Advertisement

Overview of Sexual Offender Typologies, Recidivism, and Treatment

  • Brandy L. BlaskoEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of what is known about sex offenders in terms of sexual offender typologies, recidivism, and treatment. This chapter will summarize the current knowledge in each area and identify areas requiring additional attention. Implications for sex offender policy are considered against the background of current empirical knowledge.

Keywords

Sexual offender typologies Sexual offender recidivism Sexual offender treatment 

References

  1. Ackerman, A. R., & Furman, R. (2012). Community based management for sex offenders in the US: An evidence based evaluation. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 7, 591.Google Scholar
  2. Ackerman, A. R., Sacks, M., & Osier, L. N. (2013). The experiences of registered sex offenders with internet offender registries in three states. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 52, 29–45. doi: 10.1080/10509674.2012.720959 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexander, M. (1999). Sexual offender treatment efficacy revisited. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 11, 101–116. doi: 10.1007/BF02658841 Google Scholar
  4. American Psychiatric Association. (1999). Dangerous sexual offenders: A task force report of the American Psychiatric Association. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  5. Amir, M. (1971). Patterns in forcible rape. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Anderson, A. L., & Sample, L. L. (2008). Public awareness and action resulting from sex offender community notification laws. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 19, 371–396. doi: 10.1177/0887403408316705 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Anderson, A. L., Sample, L. L., & Cain, C. M. (2015). Residency restrictions for sex offenders: Public opinion on appropriate distances. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 26, 262–277. doi: 10.1177/0887403413513897 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). Newark, NJ: LexisNexis.Google Scholar
  9. Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Hoge, R. D. (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 19–52. doi: 10.1177/0093854890017001004
  10. Andrews, D. A., & Dowden, C. (2006). Managing correctional treatment for reducing recidivism: A meta-analytic review of programme integrity. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 10, 173–187. doi: 10.1348/135532505X36723 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barnes, J. C., Dukes, T., Tewksbury, R., & De Troye, T. M. (2009). Analyzing the impact of a statewide residence restriction law on South Carolina sex offenders. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 20, 21–43. doi: 10.1177/0887403408320842 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Beck, A. T. (1991). Cognitive therapy: A 30-year retrospective. American Psychologist, 46, 368–375. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.46.4.368 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Beck, A. T. (2002). Prisoners of hate. Behavior Research and Therapy, 40, 209–216. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7967(01)00103-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Becker, J. V., & Abel, G. G. (1978). Men and the victimization of women. In J. R. Chapman & M. R. Gates (Eds.), Victimization of women. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Beech, A., Freemantle, N., Power, C., & Fisher, D. (2015). An examination of potential biases in research designs used to assess the efficacy of sex offender treatment. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 7, 204–222. doi: 10.1108/JACPR-01-2015-0154 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bickley, J., & Beech, A. R. (2001). Classifying child abusers: Its relevance to theory and clinical practice. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 45, 51–69. doi: 10.1177/0306624X01451004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Blasko, B. L., Jeglic, E. L., & Mercado, C. C. (2011). Are actuarial risk data used to make determinations of sex offender risk classification?: An examination of sex offenders selected for enhanced registration and notification. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 5, 676–692. doi: 10.1177/0306624X10372784 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Blokland, A., & Lussier, P. (2015). Sex offenders: A criminal career approach. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
  19. Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., Roth, J., & Visher, C. (1986). Criminal careers and career criminals. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  20. Brackel, S. (1985). The mentally disabled and the law. Chicago: American Bar Foundation.Google Scholar
  21. Broadhurst, R. G., & Maller, R. A. (1992). The recidivism of sex offenders in the Western Australian prison population. British Journal of Criminology, 32, 54–80.Google Scholar
  22. Bromberg, W., & Coyle, E. (1974). Rape: A compulsion to destroy. In Medical insight (pp. 21–22, 24–25).Google Scholar
  23. Burchfield, K. B. (2012). Assessing community residents’ perceptions of local registered sex offenders: Results from a pilot survey. Deviant Behavior, 33, 241–259. doi: 10.1080/01639625.2011.573396 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Burchfield, K. B., & Mingus, W. (2014). Sex offender reintegration: Consequences of the local neighborhood context. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 109–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2003). Recidivism of sex offender released from prison in 1994. Office of Justice Programs: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  26. Button, D. M., Tewksbury, R., Mustaine, E. E., & Payne, B. K. (2013). Factors contributing to perceptions about policies regarding the electronic monitoring of sex offenders: The role of demographic characteristics, victimization experiences, and social disorganization. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 57, 25–54. doi: 10.1177/0306624X11426698 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Calkins, C., Jeglic, E. L., Beattey, R. A., Zeidman, S., & Perillo, A. D. (2014). Sexual violence legislation: A review of case law and empirical research. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20, 443–462. doi: 10.1037/law0000027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Campbell, T. W. (2004). Assessing sex offenders: Problems and pitfalls. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas Publisher Ltd.Google Scholar
  29. Center for Sex Offender Management. (2010). Exploring public awareness and attitudes about sex offender management: Findings from a National public opinion poll. U.S. Department of Justice: Office of Justice Programs.Google Scholar
  30. Cohen, M. L., Garofalo, R. F., Boucher, R., & Seghorn, T. (1971). The psychology of rapists. Seminars in Psychiatry, 3, 307–327.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Cohen, M. L., Seghorn, T., & Calmas, W. (1969). Sociometric study of sex offenders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 74, 249–255. doi: 10.1037/h0027185 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Cortoni, F., & Gannon, T. A. (2016). Female sexual offenders: An overview. In A. Phenix & H. Hoberman (Eds.), Sexual offending (pp. 213–224). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  33. Craig, L. A., Browne, K. D., & Stringer, I. (2003). Treatment and sexual offence recidivism. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 4, 70–89. doi: 10.1177/1524838002238946 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Duwe, G., & Donnay, W. (2010). The effects of failure to register on sex offender recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 520–536. doi: 10.1177/0093854810364106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Evans, D. N., & Cubellis, M. A. (2015). Coping with stigma: How registered sex offenders manage their public identities. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 593–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Faller, K. C. (1987). Women who sexually abuse children. Violence and Victims, 2, 263–276.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Fitch, W. L. (1998). Sex offender commitment in the United States. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 9, 237–240. doi: 10.1080/09585189808402192 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Freeman, N. J. (2012). The public safety impact of community notification laws: Rearrest of convicted sex offenders. Crime & Delinquency, 58, 539–564. doi: 10.1177/0011128708330852 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Furby, L., Weinrott, M. R., & Blackshaw, L. (1989). Sex offender recidivism: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 3–30. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.105.1.3 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gallagher, C. A., Wilson, D. B., Paul Hirschfield, M. A., Coggeshall, M. B., & MacKenzie, D. L. (1999). Quantitative review of the effects of sex offender treatment on sexual reoffending. Corrections Management Quarterly, 3, 19–29.Google Scholar
  41. Gannon, T. A., & Rose, M. R. (2008). Female child sexual offenders: Towards integrating theory and practice. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13, 442–461. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2008.07.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gebhard, P. H., Gagnon, J. H., Pomeroy, W. B., & Christenson, C. V. (1965). Sex offenders: An analysis of types. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  43. Giordano, P. C., Cernkovich, S. A., & Rudolph, J. L. (2002). Gender, crime, and desistance: Toward a theory of cognitive transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 990–1064. doi: 10.1086/343191 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Glueck, B. C. (1956). Research project for the study and treatment of persons convicted of crimes involving sexual aberrations. Final Report; June 1952–June 1955. New York: State Department of Hygiene.Google Scholar
