Skip to main content

Employment Agency and Temporary Work Agency

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 305 Accesses

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Economics ((BRIEFSECONOMICS))

Abstract

The following chapter aims to introduce the analysis of the research that has been carried out on temporary employment, agency work and the role of employment agencies in Italy and in the world. It should be emphasized that the scientific community is displaying increasing interest in the issue. From this perspective, the studies we present represent tangible evidence of the increasing role of this industry within the Italian and the international economic system. Firstly, the chapter provides an exhaustive definition of employment agencies, secondly it aims to present an overview of the main researches and studies carried out. These aim at analyzing causes and motives of the growth of the sector in the world and we divide them into those following a mainstream approach and those that criticize this dominant approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Outsourcing has recently been recognized in several important Mediterranean countries in Europe and, in particular, in Spain in 1994, in Italy in 1996 and in Greece in 1998.

  2. 2.

    ILO (1996).

  3. 3.

    Four sub-types can be identified among these operators: (1) voluntary associations; (2) placement offices in universities and training colleges/institutions; (3) professional and student organizations; (4) trade unions.

  4. 4.

    There are numerous firms made up of individual professionals (such as the agents that provide assistance to professional footballers); however, it is important to take account of the presence of larger firms (a striking case, again in the world of professional football, is Gea Word which represents the interests of numerous footballers and managers/coaches).

  5. 5.

    Temporary work agencies and staff leasing agencies in Europe are generally known as Temporary Work Agencies.

  6. 6.

    In a study commissioned by Ecorys-Nei, Ciett (International Confederation of Temporary Work Businesses) defines the Private employment agency (as) any natural or legal entity that provides labor-market services consisting of employing workers with a view to making them available to a third party (a user firm), which assigns a certain part of its tasks and supervises the execution of these tasks by the agency worker. in Nei (2002), “Rationale of Agency Work. European labour suppliers and demanders’ motives to engage in agency work”, Ciett, Brussels.

  7. 7.

    In particular, the European Union, with the Green Paper “Partnership for a New Organization of Work” Commission of the European Communities, COM (97) 128 final, has encouraged comparative studies of the sector.

  8. 8.

    The European and American specialist literature have used different terms to refer to the “new” forms of employment: some authors use the term “contingent employment”, others refer to “forms of flexible employment” or “forms of alternative employment”, others to forms of labour outsourcing, precarious employment or “forms of temporary employment”. For a critical analysis of the terminology used to define alternative forms of employment to permanent employment, cf. Bergstrom and Storrie (2003). This study will use the term “new” forms of employment. The term “new” is used metaphorically (given that over ten years have gone by since the last piece of legislation regulating employment passed in 2003) to refer to the fact that they are alternatives to standard forms, hence the use of inverted commas.

  9. 9.

    Recruitment and selection do not represent the sole activity that the organization may decide to outsource to the employment agency. Another activity that firms generally entrust to agencies, due to their lack of experience, is outplacement. This consists in helping firms to provide support for staff facing redundancy in order to find other forms of employment. Lastly, there are agencies that offer to manage staff administration procedures on behalf of firms; this practice is highly developed among small firms which delegate all activities to specialists but is beginning to become more established in medium-sized firms and large companies.

  10. 10.

    The niche analyzed by the authors regards healthcare professionals in the UK. In this sector of the labor market, the demand for staff is far greater than the supply. This suggests that, despite efforts to internalize professionals, organizations sometimes do not succeed due to the unwillingness of these workers to accept permanent employment instead of temporary employment). For more in-depth analysis, see: Purcell et al. (2003).

  11. 11.

    Albert and Bradley have done a comparative study which shows that women who carry out book-keeping tasks through employment agencies show a higher ability to control their own lives compared to women who work with a permanent employment contract in consultancies. For a more in-depth analysis, see: Albert and Bradley (1998).

References

  • Arthur JB (1994) Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover. Acad Manag J 37:670–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson J. (1984) Manpower strategies for flexible organizations Personnel Management

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert S, Bradley K (1998) Professional temporary agencies, women and professional discretion: implications for organizations and management. Br J Manag 9:261–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backer GS (1964) Human capital. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Acad Manag Executive 9:49–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman Max H (1993) Negotiating rationally. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrom O (2002) Why does the use of contingent employment differ between industries, investigating institutional processes in the European food industries. Paper presented at 18° EGOS colloquium on organizational politics and the politics of organizations, Barcelona, Spain, June

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrom O, Storrie D (2003) Contingent Employment in Europe and the Unites States. Edward Elgar, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cappelli P (1999) The new deal at work: Managing the market-driven workforce, Harvard Business Review

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambel MJ, Fontinha R (2009) Contingencies of contingent employment: Psychological contract, job insecurity and employability of contracted workers, Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones 25(3):207–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Comi S, Grasseni M (2012) Are temporary workers discriminated against? Evidence from Europe, The Manchester School 80(1):28–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase RH (1937) The nature of the firm. Economica 4:386–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Consiglio S, Cicellin M (2012) I lavoratori in somministrazione a tempo indeterminato: il punto di vista delle Agenzie per il Lavoro. Diritti Lavori Mercati III:597–620

    Google Scholar 

  • Consiglio S, Moschera L (2001a) Le risposte organizzative alla regolazione istituzionale nella fase di nascita di un campo organizzativo: le Società Fornitrici di lavoro temporaneo in Italia, in Costa G. (a cura di), (2001), Flessibilità & Performance. L’organizzazione aziendale tra old e new economy, ISEDI, Torino

    Google Scholar 

  • Consiglio S, Moschera L (2001b) Le società di fornitura di lavoro temporaneo in Italia, organizzazione e performance. Franco Angeli, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  • Consiglio S, Moschera L (2001c) Flessibilità e Regolazione Istituzionale: le Agenzie di Lavoro Temporaneo in Italia. In: Costa G (ed) Flessibilità & Performance. L’organizzazione Aziendale tra Old e New Economy, ISEDI, Turin, pp 104–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Consiglio S, Moschera L (2002) Il lavoro temporaneo in Italia. Sviluppo & Organizzazione 189:51–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Consiglio S, Moschera L (2005) Le Agenzie per il Lavoro. Organizzazione, Regolazione, Competitività, Il Sole24Ore

    Google Scholar 

  • Consiglio S, Moschera L (2008) Dall’Interinale ai Servizi per il Lavoro. Franco Angeli, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  • Consiglio S, Moschera L (2010) Le agenzie per il lavoro e le risposte strategiche e organizzative alla crisi economica. Ebitemp, Franco Angeli, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  • Connelly CE, Gallagher DG (2004) Emerging Trends in Contingent Work. Res J Manage 30(6):959–983

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa G (a cura di) (1992) Manuale di gestione del personale, vol 1. UTET, Torino

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis-Blake A, Uzzi B (1993) Determinants of employment externalization: a study of temporary workers and independent contractors. Adm Sci Q 38:195–223

    Google Scholar 

  • de Koning J, Denys J, Walwei U (1999) Deregulation in placement services: a comparative study for eight EU countries, European Commission Directorate-General for Employment, Industrial Relations and Social Affaire Directorate V/A.2, January

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio P, Powell WW (eds) (1991) The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio P, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational field. Am Sociol Rev 48:147–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnewijk T (2001) Temporary work agencies in the Netherlands: emergence and perspective. Cpb Report n° 1, pp. 37–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei Ecorys (2002) Rationale of agency work. European labour suppliers and demanders’ motives to engage in agency work. CIETT, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni A (1961) A comparative analysis of complex organizations. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Flamholtz E, Lacey J (1981) Personell Management: Human capital theory and human resource accounting. Institute of Industrial Relations, UCLA, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher DG, Sverke M (2005) Contingent employment contracts: Are existing employment theories still relevant?. Econ Ind Democracy 26(2):181–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Guest DE, Isaksson K, De Witte H (2010) Employment contracts and employee well-being. Oxford Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy C (1989) The age on unreason. Arrow Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • ILO (1996) Convention on private employment agencies n° 181

    Google Scholar 

  • ILO (2009) Private employment agencies, temporary agency workers and their contribution to the labour market, International Labour Office, Sectoral Activities Programme, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Janta B, Ratzmann N, Ghez J, Khodyakov D, Yaqub O (2015) Employment and the changing labour market. Global societal trends to 2030, Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California and Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Joskow P (1993) Asset specificity and the structure of vertical relationships: empirical evidence. In: Williamson OE, Winter SG (eds) The nature of the firm: origins, evolution and development. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Khurana Rakesh (2002) Market Triads: A theoretical and empirical analysis of market intermediation. J Theor Soc Behav 32:2

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch MJ, McGrath RG (1996) Improving labour productivity: human resource management policies do matter”. Strateg Manag J 17:335–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kochan T, Osterman P (1994) The mutual gains enterprise. Harvard Business School Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Koene B, Paauwe J, Pot F (2002) Establishment and Acceptance of an Emerging Industry: What factors determine the development and growth of the temporary work industry in Europe? (draft circulated pre-publication). Rotterdam School of Economics Department of Business and Organization, Erasmus University, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Koene B, Van Riemsdijk M (2005) Managing temporary workers: work identity, diversity and operational HR choices, Hum Resour Manage J 15(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger AB (1991) The evolution of unjust. Dismissal legislation in the Unites States. Ind Labour Relat Rev 44(4):644–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler EE (1992) The ultimate advantage: creating the high involvement organization. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepak DP, Snell SA (1999) The Human resource architecture: toward a theory of human capital allocation and development. Acad Manag Rev 24(1):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine D (1995) Reinventing the workplace: how business and employers can both win. Brookings Institute, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu CT, Wu C, Hu CW (2010) Managing temporary workers by defining temporary work agency service quality. Hum Resour Manag 49(4):619–646

    Google Scholar 

  • Lozza E, Libreri C, Bosio AC (2012) Temporary employment, job insecurity and their extraorganizational outcomes. Econ Ind Democracy, pp 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters JK, Miles G (2002) Predicting the use of external labor arrangements: a test of the transaction costs, perspective. Acad Manag J 45:431–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melchiomo R (1999) The changing temporary work force: managerial, professional, and technical workers in the personnel supply services industry. Occup Outlook Q 43:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles R, Snow CC (1984) Designing strategic human resource systems. Organ Dyn 13:36–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitlacher LW (2007) Temporary agency work and the blurring of the traditional employment relationship in multi-party arrangements—the case of Germany and the United States. Int J Employ Stud 15(2):61–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterman P (1987) Choice of employment system in internal labour market. Ind Relat XXVI(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer J, Baron JN (1988) Taking the workers back out: Recent trends in the structuring of employment. In: Staw BM, Cunnings LL (eds) Research in organization behavior. Jai Press, Greenwich

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter M (1985) Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad CK, Hamel G (1990) The core competence of corporation. Harvard Bus Rev 68:79–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Purcell J, Purcell K, Tailby S (2003) Agency temporary work: here today, gone tomorrow? Paper for IIRA Congress

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn JB (1992) Intelligent enterprise. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau DM (1995) Psychological contracts in organizations: understanding written and unwritten agreements. Thousand Oaks, Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz TW (1961) Investment in human capital. Am Econ Rev 51:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott WR, Davis GF (2007) Labor and structure, in W.R.Scott-G.F. Davis, Organizations and Organizing. Rational, Natural and Open System Perspectives, Pearson, Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith V, Neuwirth EB (2009) Temporary help agencies and the making of a new employment practice. Acad Manage Perspect, February, pp 56–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Snell SA, Dean JW Jr (1992) Integrated manufacturing and the human resource management: a human capital perspective. Acad Manag J 35:467–504

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow CC, Miles R, Coleman H (1992) Managing 21st century network organizations. Organ Dyn 20:5–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence M (1973) Job market signalling. Q J Econ 87:355–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Storrie D (2002) Temporary agency work in the European Union, European Foundation for the Improvement of the European Communities

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanworth C, Druker J (2006) Human resource solutions? Dimensions of employers’ use of temporary agency labour in the UK, Pers Rev 35(2):175–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramony M (2011) Antecedents and outcomes of contingent workers’ attitudes toward their temporary help services firm: A unit level longitudinal investigation. J Organ Behav 32:850–868

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsui AS, Pearce JL, Porter LW, Hite JP (1995) Choice of employee-organization relationship. Influence of external and internal organization factors. Res Pers Hum Resour Manag 13:117–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesan R (1992) Strategic sourcing: to make or not to make. Harvard Bus Rev 70 Nov–Dec

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel C, Mangum SL, Greenberger DB, Heneman RL, Skoglind JD (1997) Temporary employment: can organization and employers both win. Acad Manag Executives 11; Italian translation. (1998), “Lavoratori temporanei e politiche del personale”, Sviluppo e Organizzazione, N° 168 Novembre/Dicembre

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernefelt B (1984) A resource-based view of the firm Strategic Management

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson OE (1975) Market and hierarchies. Analysis and antitrust implications. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zilber T (2011) Institutional multiplicity in practice: a tale of two high-tech conferences in Israel. Organ Sci 22:1539–1559

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Consiglio .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Consiglio, S., Moschera, L. (2016). Employment Agency and Temporary Work Agency. In: Temporary Work Agencies in Italy. SpringerBriefs in Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44541-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics