Skip to main content

Cultural Communication Patterns: A Way How Management and Engineering Can Improve Their Mutual Understanding

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Phantom Ex Machina
  • 4309 Accesses

Abstract

In the age of digital disruption, technology is no longer only a tool to improve organizational efficiency. Technology becomes a key success factor and enabler for radically new and innovative products and services, new organizational processes, as well as totally new business models. With the emergence of ubiquitous information technologies, organizations no longer just use technologies as tools or sell them as products, but increasingly depend on certain technology as the backbones and lifeblood of key organizational processes. The sciences as well have been disrupted, new tools enable advances in theory, and the scope of what science can do as well as the time it can do it in has changed beyond recognition. New branches of sciences and a tighter feedback loop between scientific advances, technological innovation as a result of applied science, as well as business innovation have been the result. To be able to develop innovations on a global scale on all those levels, good communication across disciplines, like IT, Engineering and Management and across countries and cultures becomes more and more a key success factor. In this article we want to elaborate both on the importance and the problems of interdisciplinary communication. Since the discussion cannot be exhaustive, we want instead to focus on three important aspects of communication which are often neglected: embodiment, process orientation, and the importance of motives and motivation. In a second step, we propose the concept of pattern language as an idea to think about a framework for creating understanding and fostering cooperation where translation and control are impossible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander, C. (1977). A pattern language: Towns, buildings, construction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, C. (1979). The timeless way of building. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F. (1999). Sacred ecology. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boes, A., & Pfeiffer, S. (2006). Informatisierung der Arbeit—Gesellschaft im Umbruch’. In A. Baukrowitz, T. Berker, A. Boes, S. Pfeiffer, R. Schmiede, & M. Will (Eds.), Informatisierung der Arbeit—Gesellschaft im Umbruch (pp. 19–34). Berlin: edition sigma.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Böhle, F., & Bürgermeister, M. (2012). Management von Innovation—Ungewissheit und neue Herausforderungen. In F. Böhle, M. Bürgermeister, & S. Porschen (Eds.), Innovation durch Management des Informellen: Künstlerisch, erfahrungsgeleitet, spielerisch. Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S., & Eisenhardt, K. (1995). Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. The Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 343–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation. The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMarco, T., Hruschka, P., Lister, T., McMenamin, S., Robertson, J., & Robertson, S. (2007). Adrenalin-junkies & formular-zombies: Typisches verhalten in projekten. München: Hanser.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, G. (2003). The locales framework: Understanding and designing for wicked problems. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academisch Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., & Vlissides, J. (1995). Design patterns: elements of reusable object-oriented software. Boston: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting and knowing (pp. 67–82). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harnad, S. (1990). The symbol grounding problem. Physica D, 42, 335–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper, D. (2015). “Communication”, Online Etymology Dictionary. Available from http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=communication (accessed April 4, 2016).

  • Harrison, S., & Dourish, P. (1996). Re-placing space: The roles of place and space in collaborative systems. Proceedings of the 1996 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Boston, MA, pp. 67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (2010). Cognitive ecology. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(4), 705–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, J. (2001). Motivation und Persönlichkeit. Interaktionen psychischer Systeme. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, J. (2010). Lehrburch der Persönlichkeitspsychologie: Motivation, Emotion und Selbststeuerung. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurzweil, R. (2005). Singularity is near. New York, NY: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2007). Reassembling the social. Hampshire: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge: University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. (1999). Affordances, conventions and design. Interactions, 6(3), 38–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pentland, A. (2014). Social physics: How good ideas spread-the lessons from a new science. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, M., & Pinto, J. (1990). Project team communication and cross-functional cooperation in new program development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 7(3), 200–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1985). Implizites Wissen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A. (1994). Spatial organization and the built environment. In T. Ingold (Ed.), Companion encyclopedia of anthropology (pp. 460–502). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz von Thun, F. (1981). Miteinander reden 1—Störungen und Klärungen. Allgemeine Psychologie der Kommunikation. Reinbek: Rowohlt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(03), 417–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S. (1950). Introduction: A definition of communication. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 22(6), 689–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storch, M., Cantieni, B., Hüther, G., & Tschacher, W. (2010). Embodiment: Die Wechselwirkung von Körper und Psyche verstehen und nutzen. Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storch, M., & Tschacher, W. (2014). Embodied Communication: Kommunikation beginnt im Körper, nicht im Kopf. Bern: Verlag Hans Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taleb, N. (2008). The Black Swan: the impact of the highly improbable. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taleb, N. (2012). Antifragile: how to live in a world we don’t understand. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschacher, W. (2010). Wie Embodiment zum Thema wurde. In M. Storch, B. Cantieni, G. Hüther, & W. Tschacher (Eds.), Embodiment: Die Wechselwirkung von Körper und Psyche verstehen und nutzen. Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschacher, W., & Haken, H. (2007). Intentionality in non-equilibrium systems? The functional aspects of self-organized pattern formation. New Ideas in Psychology, 25(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J., & Jackson, D. (1969). Menschliche Kommunikation—Formen, Störungen, Paradoxien. Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikipedia. (2016). Functional magnetic resonance imaging. Available from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Functional_magnetic_resonance_imaging (accessed April 4, 2016).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Senana Brugger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brugger, S., Mack, O. (2017). Cultural Communication Patterns: A Way How Management and Engineering Can Improve Their Mutual Understanding. In: Khare, A., Stewart, B., Schatz, R. (eds) Phantom Ex Machina. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44468-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics