Quantification in Malayalam

Chapter
Part of the Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy book series (SLAP, volume 97)

Abstract

After presenting some basic genetic, historical and typological information about Malayalam, this chapter outlines the quantification patterns it expresses. It illustrates various semantic types of quantifiers, such as generalized existential, generalized universal, proportional, definite and partitive which are defined in the Quantifier Questionnaire in Chap. “The Quantifier Questionnaire”. It partitions the expression of the semantic types into morpho-syntactic classes: Adverbial type quantifiers and Nominal (or Determiner) type quantifiers. For the various semantic and morpho-syntactic types of quantifiers it also distinguishes syntactically simple and syntactically complex quantifiers, as well as issues of distributivity and scope interaction, classifiers and measure expressions, and existential constructions. The chapter describes structural properties of determiners and quantified noun phrases in Malayalam, both in terms of internal structure (morphological or syntactic) and distribution.

Keywords

Malayalam Quantification patterns Semantic Morpho-syntactic Quantifiers Classifiers Determiners Quantified noun phrases 

References

  1. Asher, R. E., & Kumari, T. C. (1997). Malayalam. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Babu, H. (2006). Genericity, quantification, and modality: The many faces of –um and –unnu in Malayalam. CIEFL Occasional Papers in Linguistics 12.Google Scholar
  3. Champollion, L. (2010). Parts of a whole: Distributivity as a bridge between aspect and measurement. University of Pennsylvania dissertation.Google Scholar
  4. Gil, D. (1995). Universal quantifiers and distributivity. In Bach, et al. (1995), pp. 321–362.Google Scholar
  5. Jayaseelan, K. A. (2001). Questions and question-word incorporating quantifiers in Malayalam. Syntax, 4(2), 63–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jayaseelan, K. A. (2011). Comparative morphology of quantifiers. Lingua, 121, 269–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Schwarzschild, R. (1996). Pluralities. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Winter, Y. (2001). Flexibility principles in Boolean semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Linguistics ProgramUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations