Skip to main content

Design Optimization and Reliability Analysis of Variable Stiffness Composite Structures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Smart Structures and Materials

Part of the book series: Computational Methods in Applied Sciences ((COMPUTMETHODS,volume 43))

Abstract

This paper presents a study on the reliability analysis of variable stiffness composites to improve the performance of curved fiber composites in the presence of uncertainties. A comparison to the response of conventional straight fiber composites is presented while assuming the same material properties. To this end, a computational design framework for advanced composites has been developed and implemented and it includes both deterministic and reliability analysis capabilities. The deterministic design module uses the Discrete Material Optimization (DMO) technique, and the reliability analysis module uses the Response Surface Method (RSM) based on the First Order Reliability Method (FORM) and the Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS). Variable Stiffness Composite Laminates (VSCL) are achieved by a continuous change in fiber orientation in the plane of the laminate. The design objective is to tailor and/or maximize the stiffness of the composite structure, and the design variables are the piecewise patch orientations of the fibers in the presence of manufacturing constraints. The manufacturing constraints enforce a bounded change in fiber orientation between adjacent patches in order to ensure fiber continuity to minimize gaps and overlaps. In the reliability analysis, tip deflection and first ply failure are considered separately as the limit state function and the random variables are material properties. The results show that the VSCL are more reliable even in the presence of a high standard deviation compared to the straight fiber composites with low standard deviation assuming the same material properties. It was also observed that the curved fiber composites are more effective in handling concentrated stresses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Leissa AW, Martin AF (1990) Vibration and buckling of rectangular composite plates with variable fiber spacing. Compos Struct 14:339–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Curry JM, Johnson ER, Starnes JH (1992) Effect of dropped plies on the strength of graphite–epoxy laminates. AIAA J 30(2):449–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Setoodeh S, Abdalla MM, IJsselmuiden ST, Gürdal Z (2009) Design of variable-stiffness composite panels for maximum buckling load. Compos Struct 87:17–109

    Google Scholar 

  4. Akhavan H, Ribeiro P (2011) Natural modes of vibration of variable stiffness composite laminates with curvilinear fibers. Compos Struct 93:3040–3047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Akhavan H, Ribeiro P, Moura MFSF (2013) Large deflection and stresses in variable stiffness composite laminates with curvilinear fibres. Int J Mech Sci 73:14–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ribeiro P, Akhavan H (2012) Non-linear vibrations of variable stiffness composite laminated plates. Compos Struct 94:2424–2432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dang TD, Hallett SR (2013) A numerical study on impact and compression after impact behavior of variable angle tow laminates. Compos Struct 96:194–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ribeiro P, Akhavan H, Teter A, Warminski J (2014) A review on the mechanical behaviour of curvilinear fibre composite laminated panels. J Compos Mater 48(22):2761–2777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. IJsselmuiden ST (2011) Optimal design of variable stiffness composite structures using lamination parameters. Ph.D. thesis; Delft University of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  10. Duvaut G, Terrel G (2000) F. Lene´; Optimization of fiber reinforced composites. Compos Struct 48:83–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hyer MW, Charette RF (1991) Use of curvilinear fiber format in composite structure design. AIAA J 29(6):1011–1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stegmann J, Lund E (2005) Discrete material optimization of general composite shell structures. Int J Numer Meth Eng 62(14):2009–2027

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Sørensen SN, Lund E (2013) Topology and thickness optimization of laminated composites including manufacturing constraints. Struct Multi Optim 48:249–265

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Overgaard LCT, Lund E, Thomsen OT (2010) Structural collapse of a wind turbine blade. Part A: Static test and equivalent single layered models. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 41:257–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lund E (2009) Buckling topology optimization of laminated multi-material composite shell structures. Compos Struct 91:157–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sohouli AR, Suleman A (2014) Modeling and optimization of curvilinear fiber composites. In: Design, manufacturing and applications of composites tenth workshop. Vancouver, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sriramula S, Chryssanthopoulos MK (2009) Quantification of uncertainty modelling in stochastic analysis of FRP composites. Compos A 40(11):1673–1684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chiachio M, Chiachio J, Rus G (2012) Reliability in composites—a selective review and survey of current development. Compos B 43(3):902–913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sciuva MD, Lomario D (2003) A comparison between Monte Carlo and FORMs in calculating the reliability of a composite structure. Compos Struct 59(1):155–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jeong HK, Shenoi RA (2000) Probabilistic strength analysis of rectangular FRP plates using Monte Carlo simulation. Compos Struct 76(1–3):219–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Frangopol DM, Recek S (2003) Reliability of fiber-reinforced composite laminate plates. Probab Eng Mech 18(2):137–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim BC, Potter K, Weaver PM (2012) Continuous tow shearing for manufacturing variable angle tow composites. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 43:1347–1356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kennedy GJ, Martins J (2012) A regularized discrete laminate parametrization technique with applications to wing-box design optimization. In: Proceedings of 53rd Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. Honolulu, HI

    Google Scholar 

  24. Haftka RT, Gurdal Z (1991) Elements of structural optimization. Dordrecht, Kluwer

    Google Scholar 

  25. Svanberg K (1987) Method of moving asymptotes—a new method for structural optimization. Int J Numer Meth Eng 24:359–373

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Li L, Khandelwal K (2015) Volume preserving projection filters and continuation methods in topology optimization. Eng Struct 85:144–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Vanderplaats GN (1984) Numerical optimization techniques for engineering design. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  28. Byrd RH, Lu P, Nocedal J (1995) A limited memory algorithm for bound constrained optimization. SIAM J Sci Stat Comput 16(5):1190–1208

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Raychaudhuri S (2008) Introduction to Monte Carlo simulation. In: Proceedings of the 2008 winter simulation conference

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hasofer A, Lind N (1974) Exact and Invariant Second-Moment Code Format. J Eng Mech Div ASCE 100:111–121

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gavin HP, Yau SC (2008) High order limit state functions in the response surface method for structural reliability analysis. Struct Saf 30:162–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kaw AK (2006) Mechanics of composites materials 2006, 2nd edn. Boca Raton, CRC Taylor & Francis Group

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the Graduate Fellowship from the Fundação para a Ciencia e Tecnologia through the MIT-Portugal program and also the MITACS graduate visiting student internship grant at the University of Victoria.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Suleman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sohouli, A., Yildiz, M., Suleman, A. (2017). Design Optimization and Reliability Analysis of Variable Stiffness Composite Structures. In: Araujo, A., Mota Soares, C. (eds) Smart Structures and Materials. Computational Methods in Applied Sciences, vol 43. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44507-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44507-6_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44505-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44507-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics