Skip to main content

Gendered Leadership in Multinational Corporations: Gendered Social-Organizations: An Analysis of a Gendered Foundation in Organizations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Women Leaders in Chaotic Environments

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Social Networks ((LNSN))

  • 1235 Accesses

Abstract

It is no longer rhetorical when much of the social and economic inequality in the United States and other industrial countries is created in organizations. Feminists have looked at the gendering of organizations and organizational practices to comprehend how inequalities between women and men continue in the face of numerous attempts to erase such inequalities. Scholars working on race inequality have examined the production in work organizations of racial disparities that contribute to society-wide racial discrimination and disadvantage. When a field is numerically dominated by one gender and that same gender has more power, for example, relative to journal editorships, controlling funds, or occupying elite chairs, the other gender may be excluded or subordinated and marginalized, even if unintentionally. As such, the notion of sexuality in all its diverse forms and meanings is implicated in gendered organizational processes, practices and cultures. Inequality regimes can always be challenged and changed. However, change is difficult, and change efforts often fail. The first reason is that owners and managerial class interests and the power those interests can mobilize usually out weigh the class, gender, race, and sexuality interests of those who suffer inequality. The second reason is that, human nature is often conditioned to the status quo, because we are creatures-of-habits. The third reason is that we are fearful creatures and we fear the result, the unknown. Organizations fear that once “Pandora’s Box” has been opened, destruction permeates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    One result of differences like these is that they can become polarized and mutually reinforcing. In such cases each side of the pond is caricatured, stereotyped and downgraded by the other. Stereotyping over-simplifies and tends to result in a wholesale rejection of the other. Rather than recognize the value of diverse perspectives and methods and attempt to integrate them, academics, both critical and mainstream, on each side of the pond sometimes dismiss the others’ work and evaluate their own. In so doing they can exclude alternative perspectives while also constructing and sustaining their own identities.

  2. 2.

    Indeed, it could even be argued that the ascendancy of hard quantitative research methods over soft qualitative approaches, especially in North America itself reflects a masculine understanding of research and analysis that elevates prediction, control and objectivity over interpretation, subjectivity and open-endedness.

References

  • Acker J (1990) Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: a theory of gendered organizations. Gend Soc 4(2):139–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acker J (2006) Inequality regimes: gender, class, and race in organizations. Gend Soc 8(20):441–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adkins L (1995) Gendered work: sexuality, family and the labour market. OU Press, Buckingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen TD (2003) Mentoring others: a dispositional and motivational approach. J Vocat Behav 62(1):134–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson M (2002) Understanding organizational culture. Sage, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson M, Due-Billing Y (1997) Understanding gender and organizations. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Amelink CT (N. Y.) Overview: mentoring and women in engineering. Retrieved on 26 Sept 2015 http://www.engr.psu.edu/awe/misc/ARPs/ARP_Mentoring_overview120408.pdf

  • Anderson ME, Shannon AL (1988) Toward a conceptualization of mentoring. J Teach Educ 39(1):38–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong SJ, Allinson CW, Hayes J (2002) Formal mentoring systems: an examination of the effects of mentor/protégé cognitive styles on the mentoring process. J Manag Stud 39(8):1111–1137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aryee S, Chay YM, Chew J (1996) The motivation to mentor among managerial employees. Group Org Manag 21(3):261–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ascough RS (2002) Chaos theory and Paul’s organizational leadership style. J Relig Leadersh 1(2):21–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Bair B, Haworth J, Sandfort M (2004) Doctoral student learning and development: a shared responsibility. NASPA J 41(3):709–727

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldi S (1998) Normative versus social constructivist processes in the allocation of citations: a network-analytic approach. Am Sociol Rev 63(6):829–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bascow SA (2011) Evaluation of female leaders: stereotypes, prejudice, and discrimination in the workplace. In: Paludi MA, Coates BE (eds) Women as transformational leaders: from grassroots to global interests: VI. Praeger, Santa Barbara, pp 51–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck U (2002) Individualization: institutionalized individualization and its social and political consequences. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck U, Giddens A, Lash S (1994) Reflexive modernization: politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Polity, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker G (1964) Human capital: a theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education. Chicago University Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennis W, Nanus B (1985) Leaders: strategies for taking charge, 2nd edn. Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Blickenstaff J (2005) Women and science careers: leaking pipeline or gender filter. Gend Educ 17(4):369–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (1990) In other words: essays towards a reflective sociology. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (1993) Sociology in question. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P, Wacquant L (1992) An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago University Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton B (2000) The epistemology of the gendered organization. Gend Soc 14(3):418–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braveman H (1974) Labor and monopoly capital: the degradation of work in the twentieth century. Monthly Review Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewis J (1988) What is wrong with this picture? Sex and gender relations in disclosure. In: Hassard J, Holliday R, Willmott W (eds) Organization and representation. Sage, London, pp 83–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewis J, Linstead S (2000) Sex, work, and sex work: eroticizing organization. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brown MK, Carnoy M, Currie E, Duster T, Oppenheimer DB, Shultz MM, Wellman D (2003) White-washing race: the myth of a color-blind society. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Buell C (2004) Models of mentoring in communication. Commun Educ 53(1):56–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy M (1979) Manufacturing consent. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke RJ, McKeen CA (1990) Mentoring in organizations: implications for women. J Bus Ethics 9(4):317–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke RJ, McKeen CA (1996) Gender effects in mentoring relationships. J Soc Behav Personal 11(5):91–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrell G, Hearn J (1989) The sexuality of organization. In: Hearn J, Sheppard DL, Tancred-Sheriff P, Burrell G (eds) The sexuality of organization. Sage, London, pp 1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt RS (1992) Structural holes: social structure of competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt RS (1998) The gender of social capital. Ration Soc 10(1):5–46

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Butler J (1990) Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler J (1993) Bodies that matter. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Calas M, Smircich L (1991) Voicing seduction to silence leadership. Organ Stud 12(4):567–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calas M, Smircich L (1992a) Rewriting gender into organizational theorizing: directions from feminist perspectives. In: Reed M, Hughes M (eds) Rethinking organizations: new directions in organizational research. Sage, London, pp 227–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Calas M, Smircich L (1992b) Using the F word: feminist theories and the social consequences of organizational research. In: Mills AJ, Tancred P (eds) Gendering organizational analysis. Sage, New Park, pp 222–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Calas M, Smircich L (1997) Predicando la moral en calzoncillos? Feminist inquiries into business ethics. In: Freeman RE, Larson A (eds) Women’s studies and business ethics: toward a new conversation. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 50–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvert RL (1992) Leadership and its basis in problems of social coordination. Int Polit Sci Rev 13(1):7–24

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Castells M (1996) The information age, volume 1: the rise of the network society. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Catalyst Inc. (2012) 2012 Catalyst census: fortune 500 women executive officers and top earns. Retrieved on 27 Sept 2015 http://www.catalyst.org/2012-catalyst-census-fortune-500-women-executive-officers-and-top-eaners

  • Catalyst Inc. (2010) Targeting inequality: the gender gap in US corporate leadership. Retrieved on 27 Sept 2015 http://www.jec.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?a+Files.Serve&File-id=d5ae8b33-f762-4cf2-850b84ded6218d

  • Chao GT, Walz PM, Gardner PD (1992) Formal and informal mentorships: a comparison on mentoring functions and contrast with non-mentored counterparts. Pers Psychol 45(3):619–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb M, Fox DL, Many JE, Matthews MW, Mcgrail E, Sachs GT, Taylor DL, Wallace FH, Wang Y (2006) Mentoirng in literacy education: a commentary from graduate students, untenured professors, and tenured professors. Mentor Tutoring 14(4):371–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn C (1983) Brothers. Pluto Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn C (1988) Machinery of dominance: women, men and technical know-how. South End, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole JR (1979) Fair science: women in the scientific community. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins N (1983) Professional women and their mentors. Prentice-Hall Inc, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Collinson DL, Hearn J (1994) Naming men as men: implications for work, organization, and management. Gend Work Organ 1(1):2–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collinson DL, Hearn J (1996) Breaking the silence on men, masculinities, and managements. In: Collinson DL, Hearn J (eds) Men as managers, managers as men: critical perspectives on men, masculinities, and managements. Sage, London, pp 1–24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Colomer JM (1995) Leadership games in collective action. Ration Soc 7(2):225–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conger JA, Kanungo RN (1994) Charismatic leadership in organizations: Perceived behavioral attributes and their measurement. J Organ Behav 15(5):439–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell RW (1995) Masculinities. Polity Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Corzine J, Buntzman G, Busch E (1994) Mentoring, downsizing, gender and career outcomes. J Soc Behav Personal 9:517–528

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox TH (1994) Cultural diversity in organizations: theory, research and practice. Berret-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Cundiff NL, Stockdale MS (2011) Social psychological perspectives on discrimination against women leaders. In: Paludi MA, Coates BE (eds) Women as transformational leaders: from grassroots to global interests, vol I. Praeger, Santa Barbara, pp 177–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Dal Forno A, Merlone U (2006) The emergence of effective leaders: a experimental and computational approach. Emerg Complex Organ 8(4):36–51

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Davis AY (1981) Women, race and class. Vintage, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Denison DR, Hooijberg R, Quinn RE (1995) Paradox and performance: toward a theory of behavioral complexity in managerial leadership. Organ Sci 6(5):524–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devine F (1992) Gender segregation in the engineering and science professions: a case of continuity and change. Work Employ Soc 6(4):557–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vries J, Webb C (2006) Mentoring for gender equality and organizational change. Empl Relat 28(6):573–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly AH, Carli LL (2007) Through the labyrinth: the truth about how women become leaders. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly RJ, Rhode DL (2010) Women and leadership: defining the challenge. In: Nutria N, Khurana R (eds) Handbook of leadership theory and practice: an HBS centennial colloquium on advancing leadership. Harvard Business Press, Boston, pp 377–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Enarson E (1984) Woods-working women: sexual integration in the US forest service. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa

    Google Scholar 

  • Ensher EA, Murphy SE (1997) Effects of race, gender, perceived similarity, and contact on mentor relationships. J Vocat Behav 50(3):460–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagenson EA (1989) The mentor advantage: perceived career/job experiences of protégés versus non-protégés. J Organ Behav 10(4):309–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman DC, Folks WR, Turnley WH (1999) Mentor-protégé diversity and its impact on international internship experiences. J Organ Behav 20(5):597–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson K (1984) The feminist case against bureaucracy. Temple University Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson K (1997) Postmodernism, feminism, and organizational ethics: letting differences be. In: Larson A, Freeman RE (eds) Women’s studies and business ethics: toward a new conversation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 80–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferree MX, Martin PY (1995) Feminist organizations. Temple University Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming P (2007) Sexuality, power and resistance in the workplace. Organ Stud 28(2):239–256

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault M (1988) Technologies of the self. In: Martin L, Gutman H, Hutton P (eds) Technologies of the self: a seminar with michel foucault. Tavistock, London, pp 16–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi S (1995) Gender, culture, and symbolism in organizations. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi S (2002) Feminist theory and organizational theory: a dialogue on new bases. In: Knudsen C, Tsoukas H (eds) Organizational theory as a science: prospects and limitations. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 210–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Goh SC (1991) Sex differences in perceptions of interpersonal work style, career emphasis, supervisory mentoring behavior, and job satisfaction. Sex Roles 24(11–12):701–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon N (2013) Women and leadership: an integrative focus on equality. J Interdiscip Fem Thought 7(1):11

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter M (1973) The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol 78(6):1360–1380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosz E (1994) Volatile bodies: towards a corporeal feminism. Indiana University Press, Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart SL, Quinn RE (1993) Roles executives play: CEOs, behavioral complexity, and firm performance. Hum Relat 46(5):543–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassard J, Holliday R, Willmott H (2000) Body and organization. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes K (2007) Sexuality, sexual symbolism and organizational culture: a case study of an accounting firm. Paper presented at the 7th European critical accounting studies conference (ECAS). University of Glasgow

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazy JK (2008) Toward a theory of leadership in complex systems: computational modeling explorations. Nonlinear Dyn Psychol Life Sci 12(3):182–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Hearn J, Parkin W (1995) Sex at work: the power and the paradox of organization sexuality. Prentice Hall, Hemel Hempstead

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede G (1996) Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind: Intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooijberg R (1996) A multinational approach toward leadership: an extension of the concept of behavioral complexity. Hum Relat 49(7):917–947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooijberg R, Quinn RE (1992) Behavioral complexity and the development of effective managers. In: Phillips RL, Hunts JG (eds) Strategic management: a multiorganizational-level perspective. Quorum, New York, pp 161–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooks B (1984) Feminist theory: from margin to center. South End, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopfl H (2003) Becoming a virile member: women and military body. Body Soc 9(4):13–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubler A, Pines D (1994) Prediction and adaption in an evolving chaotic environment. In: Cowan G, Pines D, Meltzer D (eds) Complexity: metaphors, models and reality, vol. proceedings volume XIX. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, pp 343–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson S (1998) Theorising gender and sexuality. In: Jackson S, Jones J (eds) Contemporary feminist theories. New York University Press, New York, pp 131–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph G (1981) The incompatible ménage a trois: marxism, feminism and racism. In: Sargent L (ed) Women and revolution: the unhappy marriage of marxism and feminism. South End, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalbfleisch PJ (1997) Appeasing the mentor. Aggress Behav 23(5):389–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter RM (1977) Men and women of the corporation. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellerman B, Rhode DL (2009) Women and leadership: the state of play and strategies for change. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler SJ (1990) The medical construction of gender: case management of intersexed infants. Signs J Women Cult Soc 16(1):3–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinman S (1996) Opposing ambitions: gender and identity in an alternative organization. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouzes JM, Posner BZ (1987) The leadership challenge: how to get extraordinary things done in organizations. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Kram KE (1985) Mentoring at work: developmental relationships in organizational life. Scott, Foresman and Company, Glenview

    Google Scholar 

  • Leadbeater C (2008) We-think: mass innovation not mass production: the power of mass creativity. Profile Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine C, Freeman J (1984) Untying the knot: feminism, anarchism, and organization. Dark Star/Rebel Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay S (2008) The care-tech link: an examination of gender, care and technical work in healthcare labour. Gend Work Organ 15(4):333–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorber J (1993) Believing is seeing: biology as ideology. Gend Soc 7(4):568–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansbridge JJ (1980) Beyond adversary democracy. Basic Books Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin J (1994) The organization of exclusion: Institutionalization of sex inequality, gendered faculty jobs and gendered knowledge in organizational theory and research.  Organization, 1(2), 401–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin J (1990) Deconstructing organizational taboos: the suppression of gender conflict in organizations. Organ Sci 1:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin J (1994) The organization of exclusion: Institutionalization of sex inequality, gendered faculty jobs and gendered knowledge in organizational theory and research. Organization 1(2):401–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin PY, Collinson D (2002) Over the pond and across the water: developing the field of gendered organizations. Gend Work Organ 9(3):244–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin J, Knopoff K (1997) The gendered implications of apparently gender-neutral theory: re-reading mx weber. In: Freeman E, Larson A (eds) Women’s studies and business ethics: toward a new conversation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 30–49

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell L (1997) Capital culture: gender at work in the city. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg H (1973) The nature of managerial work. HarperCollin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Moberg DJ, Velasquez M (2004) The ethics of mentoring. Bus Ethics Q 14:95–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morzinsky JA, Fischer JC (1996) An evaluation of formal mentoring studies and a model for their improvement. Eval Pract 17(1):43–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosesdottir L, Serrano AP, Remery C (2006) Moving europe towards the knowledge based society and gender equality. ETUI-REHS, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson JA (1993) The study of choice or the study of provisioning? Gender and the definition of economics. In: Ferber MA, Nelson JA (eds) Beyond economic man: feminist theory and economics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 23–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Noe RA (1988) An investigation of the determinants of successful assigned mentoring relationships. Pers Psychol 41(3):457–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrander SA (1999) Gender and race in a pro-feminist, progressive, mixed-gender, mixed race organization. Gend Soc 13(5):628–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paglis LL, Green SG, Bauer TN (2006) Does adviser mentoring add value? A longitudinal study of mentoring and doctoral student outcomes. Res Vocat Behav 46(2):144–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Palermo J (2004) Breaking the cultural mould: the key to women’s career success. Retrieved on September 26, 2015, http://au.hudson.com/documents/emp_au_Whitepapers_breaking_cultural-Mould.pdf

  • Phelps KC, Hubler AW (2006) Towards an understanding of membership and leadership in youth organizations: sudden changes in average participation due to the behavior of one individual. Emerg Complex Organ 8(4):28–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips-Jones LL (1983) Establishing a formalized mentoring program. Train Dev J 37(2):38–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock R (1995) A test of conceptual models depicting the developmental course of informal mentor-protégé relationships in the work place. J Vocat Behav 46(2):144–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portes A (1998) Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annu Rev Sociol 24:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell W (1991) Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization. In: Staw BM, Cummings LL (eds) Research in organizational behavior, vol 22. JAI Press, Greenwich, pp 295–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Putman R (2000) Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Shuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn RE (1984) Applying the competing values approach to leadership: toward an integrative framework. In: Hunt JG, Hosking DM, Schriesheim CA, Stewart R (eds) Leaders and managers: international perspectives on managerial behavior and leadership. Pergamon Press, New York, pp 10–27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ragins BR (1989) Barriers to mentoring the female manager’s dilemma. Hum Relat 42:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragins BR, Cotton JL (1999) Mentor functions and outcomes: a comparison of men and women in form and informal mentoring relationships. J Appl Psychol 84(4):529–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragins BR, Townsend B, Mattis M (1998) Gender gap in the executive suite: CEOs and female executives report on breaking the glass ceiling. Acad Manag J 12(1):28–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes JE (2002) Stand by me: the risks and rewards of mentoring today’s youth. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay E (2001) Women and leadership in higher education: facing international challenges and maximizing opportunities. CCU Bull, 14–17 April 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild-Whitt J (1979) The collectivist organization: an alternative to rational bureaucratic models. Am Sociol Rev 44(4):509–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royster DA (2003) Race and the invisible hand: How white networks exclude black men from blue-collar jobs. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruthford S (2001) Are you going home already? The ling hours culture, women managers and patriarchal closure. Time Soc 10(2–3):259–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan MK, Haslam SA (2005) The glass cliff: evidence that women are over-represented in precarious leadership positions. Br J Manag 16:81–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg S (2013) Lean in: women, work, and the will to lead. Lean in Foundation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage M, Bagnall G, Longhurt B (2001) Ordinary, ambivalent and defensive: class identities in the Northwest of England. Sociology 35(4):875–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scandura TA, Viator R (1994) Mentoring in public accounting firms: an analysis of mentor-protégé relationships, mentoring functions, and protégé turnover intentions. Acc Organ Soc 19:717–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scandura TA, Williams EA (2001) An investigation of the moderating effects of gender on the relationships between mentorship initiation and protégé perceptions of mentoring functions. J Vocat Behav 59(3):342–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwiebert VL, Deck MD, Bradshaw ML, Scott P, Harper M (1999) Women as mentors. J Humanist Couns Educ Dev 37(4):241–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott E (2000) Everyone against racism: agency and the production of meaning in the anti racism practices of two feminist organizations. Theory Soc 29:785–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirianni C (1993) Learning pluralism: democracy and diversity in feminist organizations. In: Fischer F, Sirianni C (eds) Critical studies in organization and bureaucracy. Temple University Press, Philadelphia, pp 554–576

    Google Scholar 

  • Soros G (2008) The new paradigm for financial markets. Public Affairs, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosik JJ, Godshalk VM (2000) The role of gender in mentoring: Implications for diversified and homogeneous mentoring relationships. J Vocat Behav 57(1):102–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanko B (1988) Sexual harassment. In: Walby S (ed) Gender segregation at work. Open University Press, Milton Keynes, pp 91–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffy BD, Grimes AJ (1992) Personnel/organization psychology: a critique of the disciple. In: Alvesson M, Willmott H (eds) Critical management studies. Sage, London, pp 181–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart I (ed) (2002) Does God play dice? The new mathematics of chaos, 2nd edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Struthers NJ (1995) Differences in mentoring: A function of gender or organizational rank? J Soc Behav Personal 10(6):265–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarr-Whelan L (2011) Women lead the way: your guide to stepping up to leadership and changing the world. Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetenbaum TJ (1998) Shifting paradigms: from Newton to chaos. Org Dyn 26(4):21–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tran B (2008) Expatriate selection and retention. Doctoral dissertation, Alliant International University, San Francisco, USA. AAT 3326851

    Google Scholar 

  • Tran B (2009) Knowledge management: the construction of knowledge in organizations. In: Jemielniak D, Kociatkiewicz J (eds) Handbook of research on knowledge-intensive organizations. Information Science Reference/IGI Global, Hersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Tran B (2012) Gendered technology-based organizations: a view of the glass cliff through the window of the glass ceiling. In: Jemielniak D, Marks A (eds) Managing dynamic technology-oriented businesses: high-tech organizations and workplaces. Business Science Reference/IGI Global, Hersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Tran B (2013) Industrial and organizational (I/O) psychology: The roles and purposes of I/O practitioners in global business. In: Christiansen B, Turkina E, and Williams N (eds) Cultural and technological influences on global business. IGI Global, Hersey, pp. 175–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Tran B (2014a) The origin of servant leadership: the foundation of leadership. In: Selladurai R, Carraher S (eds) Servant leadership: research and practice. Premier Reference Source: Business Science Reference/IGI Global, Hersey, pp 262–294

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tran B (2014b) The human element of the knowledge worker: identifying, managing, and protecting the intellectual capital within knowledge management. In: Chilton MA, Bloodgood JM (eds) Knowledge management and competitive advantage: Issues and potential solutions. Premier Reference Source: Information Science Reference/IGI Global, Hersey, pp 281–303

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tran B (2014c) The foundation of cultural intelligence: human capital. In: Christiansen B, Yildiz S, Yildiz E (eds) Handbook of research on effective marketing in contemporary globalism. Premier Reference Source: Business Science Reference/IGI Global, Hersey, pp 348–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Tran B (2015) Organizational justice: The injustice in the foundation of organizational citizenship behavior within higher education institutions. In: Ololube NP (ed) Handbook of research on organizational justice and culture in higher education institutions. IGI Global, Hersey (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsui AS (1984) A role set analysis of managerial reputation. Organ Behav Hum Perform 34(1):64–96

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Turban DB, Dougherty TW, Lee FK (2002) Gender, race, and perceived similarity effects in developmental relationships: the moderating role of relationship duration. J Vocat Behav 61(2):240–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viator RE (1991) A study of mentor-protégé relationship in large public accountant firms. Acc Horiz 5:20–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinnecombe S, Singh V (2003) Locks and keys to the boardroom. Women Manag Rev 18(6):11–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Wajcman J (1998) Managing like a man. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Walby S (2011) Is the knowledge society gendered? Gend Work Organ 18(1):1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallance D, Abel R, Rogers-Huilman B (2000) Clearing a path of success: deconstructing borders through undergraduate mentoring. Rev High Educ 24(1):87–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster J, Beehr TA, Elacqua TC (2011) The advancement of women at work: The continued struggle to break the glass ceiling.  In: Paludi M & Coates B (ed) Women as transformational leaders: From grassroots to global interests (Vol. 1, pp. 69–94). Santa Barbara: Praeger

    Google Scholar 

  • Weedon C (1997) Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory. Basil Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • William CL (1992) The glass escalator: hidden advantages for men in the ‘female’ professions. Soc Probl 39(3):253–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson MC (2007) It’s women time. In: Kellerman B, Rhode D (eds) Women and leandership: the state of play and strategies for change. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 271–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright CA, Wright SD (1987) The role of mentors in the career development of young professionals. Fam Relat 36(2):204–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie Y, Shauman KA (1998) Sex differences in research productivity: new evidence about an old puzzle. Am Sociol Rev 63(6):847–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young JP, Alvermann DE, Kaste J, Henderson S, Many J (2004) Being a friend and a mentor at the same time: a pooled case comparison. Mentor Tutoring 12(1):23–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaccaro SJ (2001) The nature of executive leadership: a conceptual and empirical analysis of success. American Psychological Association, Washington

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ben Tran .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tran, B. (2016). Gendered Leadership in Multinational Corporations: Gendered Social-Organizations: An Analysis of a Gendered Foundation in Organizations. In: Erçetin, Ş. (eds) Women Leaders in Chaotic Environments. Lecture Notes in Social Networks. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44758-2_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44758-2_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44756-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44758-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics