Abstract
Studies based on the relationship between the evolution of family firms and their innovative performance have been rare in family-business research. This chapter reviews the characteristics of family firms and their relation to innovation strategies in emerging markets, with the case of Turkish family firms, and provides an explorative analysis of the relationship between the factors affecting the development of family business and their innovative strategies in Turkey. The most prevalent characteristics of Turkish family firms that affect their innovation decisions are the collectivist family culture, pragmatic growth decisions, and paternalistic control tendencies. The differences based on these characteristics should affect their approach to innovation differently. Founders follow an exploitative innovation strategy. Later generations coming after the founder generation generally focus on more exploratory strategies to meet market demands. By the third generation, as the firm has institutionalized, they try to balance the two forms of innovation by using their resources and exploring environmental opportunities in the form of ambidexterity.
The material in this chapter is supported in part by the The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK) under SOBAG grant 113 K280. Any opinions, findings and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the TÜBİTAK.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Agca V, Kizildag D (2013) Linking generational involvement to intrapreneurship activities in Turkish family firms: an empirical study. Bus Manag Dyn 2(12):47–57
Allison TH, McKenny AF, Short JC (2014) Integrating time into family business research: using random coefficient modeling to examine temporal influences on family firm ambidexterity. Fam Bus Rev 27(1):20–34
Altindag E, Zehir C, Acar AZ (2011) Learning, entrepreneurship and innovation orientations in Turkish family-owned firms. Emerg Mark J 1(2):36–47
Anderson RC, Sattar AM, Reeb DM (2003) Founding family ownership and the agency cost of debt. J Financ Econ 68:263–285
Astrachan JH (2003) Commentary on the special issue: the emergence of a field. J Bus Ventur 18:567–572
Astrachan JH, Allen IE (2003) MassMutual/Raymond Institute American family business survey. Mass Mutual Financial Group, Springfield, MA
Astrachan JH, Shanker MC (2003) Family businesses’ contribution to the U.S. economy: a closer look. Fam Bus Rev 26(3):211–219
Astrachan JH, Zahra SA, Sharma P (2003) Family-sponsored ventures. Kaufman Foundation, Kansas, MO
Aycan Z, Kanungo RN (1997) Current issues and future challenges in expatriate management. In: Saunders DM, Aycan Z (eds) New approaches to employee management, vol 4. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp 245–260
Baraz BA (2008) Aile işletmelerinin algılarıyla inovasyon. 3. Aile İşletmeleri Kongresi, İstanbul Kültür Üniversitesi, İstanbul
Beck L, Janssens W, Debruyne M, Lommelen T (2011) A study of the relationship between generation, market orientation, and innovation in family firms. Fam Bus Rev 24(3):252–272
Bergfeld MMH, Weber FM (2011) Dynasties of innovation: highly performing German family firms and the owners’ role for innovation. Int J Entrep Innov Manag 13(1):80–94
Brun de Ponet S, Wrosch C, Gagne M (2007) An exploration of the generational differences in levels of control held among family business approaching succession. Fam Bus Rev 20:337–353
Bugra A (1994) State and business in modern Turkey: a comparative study. Suny Press, Albany, NY
Caliskan S (2008) Overview of family business relevant issues country Fiche Turkey. European Commission Project Report in the framework of the study “Overview of Family Business Relevant Issues”
Chen H-L, Hsu W-T (2009) Family ownership, board independence, and R&D investment. Fam Bus Rev 22(4):347–362
Chrisman JJ, Patel PC (2012) Variations in R&D investments of family and nonfamily firms: behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives. Acad Manag J 55(4):976–997
Chrisman JJ, Memili E, Misra K (2013) Nonfamily managers, family firms, and the winner’s curse: the influence of noneconomic goals and bounded rationality. Enterp Theory Pract 38(5):1103–1127
Chung CN, Luo X (2008) Institutional logics or agency costs: the influence of corporate governance models on business group restructuring in emerging economies. Organ Sci 19(5):766–784
Classen N, Carree M, Gils AV, Peters B (2014) Innovation in family and non-family SMEs: an exploratory analysis. Small Bus Econ 42:595–609
Criscuolo C, Haskel JE, Slaughter MJ (2004) Why are some firms more innovative? Knowledge inputs, knowledge stocks and the role of global engagement. Tuck School of Business, Hanover, NH
Cruz C, Norqvist M (2007) Environmental factors and entrepreneurial orientation in family business. In: 3rd Eiasm workshop on family firms management research, Jonkoping
Damanpour F, Evan WM (1984) Organizational innovation and performance: the problem of organizational lag. Adm Sci Q 29:392–409
De Massis A, Frattini F, Lichtenthaler U (2013) Research on technological innovation in family firms: present debates and future directions. Fam Bus Rev 26(1):10–31
De Massis A, Frattini F, Pizzurno E, Cassia L (2015) Product innovation in family versus non-family firms: an exploratory analysis. J Small Bus Manag 53(1):1–36
Dooley RS, Fryxell GE, Judge WQ (2000) Belaboring the not-so-obvious: consensus, commitment, and strategy implementation speed and success. J Manag 26(6):1237–1257
Dyer WG (1988) Culture and continuity in family firms. Fam Bus Rev 1(1):37–50
Erdil O, Ciğerim E, Gök MŞ (2004) Aile İşletmelerinde Yönetim Biçimleri Üzerine Bir Literatür Araştırması. I. Aile İşletmeleri Kongresi, Kültür Üniversitesi, İstanbul
Erdogmus N (2007) Aile işletmeleri: yönetim devri ve ikinci kuşağın yetiştirilmesi. İGİAD Yayınları
Erdogmus N, Olcay GA, Erdemir E (2014) Factors affecting the evolution of family businesses and their innovation performances: the case of Turkey. 10th workshop on family management research innovation family firms and economic development, May 23–24, Bergamo, Italy
Erdogmus N, Olcay, GA, Erdemir E (2015) Factors that affect the evolution of Turkish family businesses and their innovation performances. Research Project (No: 113K280) supported by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK)
Fikret-Pasa S, Kabasakal H, Bodur M (2001) Society, organisations, and leadership in Turkey. Appl Psychol 50(4):559–589
Gerni GM (2013) Evaluating the effects of market and innovation orientations on family owned firms’ performance: an empirical study in Istanbul. Adv Manag Appl Econ 3(5):139
Gomez-Mejia L, Haynes KT, Nunez-Nickel M, Jacobson KJL, Moyano-Fuentes J (2007) Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Adm Sci Q 52:106–137
Gopalakrishnan S, Damanpour F (1997) A review of innovation research in economics, sociology and technology management. Omega 25(1):15–28
Guillen MF (2000) Business groups in emerging economies: a resource-based view. Acad Manag J 43(3):362–380
Gunduz L, Tatoglu E (2003) A comparison of the financial characteristics of group affiliated and independent firms in Turkey. Eur Bus Rev 15(1):48–54
Günver BA (2002) Aile işletmelerinin yapısı ve geleceği-Türk işletmelerinin gelecek kuşak yöneticilerinin önemli özelliklerini belirlemeye yönelik bir araştırma. İstanbul: İstanbul Kültür Üniversitesi Yayınları (18)
Gupta A, Das A (2008) Sustaining entrepreneurship in family business. Paper presented at the First Asian Invitational Conference on Family Business, Indian School of Business
Hofstede G (1980) Culture and organizations. Int Stud Manag Organ 10(4):15–41
Kabasakal H, Bodur M (2002) Arabic cluster: a bridge between East and West. J World Bus 37(1):40–54
Kabasakal H, Bodur M (2007) Leadership and culture in Turkey: a multi-faceted phenomenon. In: Chhokar J, Brodbeck F, House R (eds) Managerial cultures of the world: a GLOBE report of in-depth studies of the cultures of 25 countries. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
Karpuzoglu E (2002) Büyüyen ve gelişen aile şirketlerinde kurumsallaşma. Hayat Yayıncılık, İstanbul
Kaya N, Aytekin M (2004) Aile işletmelerinin ekonomik krizlere karşı uygulamış oldukları stratejilerin, performans üzerindeki etkileri: gaziantep’te faaliyet gösteren aile işletmelerinde bir uygulama, 1st edn. Aile İşletmeleri Kongresi, İstanbul
Kellermanns FW, Eddleston KA, Barnett T, Pearson A (2008) An exploratory study of family member characteristics and involvement: effects on entrepreneurial behavior in the family firm. Fam Bus Rev 21(1):1–14
Kellermanns FW, Eddleston KA, Sarathy R, Murphy F (2012) Innovativeness in family firms: a family influence perspective. Small Bus Econ 38:85–101
Kirim A (2001) Aile şirketlerinin yönetimi. Sistem yayıncılık, İstanbul
Kozan MK, Ilter SS (1994) Third party roles played by Turkish managers in subordinates’ conflicts. J Organ Behav 15(5):453–466
Kozan MK, Öksoy D, Özsoy O (2006) Growth plans of small businesses in Turkey: individual and environmental influences. J Small Bus Manag 44(1):114–129
Ling Y, Kellermanns FW (2010) The effects of family firm specific diversity: the moderating role of information exchange frequency. J Manag Stud 47(2):332–344
Litz RA, Kleysen RF (2001) Your old men shall dream dreams, your young men shall see visions: toward a theory of family firm innovation with help from the Brubeck family. Fam Bus Rev 14(4):335–351
Marcoulides GA, Yavas BF, Bilgin Z, Gibson CB (1998) Reconciling culturalist and rationalist approaches: leadership in the United States and Turkey. Thunderbird Int Bus Rev 40(6):563–583
McConaughy DL, Philips GM (1999) Founders versus descendants: the profitability, efficiency, growth characteristics and financing in large, public, founding-family controlled firms. Fam Bus Rev 12:123–131
Munoz-Bullon F, Sanchez-Bueno MJ (2011) The impact of family involvement on the R&D intensity of publicly traded firms. Fam Bus Rev 24(1):62–70
Naldi L, Nordqvist M, Sjoberg K, Wiklund J (2007) Entrepreneurial orientation, risk taking, and performance in family firms. Fam Bus Rev 20(1):33–47
Ozcan GB (1995) Small business network and local ties in Turkey. Entrep Region Dev 7:265–282
Ozcan GB (2006) A critical analysis of decentralisation and local economic development: the Turkish case. Environ Plann C Gov Policy 24(1):117–138
Ozdemir ÖG (2013) The Nexus between entrepreneurship process and value of innovation: a conceptual model including cognitive and institutional factors. Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Sayı: 35. Mart-Nisan
Ozsoy O, Oksoy D, Kozan K (2001) The characteristics of Turkish entrepreneurs and their enterprises. College of Business, Alfred University, Long Island, NY
Pappas C (1984) Strategic management of technology. J Prod Innov Manag 1:30–35
Patel PC, Fiet JO (2011) Knowledge combination and the potential advantages of family firms in searching for opportunities. Entrepr Theory Pract 35(6):1179–1197
Ritter T, Gemunden HG (2003) Network competence: its impact on innovation success and its antecedents. J Bus Res 56:745–755
Salvato C (2004) Predictors of entrepreneurship in family firms. J Priv Equity 7(3):68–76
Sayli H, Agca V (2009) Aile İşletmelerinde Aile Kültürününün İç Girişimcilik Eğilimleri Üzerine Etkisi: Afyon-Denizli-Uşak Örneği. Is, Guc: J Ind Rel Hum Resour 11(2)
Sharma P, Salvato C (2011) Commentary: exploiting and exploring new opportunities over life cycle stages of family firms. Enterp Theory Pract 35(6):1199–1205
Shepherd D, Zahra S (2003) From conservatism to entrepreneurialism: the case of Swedish family firms, Unpublished paper. University of Colorado, Boulder, CO
Sorenson RL, Folker CA, Brigham KH (2008) The collaborative network orientation: achieving business success through collaborative relationships. Enterp Theory Pract 32:615–634
Spriggs M, Yu A, Deeds D, Sorenson RL (2012) Too many cooks in the kitchen: innovative capacity, collaborative network orientation, and performance in small family businesses. Fam Bus Rev 26(1):32–50
Tidd J, Bessant J, Pavitt K (2001) Managing innovation: integrating technological, market and organizational change. Wiley, Chichester
Trott P (2008) Innovation management and new product development. Financial Times/Prentice Hall, Harlow
Trompenaars F, Hampden-Turner C (1998) Riding the waves of culture. McGraw-Hill, New York
Turgut G ve Dicle A (2004) İMKB’de Yer Alan Aile Sirketlerinin Yönetim Kurulu Olusumları ve Finansal Performansları. 1. Aile İşletmeleri Kongresi, İstanbul Kültür Üniversitesi, İstanbul
Ward JL (1997) Growing the family business: special challenges and best practices. Fam Bus Rev 10(4):323–337
Yamak S ve Oktem Y (2008) Türkiye’deki Aile şletmelerinde Genel Müdürlerin Konumu. 3. Aile İşletmeleri Kongresi, İstanbul Kültür Üniversitesi, İstanbul
Yildirim O, Üsdiken B (2007, August) Reconciling family-centric and professionalized governance: boards of firms within family business groups. In: Academy of Management Proceedings (vol 2007, No. 1, pp 1–7). Academy of Management
Yildirim‐Oktem Ö, Üsdiken B (2010) Contingencies versus external pressure: professionalization in boards of firms affiliated to family business groups in late‐industrializing countries. Br J Manag 21(1):115–130
Yurtoglu BB (2000) Ownership, control and performance of Turkish listed firms. Empirica 27(2):193–222
Zahra SA (2005) Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms. Fam Bus Rev 23(1):23–40
Zahra SA, Hayton JC, Salvato C (2004) Entrepreneurship in family vs. non-family firms: a resource-based analysis of the effect of organizational culture. Enterp Theory Pract 28:363–381
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Erdoğmuş, N., Olcay, G.A., Erdemir, E. (2017). Building Innovative Strategies for the Competitiveness of Family Firms in Emerging Markets. In: Hacioğlu, Ü., Dinçer, H., Alayoğlu, N. (eds) Global Business Strategies in Crisis. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44591-5_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44591-5_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44590-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44591-5
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)