Advertisement

Proactive Strategies to Prevent Child Sexual Abuse and the Use of Child Abuse Images: The German Dunkelfeld-Project for Adults (PPD) and Juveniles (PPJ)

  • Klaus M. BeierEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The contribution describes a German prevention approach which aims at improving proactive strategies to protect children from sexual exploitation by online offenses, such as the consumption and/or distribution of child abuse images (so-called “child pornography”), and hands-on contact child sexual abuse. Prevention strategies include research on individuals at risk to commit primary or recurrent sexual offenses against children, while at the same time offering diagnostic assessment and preventive treatment. The project goal is to help individuals gain control over their behaviors in order to prevent the sexual abuse of children. As it is acknowledged that many offenders against children remain undetected by legal authorities in the “Dunkelfeld” (literally ‘dark field’) and are therefore not included in any official statistics, this program focuses on those who admit a longstanding sexual interest in children, self-motivated by the distress experienced due to their sexual preference. The German Dunkelfeld approach started off at the Institute of Sexology and Sexual Medicine at the Charité—Universitätsmedizin in Berlin (Germany) in 2005 with the launching of the Prevention Project Dunkelfeld (PPD) aiming at adults above the age of 18 years. In 2014, and due to the success of the PPD, another project was launched, the Berlin Project for Primary Prevention of Child Sexual Abuse by Juveniles (PPJ) focusing on adolescents between the age 12 and 18 years. The first evaluation of the PPD revealed that it reduces risk factors for child sexual abuse, prevents sexual offending against minors, and reduces the number of contact offenses as well as frequency and severity of child pornography offenses. First results from the PPJ also confirmed that the group of juveniles with a sexual preference for pre- and/or early pubescent minors exists as a target group for preventive measures.

Keywords

Prevention Dunkelfeld Child sexual abuse Child abuse images Pedophilia Assessment Treatment Juveniles Comorbidity Media campaign 

Abbreviations

BEDIT

Berlin Dissexuality Therapy

CAI

Child Abuse Images

CSA

Child Sexual Abuse

DRF

Dynamic Risk Factors

DSM

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

ICD

International Classification of Mental and Behavioral Disorders

PPD

Prevention Project Dunkelfeld

PPJ

Prevention Project Juveniles

TUK

ThinkUKnow

References

  1. Abel, G. G., Becker, J. V., Mittelman, M., Cunningham-Rathner, J., Rouleau, J. L., & Murphy, W. D. (1987). Self-reported sex crimes of nonincarcerated paraphiliacs. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2(1), 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abel, G. G., Osborn, C. A., & Twigg, D. A. (1993). Sexual assault through the life span: Adult offenders with juvenile histories. In H. E. Barbaree, W. L. Marshall, & S. M. Hudson (Eds.), The juvenile sex offender (pp. 104–117). New York, London: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ahlers, C. J., Schaefer, G. A., Mundt, I. A., Roll, S., Englert, H., Willich, S., et al. (2009). How unusual are the contents of paraphilias—Prevalence of paraphilia-associated sexual arousal patterns (PASAPs) in a community–based sample of men. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 8(5), 1362–1370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amelung, T., Kuhle, L. F., Konrad, A., Pauls, A., & Beier, K. M. (2012). Androgen deprivation therapy of self-identifying, help-seeking pedophiles in the Dunkelfeld. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 35, 176–184.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. American Psychiatric Association APA. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders DSM-5. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barnett, G. D., Wakeling, H. C., Mandeville-Norden, R., & Rakestrow, J. (2012). How useful are psychometric scores in predicting recidivism for treated sex offenders? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 56, 420–446.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. BEDIT. (2013). The Berlin dissexuality therapy program. Weimar: Gutenberg Druckerei GmbH.Google Scholar
  8. Beggs, S. M., & Grace, R. C. (2011). Treatment gain for sexual offenders against children predicts reduced recidivism: A comparative validity study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79, 182–192.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Beier, K. M. (1998). Differential typology and prognosis for dissexual behaviour—A follow-up study of previously expert-appraised child molesters. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 111, 133–141.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Beier, K. M., Ahlers, C. J., Goecker, D., Neutze, J., Mundt, I. A., Hupp, E., et al. (2009a). Can pedophiles be reached for primary prevention of child sexual abuse? First results of the Berlin Prevention Project Dunkelfeld (PPD). Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 20, 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Beier, K. M., Amelung, T., Kuhle, L., Grundmann, D., Scherner, G., & Neutze, J. (2015a). Hebephilia as a Sexual Disorder. Fortschritte der Neurologie-Psychiatrie, 83(2), e1–e9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Beier, K. M., Amelung, T., & Pauls, A. (2010). Antiandrogene Therapie als Teil der Prävention von sexuellem Kindesmissbrauch im Dunkelfeld. Forensische Psychiatrie, Psychologie, Kriminologie, 4, 49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Beier, K. M., Bosinski, H. A. G., & Loewit, K. (2005). Sexualmedizin (2nd ed.). München: Elsevier Urban & Fischer.Google Scholar
  14. Beier, K. M., Grundmann, D., Kuhle, L. F., Scherner, G., Konrad, A., & Amelung, T. (2015b). The German Dunkelfeld project: A pilot study to prevent child sexual abuse and the use of child abusive images. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 12(2), 529–542.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Beier, K. M., & Loewit, K. (2013). Sexual medicine in clinical practice. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Beier, K. M., & Neutze, J. (2012). Proactive strategies to prevent the use of child abusive images The Dunkelfeld project. In E. Quayle & K. M. Ribisl (Eds.), Understanding and preventing online sexual exploitation of children (pp. 204–227). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Beier, K. M., Neutze, J., Mundt, I. A., Ahlers, C. J., Goecker, D., & Konrad, A. (2009b). Encouraging self-identified pedophiles and hebephiles to seek professional help: First results of the Berlin Prevention Project Dunkelfeld (PPD). Child Abuse and Neglect, 33, 545–549.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Beier, K. M., Oezdemir, U. C., Schlinzig, E., Groll, A., Hupp, E., & Hellenschmidt, T. (2016). “Just dreaming of them”: The Berlin project for primary prevention of child sexual abuse by juveniles (PPJ). Child Abuse and Neglect, 52, 1–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Blanchard, R. (2010). The DSM diagnostic criteria for pedophilia. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 304–316.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Blanchard, R., Klassen, P., Dickey, R., Kuban, M. E., & Blak, T. (2001). Sensitivity and specificity of the phallometric test for pedophilia in nonadmitting sex offenders. Psychological Assessment, 13, 118–126.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Blanchard, R., Kuban, M. E., Blak, T., Cantor, J. M., Klassen, P., & Dickey, R. (2006). Phallometric comparison of pedophilic interest in nonadmitting sexual offenders against stepdaughters, biological daughters, other biologically related girls, and unrelated girls. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 18(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
  22. Blanchard, R., Lykins, A. D., Wherrett, D., et al. (2009). Pedophilia, hebephilia, and the DSM-V. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 335–350.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Bogaert, A. F., Bezeau, S., Kuban, M., & Blanchard, R. (1997). Pedophilia, sexual orientation, and birth order. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106(2), 331–335.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Chasan-Taber, L., & Tabachnick, J. (1999). Evaluation of a child sexual abuse prevention program. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research & Treatment, 11, 279–292.Google Scholar
  25. Davidson, J., Martellozzo, E., & Lorent, M. (2009). Evaluation of CEOP ThinkUKnow Internet Safety Programme and exploration of young people’s Internet safety knowledge. Retrieved April 4, 2011 from http://www.cats-rp.org.uk/pdf%20files/Internet%20safety%20report%204-2010.pdf
  26. Davis, R. A. (2001). A cognitive-behavioral model of pathological Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 187–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Duff, S., & Willis, A. (2006). At the precipice: Assessing a non-offending client’s potential to sexually offend. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 12, 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Edwards, R., Whittaker, M. K., Beckett, R., Bishopp, D., & Bates, A. (2012). Adolescents who have sexually harmed: An evaluation of a specialist treatment programme. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 18, 91–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Eke, A. W., Seto, M. C., & Williams, J. (2010). Examining the criminal history and future offending of child pornography offenders: An extended prospective follow-up study. Law and Human Behavior, 35(6), 466–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Elliott, M., Browne, K., & Kilcoyne, J. (1995). Child sexual abuse prevention: What offenders tell us. Child Abuse and Neglect, 19(5), 579–594.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Federal Criminal Police Office. (2014). Polizeiliche Kriminalstatistik, 2013 (61th ed.). Retrieved January 6, 2015 from http://www.bka.de/nn_229440/DE/Publikationen/PolizeilicheKriminalstatistik/pks__node.html?__nnn=true
  32. Fedoroff, J. P., Smolewska, K., Selhi, Z., Ng, E., & Bradford, J. M. W. (2001). Victimless Pedophiles. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Academy of Sex Research (IASR), July 11–14. Montreal, Quebec, Canada.Google Scholar
  33. Finkelhor, D. (2009). The Prevention of Childhood Sexual Abuse. The Future of Children, 19, 169–194.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Finkelhor, D., Ormrod, R., Turner, H., & Hamby, S. L. (2005). The victimization of children and youth: A comprehensive, national survey. Child Maltreat, 10, 5–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Gibson, L. E., & Leitenberg, H. (2000). Child sexual abuse prevention programs: Do they decrease the occurrence of child sexual abuse? Child Abuse and Neglect, 24, 115–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Görgen, T., Rauchert, K., & Fisch, S. (2012). Langfristige Folgen sexuellen Missbrauchs Minderjähriger. Forensische Psychiatrie, Psychologie, Kriminologie, 6(1), 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Grundmann, D., Krupp, J., Scherner, G., Amelung, T., & Beier, K. M. (2016). Stability of self-reported arousal to sexual fantasies involving children in a clinical sample of pedophiles and hebephiles. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(5), 1153–1162.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Hanson, R. K., & Bussière, M. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348–362.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Hanson, R. K., & Harris, A. J. R. (2000). Where should we intervene? Dynamic predictors of sexual offense recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 6–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hanson, R. K., Harris, A. J., Scott, T., & Helmus, L. (2007). Assessing the risk of sexual offenders on community supervision: The dynamic supervision project. Ottawa: Public Safety Canada.Google Scholar
  41. Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. (2004). Predictors of sexual recidivism: An updated meta-analysis 2004–02. Ottawa, Canada: Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada.Google Scholar
  42. Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1154–1163.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Heim, C. M., Mayberg, H. S., Mletzko, T., Nemeroff, C. B., & Pruessner, J. C. (2013). Decreased cortical representation of genital somatosensory field after childhood sexual abuse. American Journal of Psychiatry, 170, 616–623.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Henry, F., & McMahon, P. (2000). What survivors of child sexual abuse told us about the people who abused them. Paper presented at the National Sexual Violence Prevention Conference, Dallas, Texas.Google Scholar
  45. Longo, R. E., & Groth, A. N. (1983). Juvenile sexual offenses in the histories of adult rapists and child molesters. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 27(2), 150–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Maniglio, R. (2009). The impact of child sexual abuse on health: A systematic review of reviews. Clinical Psychology Review, 29(7), 647–657.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Mann, R. E., Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2010). Assessing risk for sexual recidivism: Some proposals on the nature of psychologically meaningful risk factors. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22, 191–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Marshall, W. L., Barbaree, H. E., & Eccles, A. (1991). Early onset and deviant sexuality in child molesters. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 6(3), 323–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Marshall, W. L., Marshall, L. E., & Serran, G. A. (2006). Strategies in the treatment of paraphilias: A critical review. Annual Review of Sex Research, 17, 162–182.Google Scholar
  50. McElvaney, R. (2013). Disclosure of child sexual abuse: Delays, non-disclosure and partial disclosure. What the research tells us and implications for practice. Child Abuse Review, 24(3), 159–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. McGrath, R., Cumming, G., Burchard, B., Zeoli, S., & Ellerby, L. (2010). Current practices and emerging trends in sexual abuser management. The Safer Society, 24.Google Scholar
  52. National Sex Offender Public Website. (2012). Retrieved October 12, 2012 from http://www.nsopr.gov/
  53. Neutze, J., Seto, M., Schaefer, G. A., & Beier, K. M. (2010). Predictors of child pornography offenses and child sexual abuse in a community sample of pedophiles and hebephiles. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22, 1–31. doi: 10.1177/1079063210382043 Google Scholar
  54. O’Reilly, G., Carr, A., Murphy, P., & Cotter, A. (2010). A controlled evaluation of a prison-based sexual offender intervention program. Sexual Abuse A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22, 95–111.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Pereda, N., Guilera, G., Forns, M., & Gómez-Benito, J. (2009). The prevalence of child sexual abuse in community and student samples: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 328–338.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Pithers, W. D. (1990). Relapse prevention with sexual aggressors: A method of maintaining therapeutic gain and enhancing external supervision. In W. L. Marshall, D. R. Laws, & H. E. Barbaree (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories and treatment of the offender (pp. 343–361). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ponseti, J., Granert, O., Jansen, O., Wolff, S., Beier, K., Neutze, J., et al. (2012). Assessment of pedophilia using hemodynamic brain response to sexual stimuli. Archives of General Psychiatry, 69(2), 187–194.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Pullman, L. E., Leroux, E. J., Motayne, G., & Seto, M. C. (2014). Examining the developmental trajectories of adolescent sexual offenders. Child Abuse and Neglect, 38(7), 1249–1258.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Quayle, E., & Taylor, M. (2002). Paedophiles, pornography and the internet: Assessment issues. British Journal of Social Work, 32, 863–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Quayle, E., & Taylor, M. (2003). Model of problematic Internet use in people with a sexual interest in children. Cyber Psychology and Behavior, 6, 93–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Riegel, D. L. (2004). Effects on boy-attracted pedosexual males of viewing boy erotica [Letter to the editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33, 321–323.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Rispens, J., Aleman, A., & Goudena, P. P. (1997). Prevention of child sexual abuse victimization: A meta-analysis of school programs. Child Abuse and Neglect, 21, 975–987.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Schaefer, G. A., Mundt, I. A., Feelgood, S., Hupp, E., Neutze, J., Ahlers, C. J., et al. (2010). Potential and Dunkelfeld offenders: Two neglected target groups for prevention of child sexual abuse. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 33(3), 154–163.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Seto, M. C. (2008). Pedophilia and sexual offending against children: Theory, assessment, and intervention. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Seto, M. C. (2012). Is pedophilia a sexual orientation? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 231–236.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Seto, M. C., Cantor, J. M., & Blanchard, R. (2006). Child pornography offenses are a valid diagnostic indicator of pedophilia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 610–615.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Seto, M. C., & Lalumiere, M. L. (2010). What is so special about male adolescent sexual offending? A review and test of explanations through meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(4), 526.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Spitzer, R. L. (2012). Spitzer reassesses his 2003 study of reparative therapy of homosexuality. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 757.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Stoltenborgh, M., IJzendoorn, M. H., Euser, E. M., & Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. (2011). A global perspective on child sexual abuse: Meta-analysis of prevalence around the world. Child Maltreat, 16, 79–101.Google Scholar
  70. Stop it Now! (2009). Helpline Report 2005–2009. Retrieved March 26, 2011 from http://www.stopitnow.org.uk/Helpline%20Report.pdf
  71. United Nations, General Assembly. (2000, August 10). Promotion and protection of the rights of children: Sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography, A/55/297.Google Scholar
  72. Van Wijk, A. P., Blokland, A. A., Duits, N., Vermeiren, R., & Harkink, J. (2007). Relating psychiatric disorders, offender and offence characteristics in a sample of adolescent sex offenders and non-sex offenders. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 17(1), 15–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Ward, T., & Beech, A. (2006). An integrated theory of sexual offending. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, 44–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Ward, T., & Gannon, T. A. (2006). Rehabilitation, etiology, and self-regulation: The good lives model of sexual offender treatment. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, 77–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Ward, T., & Hudson, S. M. (1998). A self-regulation model of the relapse process in sexual offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 13, 700–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Ward, T., & Hudson, S. M. (2000). A Self-regulation model of relapse prevention. In D. R. Laws, S. M. Hudson, & T. Ward (Eds.), Remaking relapse prevention with sex offenders: A sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  77. Wetzels, P. (1997). Prävalenz und familiäre Hintergründe sexuellen Kindesmißbrauchs in Deutschland: Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Befragung. Sexuologie, 4(2), 89–107.Google Scholar
  78. Whitaker, D. J., Le, B., Karl Hanson, R., Baker, C. K., McMahon, P. M., Ryan, G., et al. (2008). Risk factors for the perpetration of child sexual abuse: A review and meta-analysis. Child Abuse and Neglect, 32, 529–548.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Wischka, B. (2013). Das Behandlungsprogramm für Sexualstraftäter. Recht & Psychiatrie, 31, 138–145.Google Scholar
  80. World Health Organization. (1993). The ICD-10 Classification of mental and behavioural Disorders. World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  81. World Health Organization. (2013). European report on preventing child maltreatment. Retrieved May 19, 2015 from http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/217018/European-Report-on-Preventing-Child-Maltreatment.pdf
  82. Zwi, K., Woolfenden, S., Wheeler, D. M., O’Brien, T., Tait, P., & Williams, K. J. (2007). School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, 1–36.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Health and Human SciencesInstitute of Sexology and Sexual Medicine, Charité—Universitätsmedizin BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations