Abstract
We describe the potential for an integrative perspective on corporate social performance in two distinct models. The first builds on previous research to demonstrate the theory building possibilities for conceptual integration. By extension, the second model of value attunement shows how an organization can become responsible when the executive strives to embed values in organizational decisions that facilitate the triple bottom line of social, environmental, and economic performance. According to the attunement model, the executive who strives for these goals will necessarily understand the significance of establishing means of communicating value information in the organization and between the organization and its external constituents. We move toward an integration of corporate social and financial performance by summarizing the various competitive benefits that attunement may yield for the socially and environmentally responsible firm.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
From here on, the term social performance should be understood to include environmental performance, since expectations of environmental responsibilities come from society in general and organizational stakeholders in particular.
- 2.
Swanson’s (1999) article, in which this prototype was introduced, was selected for the Best Article Award by the International Association of Business in Society in association with the California Management Review in 2001.
- 3.
This meta-analysis won the 2004 Moskowitz Award for outstanding quantitative research relevant to the social investment field for practical significance to practitioners of socially responsible investing, appropriateness and rigor of quantitative methods, and novelty of results. It has also become the most widely cited article ever published in Organization Studies. As of September 2015, this article has been cited 951 times on the Web of Science and 3676 times on Google Scholar. In general, meta-analysis is an empirical quantitative integration of the findings of previous research and corrects for certain study artifacts, such as sampling error or measurement error (Schmidt & Hunter, 2015) and has become the standard method in most quantitative sciences (e.g., medicine, physics, psychology) for drawing overall conclusions in a research area (Hunt, 1997).
References
Ackerman, R. W., & Bauer, R. A. (1976). Corporate social responsiveness: The modern dilemma. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Agle, B., & Caldwell, C. B. (1999). Understanding research on values in business: A level of analysis framework. Business and Society, 38, 326–387.
Ashby, W. R. (1962). An introduction to cybernetics. London: Chapman & Hall.
Bailey, K. D. (1994). Typologies and taxonomies. An introduction to classification techniques. Sage University Paper Series: Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 7, 1–16.
Barnett, M. L. (2007). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32, 794–816.
Barnett, M. L., & Salomon, R. M. (2006). Beyond dichotomy: The curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 1101–1122.
Benefit Corp Information Center. (2015). Retrieved September 1, 2015, from http://benefitcorp.net
Bird, F. B., & Waters, J. A. (1989). The moral muteness of managers. California Management Review, 32, 73–88.
Calton, J. M., & Lad, L. J. (1995). Social contracting as a trust-building process of network governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 5, 271–296.
Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, 497–506.
Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business and Society, 38, 268–295.
Carroll, A. B. (2008). A history of corporate social responsibility: Concepts and practices. In A. Crane, McWilliams, D. Matten, & J. Moon (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 19–46). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Carroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2015). Business and society: Ethics, sustainability, and stakeholder management (9th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.
Collins, D. (1988). Adam Smith’s social contract: The proper role of individual liberty and government intervention in the 18th century. Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 7, 120–146.
Committee for Economic Development (CED). (1971). Social responsibilities of business corporations. New York, NY: CED.
Davis, K. (1973). The case for and against business assumption of social responsibilities. Academy of Management Journal, 16, 312–322.
Deal, T., & Kennedy, A. A. (1982). Corporate cultures: The rites and rituals of corporate life. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
DeGeorge, R. T. (1990). Business ethics. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Donaldson, T. (1982). Corporations and morality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65–91.
Drucker, P. F. (1968). The age of discontinuity: Guidelines to our changing society. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win–win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36, 90–100.
Fombrun, C. J. (1996). Reputation: Realizing value from the corporate image. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 233–258.
Frederick, W. C. (1987). Theories of corporate social performance. In S. P. Sethi & C. Falbe (Eds.), Business and society: Dimensions of conflict and cooperation (pp. 142–161). New York, NY: Lexington Books.
Frederick, W. C. (1995). Values, nature, and culture in the American corporation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Frederick, W. C. (2006). Corporation, be good! The story of corporate social responsibility. Indianapolis, IN: Dog Ear Publishing.
Frederick, W. C. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: Deep roots, flourishing growth, promising future. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. S. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 522–530). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman/Ballinger.
Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, 74, 33.
Frooman, J. (1997). Socially irresponsible and illegal behavior and shareholder wealth: A meta-analysis of event studies. Business and Society, 36, 221–249.
Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24, 191–205.
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9, 193–206.
Hunt, M. (1997). How science takes stock: The story of meta-analysis. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
Johansen, T. S., & Nielsen, A. E. (2011). Strategic stakeholder dialogues—A discursive perspective on relationship building. Corporate Communication: An International Journal, 16, 204–217.
Jones, T. M. (1983). An integrating framework for research in business and society: A step toward the elusive paradigm? Academy of Management Review, 8, 559–564.
Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: a synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20, 404–437.
Mackey, A., Mackey, T. B., & Barney, J. B. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Investor preferences and corporate strategies. Academy of Management Review, 32, 817–835.
Mahon, J. F. (2002). Corporate reputation: A research agenda using strategy and stakeholder literature. Business and Society, 41, 415–445.
McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 854–872.
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 603–609.
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26, 117–127.
McWilliams, A., Van Fleet, D. D., & Cory, K. D. (2002). Raising rivals’ costs through political strategy: An extension of resource-based theory. Journal of Management Studies, 39, 707–724.
Mitnick, B. (1993). Organizing research in corporate social performance: The CSP system as core paradigm. In Proceedings of the International Association for business and society (pp. 2–15). San Diego, CA.
Orlitzky, M. (2001). Does organizational size confound the relationship between corporate social performance and firm financial performance? Journal of Business Ethics, 33, 167–180.
Orlitzky, M. (2011). Institutional logics in the study of organizations: The social construction of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21, 409–444.
Orlitzky, M. (2013). Corporate social responsibility, noise, and stock market volatility. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27, 238–254.
Orlitzky, M., & Benjamin, J. D. (2001). Corporate social performance and firm risk: A meta-analytic review. Business and Society, 40, 369–396.
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24, 403–441.
Orlitzky, M., & Swanson, D. L. (2006). Socially responsible human resource management. In J. R. Deckop (Ed.), Human resource management ethics (pp. 3–25). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84, 78–92.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89, 62–77.
Posner, B. Z., & Schmidt, W. H. (1984). Values and the American manager: An update. California Management Review, 34, 80–94.
Preston, L. E., & Post, J. E. (1975). Private management and public policy: The principle of public responsibility. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Roberts, P. W., & Dowling, G. R. (2002). Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 1077–1093.
Savitz, A. (2013). Talent, transformation, and the triple bottom line. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Schwartz, H. (1991). Narcissistic process and corporate decay: The case of general motors. Business Ethics Quarterly, 1, 249–268.
Scott, W. G., & Hart, D. K. (1979). Organizational America. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Sethi, S. P. (1975). Dimensions of corporate social performance: An analytic framework. California Management Review, 17, 58–64.
Sethi, S. P. (1979). A conceptual framework for environmental analysis of social issues and evaluation of business response patterns. Academy of Management Review, 4, 63–74.
Shleifer, A. (2004). Does competition destroy ethical behavior? American Economic Review, 94, 414–418.
Simon, H. (1957). Administrative behavior. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Swanson, D. L. (1992). Dysfunctional conglomerates: An explanation provided by linking ontological individualism to social relations within an open systems context. Behavioral Science, 37, 139–152.
Swanson, D. L. (1995). Addressing a theoretical problem by reorienting the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review, 20, 43–64.
Swanson, D. L. (1996). Neoclassical economic theory, executive control, and organizational outcomes. Human Relations, 49, 735–756.
Swanson, D. L. (1999). Toward an integrative theory of business and society: A research strategy for corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 24, 506–521.
Swanson, D. L. (2008). Top managers as drivers for corporate social responsibility. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 47–62). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Swanson, D. L. (2014). Embedding CSR into corporate culture: Challenging the executive mind. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Swanson, D. L., & Orlitzky, M. (2016). Leading the triple bottom line: A corporate social responsibility approach. In N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, H. K. Sinangil, & C. Viswesvaran (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of industrial, work & organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 3). London: SAGE (in press).
Treviño, L. K. (1990). A cultural perspective on changing and developing organizational ethics. In R. Woodman & W. Passmore (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (pp. 195–230). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Victor, B., & Cullen, J. B. (1988). The organizational bases of ethical work climates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33, 101–125.
Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). Quality of management and quality of stakeholder relations: Are they synonymous? Business and Society, 36, 250–279.
Wartick, S. L., & Cochran, P. L. (1985). The evolution of the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review, 10, 758–769.
Waters, J. A., & Bird, F. (1987). The moral dimension of organizational culture. Journal of Business Ethics, 6, 15–22.
Weber, M. (1922/1947). The theory of social and economic organization (A. H. Henderson & T. Parsons, Trans.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Weick, K. E. (1969). The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Werhane, P. (1985). Persons, rights, and corporations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Wood, D. J. (1990). Business and society. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman (Harper Collins).
Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16, 691–718.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Swanson, D.L., Orlitzky, M. (2017). Toward a Conceptual Integration of Corporate Social and Financial Performance. In: Diehl, S., Karmasin, M., Mueller, B., Terlutter, R., Weder, F. (eds) Handbook of Integrated CSR Communication. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44700-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44700-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44698-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44700-1
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)