Advertisement

Regional Disparities in the WAMZ: Integrating the Role of Market Potential and Structural Change

Chapter
Part of the Advances in African Economic, Social and Political Development book series (AAESPD)

Abstract

This paper examined the disparities in terms of income within the WAMZ member countries over the period 1980–2013. The theoretical model is based on the extended version of the New Economy Geography (EGM) Model of growth where the initial per capita GDP growth, changing market access and other controlled variables were included considering structural changes and no structural changes. The major finding obtained from the estimations was the positive and significant relationship between initial per capita GDP and Per capita GDP growth which implies lack of conditional convergence for both periods of structural changes and no structural changes. This is attributable to the uneven slow growing pattern of member countries of the sub-region. Also, the changing market access variable showed negative but significant impact on growth mostly for period of structural changes. Hence with the declining pattern of market access which has the tendency to retard growth in the long run contrary to the short run increase in growth, the rich countries in the WAMZ may not benefit from such a declining trend but may make the poorer countries to catch up. A major policy implication here is to have greater access to market in the form of lowering tariff rates and/or costs to foster trade agreement within the sub-region. Effective trade relation capable of reducing barriers is needed to further strengthen its integration plans.

Keywords

Market access Structural change Regional integration Trade WAMZ 

JEL Classification

F10 F14 F15 R11 

References

  1. Acemoglu D, Gallego FA, Robinson JA (2014a) Institutions, human capital and development. Annu Rev Econ 6(1):875–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acemoglu D, Naidu S, Restrepo P, Robinson JA (2014b) Democracy does cause growth. MIT Department of Economics Working Paper No. 14-09. SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2411791 or  10.2139/ssrn.2411791
  3. Breinlich H (2006) The spatial income structure in the European Union—What role for economic geography? J Econ Geogr 6(5):593–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Caraveli H, Tsionas M, Darzentas G (2008) Growth, convergence and the knowledge economy: an empirical investigation. J Econ Asymm 5(2):105–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caraveli H, Tsionas EG (2012) Economic restructuring, crises and regions: the political economy of regional inequalities in Greece. Hellenic Observatory European Institute, GreeSE Paper No. 61Google Scholar
  6. Dall’ Erba S (2003) European regional development policies—history and current issues. European Union Centre Working Paper 2 (4). University of IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  7. Galbraith JK (2011) Inequality and economic and political change: a comparative perspective. Camb J Regions Econ Soc 4:11–27Google Scholar
  8. Hanson G (2005) Market potential, increasing returns and geographic concentration. J Int Econ 67(1):1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jesus L-R, Malgorzata R-W (2014) Changing market potentials regional growth and income disparities in Poland. Prague Econ Paper 23(1):63–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Krugman P (1991) Geography and trade. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  11. Machlup F (1991) Economic semantics, 2nd edn. Transaction, New Brunswick, NJGoogle Scholar
  12. Martin P (1999) Are European policies delivering? Eur Invest Bank Paper 4(2):10–23Google Scholar
  13. Martin P (2004) The geography of inequalities in Europe. In: Economic Council Conference, Stockholm, Oct 25Google Scholar
  14. Ottaviano GIP, Pinelli D (2006) Market potential and productivity: evidence from finish regions. Reg Sci Urban Econ 36(5):636–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Petrakos G, Rodriques-Pose A, Rovolis A (2003) Growth, integration and regional inequality in Europe. Research paper in Environmental and spatial analysis, 81. London School of EconomicsGoogle Scholar
  16. Puga D (2002) European regional policies in the light of new location theories. J Econ Geogr 2(4):372–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Redding S, Venables AJ (2004) Economic geography and international inequality. J Int Econ 67(1):53–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rodrick D (2013) Conditional convergence in manufacturing. Q J Econ 128(1):165–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rodrik D (2014) An African growth miracle? Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton School of Social Science Paper Number 102Google Scholar
  20. Silva EG, Teixeira AC (2008) Surveying structural change: seminar contributions and a bibliometric account. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 19(4):273–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. World Economic Outlook (2015) Adjusting to lower commodity prices. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2015/02/pdf/text.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.West African Institute for Financial and Economic Management (WAIFEM)LagosNigeria

Personalised recommendations