7.1, 2014

Real per capita GDP

Real per capita GDP at 2005 constant prices

Penn World Table Version 7.1, 2014

Remittances

Workers’ remittances and compensation of employees received in current U.S. dollars

World Development Indicators online version, World Bank (2014)

Remittances/GDP*

real per capita GDP

Interaction of the Ln of real remittances/real GDP and Ln of real per capita GDP

Own calculations

Real exchange rate

Real exchange rate. Dollars per unit of foreign currency. It is defined as in Waldkirch (2003). It is computed by multiplying the nominal exchange rate by the ratio of the host country CPI to the U.S. CPI plus 0.001

Own calculations

Ln Imports/GDP

Natural log of the ratio imports to GDP

World Development Indicators online version, World Bank (2014)

Ln inflation

Natural log of 1 plus the annual change of the GDP deflator

Own calculations from International Financial Statistics CD-ROM, IMF, 2014

Ln U.S. r-Ln Host Country r

U.S. real interest rate and host country real interest rate differential

Own calculations. Real interest rate data is from the World Development Indicators online version, World Bank (2014)

Foreign capital stock

Host country foreign capital stock

UNCTAD, Division on Investment and Enterprise. http://unctadstat.unctad.org/ReportFolders/reportFolders.aspx

GDP deflator

GDP deflator

World Development Indicators online version, World Bank (2012)

Nominal

exchange rate

U.S. dollars per unit of host country currency

International Financial Statistics CD-ROM, IMF, 2014.

CPI

Consumer price index

World Development Indicators online version, World Bank (2014)

Appendix 3

1.1 Summary Statistics, Annual Values for the Period 1981–2013

Variable

N

Mean

Std. Dev.

Minimum

Maximum

FDI/GDP

863

0.0347

0.0864

−0.0859

1.6182

Ln per capita GDP

863

6.6359

1.0990

4.7351

9.6075

Ln remittances/GDP

863

−4.6722

2.1461

−14.7571

0.0628

Ln real exchange rate

863

−4.3062

2.3364

−9.4712

3.6465

Ln imports/GDP

860

−0.9880

0.5549

−3.5126

1.4465

Ln inflation

863

0.1017

0.1318

−0.3449

1.0348

Ln foreign capital stock/GDP

863

−2.0508

1.3018

−8.1593

2.0712

Remittances/GDP

863

0.0487

0.1241

0.0000

1.0648

The SSA countries included in the study are Angola, Burundi, Benin, Burkina Faso, Botswana, Central African Republic, Chad, Cote d’Ivoire, Cameroon, Comoros, Cape Verde, Ethiopia, Gabon, Ghana, Guinea, The Gambia, Guinea-Bissau, Equatorial Guinea, Kenya, Liberia, Lesotho, Madagascar, Mali, Mozambique, Mauritania, Mauritius, Malawi, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, Rwanda, Sudan, Senegal, Sao Tome and Principe, Swaziland, Seychelles, Togo, Uganda, South Africa and Zambia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Amponsah, W.A., Garcia-Fuentes, P. (2017). Do Market Size and Remittances Explain Foreign Direct Investment Flows to Sub-Sahara Africa?. In: Seck, D. (eds) Investment and Competitiveness in Africa. Advances in African Economic, Social and Political Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44787-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics