Skip to main content

Starting the Conversation: A Shift in Paradigm

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sexual Violence

Abstract

The past several decades have seen much concern over sexual violence. Current policy narrowly focuses on recidivistic sex crimes and has done little to address the overall problem of sexual violence. Not only have current policy measures had little impact on sexual violence, but in some cases they appear to make the problem worse in that they destabilize offenders and thus inadvertently increase offenders’ risk of recidivism. Furthermore, it is estimated that the large majority of sex crimes are committed by first time sex offenders and thus laws that are focused on recidivistic sex offenders are diverting scarce resources away from much needed prevention initiatives. In this first chapter we will introduce the central thesis of the book—that we need to carefully evaluate the menu of policy and prevention available and weigh the costs and benefits of different options. Underscoring our focus on how we can do better to prevent sexual violence, we then discuss why it is important to shift the dialogue in the field from what does not work to that of what is working and why.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act (AWA), Pub. L. No. 109–248, 120 Stat. 587. (2006). (codified at 42 U.S.C. §§ 16901-62).

    Google Scholar 

  • Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers. (n.d.). Sexual violence prevention fact sheet. Retrieved from http://www.atsa.com/sexual-violence-prevention-fact-sheet

  • Bonnar-Kidd, K. K. (2010). Sexual offender laws and prevention of sexual violence or recidivism. American Journal of Public Health, 100(3), 412–419. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2008.153254

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bosman, J. (2015, June 7). States confront wide budget gaps even after years of recovery. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com

  • Brieding, M. J., Smith, S. G., Basile, K. C., Walters, M. L., Chen, J., & Merrick, M. T. (2014). Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence, stalking and intimate partner violence victimization—National intimate partner and sexual violence survey, United States, 2011. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 63(SS08), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2003). Recidivism of sex offenders released from prison in. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calkins, C., Jeglic, E., Beattey, R. A., Zeidman, S., & Perillo, A. D. (2014). Sexual violence legislation: A review of case law and empirical research. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20, 443–462. http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/law0000027

  • Chajewski, M., & Mercado, C. C. (2009). An evaluation of sex offender residency restriction functioning in town, county, and city-wide jurisdictions. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 20(1), 44–61. doi:10.1177/0887403408320845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M., & Jeglic, E. L. (2007). Sex Offender Legislation in the United States: What do we know? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 51, 369–383. doi:10.1177/0306624X06296235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Colombino, N., Mercado, C. C., & Jeglic, E. L. (2009). Situational aspects of sexual offending: Implications for residence restriction laws. Justice Research and Policy, 11(1–2), 27–43. doi:10.3818/JRP.11.2009.27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelhor, D. (2009). The prevention of childhood sexual abuse. Future of Children, 19(2), 169–194.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenfeld, L. (1997). Sex offenses and offenders: An analysis of data on rape and sexual assault. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgnon, K. E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(6), 1154–1163. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1154

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. J. R., & Hanson, R. K. (2004). Sex offender recidivism: A simple question. Ottawa, ON: Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Rights Watch. (2007, September 11). Sex offender laws may do more harm than good. Retrieved from https://www.hrw.org/news/2007/09/11/us-sex-offender-laws-may-do-more-harm-good

  • Jacob Wetterling Crimes against Children and Sexually Violent Offenders Registration Act, Pub. L. No. 103–322, 108 Stat. 1796. (1994). (codified at 42 U.S.C. §§ 14071-80).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleban, H., & Jeglic, E. L. (2012). Dispelling the myths: Can psychoeducation change public attitudes towards sex offenders? Journal of Sexual Aggression, 18(2), 179–193. doi:10.1080/13552600.2011.552795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koon-Magnin, S. (2015). Perceptions of and support for sex offender policies: Testing Levenson, Brannon, Fortney, and Baker’s findings. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(1), 80–88. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2014.12.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, J. S. (2008). Collateral consequences of sex offender residence restrictions. Criminal Justice Studies, 21, 153–166. doi:10.1080/14786010802159822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, J. S., Brannon, Y. N., Fortney, T., & Baker, J. (2007a). Public perceptions about sex offenders and community protection policies. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 7(1), 137–161. doi:10.1111/j.1530-2415.2007.00119.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, J. S., & Cotter, L. P. (2005a). The effect of Megan’s Law on sex offender reintegration. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21, 49–66. doi:10.1177/1043986204271676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, J. S., & Cotter, L. P. (2005b). The impact of sex offender residence restrictions: 1,000 feet from danger or one step from absurd? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49, 168–178. doi:10.1177/0306624X04271304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, J. S., D’Amora, D. A., & Hern, A. (2007b). Megan’s Law and its impact on community re-entry for sex offenders. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 25, 587–602. doi:10.1002/bsl.770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieb, R., Quinsey, V., & Berliner, L. (1998). Sexual predators and social policy. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice (pp. 43–114). US: The University of Chicago Press Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinson, R. (1974). What works? Questions and answers about prison reform. The Public Interest, 35, 22–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meloy, M., Curtis, K., & Boatwright, J. (2013). The sponsors of sex offender bills speak up: Policy Maker’s perceptions of sex offenders, sex crimes, and sex offender legislation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40(4), 438–452. doi:10.1177/0093854812455740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercado, C. C., Alvarez, S. A., & Levenson, J. S. (2008). The impact of specialized sex offender legislation on community re-entry. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 20, 188–205. doi:10.1177/1079063208317540

    Google Scholar 

  • National Sexual Violence Resource Center. (2015). Statistics about sexual violence. Retrieved from http://www.nsvrc.org/sites/default/files/publications_nsvrc_factsheet_media-packet_statistics-about-sexual-violence_0.pdf

  • NCMEC, Prevent Abuse Now, Criminal Justice Agency. (2014, July 7). Sex offender statistics. Retrieved from http://www.statisticbrain.com/sex-offender-statistics/

  • Office of Sex Offender Sentencing, Monitoring, Apprehension, Regsitering, and Tracking (2014). Global overview of sex offender registration and notification systems. Retrieved from http://www.smart.gov/pdfs/GlobalOverview.pdf

  • Sandler, J. C., Freeman, N. J., & Socia, K. M. (2008). Does a watched pot boil? A time-series analysis of New York State’s sex offender registration and notification law. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 14(4), 284–302. doi:10.1037/a0013881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scham, D. D., & Milloy, C. D. (1995). Community notification: A study of offender characteristics and recidivism. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Socia, K. M., Levenson, J. S., Ackerman, A. R., & Harris, A. J. (2015). “Brothers under the bridge”: Factors influencing the transience of registered sex offenders in Florida. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 27(6), 559–86. doi:10.1177/1079063214521472

    Google Scholar 

  • Spoo, S., & Jeglic, E. L. (2016, June). Victims’ attitudes toward sex offenders. Paper presented at the Universitat Regensburg 12th Annual Summer Conference: Research in Forensic Psychiatry, Regensburg, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoltenborgh, M., van Ilzendoorn, M. H., Euser, E. M., & Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. (2011). A global perspective on child sexual abuse: Meta-analysis of prevalence around the world. Child Maltreatment, 16(2), 79–101. doi:10.1177/1077559511403920

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Three Strikes Law. (1995). 18 U.S.C. § 3559(c).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (1998). Prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the national violence against women survey. U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/183781.pdf

  • Vasquez, B. E., Maddan, S., & Walker, J. T. (2008). The influence of sex offender registration and notification laws in the United States: A time-series analysis. Crime & Delinquency, 54(2), 175–192. doi:10.1177/0011128707311641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye Hee Lee, M. (2015, July 7). Yes, U.S. locks people up at higher rate than any other country. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/

  • Yourish, K., & Stanton, L. (2011, February). States in budget crisis. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/

  • Zevitz, R. G. (2006). Sex offender community notification: Its role in recidivism and offender reintegration. Criminal Justice Studies, 19, 193–208. doi:10.1080/14786010600764567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zgoba, K. M, & Bachar, K. (2009). Sex offender registration and notification: Limited effects in New Jersey. In Short: Toward Criminal Justice Solutions. U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/225402.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth L. Jeglic .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jeglic, E.L., Calkins, C. (2016). Starting the Conversation: A Shift in Paradigm. In: Jeglic, E., Calkins, C. (eds) Sexual Violence. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44504-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44504-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44502-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44504-5

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics