Skip to main content

The Fundamental Problem of Dynamics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Space, Time and the Limits of Human Understanding

Part of the book series: The Frontiers Collection ((FRONTCOLL))

  • 2746 Accesses

Abstract

In a world in which all objects are in relative motion, there arises the problem of equilocality: the identification of points in space that have the same position at different times. Newton recognized this as the fundamental problem of dynamics and to solve it introduced absolute space. Inspired by Mach, Einstein created general relativity in the hope of eliminating this controversial concept, but his indirect approach left the issue unresolved. I will explain how the general method of best matching always leads to dynamical theories with an unambiguous notion of equilocality. Applied to the dynamics of Riemannian 3-geometry, it leads to a radical rederivation of general relativity in which relativity of local scale replaces replaces relativity of simultaneity as a foundational principle. Whereas in the standard spacetime picture there is no unique notion of simultaneity or history, if this alternative derivation leads to the physically correct picture both are fixed in the minutest detail. New approaches to several outstanding problems, including singularities and the origin of time’s arrows, are suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Newton, I. (1962). De gravitatione. In A.R. Hall & M.B. Hall (Eds.), Unpublished scientific papers of Isaac Newton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; discussed in Barbour, J. B. (1989). Absolute or relative motion? (Vol. 1, p. 612 ff). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mercati, F. A shape dynamics tutorial. arXiv:1409.0105.

  3. Alexander, H. G. (Ed.). (1956). The Leibniz–Clarke correspondence. Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Piaget, J. (1971) The child’s conception of time. New York: Ballantine Books, Inc. (translation of French original on 1927).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barbour, J., & Bertotti, B. (1982). Mach’s principle and the structure of dynamical theories. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 382, 295.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Barbour, J. (1994). The timelessness of quantum gravity: I. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 11, 2853.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Barbour, J. The nature of time. arXiv:0903.3489.

  8. Barbour, J., Koslowski, T., & Mercati, F. (2014) Identification of a gravitational arrow of time. Physical Review Letters, 113(18), 181101. arXiv:1409.0917.

  9. Barbour, J., Koslowski, T., & Mercati, F. Entropy and the typicality of universes. arXiv:1507.06498.

  10. Assis, A. K. T. (1995). Weber’s law and Mach’s principle. In J. Barbour & H. Pfister (Eds.), Mach’s Principle. From Newton’s bucket to quantum gravity. Boston: Birkhäuser.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hughes, V. W., et al. (1961). Upper limit for the anisotropy of inertial mass from nuclear magnetic resonance. Physical Review Letters, 4, 342 (1960); Drever, R. W. P. A search for anisotropy of inertial mass using a free precession technique. Philosophical Magazine, 6, 683.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Poincarè, H. (1913). La mesure du temps. Review of Mètaphysics Morale, 6, 1 (1898); English translation in Poincaré, H. The value of science. New York: Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Weyl, H. (1918). Gravitation und elektrizität. Sitzungsber. d.Preuss. Akad. d. Wissensch. (p. 465ff).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Misner, C. W., Thorne, K. S., & Wheeler, J. A. (1973). Gravitation. San Francisco: WH Freeman and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Anderson, E., Barbour, J., Foster, B., Kelleher, B., & Murchadha, N. Ó. (2008). The physical gravitational degrees of freedom. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 22, 1795. arXiv:gr-qc/0407104.

  16. Barbour, J., & Murchadha, N. Ó. Conformal superspace: The configuration space of general relativity. arXiv:1009.3559.

  17. York, J. W. (1972). The role of conformal 3-geometry in the dynamics of gravitation. Physical Review Letters, 28, 1082.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Barbour, J., Foster, B., & Murchadha, N. Ó. (2002). Relativity without relativity. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 19, 3217. arXiv:gr-qc/0012089.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julian Barbour .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Barbour, J. (2017). The Fundamental Problem of Dynamics. In: Wuppuluri, S., Ghirardi, G. (eds) Space, Time and the Limits of Human Understanding. The Frontiers Collection. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44418-5_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics