Advertisement

Considerations on Governing Heritage as a Commons Resource

Chapter
Part of the One World Archaeology book series (WORLDARCH)

Abstract

The “commons” is gaining attention as a possible alternative model for managing tangible and intangible heritage in a manner that devolves authority and responsibility to local communities through mechanisms that are democratic and privilege local over national or global interests. This chapter reviews the literature on the commons within archaeology and heritage management, evaluates theorizing on the commons in the context of heritage, and explores, through literature review and case studies from Belize and Peru, the challenges and opportunities that arise should archaeologists and heritage managers seek to adopt the commons as a guiding principle for community projects. The chapter emphasizes that the problem of governance—the rules under which the competing interests of stakeholders in a venture manage their activities and resolve their differences—is an underappreciated but critical ingredient in the design of effective commons-like models for heritage management.

Keywords

Commons Common pool resource Heritage Governance Community economic development Cultural heritage management 

References

  1. Agrawal, A. (2008). Sustainable governance of common-pool resources. In P. Bardhan & I. Ray (Eds.), The contested commons (pp. 46–65). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  2. Akerlof, G. A., & Shiller, R. J. (2009). Animal spirits: How human psychology drives the economy and why it matters for global capitalism (Kindle Edition). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Retrieved from Amazon.com.Google Scholar
  3. Alonso González, P. (2014). From a given to a construct. Cultural Studies, 28(3), 359–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alonso González, P. (2015). Conceptualizing cultural heritage as a common. In P. F. Biehl, D. C. Comer, C. Prescott, & H. A. Soderland (Eds.), Identity and heritage (pp. 27–35). Dordrecht: Springer International.Google Scholar
  5. Arizpe, L. (2000). Cultural heritage and globalization. In E. Avrami, R. Mason, & M. De la Torre (Eds.), Values and heritage conservation (pp. 32–37). Los Angeles: Getty Conservation Institute.Google Scholar
  6. Baland, J.-M., & Platteau, J.-P. (1996). Halting degradation of natural resources: Is there a role for rural communities? Oxford: U.N. Food and Agricultural Organization and Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bardhan, P., & Ray, I. (2008). The contested commons. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  8. Barrère, C., Bonnard, Q., & Chossat, V. (2012). Food, gastronomy and cultural commons. In E. Bertacchini, G. Bravo, M. Marrelli, & W. Santagata (Eds.), Cultural commons: A new perspective on the production and evolution of cultures (pp. 129–150). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  9. Berkes, F. (1986). Local-level management and the commons problem: A comparative study of Turkish coastal fisheries. Marine Policy, 10(3), 215–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bertacchini, E., Bravo, G., Marrelli, M., & Santagata, W. (Eds.). (2012). Cultural commons. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  11. Bob, C. (2005). The marketing of rebellion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brodie, N., & Tubb, K. W. (Eds.). (2002). Illicit antiquities: The theft of culture and the extinction of archaeology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Brousseau, É., & Glachant, J.-M. (Eds.). (2008). New institutional economics: A guidebook. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Burtenshaw, P., & Gould, P. G. (Eds.). (2015). Archaeology and economic development. Oxford: Maney and Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
  15. Camerer, C. F., & Loewenstein, G. (2004). Behavioral economics: Past, present, future. In C. F. Camerer, G. Lowenstein, & M. Rabin (Eds.), Advances in behavioral economics (pp. 2–51). New York, Princeton: Russell Sage Foundation and Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Carman, J. (2005). Against cultural property: Archaeology, heritage and ownership. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  17. Colloredo-Mansfeld, R., & Antrosio, J. (2009). Economic clusters or cultural commons? The limits of competition-driven development in the Ecuadorian Andes. Latin American Research Review, 44(1), 132–157. 306–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Comer, D. (2012). Tourism and archaeological heritage management at Petra: Driver to development or destruction? New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Comer, D. (2014a). Archaeological world heritage as a non-renewable resource: Threats from the Laissez-Faire world of tourism. Public Archaeology, 13(1–3), 121–132.Google Scholar
  20. Comer, D. (2014b). Archaeology as a global public good and a local identity good. In P. F. Biehl, D. Comer, C. Prescott, & H. A. Soderland (Eds.), Identity and heritage: Contemporary challenges in a globalized world (pp. 11–26). London: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. Cunningham, A. B. (1991, July 31). Indigenous knowledge and biodiversity: Global commons or regional heritage? Cultural Survival Quarterly, p. 4.Google Scholar
  22. Davis, P. (2011). Ecomuseums: A sense of place (2nd ed.). New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  23. DLC. (2015). Digital library of the commons. Retrieved July 5, 2015, from http://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/dlc/.
  24. Dowee, M. (2009). Conservaion refugees: The hundred-year conflict between global conservation and native peoples. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  25. Faulkner, N. (2009). The sedgeford crisis. Public Archaeology, 8(1), 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Finger, J. M., & Schuler, P. (Eds.). (2004). Poor people’s knowledge: Promoting intellectual property in developing countries. (Trade and development series). Washington, DC: The World Bank and Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Fiorentino, P., & Friel, M. (2012). Structure and evolution of two cultural commons: Italian futurism and Milanese design. In E. Bertacchini, G. Bravo, M. Marrelli, & W. Santagata (Eds.), Cultural commons: A new perspective on the production and evolution of cultures (pp. 107–128). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  28. Frischmann, B. M., Madison, M. J., & Strandburg, K. J. (Eds.). (2014). Managing knowledge commons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Gintis, H. (2000). Beyond homo economicus: Evidence from experimental economics. Ecological Economics, 35, 311–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gould, P. G. (2014a). Putting the past to work: Archaeology, community and economic development. Ph.D. thesis, University College London, London (Available from UCL Discovery at http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1427269).
  31. Gould, P. G. (2014b). A tale of two villages. Public Archaeology, 13(1–3), 162–175.Google Scholar
  32. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Herrera, A. (2014). Commodifying the indigenous in the name of development: Archaeology and heritage management in the XXI century central Andes. Public Archaeology, 13(1–3), 69–82.Google Scholar
  34. Herrera Wassilowsky, A. (Ed.). (2013). Arqueología y Desarollo en América del Sur. Bogotá: Ediciones Uniandes & Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
  35. Herzberg, R. (2005). Commentary on Richard Wagner’s “Self-governance, polycentrism, and federalism: Recurring themes in Vincent Ostrom’s scholarly oeuvre”. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 57(2), 189–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hess, C. (2006). Research on the commons, common-pool resources, and common property. Retrieved July 6, 2015, from http://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/dlc/contentguidelines.
  37. Hess, C. (2008). Mapping the new commons. Paper presented at the Governing Shared Resources: Connecting Local Experience to Global Challenges; 12th Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of the Commons, University of Gloucestershire, Cheltenham, July 14–18, 2008.Google Scholar
  38. Hess, C., & Ostrom, E. (Eds.). (2011). Understanding knowledge as a commons: From theory to practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  39. Hopgood, S. (2006). Keepers of the flame: Understanding Amnesty International. London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Hudson, C., & McEwen, C. (1987). Focusing pride in the past: Aqua Blanca, Ecuador. Museum, 39(2), 154.Google Scholar
  41. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  42. Labadi, S., & Long, C. (Eds.). (2010). Heritage and globalisation. (Key issues in cultural heritage). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Leventhal, R. M., Espinosa, C. C., Pat, E. M., & Demetrio, P. C. (2014). Community and heritage: A community heritage project in Tihosuco, Quintana Roo, Mexico. Public Archaeology, 13(1-3), 211–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Madison, M. J., Frischmann, B. M., & Strandburg, K. J. (2009–10). Constructing commons in the cultural environment. Cornell Law Review, 95(4), 657–710.Google Scholar
  45. McEwen, C., Silva, M.-I., & Hudson, C. (2006). Using the past to forge the future: The genesis of the community site museum at Agua Blanca, Ecuador. In H. Silverman (Ed.), Archaeological site museums in Latin America (pp. 187–216). Gainesville: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
  46. Meskell, L. (2012). The nature of heritage: The New South Africa. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  47. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Olsen, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Ostrom, E. (2010a). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. The American Economic Review, 100(3), 641–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ostrom, E. (2010b). Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 550–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ostrom, E., & Walker, J. (Eds.). (2003). Trust and reciprocity. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  54. Platteau, J.-P. (2008). Managing the commons: The role of social norms and beliefs. In P. Bardhan & I. Ray (Eds.), The contested commons (pp. 25–45). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  55. Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 77–90.Google Scholar
  56. Poteete, A. R., Janssen, M. A., & Ostrom, E. (2010). Working together: Collective action, the commons and multiple methods in practice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pyburn, K. A. (2014). Preservation as ‘disaster capitalism’: The downside of site rescue and the complexity of community engagement. Public Archaeology, 13(1–3), 226–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sassen, S. (2006). Territory, authority, rights: From medieval to global assemblages. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Smith, L., & Waterton, E. (2009). Heritage, community and archaeology. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  60. Wade, R. (1988). Village Republics: Economic conditions for collective action in South India. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Wagner, R. E. (2005). Self-governance, polycentrism, and federalism: recurring themes in Vincent Ostrom’s scholarly oeuvre. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 57(2), 173–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Williamson, O. E. (1996). The mechanisms of governance. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Williamson, O. E. (1998). The institutions of governance. The American Economic Review, 88(2), 75–79.Google Scholar
  64. Zhang, Y. (2012). Heritage as cultural commons: Towards an institutional approach of self governance. In E. Bertacchini, G. Bravo, M. Marrelli, & W. Santagata (Eds.), Cultural commons (pp. 153–177). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and AnthropologyPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations