Skip to main content

Public Investment and Competitiveness in ECOWAS: An Empirical Investigation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Investment and Competitiveness in Africa

Abstract

The paper, using regression analysis, ascertains whether public investment and competitiveness enhance economic growth and development in the economies of ECOWAS. Panel data results show that public investment, government consumption democracy have positive impact on growth while openness, private investment and inflation show negative relationship under fixed effects analysis. Similar arguments have positive and negative relationships with economic development and are statistically significant. The vector error correction estimates indicate various speed of adjustments from short to long-run equilibrium conditions.

Paper presented at the Sixth Annual Conference on Regional Integration in Africa (ACRIA 6), organized by CREPOL, WAIFEM, WAMI, and WAMA, at WAIFEM Headquarters, Central Bank of Nigeria Learning Centre, Lagos, July 1–3, 2015. The excellent research assistance of Jimoh Olakunle, Doctoral Fellow in WAIFEM is acknowledged. The usual disclaimer applies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aschauer AD (1989) Is public expenditure productive? J Monet Econ 23:177–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aschauer AD (1990) Is government spending simulative? Contemp Policy Iss 8:30–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro RJ (1990) Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth. J Polit Econ 98:S103–S125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedia A (2007) Relative effects of public and private investment on Cote D’ivoire’s economic performance. Appl Econ Int Dev 7(1):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Devarajan S, Swaroop V, Zou H (1996) The composition of public expenditure and economic growth. J Monet Econ 37:313–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekpo AH (1999) Public expenditure and economic growth in a petroleum-based economy: Nigeria, 1960–1992. South African J Econ Manag Sci 2(3):374–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Fosu AK (2012) Growth of African economies: productivity, policy syndromes and the importance of institutions, CSAE Working Paper Series. University of Oxford, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghali KH (1998) Public investment and private capital formation in a vector error-correction model of growth. Appl Econ 30(6):837–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2015) Making public investment more efficient. IMF Policy Paper, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoop TA (1999) Growth, welfare, and the size of government. J Econ Inq 37(1):103–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ram R (1996) Productivity of public and private investment in developing countries: a broad international perspective. World Dev 24:1373–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weymouth S, Feinbers R (2009) National competitiveness in comparative perspective: evidence from Latin America. Latin Am Soc 53(3):141–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Forum (2008) Global Competitiveness Report 2007. WEF, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasin M (2012) Public spending and economic growth: empirical investigation of Sub-Saharan Africa. Southwestern Econ Rev 30:59–68

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akpan H. Ekpo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 Test of Stationarity

figure h

The above illustrates an informal test of stationarity. Both inflation(infla) and growth (y_growth) appear to have a slow decay over time and so they do not seem to have conspicous trend and hence demonstrate some stationarity status. The informal test however would not give a clear picture on stationarity status of variables.

Levin & Chu Panel Unit Root test results

Variable

Levin, Lin & Chu (Prob)

Order of integration

Decision

y_growth

0.000

I(0)

Stationary

Yp

0.788

Non-stationary

ΔYp

0.000

I(1)

Stationary

Pr

0.456

 

Non-stationary

ΔPr

0.000

I(1)

Stationary

Gc

0.9997

 

Non-stationary

ΔGc

0.000

I(1)

Stationary

Opn

0.181

 

Non-stationary

ΔOpn

0.000

I(1)

Stationary

Gf

0.722

 

Non-stationary

ΔGf

0.000

I(1)

Stationary

Infla

0.000

I(0)

Stationary

  1. Source: Author’s computation using E-views

The stationarity status of the variables y_growth, Yp, Pr, Gc Opn, Gf and Infla is observed using the Levin, Lin & Chu (LLC) panel unit root test. The LLC is based on the assumption that there is a common persistence of parameters across cross-sections.

The test equation used for the stationarity test for each of the variables is based on the graphical illustration as to whether each variable has an intercept or trend.

Among all the variables used for this study, only two are stationary in their level form. However, the variables tagged institutionalized democracy (Dem) is left out since it takes the form of a dummy representation in the analysis.

The growth variable (y_growth) is just stationary at level with probability value 0.000 which is less than the conventional 0.05 level. As expected, the inflation variable (infla) is also found with no unit root at its level (0.000). On this basis, both the growth and inflation variables are integrated of order 0.

Other variables such as Per capita GDP (Yp), private investment (Pr), government final consumption (Gc), Openness (Opn) and gross fixed capital formation (Gf) are stationary only after taking their first differences, hence they are integrated of order 1. The overall results of the stationarity test follow from the fact that most economic variables appear to be integrated in their first differences.

Cointegration results

Series

No. of CE(s)

Fisher stat* (Trace Test)

Prob

Fisher stat(Max-Eigen test)

Prob

Y_growth, Pr, Gc, Dem, Opn, Gf, Infla

     
 

None

112.7

0.000

69.75

0.000

 

At most 1

77.37

0.000

30.23

0.000

 

At most 2

52.79

0.000

22.40

0.000

 

At most 3

34.14

0.000

19.36

0.000

 

At most 4

18.07

0.000

14.70

0.000

Series

No. of CE(s)

Fisher stat* (Trace Test)

Prob

Fisher stat(Max-Eigen test)

Prob

Yp, Pr, Gc, Dem, Opn, Gf, Infla

     
 

None

118.8

0.000

80.44

0.000

 

At most 1

84.76

0.000

38.21

0.000

 

At most 2

54.58

0.000

33.50

0.000

 

At most 3

26.47

0.000

14.68

0.000

 

At most 4

14.76

0.000

12.38

0.000

Series

No. of CE(s)

Fisher stat* (Trace Test)

Prob

Fisher stat(Max-Eigen test)

Prob

Gc, Y_growth, Gf, Dem, Opn

None

240.0

0.000

127.6

0.000

 

At most 1

137.3

0.000

80.05

0.000

 

At most 2

70.24

0.000

53.51

0.000

 

At most 3

44.15

0.000

29.72

0.000

 

At most 4

49.20

0.000

49.20

0.000

  1. *stable and significant

Kao-residual co integration

Series

ADF

t-stat

Prob

Y_growth, Pr, Gc, Dem, Opn, Gf, Infla

−8.122

0.000

Yp, Pr, Gc, Dem, Opn, Gf, Infla

−8.239

0.000

Gc, Y_growth, Gf, Dem, Opn

−7.541

0.000

Pedroni residual cointegration

Series

Panel v-stat

Panel rho stat

Panel PP stat

Panel ADF stat

Stat

Prob

Stat

pro

Stat

Prob

Stat

Prob

Y_growth, Pr, Gc, Dem, Opn, Gf, Infla

−0.992

0.839

−0.237

0.406

−5.243

0.000

−4.431

0.000

Group Rho stat

Group PP stat

Group ADF stat

Stat

Prob

Stat

Prob

Stat

Prob

1.362

0.913

−5.047

0.000

−3.697

0.000

Series

Panel v-stat

Panel rho stat

Panel PP stat

Panel ADF stat

Stat

Prob

Stat

Pro

Stat

Prob

Stat

Prob

Yp, Pr, Gc, Dem, Opn, Gf, Infla

−405.0515

1.000

−0.1573

0.4375

−7.820

0.000

−2.817

0.028

Group Rho stat

Group PP stat

Group ADF stat

Stat

Prob

Stat

Prob

Stat

Prob

1.1755

0.8801

−7.2764

0.000

−2.231

0.013

 

Panel v-stat

Panel rho stat

Panel PP stat

Panel ADF stat

Series

Stat

Prob

Stat

Pro

Stat

Prob

Stat

Prob

Gc, Y_growth, Gf, Dem, Opn

2.5978

0.005

−6.6657

0.000

−9.3128

0.000

−9.3531

0.000

Group Rho stat

Group PP stat

Group ADF stat

Stat

Prob

Stat

Prob

Stat

Prob

−4.950

0.000

−10.458

0.000

−10.5265

0.000

The above tables discuss the long run relationship among the variables used. First, the cointegration test is performed for three different equations. These are the growth (Y_growth), the economic development (Per capita GDP) and the government final consumption (Gc) equations. The three variants of panel cointegration tests carried out are the Johansen Fisher Panel cointegration test, the Kao Residual cointegration test and the Pedroni Residual cointegration test. These become necessary to ascertain the robustness of the estimation results.

In the test for the long run relationship among the variables using the Johansen Fisher Panel cointegration test, a linear deterministic trend is assumed with lag interval of 11 in first differences.

For the growth equation where growth is endogenously defined and determined by the private investment, government final consumption, state of democracy, openness, government fixed capital formation; there is evidence of a long run relationship among these variables.

The Johansen cointegration test has demonstrated five cointegrating vectors for both the Trace test statistics and the Max-Eigen value statistics; all with probability values 0.000. The number of cointegrating vectors displayed is a clear indication of the stability of the system since the greater the number of the cointegrating vectors, the more stable the system is.

The Kao Residual test gives similar results of a long run relationship as demonstrated by the t-statistics of −8.122. In the same way, the Pedroni cointegation test shows that the variables are cointegrated especially for the Panel PP statistics (−5.243), Panel ADF statistics (−4.43), Group PP statistics (−5.047) and the Group ADF statistics (−3.697).

The long run relationship among the variables in the growth equation follows the interaction between the determinants and growth. It further demonstrates that these variables seem to be fundamental to growth in the ECOWAS region.

The Economic development equation shows similar trend. In this case too using all the three variants of cointegration tests, there exists a long run relationship among the variables in the economic development equation including the endogenous variable itself. Exactly five cointegrating vectors too were displayed for both Trace and Max-Eigen value statistics. This also shows that the model operates under a stable system. The Kao statistics also shows evidence of a long run relationship among the variables in question based on its ADF t-statistics of −8.239. The Pedroni cointegration test gives similar results of cointegration among the variables as observed from the Panel PP statistics (−7.819), Panel ADF statistics (−2.817) Group PP statistics (−7.276) and Group ADF statistics (−2.231).

All the three variants also demonstrate a long run relationship between the government final consumption and its determinants.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ekpo, A.H. (2017). Public Investment and Competitiveness in ECOWAS: An Empirical Investigation. In: Seck, D. (eds) Investment and Competitiveness in Africa. Advances in African Economic, Social and Political Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44787-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics