Abstract
The paper deals with implicitness in normative texts. Assuming a definition of normative text and considering as implicit meaning whatever is presupposed or implicated by a text, it is argued that the retrieval of implicit meaning is indispensable to the understanding of normative texts as well as of informative ones. The reliability of explicitation practices relies, however, upon the normativity of implicitness, without which we could not distinguish between correct understanding and failure to understand. The implications of the claim that implicitness is normative are examined and the explicitation of presuppositions and implicatures of normative texts is exemplified by reference to passages drawn from the regulations of a condominium and a draft law presented to Italian parliament. Explicitation practices are shown to yield information about the normative background and the motivations of the norm at issue, and to contribute to the content of the norm and to its possible applications.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This paper develops a theme already discussed in my contribution entitled “Normatività e comunicazione” to the volume Questioni di genere nel diritto: impliciti e crittotipi, edited by Lucia Morra and Barbara Pasa, Torino: Giappichelli. I thank Lucia Morra and Francesca Poggi for insightful exchanges.
- 2.
I cite my examples in their original language (Italian, which is my mother tongue), followed by the English translation. In so doing, I assume that the characteristics of the textual genre at issue, which are relevant here, are not language-specific.
References
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2nd ed. 1975.
Bairati, L. (2015). La trascrizione del matrimonio omosessuale celebrato all’estero: argomentazioni e strategie interpretative fra implicito e non detto. In L. Morra & B. Pasa (Eds.), Questioni di genere nel diritto: impliciti e crittotipi (pp. 111–129). Torino: Giappichelli.
Bianchi, C. (2009). Pragmatica cognitiva. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
Bianchi, C. (2013). Implicating. In M. Sbisà & K. Turner (Eds.), Pragmatics of speech actions (pp. 107–142). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.
Bianchi, C. (2016). What did you (legally) say? Cooperative and strategic interactions. In A. Capone & F. Poggi (Eds.), Pragmatics and law, philosophical perspectives (pp. 185–199). Dordrecht: Springer.
Carston, R. (2002). Thoughts and utterances. The pragmatics of explicit communication. Oxford: Blackwell.
Cooren, F. (2010). Action and agency in dialogue. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
Grice, P. (1957). Meaning. The Philosophical Review, 64, 377–388. In Grice: 1989.
Grice, P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Höfler, S. (2014). Between conciseness and transparency: Presuppositions in legislative texts. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 27, 627–644.
Levinson, S. (2000). Presumptive meanings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Long, J. (2015). Diritto italiano della famiglia e impliciti “normativi”. In L. Morra & B. Pasa (Eds.), Questioni di genere nel diritto: impliciti e crittotipi (pp. 149–166). Torino: Giappichelli.
Marmor, A. (2008). The pragmatics of legal language. Ratio Iuris, 21(4), 423–452.
Morra, L. (2011). Implicature conversazionali nei testi di legge. Esercizi filosofici, 6(1), 214–231.
Morra, L. (2015). Conversational implicatures in normative texts. In A. Capone & J. L. Mey (Eds.), Interdisciplinary studies in pragmatics, culture and society (pp. 537–562). Dordrecht: Springer.
Poggi, F. (2011). Law and conversational implicatures. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 24, 21–40.
Recanati, F. (2004). Literal meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Saul, J. (2002). Speaker meaning, what is said, and what is implicated. Nous, 36, 228–248.
Saul, J. (2012). Lying, misleading, and what is said. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sbisà, M. (1999). Presupposition and implicature in text understanding. In P. Bouquet, L. Serafini, P. Brézillon, M. Benerecetti, & F. Castellani (Eds.), Modeling and using context (pp. 324–338). Berlin: Springer.
Sbisà, M. (2007). Detto non detto. Le forme della comunicazione implicita. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
Simons, M. (2013). Presupposing. In M. Sbisà & K. Turner (Eds.), Pragmatics of speech actions (pp. 143–172). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance. Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Stalnaker, R. (1973). Presuppositions. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2, 447–457.
Stalnaker, R. (1999). Context and content. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Strawson, P. (1950). On referring. Mind, 59, 320–344.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sbisà, M. (2017). Implicitness in Normative Texts. In: Poggi, F., Capone, A. (eds) Pragmatics and Law. Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, vol 10. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44601-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44601-1_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44599-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44601-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)