  45. Gottfredson, M., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Grossman, L. S., Martis, B., & Fichtner, C. G. (1999). Are sex offenders treatable? A research overview. Psychiatric Services, 3, 349–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Groth, A. N. (1979). Men who rape: The psychology of the offender. New York, NY: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Groth, A. N., Burgess, A. W., & Holmstrom, L. L. (1977). Rape: Power, anger, and sexuality. American Journal of Psychiatry, 134, 1239–1243. doi: 10.1176/ajp.134.11.1239 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Groth, A. N., Hobson, W. F., & Gary, T. S. (1982). The child molester: Clinical observations. In J. Conte & D. A. Shore (Eds.), Social work and child sexual abuse (pp. 129–145). New York: Haworth.Google Scholar
  50. Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry. (1977). Psychiatry and sex psychopath legislation: The thirties to the eighties. New York: Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
  51. Guttmacher, M. S., & Weihofen, H. (1952). Psychiatry and the law. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  52. Hall, G. C. N. (1995). Sexual offender recidivism revisited: A meta-analysis of recent treatment studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 802–809. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.63.5.802 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hanson, R. K., Broom, I., & Stephenson, M. (2004). Evaluating community sex offender treatment programs: A 12-Year follow-up of 724 offenders. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 36, 84–96. doi: 10.1037/h0087220 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hanson, R. K., Bourgon, G., Helmus, L., & Hodgson, S. (2009a). The principles of effective correctional treatment also apply to sexual offenders a meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 865–891. doi: 10.1177/0093854809338545 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hanson, R. K., Bourgon, G., Helmus, L., & Hodgson, S. (2009b). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of treatment for sex offenders: Risk, need, and responsivity. Ottawa, ON: Public Safety Canada.Google Scholar
  56. Hanson, R. K., & Bussiére, M. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348–362. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.66.2.348 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Hanson, R. K., Gordon, A., Harris, A. J., Marques, J. K., Murphy, W., Quinsey, V. L., et al. (2002). First report of the collaborative outcome data project on the effectiveness of psychological treatment for sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 169–194. doi: 10.1023/A:1014624315814 Google Scholar
  58. Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. (2004). Predictors of sexual recidivism: An updated meta-analysis 2004-02. Ottawa, Canada: Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada.Google Scholar
  59. Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1154–1163. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1154 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Harkins, L., & Beech, A. R. (2007). A review of the factors that can influence the effectiveness of sexual offender treatment: Risk, need, responsivity, and process issues. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 615–627. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2006.10.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Harris, A. J. R., & Hanson, R. K. (2004). Sex offender recidivism: A simple question (Vol. 3). Ottawa: Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada.Google Scholar
  62. Harris, D. A. (2010). Theories of female sexual offending. In T. R. Gannon & F. Cortoni (Eds.), Female sexual offenders. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  63. Harris, D. A., Knight, R. A., Dennison, S., & Smallbone, S. (2011). Post release specialization and versatility in sexual offenders referred for civil commitment. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 23, 243–259. doi: 10.1177/1079063210384276 Google Scholar
  64. Harris, D. A., Mazerolle, P., & Knight, R. A. (2009a). Understanding male sexual offending: A comparison of general and specialist theories. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 1051–1069. doi: 10.1177/0093854809342242 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Harris, D. A., Smallbone, S., Dennison, S., & Knight, R. A. (2009b). Specialization and versatility in sexual offenders referred for civil commitment. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 37–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2008.12.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Hazelwood, R. (1995). Analyzing rape and profiling the offender. In R. Hazelwood & A. Burgess (Eds.), Practical aspects of rape investigation: A multi-disciplinary approach (pp. 155–181). New York: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  67. Helmus, L., Thornton, D., Hanson, R. K., & Babchishin, K. M. (2015). Improving the predictive accuracy of Static-99 and Static-2002 with older sex offenders: Revised age weights. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 24, 64–101. doi: 10.1177/1079063211409951 Google Scholar
  68. Howard, P. (2011). Hazards of different types of reoffending (Ministry of Justice Research Series 3/11). London, England: UK Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
  69. Jennings, W. G., Zgoba, K. M., Donner, C. M., Henderson, B. B., & Tewksbury, R. (2014). Considering specialization/versatility as an unintended collateral consequence of SORN. Journal of Criminal Justice, 42, 184–192. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2013.06.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Kernsmith, P. D., Craun, S. W., & Foster, J. (2009). Public attitudes toward sexual offenders and sex offender registration. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 18(290–301), 1053. doi: 10.1080/8710902901663 Google Scholar
  71. Kim, B., Benekos, P. J., & Merlo, A. (2016). Sex offender recidivism revisited: Review of recent meta-analysis on the effect of sex offender treatment. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 17, 105–117. doi: 10.1177/1524838014566719 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Klein, J. L. (2015). Vilifying the pedophiles and perverts: A nationwide test of the community attitudes toward Sex Offenders (CATSO) scale. CCJLS Acknowledgements, 16, 41–60.Google Scholar
  73. Knight, R. A. (1992). The generation and corroboration of a taxonomic model for child molesters. In W. O’Donohue & J. H. Geer (Eds.), The sexual abuse of children: Theory, research, and therapy (Vol. 2, pp. 24–70). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  74. Knight, R. A. (1999). Validation of a typology for rapists. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 297–323. doi: 10.1177/088626099014003006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Knight, R. A., & Prentky, R. A. (1990). Classifying sexual offenders. In W. L. Marshall, D. R. Laws, & H. E. Barbaree (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault (pp. 23–52). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Koon-Magnin, S. (2015). Perceptions of and support for sex offender policies: Testing Levenson, Brannon, Fortney, and Baker’s findings. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43, 80–88. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2014.12.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Kopp, S. B. (1962). The character structure of sex offenders. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 16, 64–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Lanning, K. (1986). Child molesters: A behavioral analysis for law enforcement officers investigating cases of child sexual exploitation. Washington, DC: National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.Google Scholar
  79. Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (1993). Turning points in the life course: Why change matters to the study of crime. Criminology, 31, 301–325. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1993.tb01132.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Laws, D. R., & Ward, T. (2011). Desistance from sex offending: Alternatives to throwing away the keys. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  81. Levenson, J. S., Brannon, Y. N., Fortney, T., & Baker, J. (2007). Public perceptions about sex offenders and community protection policies. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 7, 137–161. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-2415.2007.00119.x Google Scholar
  82. Levenson, J., Letourneau, K., Armstrong, K., & Zgoba, K. M. (2010). Failure to register as a sex offender: Is it associated with recidivism? Justice Quarterly, 27, 305–325. doi: 10.1080/07418820902972399 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Lieb, R., & Nunlist, C. (2008). Community notification as viewed by Washington’s citizens: A 10-year follow-up. Washington State Institute for Public Policy.Google Scholar
  84. Lösel, F., & Schmucker, M. (2005). The effectiveness of treatment for sexual offenders: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 117–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Lovins, B., Lowenkamp, C. T., & Latessa, E. J. (2009). Applying the risk principle to sex offenders Can treatment make some sex offenders worse? The Prison Journal, 89, 344–357. doi: 10.1177/0032885509339509 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Lowenkamp, C. T., Latessa, E. J., & Holsinger, A. M. (2006). The risk principle in action: What have we learned from 13,676 offenders and 97 correctional programs? Crime & Delinquency, 52, 77–93. doi: 10.1177/0011128705281747 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Lussier, P., LeBlanc, M., & Proulx, J. (2005). The generality of criminal behavior: A confirmatory factor analysis of the criminal activity of sex offenders in adulthood. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 177–189. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2004.12.009
  88. Maltz, M. D. (1984, 2001). Recidivism. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  89. Mann, R. E., Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2010). Assessing risk for sexual recidivism: Some proposals on the nature of psychologically meaningful risk factors. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22, 191–217. doi: 10.1177/1079063210366039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Marques, J. K., Wiederanders, M., Day, D. M., Nelson, C., & von Ommeren, A. (2005). Effects of a relapse prevention program on sexual recidivism: Final results from California’s Sex Offender Treatment and Evaluation Project (SOTEP). Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 17, 79–107. doi: 10.1007/s11194-005-1212-x Google Scholar
  91. Marshall, W. L., & Hollin, C. (2015). Historical developments in sex offender treatment. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 21, 125–135. doi: 10.1080/13552600.2014.980339 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Marshall, W. L., Jones, R., Ward, T., Johnston, P., & Barbaree, H. E. (1991). Treatment outcome with sex offenders. Clinical Psychology Review, 11, 465–485. doi: 10.1016/0272-7358(91)90119-F CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Marshall, W. L., & Pithers, W. D. (1994). A reconsideration of treatment outcome with sex offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 21, 10–27. doi: 10.1177/0093854894021001003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Maruna, S. (2001). Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Mathews, R., Matthews, J., & Speltz, K. (1989). Female sexual offenders: An exploratory study. Orwell, VT: The Safer Society Press.Google Scholar
  96. Mathews, R., Matthews, J., & Speltz, K. (1990). Female sexual offenders. In M. Hunger (Ed.), The sexually abused male: Prevalence, impact, and treatment (pp. 235–254). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  97. McCarty, L. M. (1986). Mother-child incest: Characteristics of the offender. Child Welfare, 65, 447–458.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. McGrath, R., Cumming, G., Burchard, B., Zeoli, S., & Ellerby, L. (2010). Current practices and emerging trends in sexual abuser management: The Safer Society 2009 North American Survey. Brandon, Vermont: Safer Society Press.Google Scholar
  99. McGrath, R. J., Hoke, S. E., & Vojtisek, J. E. (1998). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of sex offenders. A treatment comparison and long-term follow-up study. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 25, 203–225. doi: 10.1177/0093854898025002004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. McGuire, T. J. (2000). Correctional institution based sex offender treatment: A lapse behavior study. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18, 57–71. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0798(200001/02)18 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Miethe, T. D., Olson, J., & Mitchell, O. (2006). Specialization and persistence in the arrest histories of sex offenders: A comparative analysis of alternative measures and offense types. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 43, 204–229. doi: 10.1177/0022427806286564 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Muskens, M., Bogaerts, S., van Casteren, M., & Labrijn, S. (2011). Adult female sexual offending: A comparison between co-offenders and solo offenders in a Dutch sample. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 17, 46–60. doi: 10.1080/13552600.2010.544414 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Nathan, P., & Ward, T. (2001). Females who sexually abuse children: Assessment and treatment issues. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 8, 44–55. doi: 10.1080/13218710109525003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Nathan, P., & Ward, T. (2002). Female sex offenders: Clinical and demographic features. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 8, 5–21. doi: 10.1080/13552600208413329 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. National Institute of Justice. (2008). Measuring recidivism. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  106. O’Connor, A. A. (1987). Female sex offenders. British Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 615–620. doi: 10.1520/JFS12811J PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Phillips, D. M. (1998). Community notification as viewed by Washington’s citizens [Electronic version]. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.Google Scholar
  108. Polizzi, D. M., MacKenzie, D. L., & Hickman, L. J. (1999). What works in adult sex offender treatment? A review of prison-and non-prison-based treatment programs. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 43, 357–374. doi: 10.1177/0306624X99433008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Prentky, R. A., Cohen, M. L., & Seghorn, T. K. (1985). Development of a rational taxonomy for the classification of sexual offenders: Rapists. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 13, 39–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Proctor, J. L., Badzinski, D. M., & Johnson, M. (2002). The impact of media on knowledge and perceptions of Megan’s Law. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 13, 356–379. doi: 10.1177/088740302237804 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Rada, R. T. (1978). Clinical aspects of the rapist. New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
  112. Redlich, A. (2001). Community notification: Perceptions of its effectiveness in preventing child sexual abuse. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 10, 91–116. doi: 10.1300/J070v10n03_06 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Robertillo, G., & Terry, K. (2007). Can we profile sex offenders? A review of sex offender typologies. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 508–519. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2007.02.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Romero, J. J., & Williams, L. M. (1983). Group psychotherapy and intensive probation supervision with sex offenders: A comparative study. Federal Probation, 47, 36–42.Google Scholar
  115. Rydberg, J., Grommon, E., Huebner, B. M., & Bynum, T. (2014). The effect of statewide residency restrictions on sex offender post-release housing mobility. Justice Quarterly, 31, 421–444. doi: 10.1080/07418825.2012.667141 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Sandler, J. C., & Freeman, N. J. (2007). Typology of female sex offenders: A test of Vandiver and Kercher. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19, 73–89. doi: 10.1007/s11194-007-9037-4 Google Scholar
  117. Saradjian, J., & Hanks, H. G. (1996). Women who sexually abuse children: From research to clinical practice. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  118. Sarrel, P. M., & Masters, W. H. (1982). Sexual molestation of men by women. Archives of Sexual Behaviour, 11, 117–131. doi: 10.1007/BF01541979 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Schiavone, S. K., & Jeglic, E. L. (2009). Public perceptions of sex offenders, social policies and the impact on sex offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 53, 679–695. doi: 10.1177/0306624X08323454 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Schmucker, M., & Lösel, F. (2015). The effects of sexual offender treatment on recidivism: An international meta-analysis of sound quality evaluations. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11, 597–630. doi: 10.1007/s11292-015-9241-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Selkin, J. (1975). Rape. Psychology Today, 8, 70.Google Scholar
  122. Simon, L. M. (2000). An examination of the assumptions of specialization, mental disorder, and dangerousness in sex offenders. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 18, 275–308. doi: 10.1002/1099-0798(200003/06)18 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Smallbone, S., & Wortley, R. (2004). Onset, persistence, and versatility of offending among adult males convicted of sexual offenses against children. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16, 285–298.Google Scholar
  124. Soothill, K., Francis, B., Sanderson, B., & Ackerley, E. (2000). Sex offenders: Specialists, generalists—or both? British Journal of Criminology, 40, 56–67. doi: 10.1093/bjc/40.1.56 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Terry, K. J. (2011). What is smart sex offender policy? Criminology & Public Policy, 10, 275–282. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2011.00707.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Vandiver, D. M. (2006). Female sex offenders: A comparison of solo offenders and co-offenders. Violence and Victims, 21, 339–354. doi: 10.1891/vivi.21.3.339 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Vandiver, D. M., & Kercher, G. (2004). Offender and victim characteristics of registered female sexual offenders in Texas: A proposed typology of female sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research & Treatment, 16, 121–137. doi: 10.1023/B:SEBU.0000023061.77061.1 Google Scholar
  128. Ward, T., & Hudson, S. M. (1998). The construction and development of theory in the sexual offending area: A meta-theoretical framework. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 10, 47–63. doi: 10.1177/107906329801000106 Google Scholar
  129. Weinrott, M. R., & Saylor, M. (1991). Self-report of crimes committed by sex offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 6, 286–300. doi: 10.1177/088626091006003002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Yates, P. M., Prescott, D., & Ward, T. (2010). Applying the good lives and self-regulation models to sex offender treatment: A practical guide for clinicians. Brandon, VT: Safer Society Press.Google Scholar
  131. Zevitz, R. G., & Farkas, M. A. (2000). Sex offender community notification: Examining the importance of neighborhood meetings. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 18, 393–408. doi: 10.1002/1099-0798(200003/06)18 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Zgoba, K. M., & Simon, L. M. (2005). Recidivism rates of sexual offenders up to 7 years later: Does treatment matter? Criminal Justice Review, 30, 155–173. doi: 10.1177/0734016805284146 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Criminal Justice and CriminologySam Houston State UniversityHuntsvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations