Abstract
The paper, using regression analysis, ascertains whether public investment and competitiveness enhance economic growth and development in the economies of ECOWAS. Panel data results show that public investment, government consumption democracy have positive impact on growth while openness, private investment and inflation show negative relationship under fixed effects analysis. Similar arguments have positive and negative relationships with economic development and are statistically significant. The vector error correction estimates indicate various speed of adjustments from short to long-run equilibrium conditions.
Paper presented at the Sixth Annual Conference on Regional Integration in Africa (ACRIA 6), organized by CREPOL, WAIFEM, WAMI, and WAMA, at WAIFEM Headquarters, Central Bank of Nigeria Learning Centre, Lagos, July 1–3, 2015. The excellent research assistance of Jimoh Olakunle, Doctoral Fellow in WAIFEM is acknowledged. The usual disclaimer applies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aschauer AD (1989) Is public expenditure productive? J Monet Econ 23:177–200
Aschauer AD (1990) Is government spending simulative? Contemp Policy Iss 8:30–45
Barro RJ (1990) Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth. J Polit Econ 98:S103–S125
Bedia A (2007) Relative effects of public and private investment on Cote D’ivoire’s economic performance. Appl Econ Int Dev 7(1):1–8
Devarajan S, Swaroop V, Zou H (1996) The composition of public expenditure and economic growth. J Monet Econ 37:313–344
Ekpo AH (1999) Public expenditure and economic growth in a petroleum-based economy: Nigeria, 1960–1992. South African J Econ Manag Sci 2(3):374–389
Fosu AK (2012) Growth of African economies: productivity, policy syndromes and the importance of institutions, CSAE Working Paper Series. University of Oxford, Oxford
Ghali KH (1998) Public investment and private capital formation in a vector error-correction model of growth. Appl Econ 30(6):837–844
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2015) Making public investment more efficient. IMF Policy Paper, Washington, DC
Knoop TA (1999) Growth, welfare, and the size of government. J Econ Inq 37(1):103–119
Ram R (1996) Productivity of public and private investment in developing countries: a broad international perspective. World Dev 24:1373–78
Weymouth S, Feinbers R (2009) National competitiveness in comparative perspective: evidence from Latin America. Latin Am Soc 53(3):141–159
World Economic Forum (2008) Global Competitiveness Report 2007. WEF, Geneva, Switzerland
Yasin M (2012) Public spending and economic growth: empirical investigation of Sub-Saharan Africa. Southwestern Econ Rev 30:59–68
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
1.1 Test of Stationarity
The above illustrates an informal test of stationarity. Both inflation(infla) and growth (y_growth) appear to have a slow decay over time and so they do not seem to have conspicous trend and hence demonstrate some stationarity status. The informal test however would not give a clear picture on stationarity status of variables.
Levin & Chu Panel Unit Root test results
Variable | Levin, Lin & Chu (Prob) | Order of integration | Decision |
---|---|---|---|
y_growth | 0.000 | I(0) | Stationary |
Yp | 0.788 | Non-stationary | |
ΔYp | 0.000 | I(1) | Stationary |
Pr | 0.456 | Â | Non-stationary |
ΔPr | 0.000 | I(1) | Stationary |
Gc | 0.9997 | Â | Non-stationary |
ΔGc | 0.000 | I(1) | Stationary |
Opn | 0.181 | Â | Non-stationary |
ΔOpn | 0.000 | I(1) | Stationary |
Gf | 0.722 | Â | Non-stationary |
ΔGf | 0.000 | I(1) | Stationary |
Infla | 0.000 | I(0) | Stationary |
The stationarity status of the variables y_growth, Yp, Pr, Gc Opn, Gf and Infla is observed using the Levin, Lin & Chu (LLC) panel unit root test. The LLC is based on the assumption that there is a common persistence of parameters across cross-sections.
The test equation used for the stationarity test for each of the variables is based on the graphical illustration as to whether each variable has an intercept or trend.
Among all the variables used for this study, only two are stationary in their level form. However, the variables tagged institutionalized democracy (Dem) is left out since it takes the form of a dummy representation in the analysis.
The growth variable (y_growth) is just stationary at level with probability value 0.000 which is less than the conventional 0.05 level. As expected, the inflation variable (infla) is also found with no unit root at its level (0.000). On this basis, both the growth and inflation variables are integrated of order 0.
Other variables such as Per capita GDP (Yp), private investment (Pr), government final consumption (Gc), Openness (Opn) and gross fixed capital formation (Gf) are stationary only after taking their first differences, hence they are integrated of order 1. The overall results of the stationarity test follow from the fact that most economic variables appear to be integrated in their first differences.
Cointegration results
Series | No. of CE(s) | Fisher stat* (Trace Test) | Prob | Fisher stat(Max-Eigen test) | Prob |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Y_growth, Pr, Gc, Dem, Opn, Gf, Infla | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
 | None | 112.7 | 0.000 | 69.75 | 0.000 |
 | At most 1 | 77.37 | 0.000 | 30.23 | 0.000 |
 | At most 2 | 52.79 | 0.000 | 22.40 | 0.000 |
 | At most 3 | 34.14 | 0.000 | 19.36 | 0.000 |
 | At most 4 | 18.07 | 0.000 | 14.70 | 0.000 |
Series | No. of CE(s) | Fisher stat* (Trace Test) | Prob | Fisher stat(Max-Eigen test) | Prob |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yp, Pr, Gc, Dem, Opn, Gf, Infla | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
 | None | 118.8 | 0.000 | 80.44 | 0.000 |
 | At most 1 | 84.76 | 0.000 | 38.21 | 0.000 |
 | At most 2 | 54.58 | 0.000 | 33.50 | 0.000 |
 | At most 3 | 26.47 | 0.000 | 14.68 | 0.000 |
 | At most 4 | 14.76 | 0.000 | 12.38 | 0.000 |
Series | No. of CE(s) | Fisher stat* (Trace Test) | Prob | Fisher stat(Max-Eigen test) | Prob |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gc, Y_growth, Gf, Dem, Opn | None | 240.0 | 0.000 | 127.6 | 0.000 |
 | At most 1 | 137.3 | 0.000 | 80.05 | 0.000 |
 | At most 2 | 70.24 | 0.000 | 53.51 | 0.000 |
 | At most 3 | 44.15 | 0.000 | 29.72 | 0.000 |
 | At most 4 | 49.20 | 0.000 | 49.20 | 0.000 |
Kao-residual co integration
Series | ADF | |
---|---|---|
t-stat | Prob | |
Y_growth, Pr, Gc, Dem, Opn, Gf, Infla | −8.122 | 0.000 |
Yp, Pr, Gc, Dem, Opn, Gf, Infla | −8.239 | 0.000 |
Gc, Y_growth, Gf, Dem, Opn | −7.541 | 0.000 |
Pedroni residual cointegration
Series | Panel v-stat | Panel rho stat | Panel PP stat | Panel ADF stat | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stat | Prob | Stat | pro | Stat | Prob | Stat | Prob | |
Y_growth, Pr, Gc, Dem, Opn, Gf, Infla | −0.992 | 0.839 | −0.237 | 0.406 | −5.243 | 0.000 | −4.431 | 0.000 |
Group Rho stat | Group PP stat | Group ADF stat | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stat | Prob | Stat | Prob | Stat | Prob |
1.362 | 0.913 | −5.047 | 0.000 | −3.697 | 0.000 |
Series | Panel v-stat | Panel rho stat | Panel PP stat | Panel ADF stat | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stat | Prob | Stat | Pro | Stat | Prob | Stat | Prob | |
Yp, Pr, Gc, Dem, Opn, Gf, Infla | −405.0515 | 1.000 | −0.1573 | 0.4375 | −7.820 | 0.000 | −2.817 | 0.028 |
Group Rho stat | Group PP stat | Group ADF stat | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stat | Prob | Stat | Prob | Stat | Prob |
1.1755 | 0.8801 | −7.2764 | 0.000 | −2.231 | 0.013 |
 | Panel v-stat | Panel rho stat | Panel PP stat | Panel ADF stat | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Series | Stat | Prob | Stat | Pro | Stat | Prob | Stat | Prob |
Gc, Y_growth, Gf, Dem, Opn | 2.5978 | 0.005 | −6.6657 | 0.000 | −9.3128 | 0.000 | −9.3531 | 0.000 |
Group Rho stat | Group PP stat | Group ADF stat | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stat | Prob | Stat | Prob | Stat | Prob |
−4.950 | 0.000 | −10.458 | 0.000 | −10.5265 | 0.000 |
The above tables discuss the long run relationship among the variables used. First, the cointegration test is performed for three different equations. These are the growth (Y_growth), the economic development (Per capita GDP) and the government final consumption (Gc) equations. The three variants of panel cointegration tests carried out are the Johansen Fisher Panel cointegration test, the Kao Residual cointegration test and the Pedroni Residual cointegration test. These become necessary to ascertain the robustness of the estimation results.
In the test for the long run relationship among the variables using the Johansen Fisher Panel cointegration test, a linear deterministic trend is assumed with lag interval of 11 in first differences.
For the growth equation where growth is endogenously defined and determined by the private investment, government final consumption, state of democracy, openness, government fixed capital formation; there is evidence of a long run relationship among these variables.
The Johansen cointegration test has demonstrated five cointegrating vectors for both the Trace test statistics and the Max-Eigen value statistics; all with probability values 0.000. The number of cointegrating vectors displayed is a clear indication of the stability of the system since the greater the number of the cointegrating vectors, the more stable the system is.
The Kao Residual test gives similar results of a long run relationship as demonstrated by the t-statistics of −8.122. In the same way, the Pedroni cointegation test shows that the variables are cointegrated especially for the Panel PP statistics (−5.243), Panel ADF statistics (−4.43), Group PP statistics (−5.047) and the Group ADF statistics (−3.697).
The long run relationship among the variables in the growth equation follows the interaction between the determinants and growth. It further demonstrates that these variables seem to be fundamental to growth in the ECOWAS region.
The Economic development equation shows similar trend. In this case too using all the three variants of cointegration tests, there exists a long run relationship among the variables in the economic development equation including the endogenous variable itself. Exactly five cointegrating vectors too were displayed for both Trace and Max-Eigen value statistics. This also shows that the model operates under a stable system. The Kao statistics also shows evidence of a long run relationship among the variables in question based on its ADF t-statistics of −8.239. The Pedroni cointegration test gives similar results of cointegration among the variables as observed from the Panel PP statistics (−7.819), Panel ADF statistics (−2.817) Group PP statistics (−7.276) and Group ADF statistics (−2.231).
All the three variants also demonstrate a long run relationship between the government final consumption and its determinants.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ekpo, A.H. (2017). Public Investment and Competitiveness in ECOWAS: An Empirical Investigation. In: Seck, D. (eds) Investment and Competitiveness in Africa. Advances in African Economic, Social and Political Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44787-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44787-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44786-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44787-2
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)