Abstract
Tactical networks are typically of an ad-hoc nature operating in highly restricted environments and constrained resources. The frequent presence of communication disruptions and network partitioning must also be expected and managed, while core functionalities must be maintained, providing asynchronous invocation and access to services in a distributed manner. Supporting the required functionalities of the contemporary tactical environment, requires the dynamic evaluation of security policies, incorporating semantic knowledge from various network layers, together with facts and rules that are defined axiomatically a priori. However, the required basis for such policy decisions can be excessively extended and dynamic. Thus, it is desirable to locally minimize the scope of the policy maximizing efficiency. In this paper, we therefore analyze criteria and optimization goals for the a priori distribution and partitioning of security policies, ensuring the continuous support of the required capabilities, given the operational tasks of each deployed actor.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Horne, G., Leonardi, M.: Maneuver warfare science 2001 (2001)
Bar-Noy, A., Cirincione, G. Govindan, R. Krishnamurthy, S., LaPorta, T., Mohapatra, P., Neely, M., Yener, A.: Quality-of-information aware networking for tactical military networks. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops), pp. 2–7, Mar 2011
Burbank, J., Chimento, P., Haberman, B., Kasch, W.: Key challenges of military tactical networking and the elusive promise of manet technology. IEEE Commun. Mag. 44, 39–45 (2006)
Elmasry, G.: A comparative review of commercial versus tactical wireless networks. IEEE Commun. Mag. 48, 54–59 (2010)
Shi, V.: Evaluating the performability of tactical communications networks. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 53, 253–260 (2004)
Moffat, J.: Adapting Modeling & Simulation for Network Enabled Operations (2011)
Alberts, D.S., Hayes, R.E.: Power to the Edge (2003)
Smith, E.A.: Complexity, Networking, and Effects-Based Approaches to Operations (2006)
Lund, K., Eggen, A., Hadzic, D., Hafsoe, T., Johnsen, F.: Using web services to realize service oriented architecture in military communication networks. IEEE Commun. Mag. 45, 47–53 (2007)
Johnsen, F., Bloebaum, T., Schenkels, L., Fiske, R., Van Selm, M., de Sortis, V., van der Zanden, A., Sliwa, J., Caban, P.: Soa over disadvantaged grids experiment and demonstrator. In: Communications and Information Systems Conference (MCC), 2012 Military, pp. 1–8, Oct 2012
Suri, N.: Dynamic service-oriented architectures for tactical edge networks. In: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Emerging Web Services Technology, WEWST ’09, pp. 3–10. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2009)
IST-090 Task Group, Service oriented architecture (SOA) challenges for real time and disadvantaged grid (IST-090). https://www.cso.nato.int/Activity_Meta.asp?ACT=1830, Apr 2014
IST-118 Task Group, SOA recommendations for disadvantaged grids in the tactical domain (IST-118). https://www.cso.nato.int/ACTIVITY_META.asp?ACT=2293
Maule, R., Lewis, W.: Security for distributed soa at the tactical edge. In: Military Communications Conference, 2010—MILCOM 2010, pp. 13–18, Oct 2010
Mayott, G., Self, M., Miller, G.J., McDonnell, J.S.: Soa approach to battle command: simulation interoperability (2010)
Damianou, N., Dulay, N., Lupu, E., Sloman, M.: The ponder policy specification language. In: Sloman, M., Lupu, E., Lobo, J. (eds.) Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1995, pp. 18–38. Springer, Berlin (2001)
OASIS, Oasis security services (saml) tc
Ramli, C.D.P.K., Nielson, H.R., Nielson, F.: The logic of XACML. Sci. Comput. Prog. 83, 80–105 (2014)
Li, N., Mitchell, J., Winsborough, W.: Design of a role-based trust-management framework. In: Proceedings. 2002 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2002, pp. 114–130 (2002)
Becker, M., Sewell, P.: Cassandra: distributed access control policies with tunable expressiveness. In: Proceedings. Fifth IEEE International Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks, 2004. POLICY 2004, pp. 159–168, June 2004
Nejdl, W., Olmedilla, D., Winslett, M.: Peertrust: Automated trust negotiation for peers on the semantic web. In: Jonker, W., Petkovi, M. (eds.) Secure Data Management, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3178 pp. 118–132. Springer, Berlin (2004)
Czenko, M., Doumen, J., Etalle, S.: Trust management in p2p systems using standard tulip. In: Karabulut, Y., Mitchell, J., Herrmann, P., Jensen, C. (eds.) Trust Management II, FIP The International Federation for Information Processing, vol. 263 pp. 1–16, Springer, US (2008)
Finin, T., Joshi, A., Kagal, L., Niu, J., Sandhu, R., Winsborough, W.H., Thuraisingham, B.: ROWLBAC—representing role based access control in OWL. In: Proceedings of the 13th Symposium on Access control Models and Technologies, ACM Press, Estes Park, Colorado, USA, June 2008
Kagal, L., Finin, T., Paolucci, M., Srinivasan, N., Sycara, K., Denker, G.: Authorization and privacy for semantic web services. IEEE Intell. Syst. 19, 50–56 (2004)
Uszok, A., Bradshaw, J.M., Johnson, M., Jeffers, R., Tate, A., Dalton, J., Aitken, S.: Kaos policy management for semantic web services. IEEE Intell. Syst. 19, 32–41 (2004)
Kolter, J., Schillinger, R., Pernul, G.: Building a distributed semantic-aware security architecture. In: Venter, H., Eloff, M., Labuschagne, L., Eloff, J., von Solms, R. (eds.) New Approaches for Security, Privacy and Trust in Complex Environments, IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, vol. 232 pp. 397–408. Springer, US (2007)
Ferrini, R., Bertino, E.: Supporting RBAC with XACML + OWL. In: Carminati, B., Joshi, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 14th ACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies (SACMAT ’09), pp. 145–154. ACM Press, Stresa, Italy, June 2009
Ben Brahim, M., Chaari, T., Ben Jemaa, M., Jmaiel, M.: Semantic matching of ws-securitypolicy assertions. In: Pallis, G., Jmaiel, M., Charfi, A., Graupner, S., Karabulut, Y., Guinea, S., Rosenberg, F., Sheng, Q., Pautasso, C., Ben Mokhtar, S. (eds.) Service-Oriented Computing-ICSOC 2011 Workshops, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7221, pp. 114–130. Springer, Berlin (2012)
Helil, N., Rahman, K.: Extending xacml profile for rbac with semantic concepts. In: 2010 International Conference on Computer Application and System Modeling (ICCASM), vol. 10, pp. V10–69–V10–74, Oct 2010
Blanco, C., Lasheras, J., Valencia-Garcia, R., Fernandez-Medina, E., Toval, A., Piattini, M.: A systematic review and comparison of security ontologies. In: 3rd International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security, 2008. ARES 08, pp. 813–820, Mar 2008
Souag, A., Salinesi, C., Comyn-Wattiau, I.: Ontologies for security requirements: a literature survey and classification. In: Bajec, M., Eder, J. (eds.) Advanced Information Systems Engineering Workshops, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 112 pp. 61–69. Springer, Berlin (2012)
Nguyen, V.: Ontologies and information systems: a literature survey 6 (2011)
Kolovski, V., Parsia, B., Katz, Y., Hendler, J.: Representing web service policies in owl-dl. In: International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), pp. 6–10 (2005)
Trivellato, D., Zannone, N., Glaundrup, M., Skowronek, J., Etalle, P.S.: A semantic security framework for systems of systems. Int. J. Coop. Inf. Syst. 22, 1–35 (2013)
Gkioulos, V., Wolthusen, S.D.: Enabling dynamic security policy evaluation for service-oriented architectures in tactical networks. In: Accepted for presentation at Norwegian Information Security Conference 2015 (NISK-2015) (2015)
Nato Architecture Framework, NATO Capability View, NAF v3 NCV-2, June 2013
W3C Recommendation, OWL2-OVERVIEW OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Document Overview, 2nd Edn. http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/REC-owl2-overview-20121211/. Dec 2012
Schneider, P.F.P., Hayes, P., Horrocks, I.: OWL-SEMANTICS OWL Web Ontology Language Semantics and Abstract Syntax. http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-semantics-20040210/. Feb 2004
Motik, B., Grau, B.C., Horrocks, I., Wu, Z., Fokoue, A.: OWL2-PROFILES OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Profiles, 2nd edn. http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/REC-owl2-profiles-20121211/. Dec 2012
Breton, R., Rousseau, R.: The future of c2 the c-ooda: a cognitive version of the ooda loop to represent c2 activities. Topic: C2 process modelling
Smith, E.A.: Effects Based Operations. Crisis, and War. Center for Advanced Concepts and Technology, Applying Network Centric Warfare in Peace (2002)
Harrison, F.: The Managerial Decision-Making Process-5th edn. South-Western College Pub (1998)
Veni, K.K., Balachandar, S.R.: Int. J. Math. Comput. Phys. Electr. Comput. Eng. 4(7), 1044–1048 (2010)
Balas, E., Glover, F., Zionts, S.: An additive algorithm for solving linear programs with zero-one variables. Oper. Res. 13(4), 517–549 (1965)
Frville, A.: The multidimensional 01 knapsack problem: an overview. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 155(1), 1–21 (2004)
Ohkura, K., Igarashi, T., Ueda, K., Okauchi, S., Matsunaga, H.: A genetic algorithm approach to large scale combinatorial optimization problems in the advertising industry. In: Proceedings. 2001 8th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, 2001, vol. 2, pp. 351–357, Oct 2001
Chu, P., Beasley, J.: A genetic algorithm for the multidimensional knapsack problem. J Heuristics 4(1), 63–86 (1998)
Balas, E., Martin, C.H.: Pivot and complement heuristic for 0–1 programming. Manag. Sci. 26(1), 86–96 (1980)
Gavish, B., Pirkul, H.: Efficient algorithms for solving multiconstraint zero-one knapsack problems to optimality. Math. Program. 31(1), 78–105 (1985)
Gilmore, P.C., Gomory, R.E.: The theory and computation of knapsack functions. Oper. Res. 14(6), 1045–1074 (1966)
Osorio, M., Glover, F., Hammer, P.: Cutting and surrogate constraint analysis for improved multidimensional knapsack solutions. Ann. Oper. Res. 117(1–4), 71–93 (2002)
Magazine, M., Oguz, O.: A heuristic algorithm for the multidimensional zero-one knapsack problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 16(3), 319–326 (1984)
Volgenant, A., Zoon, J.A.: An improved heuristic for multidimensional 0–1 knapsack problems. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 41(10), 963–970 (1990)
Weingartner, H.M., Ness, D.N.: Methods for the solution of the multidimensional 0/1 knapsack problem. Oper. Res. 15(1), 83–103 (1967)
Caccetta, L., Kulanoot, A.: Computational aspects of hard knapsack problems. In: Proceedings of the Third World Congress of Nonlinear Analysts Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 5547–5558 (2001)
Pisinger, D.: Where are the hard knapsack problems? Comput. Oper. Res. 32(9), 2271–2284 (2005)
Acknowledgements
The results described in this work were obtained as part of the European Defence Agency project TACTICS (Tactical Service Oriented Architecture). The TACTICS project is jointly undertaken by Patria (FI), Thales Communications & Security (FR), Fraunhofer-Institut für Kommunikation, Informationsverarbeitung und Ergonomie FKIE (DE), Thales Deutschland (DE), Finmeccanica (IT), Thales Italia (IT), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), ITTI (PL), Military Communication Institute (PL), and their partners, supported by the respective national Ministries of Defence under EDA Contract No. B 0980.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gkioulos, V., Wolthusen, S.D. (2017). Constraint Analysis for Security Policy Partitioning Over Tactical Service Oriented Architectures. In: Grzenda, M., Awad, A., Furtak, J., Legierski , J. (eds) Advances in Network Systems . iNetSApp 2015. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 461. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44354-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44354-6_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44352-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44354-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)