Skip to main content

Collision or Collaboration? Archaeology Encounters Economic Development: An Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Collision or Collaboration

Part of the book series: One World Archaeology ((WORLDARCH))

Abstract

Economic development activities globally have increasingly severe consequences for the practice of archaeology. Archaeologists’ ambivalent views on engaging with development, however, affect the prospects for improvement of living standards the communities in which we work, and for the ability of the discipline to influence the powerful corporate, financial, and political forces behind development efforts. This volume explores, through theoretical, ethical, and case study analysis, the challenging choices facing the discipline in a fast-developing world: Is it better to collaborate with development forces in order to preserve heritage and the archaeological record and, perhaps to support local communities? Or is it better to contend with demands for economic growth and so collide with potentially irresistible demands. This chapter presents the context in which these issues must be considered, and reviews the themes arising from the chapters in this volume, which in the aggregate evaluate the question of Collision or Collaboration from a global perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, J. L. (2010). Interrogating the equity principle: The rhetoric and reality of management planning for sustainable archaeological heritage tourism. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 5(2), 103–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aitchison, K., & Edwards, R. (2008). Discovering the archaeologists of Europe: United Kingdom. Reading, UK: Institute of Field Archaeologists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2015). Occupational Employment and Wages May 2014 OES 19-301 and OES 25-1061. Retrieved August 20, 2015, from http://www.bls.gov/home.htm.

  • Carver, M. (1996). On archaeological value. Antiquity, 70, 45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castañeda, Q., & Mathews, J. P. (2013). Archaeology meccas of tourism: Exploration, protection, and exploitation. In C. Walker & N. Carr (Eds.), Tourism and archaeology (pp. 37–64). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIFA. (2014). Code of conduct. Retrieved February 13, 2016, from http://www.archaeologists.net/sites/default/files/CodesofConduct.pdf.

  • Cohen, J., & Easterly, W. (2009). What works in development? Thinking big and thinking small (Kindle edition). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution. Retrieved from Amazon.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darvill, T. (2005). “Sorted for ease and whiz”?: Approaching value and importance in archaeological resource management. In C. Mathers, T. Darvill, & B. J. Little (Eds.), Heritage of value, archaeology of renown (pp. 21–43). Gainesville: University of Florida Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, A. (2013). The Great Escape: Health, wealth and the origins of inequality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • EAA. (2016). European Association of Archaeologists Codes. Retrieved March 23, 2016, from http://www.e-a-a.org/codes.htm.

  • Equator Principles Association. (2013). The Equator principles. Retrieved August 20, 2015, from http://www.equator-principles.com/resources/equator_principles_III.pdf.

  • Fleming, A. K. (2014). Archaeology and economic development: Commitment and support from the World Bank Group. Public Archaeology, 13(1–3), 135–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafrenz Samuels, K. (2009). Trajectories of development: International heritage management of archaeology in the Middle East and North Africa. Archaeologies, 5(1), 68–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafrenz Samuels, K., & Lilley, I. (2015). Transnationalism and heritage development. In L. Meskell (Ed.), Global heritage: A reader (pp. 217–239). Malden, MA: Wiley/Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • LEAP. (2016). Leaders in energy and preservation. Retrieved April 23, 2016, from http://www.energyandpreservation.org/.

  • Meskell, L. (2012). The nature of heritage: The New South Africa. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford Economics. (2013). The economic impact of the UK Heritage Tourism Economy. London: Heritage Lottery Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (2007). One economics, many recipes: Globalization, institutions and economic growth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAA. (1996). Principles of archaeological ethics. Retrieved March 29, 2016, from http://www.saa.org/AbouttheSociety/PrinciplesofArchaeologicalEthics/tabid/203/Default.aspx.

  • Shepherd, N., & Haber, A. (2011). What’s up with WAC? Archaeology and ‘Engagement’ in a globalized world. Public Archaeology, 10(2), 96–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. (2011). Errors of fact and errors of representation: Response to Shepherd and Haber’s Critique of the World Archaeological Congress. Public Archaeology, 10(4), 223–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. (2003). Globalization and its discontents. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2015). The Millennium Development Goals Report. New York, NY: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wait, G., & Altschul, J. H. (2014). Cultural heritage management and economic development programmes: Perspectives from desert fringes where IGOs and NGOs have no locus. Public Archaeology, 13(1–3), 151–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch, J. R., & Ferris, N. (2014). “We have met the enemy and it is us”: Transforming archaeology through sustainable design. In S. Atalay, L. R. Clauss, R. H. McGuire, & J. R. Welch (Eds.), Transforming archaeology: Activist practices and prospects (pp. 91–114). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2016). International Tourism, number of arrivals. Retrieved April 24, 2016, from http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/ST.INT.ARVL/countries?display=graph.

  • WTTC. (2015). Country reports. Retrieved August 20, 2015, from http://www.wttc.org/research/economic-research/economic-impact-analysis/country-reports/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter G. Gould .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gould, P.G. (2017). Collision or Collaboration? Archaeology Encounters Economic Development: An Introduction. In: Gould, P., Pyburn, K. (eds) Collision or Collaboration. One World Archaeology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44515-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44515-1_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44514-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44515-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics